Now we have this five column omnibus Top 20 days for Bitcoin data barrage we can play Jackpot ... whenever we get 5 reds ATH across the top  What do you have in mind, some kind of pool? Everyone picks a date and scoops the pool if their date is a new ATH? |
|
|
|
Update:
BitStamp USD/BTC OKCoin CNY/BTC Kraken EUR/BTC Kraken CAD/BTC CoinCheck JPY/BTC
----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
1 2013-11-30 1132.29 | 1 2017-01-04 7930.09 | 1 2017-02-22 1062.21 | 1 2017-02-22 1462.33 | 1 2017-01-05 134130.07
2 2017-02-22 1126.24 | 2 2017-01-05 7503.71 | 2 2017-01-04 1045.93 | 2 2017-01-04 1447.48 | 2 2017-01-04 131489.82
3 2013-12-04 1111.56 | 3 2017-02-22 7464.16 | 3 2017-02-21 1043.01 | 3 2017-02-21 1378.77 | 3 2017-02-22 129848.88
4 2017-02-21 1104.60 | 4 2013-11-30 7405.69 | 4 2017-02-20 1003.13 | 4 2017-01-03 1371.34 | 4 2017-02-21 126654.44
5 2017-01-04 1088.45 | 5 2017-01-03 7389.84 | 5 2017-02-18 999.75 | 5 2017-02-07 1362.32 | 5 2017-01-03 122707.19
6 2013-11-29 1065.36 | 6 2017-02-21 7376.07 | 6 2017-02-17 990.91 | 6 2017-02-08 1361.83 | 6 2013-11-30 122146.55
7 2017-02-20 1065.03 | 7 2017-02-08 7367.02 | 7 2017-02-19 989.48 | 7 2017-02-17 1360.19 | 7 2017-02-20 121947.53
8 2017-02-18 1060.53 | 8 2017-02-07 7347.40 | 8 2017-02-08 983.77 | 8 2017-02-19 1358.94 | 8 2017-01-02 121517.69
9 2017-02-19 1051.93 | 9 2017-01-02 7323.36 | 9 2017-01-03 978.51 | 9 2017-01-05 1356.48 | 9 2017-02-18 121413.79
10 2013-12-03 1050.57 | 10 2017-02-06 7245.30 | 10 2017-02-07 977.62 | 10 2017-01-02 1353.14 | 10 2017-02-19 121203.40
11 2017-02-17 1049.51 | 11 2017-02-05 7216.24 | 11 2017-02-16 974.94 | 11 2017-02-06 1347.02 | 11 2017-02-08 121106.15
12 2017-02-08 1045.63 | 12 2017-02-18 7184.08 | 12 2017-01-05 969.07 | 12 2017-02-05 1339.71 | 12 2017-02-17 120899.37
13 2017-02-07 1043.50 | 13 2017-02-20 7169.83 | 13 2017-01-02 967.42 | 13 2017-02-20 1334.78 | 13 2017-02-16 118865.98
14 2017-02-16 1029.04 | 14 2013-11-29 7156.07 | 14 2017-02-15 959.22 | 14 2017-02-16 1331.86 | 14 2017-02-07 118785.14
15 2017-02-04 1022.99 | 15 2017-02-04 7141.35 | 15 2017-02-14 953.93 | 15 2017-02-18 1326.10 | 15 2017-01-01 118615.24
16 2017-02-06 1021.23 | 16 2017-02-19 7128.42 | 16 2017-02-06 953.52 | 16 2017-02-04 1323.57 | 16 2013-12-04 118215.64
17 2017-01-03 1020.56 | 17 2017-02-03 7108.19 | 17 2017-02-04 951.30 | 17 2017-02-14 1323.47 | 17 2016-12-29 117763.73
18 2017-02-05 1015.96 | 18 2017-02-09 7053.26 | 18 2017-02-11 949.68 | 18 2017-02-03 1319.54 | 18 2017-02-06 117584.67
19 2017-01-02 1013.00 | 19 2017-01-01 7011.23 | 19 2017-02-12 946.24 | 19 2017-01-01 1319.10 | 19 2017-02-03 117574.98
20 2017-02-03 1009.32 | 20 2017-02-17 6989.63 | 20 2017-02-05 945.54 | 20 2017-02-15 1318.53 | 20 2013-11-29 117451.98
|
|
|
|
I just played my first "OverKrill" game. Was happy to see such a large guarantee on the game. I made it to the final table. It was kind of weird because when I got there a hand was already in play. I guess it was the previous hand from the other table finishing up, so it kind of makes sense, although I'm used to the final table being a new table. What was weirder though was when that hand finished another was dealt and I noticed the antes in the middle of the table were worth just 480 chips. They were 60 chips per player and there were 9 of us on the final table, so why only 480 (6 times 80)? I checked afterwards in the hand replayed and it showed that only 6 players were dealt into the hand. How can that be? And why 6?   Before the final table we were 4 and 5, so it's not to do with that. I guess something went wrong so I thought I'd post it here. Edit: I got an explanation in the on-site chat from glitch: when the 10th player busts, the people from his table are moved to the other.
