Doog, did you invest here?
No, I didn't. |
|
|
|
I don't think I can answer that question any clearer so if someone still doesn't understand can someone please chip in and explain that?  Everyone already understands. The recent posts are likely just signature spammers trying to find something pseudo-meaningful to write to increase their post count. |
|
|
|
Update:
1 2013-11-30 1132.29
2 2013-12-04 1111.56
3 2013-11-29 1065.36
4 2013-12-03 1050.57
5 2013-12-02 1000.49
6 2013-11-28 998.56
7 2013-12-05 975.06
8 2016-12-28 955.98
9 2013-12-01 945.67
10 2013-12-10 941.56
11 2013-11-27 937.09
12 2014-01-06 936.62
13 2016-12-27 922.42
14 2016-12-24 900.20
15 2016-12-26 898.97
16 2016-12-23 897.77
17 2013-12-06 894.36
18 2013-12-11 890.42
19 2014-01-11 883.00
20 2013-12-13 882.99
Feels good to see this being updated after 3 years  Yeah! |
|
|
|
This will be my last reply, please update your website or post on that hater reddit in the future.
I think you've fed that particular troll enough already. |
|
|
|
What was the problemo?
I don't know if anyone noticed but we were down over Christmas due to a security breach. No players lost funds. I lost 18 Btc. Full details here https://betking.io/help/attack |
|
|
|
Update:
1 2013-11-30 1132.29
2 2013-12-04 1111.56
3 2013-11-29 1065.36
4 2013-12-03 1050.57
5 2013-12-02 1000.49
6 2013-11-28 998.56
7 2013-12-05 975.06
8 2013-12-01 945.67
9 2013-12-10 941.56
10 2013-11-27 937.09
11 2014-01-06 936.62
12 2016-12-27 922.42
13 2016-12-24 900.20
14 2016-12-26 898.97
15 2016-12-23 897.77
16 2013-12-06 894.36
17 2013-12-11 890.42
18 2014-01-11 883.00
19 2013-12-13 882.99
20 2014-01-05 881.82
|
|
|
|
Your bet size determines how much of the jackpot you win.
Bet 0.0001 or more and win 100% of the jackpot.
Bet 0.00001 or more and win 15% of the jackpot.
Bet 0.000005 or more and win 5% of the jackpot.
Did you intentionally make the 2nd line the best line? You're making it best to bet 0.00001 BTC per bet. Anyone betting more than that is getting a lower EV. It would make more sense to say that the percentage of the jackpot you get scales linearly with the amount you bet. So if you bet x and roll 77.7777 you get "x times a million" percent of the jackpot, or 100% of it, whichever is smaller. That way you're not making it unattractive to be anything over 0.00001 BTC per roll. You could even take it a step further and make the EV get better as the stake increases, thereby encouraging people to make bigger bets, although I'm not sure how best to do that. |
|
|
|
Update:
1 2013-11-30 1132.29
2 2013-12-04 1111.56
3 2013-11-29 1065.36
4 2013-12-03 1050.57
5 2013-12-02 1000.49
6 2013-11-28 998.56
7 2013-12-05 975.06
8 2013-12-01 945.67
9 2013-12-10 941.56
10 2013-11-27 937.09
11 2014-01-06 936.62
12 2016-12-24 900.20
13 2016-12-26 898.97
14 2016-12-23 897.77
15 2013-12-06 894.36
16 2013-12-11 890.42
17 2014-01-11 883.00
18 2013-12-13 882.99
19 2014-01-05 881.82
20 2016-12-25 874.03
|
|
|
|
so how much would it costto have 1million tokens?
30 million tokens cost 2000 BTC, so 1 million would cost 30 times less, or 66.66666667 BTC. At least, I think that's how it works. There was something about a discount for the people who buy in early and I'm not sure if that affects the price for people who buy in later. |
|
|
|
I think we have a few serious winners now:
So yes, it is possible to win some bitcoins :-)
I think it's because I invested the tip you gave me:  I've made a massive -4.7% "profit" already... Please note that I do not vouch for yolodice. |
|
|
|
Back online now. Was disabled just for routine checks apparently.
The password reset links should send ok now too.
I see this: Service Unavailable
HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable.
Edit: it's working now - not sure what that 503 was about. |
|
|
|
18 coins is much but thank god you didn't have investments anymore.
What difference would it make whether he had investments or not? It seems the attacker drained the hot wallet, and would have done the same whether there were investments or not. |
|
|
|
IN my experience whenever it comes to trying to "win big from faucet" the best is to make a few 2x bets and once you win 2-3 times in a row, go on to betting at 100x-200x or so. Eventually it will take a while but its the fastest way to generate close to 100,000 Sats or so or at least the minimum amount to withdraw.
