Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 08:36:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 [112] 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 ... 247 »
2221  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / OLD: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB on: April 05, 2013, 06:53:14 PM



Announcing BFGMiner 3.10, the modular ASIC/FPGA miner written in C. BFGMiner features dynamic clocking, monitoring, and remote interface capabilities.

"St. Barbara's Faithfully Glorified Mining Initiative Naturally Exceeding Rivals", or just basically a freaking good miner.

This code is provided entirely free of charge by the programmer, so donations would be greatly appreciated.
Please consider donating: 1QATWksNFGeUJCWBrN4g6hGM178Lovm7Wh
If you are donating for a specific bugfix/feature request, please post the Issue number and it will be flagged as "funded".

If you find a bug or have a suggestion, please check to see if it's already been reported and, if not, report it.
Help can also be obtained (or provided) by joining the support mailing list or IRC: chat.freenode.net #eligius
READ THE README INCLUDED IN THE ARCHIVE BEFORE ASKING QUESTIONS.
Also, please note that this thread is for discussion of BFGMiner, its features and bugs - if you feel the need to troll or talk off-topic, start another forum thread (and PM me with it if you want my attention).

If you want to help develop BFGMiner, the best way to get in touch with me is on IRC.
We also have a development mailing list, mainly used to pre-announce upcoming releases for third-party packagers.

If you would like to be notified of new versions, please join the announcement mailing list.

For miners using ModMiner, X6500, or ZTEX devices, you will need to download bitstreams for BFGMiner 3+ to work with your device. Download links and instructions are included in the README.FPGA file.

Latest release: 3.10.0 (announcement & changes)Stable release: 3.5.7
Archive of all official release source & binaries

Features:
Sample output:
Code:
 bfgminer version 3.10.0 - Started: [2013-08-20 02:03:56] - [  0 days 00:35:05]
 [M]anage devices [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options  [H]elp [Q]uit
 Connected to mining.eligi.us diff 32 with stratum as user 1QATWksNFGeUJCWBrN4g6hGM178Lovm7Wh
 Block: ...a83dc890 #249720  Diff:31.3M (223.8Th/s)  Started: [01:22:11]
 ST:10  F:0  NB:5  AS:0  BW:[341/153 B/s]  E:89.27  I: 6.58mBTC/hr  BS:89.7k
 7/36   77.0°C │ 90.13/91.42/92.50Gh/s │ A:2171 R:7+0(.49%) HW:430/.62%
───────────────┼───────────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────
 BFL 0: 65.9°C │ 877.7/871.2/940.5Mh/s │ A:  20 R:0+0(none) HW:  0/none
 BFL 1: 68.0°C │ 30.58/29.63/30.37Gh/s │ A: 733 R:3+0(.64%) HW:  8/.05%
 BFL 2: 78.0°C │ 56.98/58.81/59.58Gh/s │ A:1379 R:4+0(.44%) HW:195/.68%
 MMQ 0: 50.0°C │ 799.8/785.1/537.3Mh/s │ A:  15 R:0+0(none) HW: 21/5.7%
 XBS 0: 48.2°C │ 398.0/400.3/ 8.18Mh/s │ A:   4 R:0+0(none) HW: 51/ 25%
 ZTX 0:        │ 198.5/197.6/196.7Mh/s │ A:   3 R:0+0(none) HW: 27/none
 ZTX 1:        │ 849.0/836.6/992.4Mh/s │ A:  20 R:0+0(none) HW:129/.70%
───────────────┴───────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────
 [2013-08-02 02:38:58.462496] Accepted 0321a601 BFL 2p pool 0 Diff 81/32
 [2013-08-02 02:38:59.007820] Accepted 00c348b2 BFL 2d pool 0 Diff 335/32
 [2013-08-02 02:38:59.133534] Accepted 05b3443a BFL 2n pool 0 Diff 44/32
 [2013-08-02 02:38:59.785127] Accepted 07563198 ZTX 1a pool 0 Diff 34/32
---
Pool menu:
Code:
0: Enabled  Strtm Priority 0: stratum+tcp://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334  User:1QATWksNFGeUJCWBrN4g6hGM178Lovm7Wh
1: Disabled GWork Priority 1: http://127.0.0.1:9332  User:x