if there's a hand in progress there, you arrive during it.
the button has to pass you before you can dealt cards. the first hand might have less than 9 dealt in.
your replayer may not show the players seated at the table who were not dealt in for that hand, since you moved mid hand
|
|
|
|
Update:
BitStamp USD/BTC OKCoin CNY/BTC Kraken EUR/BTC Kraken CAD/BTC CoinCheck JPY/BTC
----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
1 2013-11-30 1132.29 | 1 2017-01-04 7930.09 | 1 2017-01-04 1045.93 | 1 2017-01-04 1447.48 | 1 2017-01-05 134130.07
2 2013-12-04 1111.56 | 2 2017-01-05 7503.71 | 2 2017-02-21 1043.01 | 2 2017-02-21 1378.77 | 2 2017-01-04 131489.82
3 2017-02-21 1104.60 | 3 2013-11-30 7405.69 | 3 2017-02-20 1003.13 | 3 2017-01-03 1371.34 | 3 2017-02-21 126654.44
4 2017-01-04 1088.45 | 4 2017-01-03 7389.84 | 4 2017-02-18 999.75 | 4 2017-02-07 1362.32 | 4 2017-01-03 122707.19
5 2013-11-29 1065.36 | 5 2017-02-21 7376.07 | 5 2017-02-17 990.91 | 5 2017-02-08 1361.83 | 5 2013-11-30 122146.55
6 2017-02-20 1065.03 | 6 2017-02-08 7367.02 | 6 2017-02-19 989.48 | 6 2017-02-17 1360.19 | 6 2017-02-20 121947.53
7 2017-02-18 1060.53 | 7 2017-02-07 7347.40 | 7 2017-02-08 983.77 | 7 2017-02-19 1358.94 | 7 2017-01-02 121517.69
8 2017-02-19 1051.93 | 8 2017-01-02 7323.36 | 8 2017-01-03 978.51 | 8 2017-01-05 1356.48 | 8 2017-02-18 121413.79
9 2013-12-03 1050.57 | 9 2017-02-06 7245.30 | 9 2017-02-07 977.62 | 9 2017-01-02 1353.14 | 9 2017-02-19 121203.40
10 2017-02-17 1049.51 | 10 2017-02-05 7216.24 | 10 2017-02-16 974.94 | 10 2017-02-06 1347.02 | 10 2017-02-08 121106.15
11 2017-02-08 1045.63 | 11 2017-02-18 7184.08 | 11 2017-01-05 969.07 | 11 2017-02-05 1339.71 | 11 2017-02-17 120899.37
12 2017-02-07 1043.50 | 12 2017-02-20 7169.83 | 12 2017-01-02 967.42 | 12 2017-02-20 1334.78 | 12 2017-02-16 118865.98
13 2017-02-16 1029.04 | 13 2013-11-29 7156.07 | 13 2017-02-15 959.22 | 13 2017-02-16 1331.86 | 13 2017-02-07 118785.14
14 2017-02-04 1022.99 | 14 2017-02-04 7141.35 | 14 2017-02-14 953.93 | 14 2017-02-18 1326.10 | 14 2017-01-01 118615.24
15 2017-02-06 1021.23 | 15 2017-02-19 7128.42 | 15 2017-02-06 953.52 | 15 2017-02-04 1323.57 | 15 2013-12-04 118215.64
16 2017-01-03 1020.56 | 16 2017-02-03 7108.19 | 16 2017-02-04 951.30 | 16 2017-02-14 1323.47 | 16 2016-12-29 117763.73
17 2017-02-05 1015.96 | 17 2017-02-09 7053.26 | 17 2017-02-11 949.68 | 17 2017-02-03 1319.54 | 17 2017-02-06 117584.67
18 2017-01-02 1013.00 | 18 2017-01-01 7011.23 | 18 2017-02-12 946.24 | 18 2017-01-01 1319.10 | 18 2017-02-03 117574.98
19 2017-02-03 1009.32 | 19 2017-02-17 6989.63 | 19 2017-02-05 945.54 | 19 2017-02-15 1318.53 | 19 2013-11-29 117451.98
20 2017-02-15 1009.09 | 20 2016-12-29 6900.76 | 20 2017-02-03 942.26 | 20 2017-02-11 1304.94 | 20 2017-02-15 117394.70
|
|
|
|
its all three players that get 50% back and yes if 4 players playing but one sits out then its 50% rackback for the remaining 3 untill a 4th joins