However this also depends on the time limit for the faucet and obviously you need to manually enter the CAPTCHA every single time.
That was only my third faucet drip, and I more than 100x'ed it. Just luck, of course. Those straight lines sloping down to 0 at the end are me trying to hit a 1000x payout, much like you suggested. I went thousands of rolls and only hit it once. The verification checked out though - I got unlucky and started aiming for the high multipliers at the wrong time. Please note that I do not vouch for yolodice. |
|
|
|
Update:
1 2013-11-30 1132.29
2 2013-12-04 1111.56
3 2013-11-29 1065.36
4 2013-12-03 1050.57
5 2013-12-02 1000.49
6 2013-11-28 998.56
7 2013-12-05 975.06
8 2013-12-01 945.67
9 2013-12-10 941.56
10 2013-11-27 937.09
11 2014-01-06 936.62
12 2016-12-24 900.20
13 2016-12-23 897.77
14 2013-12-06 894.36
15 2013-12-11 890.42
16 2014-01-11 883.00
17 2013-12-13 882.99
18 2014-01-05 881.82
19 2016-12-25 874.03
20 2013-12-09 867.49
|
|
|
|
You are right! It's my fault, it's definitely SHA256 of the hex representation of the server secret. SHA512 would be an overkill. My mistake.
I have tipped your YD account 0.01 BTC. Thanks for reading through the FAQ and having a critical look at YOLOdice!
I know you might see it as a conflict of interests, but I highly encourage you to keep an eye on YD. I would be more than happy if you invested in YD some day too :-)
Thanks for the tip. Now I can get to work on repairing my chart. I was doing so well, turning a 1,500 satoshi faucet drip into 222,222 satoshis at one point, but then lost it all trying to hit a 0.1% bet:  I revealed my server seed to verify the rolls. I eventually got it to verify, but it's weird how you use the server seed in its binary form for the HMAC, but in hex form for the SHA256 hashing. In my javascript roll verifier I had to add code like this to convert the secret as given by the site (a hex string) to a binary format: bytes = [];
for (i = 0; i < secret.length - 1; i += 2)
bytes.push(parseInt(secret.substr(i, 2), 16));
secret = String.fromCharCode.apply(String, bytes);
Please note that I do not vouch for yolodice. |
|
|
|
Update:
1 2013-11-30 1132.29
2 2013-12-04 1111.56
3 2013-11-29 1065.36
4 2013-12-03 1050.57
5 2013-12-02 1000.49
6 2013-11-28 998.56
7 2013-12-05 975.06
8 2013-12-01 945.67
9 2013-12-10 941.56
10 2013-11-27 937.09
11 2014-01-06 936.62
12 2016-12-24 900.20
13 2016-12-23 897.77
14 2013-12-06 894.36
15 2013-12-11 890.42
16 2014-01-11 883.00
17 2013-12-13 882.99
18 2014-01-05 881.82
19 2013-12-09 867.49
20 2013-12-12 862.85
|
|
|
|
IN the end I get a WARNING however
It's saying the signature is good for the key: but that it has no way of checking that the key you used is the correct one. Anyone can make a key for pointbiz@bitaddress.org. You need to check that you have the right one. If you do, everything is fine, and you can ignore the warning. |
|
|
|
On the other hand, JD's "off-site investment" can also be used as leverage in exactly the same way as our leverage.
Yes, in fact I wrote words saying just that: So your "leverage" is exactly the same as Just-Dice's "offsite investment" feature, rather than true leverage. The "loan" amount (or "offsite amount" in JD terms) is constant and doesn't grow or shrink as people play.
My complaint is only in the words you use. "Deposited" isn't how much people deposited.. "In the bank" doesn't show how much is in the bank. Etc.: [Edit: I guess that also means the "Deposited" column doesn't show how much the investors deposited, but rather shows how much they have now. And the "In the bank" statistic doesn't show how much is in the bank, or how much is available to be won because most of it is made up of coins which don't actually exist (and were 'loaned' into existence). The same goes for the "over 226BTC already invested" - most of that isn't real coins, but the result of pretend loans. Right?]
Do you pay bug bounties at all? I didn't find a way of cheating, but I did find some factual errors in the FAQ.
Yes, definitely! Site's profit is not stellar yet, but I try my best! OK, the most obvious error I found was where the FAQ says:  The server seed hash is only 64 hex characters, or 256 bits. I verified that it is an SHA256 hash of the server seed, not SHA512. My user_id is 113. Please note that I do not vouch for yolodice. |
|
|
|
Changed the design of dice.
Now looks more like slots from the social dice game we had.
Let me know if you think it's better or worse and if you want any changes.
I like it better, but it's cutting off the bet and payout numbers. It would be better if it would fit all 8 decimal places:  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
