copy wallet.dat to safe place delete everything else (specially in roaming \ lux directory) install 4.0.0 alpha (it's stable). put the wallet dat back to roaming \ lux start the wallet if no synching, get the nodes manually (instruction posted above some pages back) Ok what should i do.
Trying to build v4.0.0 -> fatal error: masternode-payments.h: No such file or directory
Trying to build v4.0.1 -> done -> not syncinc with blockchain.
any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
Hope devs realize that staking and functioning MN were very good to the coin value, next to all other "future exciting" features. People held a lot in wallets to stake and to generate value by MN. Currently though, most people will be just inclined to dump unless something changes fast.
I.e. within a week release working staking and MN
Within 1-2 months start rolling out new key differentiator features
|
|
|
|
|
Can confirm the sighting of the LUX 4.0.1.1 being used by the pools.
When will this be released to the public?
|
|
|
|
|
The issues are bad for value... Most crypto on a bull run, LUX dropping continuously. Please urge your devs to fix basic functionality in wallet, 4.0.1 beta really not good for any newcomer who didn't invest hours to read through previous posts (and why should he/she?)
|
|
|
|
Hope this one finally runs okay. I'm not a coder myself, but the issues related to wallets were mostly in miscommunication. First dev team told us there is just wallet upgrade, then they advised it's a mandatory protocol upgrade, then the new wallet was supposed to be PoS and MN ready, upon which another update came out that the "new beta" is, and the "alpha" isn't. Now there's news that all of that is due to ddos and need for quick damage control, as well as there will be new "way" of rolling out updates. In my opinion it's not about the new way, it's about timely, clear and transparent communication to the community.Saw wallet 4.0.1.1 on block explorer. Obviously they're testing new release .  |
|
|
|
|
Updated to wallet 4.0.0996 beta aka 4.0.1. Two major issues:
1) In previous wallet it was necessary to encrypt wallet, then unlock it to stake. Can't encrypt / unencrypt wallet in 4.0.1 ("encryption" is greyed out). Other than than locking and unlocking wallet again doesn't seem to enable staking either (I believe we are well 36 hours into post block 180K).
2) Closing the wallet and opening again creates "database error" and then the wallet needs to reindex blocks from disk again, which on a fast SSD coupled with a 8600K @5Ghz takes over 15 minutes. That's just not okay. I believe another user had this bug as well.
Can anyone report that issue 1) and issue 2) has been resolved / working for them?
|
|
|
|
Regardless of the technical analysis below, I can confirm you (mining LUX several weeks now) that the earnings are as expected or above, this due to recent network instability / pools being down, while utilizing pools which are up at that time (i.e. overall network difficulty significantly lower during such outage). Therefore, make your own conclusions, but my mileage so far is very good. Also, amount of orphan blocks seems to have been reduced to virtually 0 (this is probably because staking isn't active until block 180K) How much time it takes to see deposit on Cryptopia? In wallet transaction is confirmed, but i do not see any coins on Cryptopia  According to LUX block Explorer here: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/lux/#!overview the number of blocks per day has reduced a lot. It is my understanding that if there is no transaction, no block is being generated. As such, most of the Hashrate going into the network does not pay the miners. At one block every 60 seconds LUX should generate 1440 blocks per day. Yesterday less than 300 blocks were generated. Is it because there is no transactions in the pipeline or something is chocking in the network? I will be mining something else for the time being. |
|
|
|
Can you make sure Unimining is upgraded properly as well? https://www.unimining.net/no, this happened after upgrade. They are resyncing again ... will see. Future coins are also seems to have issues. They are not showing orphanes but have no blocks found after upgrade Futupool, altminer and Yiimp are upgraded and running on new protocol, Bsod doing it now, other pools are head. Mining on upgraded pools is safe. |
|
|
|
Following this with great enthousiasm Do keep us posted What's preliminary assessment? I just started a head-to-head comparison of dstm 0.5.8 and bminer 5.3.0 mining ZEN to separate wallet addresses on luckpool.org with each getting a GTX 1080 that were tuned to have matching hashrate on either miner (ie - the hashrate reported by bminer was the same on each card, not that the hashrates for bminer and dstm were the same).
Test started at 6:00AM my time and will run for 24 hours so I can use the average difficulty on minethecoin to evaluate how accurately each miner reports its hashrate and, of course, to see which one comes out on top.
I should note, however, that I had some issues with bminer locking up my computer so hard I had to hit the reset button when I tried to exit it while I was setting up the test; not a promising start, really, but it seems to run okay if left alone.
|
|
|
|
If you're a miner always mine what's most profitable, and convert to what's most prospective. I do happen to believe this project has good potential, which also coincides with (still) above market mining profits. As for the non-working wallet - what exact functionality is not working for you? Sure all the fancy stuff (luxgate, parallel blockchain tech, etc etc) is not enabled (yet), but the basics of sending, receiving, as well as staking work just fine. How so? ZEC mining returns are currently 30% lower, taking in account the orphan blocks rate of LUX.
The fact that everyone woke up shaken by the market today (even the ones that made $$) is no reason to start uttering your frustrations calling people a scam.