Thanks for clarifying. I think the text on the promos page could use some clarification because I totally misunderstood it. It doesn't matter who started the table, it only matters who is playing 2 or 3 handed. |
|
|
|
Nonetheless, it appears that JPN is going to remain an interesting currency to watch in the near future because of the various recent bitcoin friendly developments, including three major banks investing into their main exchange (bitflyer) and also some of the bitcoin friendly legislation.
The only exchange with price info in bitcoinchart.com seems to be CoinCheck - and they weren't around during the 2013 price spike. So I'm merging MtGox prices from then with CoinCheck prices from now: Update:
BitStamp USD/BTC OKCoin CNY/BTC Kraken EUR/BTC Kraken CAD/BTC CoinCheck JPY/BTC
----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
1 2013-11-30 1132.29 | 1 2017-01-04 7930.09 | 1 2017-01-04 1045.93 | 1 2017-01-04 1447.48 | 1 2017-01-05 134130.07
2 2013-12-04 1111.56 | 2 2017-01-05 7503.71 | 2 2017-02-20 1003.13 | 2 2017-01-03 1371.34 | 2 2017-01-04 131489.82
3 2017-01-04 1088.45 | 3 2013-11-30 7405.69 | 3 2017-02-18 999.75 | 3 2017-02-07 1362.32 | 3 2017-01-03 122707.19
4 2013-11-29 1065.36 | 4 2017-01-03 7389.84 | 4 2017-02-17 990.91 | 4 2017-02-08 1361.83 | 4 2013-11-30 122146.55
5 2017-02-20 1065.03 | 5 2017-02-08 7367.02 | 5 2017-02-19 989.48 | 5 2017-02-17 1360.19 | 5 2017-02-20 121947.53
6 2017-02-18 1060.53 | 6 2017-02-07 7347.40 | 6 2017-02-08 983.77 | 6 2017-02-19 1358.94 | 6 2017-01-02 121517.69
7 2017-02-19 1051.93 | 7 2017-01-02 7323.36 | 7 2017-01-03 978.51 | 7 2017-01-05 1356.48 | 7 2017-02-18 121413.79
8 2013-12-03 1050.57 | 8 2017-02-06 7245.30 | 8 2017-02-07 977.62 | 8 2017-01-02 1353.14 | 8 2017-02-19 121203.40
9 2017-02-17 1049.51 | 9 2017-02-05 7216.24 | 9 2017-02-16 974.94 | 9 2017-02-06 1347.02 | 9 2017-02-08 121106.15
10 2017-02-08 1045.63 | 10 2017-02-18 7184.08 | 10 2017-01-05 969.07 | 10 2017-02-05 1339.71 | 10 2017-02-17 120899.37
11 2017-02-07 1043.50 | 11 2017-02-20 7169.83 | 11 2017-01-02 967.42 | 11 2017-02-20 1334.78 | 11 2017-02-16 118865.98
12 2017-02-16 1029.04 | 12 2013-11-29 7156.07 | 12 2017-02-15 959.22 | 12 2017-02-16 1331.86 | 12 2017-02-07 118785.14
13 2017-02-04 1022.99 | 13 2017-02-04 7141.35 | 13 2017-02-14 953.93 | 13 2017-02-18 1326.10 | 13 2017-01-01 118615.24
14 2017-02-06 1021.23 | 14 2017-02-19 7128.42 | 14 2017-02-06 953.52 | 14 2017-02-04 1323.57 | 14 2013-12-04 118215.64
15 2017-01-03 1020.56 | 15 2017-02-03 7108.19 | 15 2017-02-04 951.30 | 15 2017-02-14 1323.47 | 15 2016-12-29 117763.73
16 2017-02-05 1015.96 | 16 2017-02-09 7053.26 | 16 2017-02-11 949.68 | 16 2017-02-03 1319.54 | 16 2017-02-06 117584.67
17 2017-01-02 1013.00 | 17 2017-01-01 7011.23 | 17 2017-02-12 946.24 | 17 2017-01-01 1319.10 | 17 2017-02-03 117574.98
18 2017-02-03 1009.32 | 18 2017-02-17 6989.63 | 18 2017-02-05 945.54 | 18 2017-02-15 1318.53 | 18 2013-11-29 117451.98
19 2017-02-15 1009.09 | 19 2016-12-29 6900.76 | 19 2017-02-03 942.26 | 19 2017-02-11 1304.94 | 19 2017-02-15 117394.70
20 2017-02-11 1008.19 | 20 2017-02-02 6879.06 | 20 2017-01-01 937.48 | 20 2017-02-12 1304.85 | 20 2017-01-06 117370.00