Current pool management strategy: Load Balance
[A]dd pool [R]emove pool [D]isable pool [E]nable pool
[C]hange management strategy [S]witch pool [I]nformation
Or press any other key to continue

Device management menu:
Code:
Select processor to manage using up/down arrow keys
 MMQ 0d: 41.0°C │ 194.0/190.9/32.98Mh/s │ A:   4 R:0+0(none) HW: 0/none
  ModMiner LJRalpha  from BTCFPGA
Serial: 19191F145358077D4FAADA7AF5000004
Clock speed: 194

[D]isable [C]lock speed
Or press Enter when done
Code:
Select processor to manage using up/down arrow keys
 OCL 0 : 77.0C | 272.2/272.2/265.7Mh/s | A:2992 R:13+0(.43%) HW:0/none
I:10  F: 69% (2655 RPM)  E: 765 MHz  M: 1000 MHz  V: 1.088V  A: 99%  P: 0%
Last initialised: [2013-07-08 05:33:26]
Thread 0: 90.9 Mh/s Enabled ALIVE
Thread 1: 90.6 Mh/s Enabled ALIVE
Thread 2: 90.8 Mh/s Enabled ALIVE

[D]isable [I]ntensity [R]estart GPU [C]hange settings
Or press Enter when done

Change GPU settings menu:
Code:
Temp: 72.0 C
Fan Speed: 50% (4489 RPM)
Engine Clock: 950 MHz
Memory Clock: 825 Mhz
Vddc: 1.175 V
Activity: 99%
Powertune: 20%
Fan autotune is enabled (0-85)
GPU engine clock autotune is enabled (880-950)
Change [A]utomatic [E]ngine [F]an [M]emory [V]oltage [P]owertune
Or press any other key to continue

Settings menu:
Code:
[L]ongpoll: On
[Q]ueue: 0
[S]cantime: 60
[E]xpiry: 120
[R]etries: -1
[W]rite config file
[B]FGMiner restart
Select an option or any other key to return

Display menu:
Code:
[N]ormal [C]lear [S]ilent mode (disable all output)
[D]ebug:off
[P]er-device:off
[Q]uiet:off
[V]erbose:off
[R]PC debug:off
[W]orkTime details:off
su[M]mary detail level:devices
[L]og interval:5
[Z]ero statistics
Select an option or any other key to return


On exiting:
Code:
Summary of runtime statistics:

Started at [2011-07-19 14:40:09]
Runtime: 2 hrs : 31 mins : 18 secs
Average hashrate: 1680.1 Megahash/s
Solved blocks: 0
Best share difficulty: 49
Share submissions: 3489
Accepted shares: 3489
Rejected shares: 0 + 9 stale (0.00%)
Accepted difficulty shares: 32
Rejected difficulty shares: 0
Hardware errors: 3
Efficiency (accepted shares * difficulty / 2 KB): 0.05
Utility (accepted shares / min): 34.26/min

Unable to get work from server occasions: 16
Work items generated locally: 330
Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 33
New blocks detected on network: 10

Pool: http://getwork.mining.eligius.st:8337
 Share submissions: 3426
 Accepted shares: 3426
 Rejected shares: 0 + 0 stale (0.00%)
 Accepted difficulty shares: 31
 Rejected difficulty shares: 0
 Efficiency (accepted * difficulty / 2 KB): 0.08
 Unable to get work from server occasions: 0
 Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0

Summary of per device statistics:

 ICA 0:       | 375.9/376.0/349.5Mh/s | A: 487 R:4+0(none) HW:  0/none
 MMQ 0: 46.0C | 629.9/632.0/526.8Mh/s | A: 734 R:0+0(none) HW:196/none
 XBS 0: 46.9C | 392.0/397.8/398.3Mh/s | A: 555 R:0+0(none) HW: 57/none
 ZTX 0:       | 198.6/198.5/190.2Mh/s | A: 265 R:0+0(none) HW: 95/none
 ZTX 1:       | 855.0/848.7/825.3Mh/s | A:1150 R:4+0(none) HW:176/none
2222  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: how can BFL still be advertising on the forum on: April 05, 2013, 05:22:11 PM
Sorry, when I could have had it on my desk a long time ago if I chose to, I think claiming my choice to request they wait is somehow relevant, is very much nitpicking.
2223  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: how can BFL still be advertising on the forum on: April 05, 2013, 04:34:31 PM
Ignore the trolls. I've had my Little Single (ASIC) for nearly a week now, and it's working fine.
Even if the rest of the devices haven't shipped yet, it's obvious there is a product and only a fool would claim they aren't going to deliver.
2224  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner: modular ASIC/FPGA, GBT, Stratum, RPC, Avalon/Lnx/OpnWrt/PPA/W64 3.0pre on: April 05, 2013, 03:40:51 PM
What should I do, to make bfgminer from git working properly on my system? I prefere to use git version instead of Ubuntu Lucid version on Debian system. Please help  Smiley
Best bet is probably to bisect it.
I'm planning to release BFGMiner 3.0 tonight, so if you want this fixed in it, it may be best to get in touch on IRC.
2225  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: coinjedi / betsofbitco.in SCAMMERS: Declares "Push" on obvious win for BFL bet on: April 05, 2013, 06:40:52 AM
Since there is so much different opinions on that matter, and since the people that has the power to define events (BoB, theymos) seems against the vast majority:

what about putting this whole debate to http://www.judge.me/ and then everybody accept whatever the outcome will be?

CoinJedi:  would you accept the sentence of judge.me?

Theymos:  would you accept the sentence of judge.me?

The real question is, will everyone else here?
The fact is, they already agreed to accept the judgement of BetsofBitco.in by participating in the bet.
Yet now that they're unhappy with the outcome, they've decided they won't accept it.
Why should anyone expect them to treat Judge.me in any other way?
2226  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: coinjedi / betsofbitco.in SCAMMERS: Declares "Push" on obvious win for BFL bet on: April 04, 2013, 10:24:50 PM
At this point I'll go ahead and reveal that I am the bet's creator, and that I initially took a large position on the "True" side.  By ruling the way they did, BoB effectively took from me over 150 BTC in potential winnings and commissions that I feel should rightfully be mine.
If you were on the True side, then you should be happy with the draw, since it was the False side that should have won.
Having created the bet, you don't get more authority than other betters, but you do get more responsibility: you can't blame anyone else for poorly defining the bet.

• BFL shipped nothing.  The bet title clearly is about BFL *shipping* a Bitforce SC product.  Coinjedi has said himself that the bet title is a part of the bet. [1]
"Shipped" is sadly enough ambiguous by itself due to the precedent set with Avalon's "shipping".
The terms of the bet gave it an explicit definition in this case.

• The pictures were posted after midnight.  No matter whether you go by GMT, Eastern time (official BoB time [2]), or Central time (which I believe is BFL time and also Luke-Jr time).  Sure, the pics were arguably taken before midnight, but the bet clearly says they had to be *posted* before April.
I am in Eastern time.
But this seems like a technicality.

• The pictures were not credible.  They were taken by Josh/Inaba, a BFL employee, and were of a device that was pretty clearly sitting on a test bench at BFL.  The bet clearly says the pictures must be credible.
Look credible enough to me. I don't see how Josh taking the pictures makes them non-credible.

• The pictures claim to show a product hashing at about 25GH/s, which Luke-Jr says in a Little Single.  There was no such thing as a Little Single when the bet was made.  The 3 Bitforce SC products the bet concerns, and their hashrates concerning the bet are those listed in the post linked in the Bet.
More technicalities.
Before I got my Little Single, can you honestly say you would have interpreted the bet to exclude it?