Besides the wallet delay and some other minor missed deadlines (guys - please do update your roadmap! now it looks like 15th Jan was a missed deadline for many milestones) it's too early to make such statements.
they don't have working wallet right from start of project it means that all they can do is writing "beautiful" white pappers and blind investors and now pepole get understanding what shit is going on and trying to out from this scam and yes, ZEC at least have same profit for now. for last 24 ours i turned on 6x3 rigs of 1070 and get same profit as i get for lux. so if lux keep going down at cryptopia = buy buy lux there is more coins with more profitable mining |
|
|
|
How so? ZEC mining returns are currently 30% lower, taking in account the orphan blocks rate of LUX. The fact that everyone woke up shaken by the market today (even the ones that made $$) is no reason to start uttering your frustrations calling people a scam. Besides the wallet delay and some other minor missed deadlines (guys - please do update your roadmap! now it looks like 15th Jan was a missed deadline for many milestones) it's too early to make such statements. A couple more bucks down and it's time to go back to mining a zec  right, scam coin story is over |
|
|
|
Sure. But then again so is ICON, Electroneum, PIVX, Ardor, Ethos, the list is endless - these are just some major ones. Today is volatile as heck, but ask yourself - what has changed from tech / future value perspective? Except for market hysteria nothing, AFAIK market is going down just to follow BTC but LUX going down also in BTC/LUX pair. and going down fast. know what i mean? check other altcoins all of them get up in their BTC pair |
|
|
|
As discussed, probably best estimation is to use WTM, then subtract ~20% (so X * 0.  as this is approximate amount of orphan blocks, that WTM doesn't take into account by the looks of it (i.e. it can't predict those). So it's definitely not as profitable as WTM estimates, as you've noticed when i mine do developers get a fee? because whenever i mine lux i always get less profit that what i should, and happened with a friend as well instead of getting 1 lux we keep getting way less like 0.8 or less and i used 3 pools bosd yiimp and altminer. is it a problem with the blockchain or something?
WTM showing not quite correct numbers regarding Lux. do you have any other profit calculator i can use? |
|
|
|
What are you on about? Withdrawing / sending from the wallet works fine. You need to unlock it first (not just for staking) then go to different tab, where you can enter amount to send. Then confirm the network fee. Done. People are not selling because they are staking and waiting for real value of Luxcore to hit to review. Developers do not release a new wallet, because a lot of people are waiting for this to withdraw coins from local wallets and sell, SEND does not work. I assure that after the release of the purse - the price will go down! |
|
|
|
Dev team, check all major pools - orphans left and right. Last 24 hours every 5-10 blocks an orphan this is 10-20% orphan blocks. http://bsod.pw/site/mininghttps://altminer.net/If you look now, last several blocks all orphans on these major pools altminer has 0.016, so low too.
Why so many orphaned blocks, what are they?
Most of this orphans is a POS blocks, and the rest POW orphans amount is withing normal limits. So how to calculate profit then? How much should I lower profit vs standard formula? Well having orphans withing 5% limits is a normal. About calculation of profit, only way to do it as I know is using WTM, and I guessing they consider that aspect. |
|
|
|
Read it thoroughly and although it is a very solid piece of work, the document still requires some polishing in my opinion. Main issues: - Style and linguistic inconsistencies. Sentences starting with "but"; usage of Capitallizaiton where not required (i.e. for terms that are not established definitions or proprietary nouns). I would definitely do a cleanup before any major corporate presentations. - Visual layout issues (graphics offset, for example the portraits in in the team section are off) - Team. Either full disclosure or partial disclosure, but no aliases or nicknames. By the very least, these should be listed as secondary, with proper personal details first. Use LinkedIN style templating. Maybe other issues as well, but these are the ones I could identify during the first read through. Great job! It looks really good in my eyes, though im not an expert in whitepapers. Now just waiting for the new wallet Unable to activate staking at the moment hehe. |
|
|
|
Unimining is several factors lower overall LUX hashrate, so could be an outlier (lucky 24 hours timespan), will monitor a bit while testing another pool and if Unimining stays outperforming others - give it a shot. Had same issue. Sent ~600Mh their way, got about 3.65 average only. Retesting with a different pool. Sometimes whattomine is off in their calculations, even if you factor in harder difficulty than in reality (I always add 10% difficulty for good measure). Tried to mine LUX on bsod.pw but seem to get really low amount. For my 400MH I should get currently about 3 coins, but was able to get only 2.2 after 24h. On bsod estimated earning is about 0.0019 mBTC/day/Mh but pool stats tell different: only 0.0013 (I earned that), how come there's such a difference?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Seems like https://www.unimining.net/ is most profitable pool @ 0.0018 mBTC/Mh/day. But that's weird, how come http://yiimp.eu/ has 0.0016 then? I don't get this... Both are big pools, so where hashrate goes? |
|
|
|
Had same issue. Sent ~600Mh their way, got about 3.65 average only. Retesting with a different pool. Sometimes whattomine is off in their calculations, even if you factor in harder difficulty than in reality (I always add 10% difficulty for good measure). Tried to mine LUX on bsod.pw but seem to get really low amount. For my 400MH I should get currently about 3 coins, but was able to get only 2.2 after 24h. On bsod estimated earning is about 0.0019 mBTC/day/Mh but pool stats tell different: only 0.0013 (I earned that), how come there's such a difference?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
|
|
|
|
Which OC and power settings are you running your 1080Ti's to get 37Mhash? And which Miner? SP MOD1? I can add to the list that Titan Xp is getting ~40Mhash @ 105pwr +135 core Could someone let us know hashrates for the following cards with reasonable power consumption? 1) R9 Fury/Nano (volts usually clearly under 1.1V in any mining) 2) GTX 1070 (22MH/s when optimized for 130W?) 3) GTX 1070ti (-------- | | --------) 4) GTX 1080 (-------- | | --------) 5) GTX 1080ti (-------- | | --------)  GTX 1080 Ti 37 MH/s - 200W GTX 750 3,2 MH/s - 30W |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