|
|
|
|
I use Oracle's VirtualBox, have used XP in the past, but Win7 also seems to deal with it fine. I've had the Bridged Adapter setting cause issues. Whichever setting you have, try the other. I have also had minor issues with other PC software, and sometimes choosing different virtual hardware fixes something. I can't speak to VMware, and don't know if anyone uses that.
I'm using VirtualBox too. Switching the network adaptor type from NAT to Bridged seems to have fixed the problem. I quite like the table-started rakeback promo. I played small stakes for a few hours, made ~10 chips in profit and then got paid 2.5 chips in rakeback for my trouble. The rakeback payment happened at 4:20pm Pacific time on Sunday, which I guess is 12:20am UTC on Monday. I'm curious to understand the rules for the rakeback bonus. https://swcpoker.eu/promotions/ says: Help us start games and keep them going, and we’ll help you, with 50% rakeback shorthanded! All two and three handed play, at any table with 6 or more seats, awards 50% rakeback but it doesn't say who gets the rakeback. Is it all 2 or 3 players who were dealt in to a 2 or 3 handed game, or just the guy who sat down first? If a game is playing 4 handed and someone sits out, do the remaining 3 players all get 50% rakeback while the game stays 3 handed? |
|
|
|
If any additional currency should be added is JPN.
The JPN exchanges have no trading fees, so much of the volume is presumably not "real". I can't keep on adding every little currency that people ask for, or I'll run out of screen space. |
|
|
|
Update:
BitStamp USD/BTC OKCoin CNY/BTC Kraken EUR/BTC Kraken CAD/BTC
----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
1 2013-11-30 1132.29 | 1 2017-01-04 7930.09 | 1 2017-01-04 1045.93 | 1 2017-01-04 1447.48
2 2013-12-04 1111.56 | 2 2017-01-05 7503.71 | 2 2017-02-20 1003.13 | 2 2017-01-03 1371.34
3 2017-01-04 1088.45 | 3 2013-11-30 7405.69 | 3 2017-02-18 999.75 | 3 2017-02-07 1362.32
4 2013-11-29 1065.36 | 4 2017-01-03 7389.84 | 4 2017-02-17 990.91 | 4 2017-02-08 1361.83
5 2017-02-20 1065.03 | 5 2017-02-08 7367.02 | 5 2017-02-19 989.48 | 5 2017-02-17 1360.19
6 2017-02-18 1060.53 | 6 2017-02-07 7347.40 | 6 2017-02-08 983.77 | 6 2017-02-19 1358.94
7 2017-02-19 1051.93 | 7 2017-01-02 7323.36 | 7 2017-01-03 978.51 | 7 2017-01-05 1356.48
8 2013-12-03 1050.57 | 8 2017-02-06 7245.30 | 8 2017-02-07 977.62 | 8 2017-01-02 1353.14
9 2017-02-17 1049.51 | 9 2017-02-05 7216.24 | 9 2017-02-16 974.94 | 9 2017-02-06 1347.02
10 2017-02-08 1045.63 | 10 2017-02-18 7184.08 | 10 2017-01-05 969.07 | 10 2017-02-05 1339.71
11 2017-02-07 1043.50 | 11 2017-02-20 7169.83 | 11 2017-01-02 967.42 | 11 2017-02-20 1334.78
12 2017-02-16 1029.04 | 12 2013-11-29 7156.07 | 12 2017-02-15 959.22 | 12 2017-02-16 1331.86
13 2017-02-04 1022.99 | 13 2017-02-04 7141.35 | 13 2017-02-14 953.93 | 13 2017-02-18 1326.10
14 2017-02-06 1021.23 | 14 2017-02-19 7128.42 | 14 2017-02-06 953.52 | 14 2017-02-04 1323.57