• It is not clear whether or not Luke-jr is a BFL employee.  He continues to not answer when asked if he is/has received compensation from BFL. [3]  At the least, it looks like he's getting his order bumped to the front of the line.
It is perfectly clear (to me, at least) that I am not a BFL employee.
If you want to doubt me, that's your problem - I'm sure you could ask the IRS somehow or another.

Sure BoB (and Luke-Jr and Josh/Inaba and BFL) will lose face over this, but that does nothing to fill my wallet, and history is quickly forgotten.
No, I wouldn't lose anything if BoB ruled in your favour.
It would just set a precedent for BoB bets being decided on technicalities.

I'm feeling cheated and a little butthurt about it.  Wouldn't you?
I might, but I'd also recognize that the real problem were in the terms of the bet not being "cheatable".
2227  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 04, 2013, 06:48:38 PM
Yeah, boycott me because I got a device I paid for. Makes so much sense.
2228  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: coinjedi / betsofbitco.in SCAMMERS: Declares "Push" on obvious win for BFL bet on: April 04, 2013, 04:52:31 PM
Well this will be interesting.... Lets see if BoB try to Push this one

http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=1352

Quote
Butterfly Labs Will Ship Before Mid-April 2013
Butterfly Labs (BFL_Josh) have stated that the first shipment will be dispatched before the last week of March 2013.

To qualify as a 'Agree', a Butterfly Labs customer must acknowledge receipt of an ASIC unit, test it and have it perform within advertised specifications by the 14th April 2013. The post confirming the status has to be on either BitcoinTalk or Butterfly Labs forums with conclusive evidence (video etc)

All Butterfly Labs employees or affiliates are discounted.

1: Although 1 person has 'received' a BFL ASIC (Luke-Jr) he is an affiliate at this point in time (as a developer working on software for the ASICs).

2: "Must perform within advertised specifications"..... well BFL changed the advertised specs today (https://products.butterflylabs.com/ upping the price whilst dropping the specs..... classy!).

3. At the time of the bet opening it was not known that the power consumption was over the limit (another failure for advertised specs).


I will be interested to know if a Push will be declared.
This bet is clearly already lost for the pro-BFL side. There is no way they're meeting advertised specs exactly, and they're current schedule says late April.
2229  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Decentralized mining protocol standard: getblocktemplate (ASIC ready!) on: April 04, 2013, 03:35:37 PM
Code:
{"id": 0, "method": "getblocktemplate", "params": [{"capabilities": ["coinbasetxn", "workid", "coinbase/append"]}]}
I have tried a multitude of different variations on this, but it still doesn't work.
This looks fine, are you including the HTTP headers for JSON-RPC? While GBT could be used with a raw TCP connection like Stratum, bitcoind does not support this at present.

