When it comes to determining if it's possible to save as much it all depends on the cost of living in your country.

For example sounds like your rent and other expenses isn't taking much from your salary.

In where i live $500 wouldn't cover 1 bedroom apartment. Not to mention insurance, water and electric bills that come to top of that. And i am talking about apartments that are considered as cheap.

I can't get over the what that you are using gmail as official email for a casino. For a site that should signal professionalism that's just weird oversight.

Now i don't know if it's my browser but i've seen pages running smoother in year 2000. I don't know who has coded it or if you just bought it as a turnkey solution but you need to step up on GUI. Because usability is step one and i can't get to step 2 to tell you what that would be as step one was just too much for my browser.

I don't need any evidence if the casino has a strong community and history of happy customers. And i don't mean testimonials page, that would actually turn me away. I rarely trust new casinos at all because i don't need to. I get my gambling fix from trusted casinos and don't want to risk my money with some unknown newcomers that might pay or might close my account.

So why would i risk it? Maybe for some insane bonus, but even with those i would wait until someone in the community had withdrawed their winnings.

Well, basically magical thinking works as well as martingale (as they both don't work), but funny enough they don't hurt your changes any more then any other strategy. So you might as well go full superstitious.

I agree with you. Technically there's no such thing as luck as what word comes with a package of different meanings, but i think that's the best word to describe the situation when you are against all odds winning a lot. It however doesn't necessarily mean that word "luck" would contain anything magical. Or that there would be some items that bring luck or or that some people would be born lucky or anything like that.

It most likely is bullish, but i can't say if it's bullish for the tokens you are holding. Especially for tokens like Verasity i wouldn't automatically count in to be a part of next bull run, or some other tokens no one has heard of. Some low caps will why high but there's really no way of knowing which. Fundamentals doesn't necessarily matter. In the time of hype, hype counts most.

If bitcoin breaks out tomorrow, maybe. But even if it doesn't, everything in my core says that this year will be interesting. And i am guessing it will be profitable to buy anything. Well almost anything. Some projects always will get left behind when the bull run starts but i am guessing bitcoin won't be one of them.

I am happy about this. But i don't get what you are saying. This doesn't in any way change the fundamentals of bitcoin. Weakest point of the security has always been and will always be the one one who is holding the privatekey. This isn't about security of bitcoin, this is about personal security.

People didn't believe in memecoins like Doge and Shiba when they came.
Some people warned not to invest in such a crap.
Some people didn't listen to warnings and made lots of money by investing to them.

So how can you tell this is  not one of those cases in the future?
Personally i wouldn't know. One thing i've learned is to never underestimate stupid people and their willingness to keep meme coins high in charts.

Are the usecases for this token purely only inside freebitcoin or are other casinos using this as well?

I am a little conflicted. One one side i want to wait until Funtoken is worth next to nothing and buy the max amount i can in order to get my bonuses/benefits.
It could still go down and confidence of the markets haven't restored yet.

On other side i am sure that there are whales looking at this and balancing the cost/profit ratio for staking. They would stack their accounts full of it when it's cheap enough. And if i wait long enough whale activity could make price peaking before i get change to accumulate.

I didn't say that they weren't working. They would be sued if they didn't use their ico money for something productive.
I was explaining to you why their tech won't be widely adopted, it's not because it's too new and high tech. It's because it's unnecessary and doesn't solve anything.

But please, elaborate how i was wrong.

This guy gets it.

Strategy is not a substitute for luck and poker isn't based purely on luck, it's a setup of various skills like counting probabilities, choosing what hands to play and in live games, getting inside of your opponent's head.

I was talking about in-house games like plinko.

What i meant by pure luck is that implying that there's a winning strategy means that casino would had a flaw in their calculations. Game wouldn't be profitable to the casino if probability of every setup wasn't constantly work slighly for them.

There's no strategy that affects the pre-programmed constant probabilities of the game. There's only "luck".