15 2017-01-03 1020.56 | 15 2017-02-03 7108.19 | 15 2017-02-04 951.30 | 15 2017-02-14 1323.47
16 2017-02-05 1015.96 | 16 2017-02-09 7053.26 | 16 2017-02-11 949.68 | 16 2017-02-03 1319.54
17 2017-01-02 1013.00 | 17 2017-01-01 7011.23 | 17 2017-02-12 946.24 | 17 2017-01-01 1319.10
18 2017-02-03 1009.32 | 18 2017-02-17 6989.63 | 18 2017-02-05 945.54 | 18 2017-02-15 1318.53
19 2017-02-15 1009.09 | 19 2016-12-29 6900.76 | 19 2017-02-03 942.26 | 19 2017-02-11 1304.94
20 2017-02-11 1008.19 | 20 2017-02-02 6879.06 | 20 2017-01-01 937.48 | 20 2017-02-12 1304.85
|
|
|
|
Here's the last 24 hours of prices and volumes on BitStamp. Almost all the volume was in the last hour while the price was shooting updards so the volume weighted average price should presumably be around $1070:  |
|
|
|
Update:
BitStamp USD/BTC OKCoin CNY/BTC Kraken EUR/BTC Kraken CAD/BTC
----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
1 2013-11-30 1132.29 | 1 2017-01-04 7930.09 | 1 2017-01-04 1045.93 | 1 2017-01-04 1447.48
2 2013-12-04 1111.56 | 2 2017-01-05 7503.71 | 2 2017-02-18 999.75 | 2 2017-01-03 1371.34
3 2017-01-04 1088.45 | 3 2013-11-30 7405.69 | 3 2017-02-17 990.91 | 3 2017-02-07 1362.32
4 2013-11-29 1065.36 | 4 2017-01-03 7389.84 | 4 2017-02-19 989.48 | 4 2017-02-08 1361.83
5 2017-02-18 1060.53 | 5 2017-02-08 7367.02 | 5 2017-02-08 983.77 | 5 2017-02-17 1360.19
6 2017-02-19 1051.93 | 6 2017-02-07 7347.40 | 6 2017-01-03 978.51 | 6 2017-02-19 1358.94
7 2013-12-03 1050.57 | 7 2017-01-02 7323.36 | 7 2017-02-07 977.62 | 7 2017-01-05 1356.48
8 2017-02-17 1049.51 | 8 2017-02-06 7245.30 | 8 2017-02-16 974.94 | 8 2017-01-02 1353.14
9 2017-02-08 1045.63 | 9 2017-02-05 7216.24 | 9 2017-01-05 969.07 | 9 2017-02-06 1347.02
10 2017-02-07 1043.50 | 10 2017-02-18 7184.08 | 10 2017-01-02 967.42 | 10 2017-02-05 1339.71
11 2017-02-16 1029.04 | 11 2013-11-29 7156.07 | 11 2017-02-15 959.22 | 11 2017-02-16 1331.86
12 2017-02-04 1022.99 | 12 2017-02-04 7141.35 | 12 2017-02-14 953.93 | 12 2017-02-18 1326.10
13 2017-02-06 1021.23 | 13 2017-02-19 7128.42 | 13 2017-02-06 953.52 | 13 2017-02-04 1323.57
14 2017-01-03 1020.56 | 14 2017-02-03 7108.19 | 14 2017-02-04 951.30 | 14 2017-02-14 1323.47
15 2017-02-05 1015.96 | 15 2017-02-09 7053.26 | 15 2017-02-11 949.68 | 15 2017-02-03 1319.54
16 2017-01-02 1013.00 | 16 2017-01-01 7011.23 | 16 2017-02-12 946.24 | 16 2017-01-01 1319.10
17 2017-02-03 1009.32 | 17 2017-02-17 6989.63 | 17 2017-02-05 945.54 | 17 2017-02-15 1318.53
18 2017-02-15 1009.09 | 18 2016-12-29 6900.76 | 18 2017-02-03 942.26 | 18 2017-02-11 1304.94
19 2017-02-11 1008.19 | 19 2017-02-02 6879.06 | 19 2017-01-01 937.48 | 19 2017-02-12 1304.85
20 2017-02-14 1006.66 | 20 2016-12-28 6875.81 | 20 2017-02-13 937.09 | 20 2016-12-29 1303.32
|
|
|
|
Any chance you could add CAD (Canadian Dollar) to the report? Back when BTC hit 1k USD in 2013, the USD/CAD exchange rate was close to 1:1, and the rate is now 1:1.3. I believe the Canadian ATH was hit in late 2016, so I'm curious to see what the highest is and how much the old ATH was beat by.
