Well, I'm also thinking the same thing as you think this project is a pump and dump project.
Wonder why they were given a checklist by twitter like they are an official project when it is quite risky to enter here. In fact, I see that they have not revealed their application or platform, the contents of the tweet are only education and market listings. Even though they are listed on some good exchanges like CRO, but I still don't believe this project is good to last.

Becoming a bounty manager is not an easy thing, sometimes we need a team to make our work fast
to manage multiple campaigns because it is impossible to do it yourself quickly.
Bounty managers will continue to be in demand as long as there are cryptocurrency projects that always
 want to promote with bounties, if you want to become a bounty manager of course you can try it.
But the initial manager pay is of course usually small unless you have a lot of experience in bounty managers.

I'm sure your friend is following launchpad for a long time. Because as long as I followed launchpad a few months ago I only got a small allocation so I only bought a little that was provided by platform. Even if it goes up more than thirty times it doesn't mean I will get everything I invested, some money will be returned, even before to follow launchpad we have to buy a ticket and have to save as much as the conditions set by the platform, the ticket will be drawn to get a waitlist from those tokens.

I think Binance will stay in the long term, as cryptocurrency traders trust the Binance market very high.
But, if something happens that is not wanted by everyone then we must prepare for this.
I'm sure if there are safe assets in the market such as MXC, FTX, upbit. Because they have never received a history of hacking attacks until now.
But if you are still in doubt, a hardwallet is the best solution to keep your assets safe.

Apart from the internal factors of the project, market conditions also greatly influenced the development of the coin.
When we are in a bull market so many projects are easy to succeed here their coins are sold out - in exchange - boom.
However, when the market is in a bear market, it will actually complicate the development of the coin even though it has large funds, because most of the trading community or cryptocurrency will judge the success rate of the coin from its high price or can survive in extreme markets but currently only a few projects who can survive in that situation.

I'm not sure if it happens in 2022 because we have experienced it one year before, if it happens it will make cryptocurrency grow unhealthy and many people don't want to buy it if every year the price continues to be hit by ATH.
In 2022 we should continue to be in a bear market even though some coins go up by tens of percent that doesn't mean it will break through ATH because the chances are small.
For now the only movement that can be trusted is bitcoin, although the possibility of ATH happening again this year is small, it doesn't mean it's impossible if bitcoin continues to show green on the chart.

The bottom line is that game projects are businesses that are really meant for gamers who pay
their developers with stuff in the game to upgrade to whatever they need.
However, the Play to Earn concept is against that, making developers have to spend a lot of thought
and funds because they have to develop while providing income for their players. Even though it has been done now but they can't last for long.

I believe that bitcoin is currently doing a test to break through the next resistance if it succeeds in several stages then bitcoin is declared a positive market or we are already in a bull market. But, currently bitcoin is only going up to break the first resistance, although of course there will be other movements as well from other altcoins, it does not rule out bitcoin will still go down because the bull market has not been confirmed until now.

I'm sure it's still worth it and you can try it, one of my friends is a bounty manager, yes I must admit the payment for the new bounty manager may not be as big as the old bounty manager they will be paid with coins that are worth selling at a high fee (depending on agreement) .
The thing you have to do is be patient at the start, and build the best possible experience as a bounty manager so that you are liked by many people.

What I see from the project is that it wants to be a base project for Play to earn but also incorporates the concept of DeFi where everyone can stake on their platform.
I think the quality is quite low even if they enter on a high tier exchange. it looks like they are listed on several high exchanges even binance but have experienced a huge drop in price. I'm not saying that this project will rugpull but I'm sure to get the hype on this project you will have to be patient, put in the money where you can accept the loss.

I think if we invest as high as $1,000,000 to get 2x or even more it is a fatal mistake.
This happens because that amount of money will immediately be able to control the price of the assets we buy.
in the $1 million we have when we buy we will see the price going up because of buying in bulk.
At that time, it would be difficult for us to get out quickly because there must be someone to accommodate our many assets to sell.
For management I think we have to divide some of the funds in large amounts for the long term and a small part to get 2x or more profit this seems more reasonable.

All of them seem to have the same great potential, but if viewed from a low staking presentation it is indeed shown for the long term.
Actually I'm very happy with Polkadot and Tron, because Polkadot is quite popular and so loved by the community is very suitable for taking medium-term profits.
Whereas tron is used for long term investing, so far tron is of great quality it's just that the lack of community support makes this coin a slow mover, but I'm sure it will explode soon.

That is a sign that a developer or founder is not an innovative person.
It's better to develop your own idea even though you have to follow the trend but not overall, at least the uniqueness of the project will be appreciated by many people.
Usually people who think of making coins according to news trends just want quick profits so they don't care about who buys the coins because the founder will soon run away from the project.

I really don't understand why binance seems to be the best exchange because previously there were so many exchanges with the same tier that it was easy to trade anywhere even without KYC.
Apart from binance, I usually trade on:
FTX - friendly website, trading here has quite complete security even one of the uniqueness is the cheap ethereum fee for withdrawals.
Gate.io - So far, only Gate.io exchange has survived for a long time but has steady popularity.
MXC - Even though the market is not as big as binance, the exchange is friendly enough that it's convenient to use and also safe when I trade there.

I'm not sure about that, because we're still in Q1 of 2022.
At least if you mean good coins in the previous year that were very cheap are Dogecoin and Shiba INU.
I think that among the cheap coins can be trusted only those two coins, I know there are still many coins that I didn't mention,
because they just appear but don't have strong enough backups or their fundamentals are very weak, that's why I advise you to take a look back Dogecoin and Shiba INU.

Because bitcoin is an icon of cryptocurrency itself, everyone must be familiar with bitcoin before learning about other coins.
In fact, before there was a stable bitcoin coin first became the only fair to trade because bitcoin would be trusted by everyone.
making bitcoin the leading direction of all cryptocurrencies. Usually, a professional cryptocurrency trader will look at the bitcoin price before he starts investing in the altcoin of his choice.

Talking about passive income seems to lead to the concept of DeFi,
but some of the DeFis I've come acrossare quite risky and they will usually leave the project in no time.
For that, I suggest it's better to invest by holding it than to risk buying DeFi coins even though not all DeFi is bad.
Currently the good altcoins are those focused in networks like Avax, Ethereum, Solana, Cardona, Matic, BNB.

Some of the traders who want to get rich immediately do this.
They purposely lock their tokens in their wallets without any targets to sell them, even though the tokens they hold initially
rose high during the bull market, there will definitely be a decline after that.
Panic will only make them regret, I have experienced this many times, you are right about that.

I thought they wanted to create a new trend, but unfortunately they just duplicated the original concept.
What is certain is that they only took the word "meta" from the metaverse concept, then created a concept that was not much different from the metaverse.
Actually it's not too bad because their idea could make a project that uses other meta concepts to be successful, but unfortunately they actually want to immediately release their project with the concept they created just looking for profit from investors' purchases and then immediately run away with it, that's what makes concept with the word "Meta" looks bad in the eyes of others.

Both have their respective advantages. I will explain and you can conclude.
Ethereum Network: Has high gas costs as a drawback, but has good project quality even projects published on their network are quality projects.
Binance Smart Chain Network: Has low gas costs as an advantage, but has low project quality and is even prone to hacker attacks on their network such as token dusting, projects published on this network are often fraudulent.

You can deduce which one, but I'm sure those who want security and investment will choose ethereum, if they want low cost they will choose BSC.