Light reading:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossibility_of_a_gambling_system

Strategy? Isn't that based on pure luck? And no matter the setup, winnings and losses are calculated so that casino wins in the end?
I think that best strategy is a cliche, and it's not to play more you can lose.
I personally just trust my luck and play all my budget with one big bet. It's not as lasting fun but payoff could be huge.

I have to say that them paying bounties with their own BFG token was a genius move from their point of view. They instantly created people that would advertise it for freee in the future because it's suits BFG hodler's interest. And it didn't cost them anything. Those were earmarket for promotion and they didn't have value at the start of betfury. They could have easily afforded to give them even more.

However releasing those tokens was a mess, where they totally served first themselves and got rich by selling their own tokens first.  Our tokens were released way after price was already crumbling. That made me angry.

Money is the first one. That i have small change to win large amount of money with pocket money. But that's not everything. Games i play need to be rewarding in some way. Crappy craphics and poor user interface would drive me away even if there were higher changes for me to win. I am illogical that way. And games need to be interesting. Either it's betting sports that i can watch live, or complex, beautiful, social, etc. Something i can look forward to spend time with.

That's just some weird "whales are bad" conspriracy.
Only way that would work is that those whales would buy every BONK from everyone who got it airdropped and after gaining most of the tokens they would use it on pump & dump scheme.
Some people aren't accepting easy and more plausible answers because they see everything as some interesting plot they uncovered.

So you are so heavily invested in BST and you made a PDF to tell us why you did it? Sounds like BlockSquare haven't been completely honest with you. Tech suitable for something like this doesn't exist yet. It's not going to be suitable for ETH or any existing blockchains, nor there is layer 2 solution. You can tokenize synthetic assets but that's nothing special.

Using tokenization on current blockhains doesn't solve any problems. In fact it just creates an unnecessary layer of other problems, starting from the fact that transactions should be reversable if you want to satisfy regulators. They also should be private on L1 in order to prevent front running. And this that's just a surface. That's why all these projects are going to fail. They are not creating solutions nor they are taking out a middle man, the are taking out A middle man and replacing it with them. They are creating smoke and mirrors.

If you really want to take a look a platform who is trying to solve this, google dusk network.

No one? I just literally said that i would like it. Or at least it would be a nice option to have. Just because it wouldn't fit on your taste doesn't mean i would somehow change my mind because of it.

Because sure, i can bet winners and results, but i have no experience using anything else then straight forward betting so i have no idea what for example handicaps or totals mean in the choices. So demo money would give me ton of confidence to execute my bets later irl as i could have tried them out. Also i could test out new tactics in betting to get a better feeling for it.

"No altcoins" and yet you have written this in Altcoin discussion .
Birth of something completely new would be impossible to predict because no one had even had attempted it, researched and talked about in the forums before.
I think that next big thing already has ton of failed attempts in the market. And my guess it would be related to Digital identity and Zero knowledge tech.

That could honestly change everything. Concept of privatekeys as they are probably also going to change a lot. Because when even experienced users can't always handle them safely, you cant expect normies woud.

I agree with you that demo money would be optimal with that but sadly you can't use demo currency with in-house games. Also sports betting doesn't accept demo money so you cannot try all the unfamiliar nuances of betting in there. That would be a sweet option to have to test out some specific betting i've never even tried.

Noin kerran viikossa pienin panoksin. Kasinopelejä enemmänkin mutta yrittänyt siirtyä vedonlyöntiin että vois edes vähän vaikuttaa siihen voittaako. En vaan tiedä suurimmasta osasta urheilua tai esportista yhtään mitään niin pysyttelen tappelulajeissa joista on jotain tietoa.

Kasinon puolella olis muuten hauskaa mutta se perustuu niin paljon pelkkään tuuriin että oon huomannu paremmaks vaan pelata kerran isommalla panoksella ja lopettaa, voitti tai ei.