Bitcoin Charts (where I pull the data from) doesn't have prices for Quadriga or recent prices for CAVirtex, but it does have prices for Kraken's CAD market, so I'll use that. I checked out the old Virtex prices from 2013 and saw these: 1 2013-12-04 1047.13 CAD
2 2013-11-30 1002.23 CAD
3 2013-11-28 982.38 CAD
4 2013-12-03 981.81 CAD
5 2013-11-29 979.03 CAD
6 2013-12-05 975.73 CAD
7 2014-01-06 954.31 CAD
8 2013-12-02 946.97 CAD
9 2013-12-10 944.71 CAD
10 2013-11-27 931.02 CAD so you're right that none of those old prices are in the top 50 any more. I edited yesterday's post to include the top 50 CAD prices. |
|
|
|
Why do you feel the need to connect from a VM?
I've been unable to find any non-Windows client, and I don't have Windows on any of my machines. |
|
|
|
I added CNY (edit: and CAD) to the report:
1 2013-11-30 1132.29 USD | 1 2017-01-04 7930.09 CNY | 1 2017-01-04 1045.93 EUR | 1 2017-01-04 1447.48 CAD
2 2013-12-04 1111.56 USD | 2 2017-01-05 7503.71 CNY | 2 2017-02-18 999.75 EUR | 2 2017-01-03 1371.34 CAD
3 2017-01-04 1088.45 USD | 3 2013-11-30 7405.69 CNY | 3 2017-02-17 990.91 EUR | 3 2017-02-07 1362.32 CAD
4 2013-11-29 1065.36 USD | 4 2017-01-03 7389.84 CNY | 4 2017-02-08 983.77 EUR | 4 2017-02-08 1361.83 CAD
5 2017-02-18 1060.53 USD | 5 2017-02-08 7367.02 CNY | 5 2017-01-03 978.51 EUR | 5 2017-02-17 1360.19 CAD
6 2013-12-03 1050.57 USD | 6 2017-02-07 7347.40 CNY | 6 2017-02-07 977.62 EUR | 6 2017-01-05 1356.48 CAD
7 2017-02-17 1049.51 USD | 7 2017-01-02 7323.36 CNY | 7 2017-02-16 974.94 EUR | 7 2017-01-02 1353.14 CAD
8 2017-02-08 1045.63 USD | 8 2017-02-06 7245.30 CNY | 8 2017-01-05 969.07 EUR | 8 2017-02-06 1347.02 CAD
9 2017-02-07 1043.50 USD | 9 2017-02-05 7216.24 CNY | 9 2017-01-02 967.42 EUR | 9 2017-02-05 1339.71 CAD
10 2017-02-16 1029.04 USD | 10 2017-02-18 7184.08 CNY | 10 2017-02-15 959.22 EUR | 10 2017-02-16 1331.86 CAD
11 2017-02-04 1022.99 USD | 11 2013-11-29 7156.07 CNY | 11 2017-02-14 953.93 EUR | 11 2017-02-18 1326.10 CAD
12 2017-02-06 1021.23 USD | 12 2017-02-04 7141.35 CNY | 12 2017-02-06 953.52 EUR | 12 2017-02-04 1323.57 CAD
13 2017-01-03 1020.56 USD | 13 2017-02-03 7108.19 CNY | 13 2017-02-04 951.30 EUR | 13 2017-02-14 1323.47 CAD
14 2017-02-05 1015.96 USD | 14 2017-02-09 7053.26 CNY | 14 2017-02-11 949.68 EUR | 14 2017-02-03 1319.54 CAD
15 2017-01-02 1013.00 USD | 15 2017-01-01 7011.23 CNY | 15 2017-02-12 946.24 EUR | 15 2017-01-01 1319.10 CAD
16 2017-02-03 1009.32 USD | 16 2017-02-17 6989.63 CNY | 16 2017-02-05 945.54 EUR | 16 2017-02-15 1318.53 CAD
