Guys, with so many privacy / anon coins out there, one being a spin-off of the other, can you please elaborate the real competitive differentiation of BWK?
Overall impression is good so far, mining some, but I'd really want to understand better how this coin will differentiate itself from XMR, ZEC and other more modern "anon 2.0 / 3.0" coins

Thanks everyone for inputs so far! Very interesting perspective.
In essence, I believe XMR and ZCASH are and will remain "base research" platforms, while other (newer) coins/tokens will be "applied research" and actual added value to the market.
The question is then of course, do you invest in technology, or in the application of that technology with certain twists. If we look at traditional (including high-tech, multimedia, cellular, etc markets) we can clearly see that B2B wise owning/investing in backbone infrastructure has edge, while in consumer targeted channels the actual successful application of that technology is king (i.e. iPhone wasn't the first touch phone, but was the most successful one at the time it came out and for many years after).

Above is pretty much a dilema in anon crypto to me atm.

That's why I listed Bulwark (BWK), they are on the way to implement the Zerocoin protocol, with a number of other new features

Which mobo is it? Now I really want to know

As the title says, currently invested in several of these, wonder which ones do you think are better long term (>1YR) investment?
I know there's a plethora more coins out there, but since I never "buy" with fiat, its mostly mined holdings.

XMR
ZEC
ZCL
BTCZ
BULWARK

Other (PoW!) coin suggestions are welcome, as long as these are not ICO/Tokens.

This is exactly what I had on various pools and on various equihash coins (each time testing for at least 24 hours) with v5.1 and v5.0
Lets see if this v5.2 actually improved anything *in pool*

Update: first thing I do notice is so far no rejects, over multiple machines in about 15 minutes of mining. lets see what 24h test will show

Try installing Visual Basic libraries, .NET Framework libraries, and latest CUDA SDK. 99% it will fix this for you

Try those GPUS on an entirely different Mobo+PSU combo. Chance is high they are still alive.
Very hard to kill a GPU in my experience. No detection errors are probably coming due to your current PSU & MOBO acting up. Probably PSU though as others have said.

My thoughts exactly. This Monday has been pretty bad across the board, but BTCZ holds rather solid. Also very consistent growh over the last weeks.
This project shows very promising future by the looks of it.

Acknowledging issues in a timely manner and sharing through a structured update, as well as engaging community to alleviate and overcome these issues shows otherwise.
It's just that no one is looking to take a hiccup or delay and everyone is looking into instant gratification, which is understandable of course, but doesn't nullify other arguments.

People are attempting to manipulate the hysteria sell-off even more to buy at a lower price point, intensified by the effect of shrinking markets today.
There isn't anything wrong with the released statement, sure a delay of 4 weeks can be disappointing to those looking for immediate gain, however at the same time there's sound argumentation as to the reasons for this delay (more thorough testing, added exchange support for this fork amongst others, clear initiatives on how to reach that). Therefore it shows clearly:

a) Maturity of the dev team
b) Elimination of any contingencies related to the hardfork
c) Added support of exchanges, therefore significantly better launch / wider spread volume, which in turn will result to augmented value.

Additionally to all previous comments, seeing about ~1 out of 100 rejects on shares, with DTSM literally no rejects.

You are running under Linux right? I'm running under Win 10 x64.
Meaning it's not OS specific either.

For now advise caution with this miner

This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?

Thanks again. Did the trick.
Getting ~850-860 sols on Titan Xp Star-Wars edition cards

Great thanks.
So what's the syntax in bat file?

SET MAX-TEMPERATURE INT=95

for example

Bump. Can someone advise how to disable artificial throttling in miner in bat file, as I have reference cards (Titan Xp) and they do get to 86c normally...

Getting message temperature 86c, slowing down for 2 seconds.
How can I disable this?

Hi there fellow miners,

Just ordered both the Titan Xp Jedi and the Empire edition cards, heck together probably a much better collectors item for the future.
Meanwhile, the cards will of course not be idle. Once they arrive, they will be put to good use.

Anyone with a Titan Xp (2017 pascal) to share performance and max output settings? (electricity not a major concern).

I'm looking at mining ZEC / Equihash, maybe some other algos (LBC, Lyra, etc)

DES

Now I understand why I don't need to fill in CC