Problems I stumble across:
1. I'm unsure if the "coinbasetxn", "workid", "coinbase/append" and even the whole "capabilities" are optional, or that the brackets in the example are actually part of the syntax to forward the different arguments as an array (as they are usually used in JSON).
It's all optional, but necessary for some servers which make decisions on what features to use in your template.
2. the BIP 22 does not list this request at all, only telling me about two non-optional arguments.
3. Analyzing the python-blkmaker source code, I find another argument called "maxversion". This is not mentioned on the wiki page and not on the BIP 22 page or anywhere else either.
These are part of BIP 23 mainly.
2230  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 04, 2013, 03:37:13 AM
I'm goin' to ask again, since I've yet to see an answer. How was Luke notified by Josh that the images were ready to be posted, given that they were taken less than 30 minutes prior?
I talk to Josh on a regular basis, usually between midnight and 2 AM.
I don't see the relevance of your question, or why the pictures seem at all a surprise.
2231  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 03, 2013, 10:56:28 PM
Luke:   When do you expect to get the unit?   Wouldn't it be easier if you had it there to tinker with?   Do you have to call them each time you need to cycle something?   I would think they should just ship it to you?
Like I said, I'll probably have them ship it to me when the rest of my order is ready to go as well. I certainly prefer they NOT ship it until at least the next difficulty adjustment Wink
Or you could just wait for the next plateau.  because then the opportunity cost of three days down is not as much.   Any idea when you will have your full order up and running?
I assume BFL will want to charge me for hosting, if I ask them to keep it there once the rest of my order is done. The rest of my order is waiting on the fixed power stuff.
2232  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 03, 2013, 10:50:38 PM
Luke:   When do you expect to get the unit?   Wouldn't it be easier if you had it there to tinker with?   Do you have to call them each time you need to cycle something?   I would think they should just ship it to you?
Like I said, I'll probably have them ship it to me when the rest of my order is ready to go as well. I certainly prefer they NOT ship it until at least the next difficulty adjustment Wink
2233  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: coinjedi / betsofbitco.in SCAMMERS: Declares "Push" on obvious win for BFL bet on: April 03, 2013, 06:45:34 PM
From what I'm hearing a certain competitor to betsofbitco.in didn't have any problems in determining a clear outcome to the same bet...
Not the same bet. betsofbitco.in allowed for +/- 25% on hashrate (which was met), but the competitior's bet only allowed +/- 10% (which was not met).
2234  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 03, 2013, 06:44:44 PM
Won the bitbet bet for those who bet on that,
sorry for those who bet on bestofbitcoin  Tongue

Am I reading this correctly? Two different sites with the same bet, but one awards and the other declares a draw?
The bitbet one was clearly won by those betting against BFL. It only allowed +/- 10% of hashrate, which BFL has failed to meet so far.

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.
2235  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 03, 2013, 05:29:58 AM
Little Single was advertised as 30 Gh/s. 75% of 30 is 22.5.
Yes, the little single was advertised with 30Gh/s. But if you are one of the first customers, there was no little single at this point in time.
You are correct, but as I already stated, in the interest of having diversity of my mining devices (for testing BFGMiner against all possible devices), I changed one of my Singles to a pair of Little Singles.
2236  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 03, 2013, 05:24:06 AM
BTW, I started out that semi-long post I made a few minutes ago with the intention of presenting arguments for both sides.
I was surprised that I couldn't come up with any good arguments for the post-April betters... but it is what it is.
Try reading the title of the bet and see if you may figure any "intent" of what people might be actually betting on.  When I do that, it talks about a product "shipping".
The title seems to suggest an intent of referring to the product being with customers - that's usually what "shipping" refers to.
If the title were on its own, I would agree completely with the post-April position.
However, the details specifically elaborate on the definition of the bet, and that definition seems to have been met.
2237  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: coinjedi / betsofbitco.in SCAMMERS: Declares "Push" on obvious win for BFL bet on: April 03, 2013, 05:17:05 AM
I think this accusation is too ridiculous to spend time typing up a defense (it's obviously bogus), but if any moderator is taking it seriously for any reason feel free to contact me.
2238  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 03, 2013, 05:09:58 AM
It says enough when all you have is ad hominem and no logical arguments.
here is a logical argument:   who took the picture that is accepted as the "hashrate" for this device?
Josh did, nobody's trying to hide or deny that.

should a BFL employee taking the pic be considered valid evidence of a hashrate?
I don't see why not. I mean, as far as hashrate is concerned I could have just as easily taken a picture of my own screen.
2239  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 03, 2013, 05:03:40 AM
It says enough when all you have is ad hominem and no logical arguments.
2240  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 03, 2013, 04:40:16 AM
Can you, Luke-Jr, show the calculation how you get the result that the observed realized hashrate fulfills the 75% criteria. I see you have shown to have the opinion that there are absolutely no arguments for the 'BFL has failed' position
Little Single was advertised as 30 Gh/s. 75% of 30 is 22.5.
Pages: « 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 [112] 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 ... 247 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!