17 2017-02-15 1009.09 USD | 17 2016-12-29 6900.76 CNY | 17 2017-02-03 942.26 EUR | 17 2017-02-11 1304.94 CAD
18 2017-02-11 1008.19 USD | 18 2017-02-02 6879.06 CNY | 18 2017-01-01 937.48 EUR | 18 2017-02-12 1304.85 CAD
19 2017-02-14 1006.66 USD | 19 2016-12-28 6875.81 CNY | 19 2017-02-13 937.09 EUR | 19 2016-12-29 1303.32 CAD
20 2017-01-05 1005.35 USD | 20 2017-02-12 6839.98 CNY | 20 2017-02-09 932.77 EUR | 20 2017-02-13 1301.62 CAD
21 2017-02-12 1002.34 USD | 21 2017-02-16 6805.45 CNY | 21 2016-12-29 927.36 EUR | 21 2017-02-09 1295.33 CAD
22 2013-12-02 1000.49 USD | 22 2017-02-11 6799.59 CNY | 22 2017-02-02 926.10 EUR | 22 2017-02-02 1287.15 CAD
23 2013-11-28 998.56 USD | 23 2016-12-30 6788.41 CNY | 23 2016-12-28 920.82 EUR | 23 2016-12-28 1277.32 CAD
24 2017-02-09 996.61 USD | 24 2016-12-31 6783.99 CNY | 24 2017-02-10 916.73 EUR | 24 2016-12-30 1274.15 CAD
25 2017-02-13 994.47 USD | 25 2017-02-01 6781.34 CNY | 25 2016-12-31 909.36 EUR | 25 2016-12-31 1273.23 CAD
26 2017-02-02 994.32 USD | 26 2017-02-15 6767.66 CNY | 26 2017-02-01 908.15 EUR | 26 2017-02-10 1273.00 CAD
27 2017-01-01 987.47 USD | 27 2017-02-14 6742.89 CNY | 27 2016-12-30 904.97 EUR | 27 2017-02-01 1264.24 CAD
28 2017-02-10 977.66 USD | 28 2017-02-13 6699.90 CNY | 28 2016-12-27 887.17 EUR | 28 2016-12-27 1241.26 CAD
29 2013-12-05 975.06 USD | 29 2013-12-04 6670.54 CNY | 29 2017-01-31 885.64 EUR | 29 2017-01-31 1236.58 CAD
30 2017-02-01 970.40 USD | 30 2013-12-01 6614.08 CNY | 30 2017-01-06 874.03 EUR | 30 2017-01-23 1228.72 CAD
31 2016-12-29 967.02 USD | 31 2017-02-10 6597.18 CNY | 31 2017-01-08 869.79 EUR | 31 2016-12-24 1228.50 CAD
32 2016-12-28 955.98 USD | 32 2016-12-27 6585.48 CNY | 32 2017-01-10 864.98 EUR | 32 2016-12-26 1225.16 CAD
33 2016-12-31 955.73 USD | 33 2017-01-06 6534.62 CNY | 33 2016-12-23 863.33 EUR | 33 2017-01-22 1222.93 CAD
34 2016-12-30 951.07 USD | 34 2017-01-31 6527.05 CNY | 34 2017-01-23 863.06 EUR | 34 2017-01-21 1222.65 CAD
35 2017-01-31 949.19 USD | 35 2013-11-28 6521.05 CNY | 35 2016-12-24 863.06 EUR | 35 2017-01-06 1218.48 CAD
36 2013-12-01 945.67 USD | 36 2013-12-03 6494.28 CNY | 36 2017-01-28 862.80 EUR | 36 2017-01-08 1212.55 CAD
37 2013-12-10 941.56 USD | 37 2016-12-26 6473.41 CNY | 37 2016-12-26 862.68 EUR | 37 2017-01-29 1211.46 CAD
38 2013-11-27 937.09 USD | 38 2016-12-24 6465.82 CNY | 38 2017-01-27 861.82 EUR | 38 2017-01-10 1208.40 CAD
39 2014-01-06 936.62 USD | 39 2017-01-08 6410.55 CNY | 39 2017-01-21 861.04 EUR | 39 2017-01-27 1208.38 CAD
40 2016-12-27 922.42 USD | 40 2016-12-23 6391.22 CNY | 40 2017-01-22 860.87 EUR | 40 2017-01-30 1207.15 CAD
41 2017-01-23 920.25 USD | 41 2017-01-27 6373.54 CNY | 41 2017-01-30 860.02 EUR | 41 2017-01-24 1204.24 CAD
42 2017-01-30 917.94 USD | 42 2017-01-29 6367.85 CNY | 42 2017-01-29 859.08 EUR | 42 2016-12-25 1201.37 CAD
43 2017-01-27 917.86 USD | 43 2017-01-28 6367.75 CNY | 43 2017-01-09 852.64 EUR | 43 2017-01-09 1200.63 CAD
44 2017-01-28 917.53 USD | 44 2017-01-30 6358.18 CNY | 44 2017-01-26 850.71 EUR | 44 2017-01-20 1198.35 CAD
45 2017-01-22 916.63 USD | 45 2017-01-21 6353.36 CNY | 45 2017-01-24 846.07 EUR | 45 2017-01-28 1197.35 CAD
46 2017-01-21 916.08 USD | 46 2017-01-23 6351.54 CNY | 46 2017-01-19 845.23 EUR | 46 2016-12-23 1195.06 CAD
47 2017-01-29 915.29 USD | 47 2017-01-10 6349.53 CNY | 47 2017-01-20 842.00 EUR | 47 2017-01-26 1194.79 CAD
48 2017-01-06 914.26 USD | 48 2017-01-22 6347.55 CNY | 48 2017-01-25 837.37 EUR | 48 2017-01-19 1194.03 CAD
49 2017-01-08 913.92 USD | 49 2016-12-25 6288.50 CNY | 49 2016-12-25 835.59 EUR | 49 2017-01-18 1183.07 CAD
50 2017-01-26 907.69 USD | 50 2017-01-24 6284.66 CNY | 50 2017-01-17 835.56 EUR | 50 2017-01-25 1165.35 CAD
|
|
|
|
JPY is the largest market by volume now.
Isn't that mostly because the Japanese exchanges don't charge a trading fee? I summed the 24 hour volumes across all the non-excluded markets on coinmarketcap and got this: BTC/USD $36,651,881
BTC/CNY $19,848,794
BTC/EUR $10,767,376
BTC/KRW $2,417,710
BTC/PLN $1,401,575
BTC/GBP $1,103,675
BTC/USDT $921,124
BTC/IDR $661,995
BTC/CAD $393,426
BTC/RUR $293,879
BTC/RUB $235,211
BTC/SGD $187,210
BTC/THB $155,200
BTC/MXN $126,786
BTC/NGN $118,438
BTC/ZAR $88,924
BTC/BRL $83,631
BTC/INR $81,038 Is there some site that shows the volume per pair? |
|
|
|
€uro update:
1 2017-01-04 1045.93
2 2017-02-18 1000.21
3 2017-02-08 983.77
4 2017-02-17 990.91
5 2017-01-03 978.51
6 2017-02-16 974.94
7 2017-02-07 977.62
8 2017-01-05 969.07
9 2017-01-02 967.42
10 2017-02-15 959.22
11 2017-02-14 953.78
12 2017-02-06 953.53
13 2017-02-04 951.3
14 2017-02-11 949.68
15 2017-02-12 946.24
16 2017-02-05 945.54
17 2017-02-03 942.26
18 2017-01-01 937.48
19 2017-02-13 937.09
20 2017-02-09 932.77
Are you generating this by hand? #4 is higher than #3, #7 is higher than #6, and #2 is for a day that didn't finish yet. How about I post both tables in future? It's no extra work for me. Here's my version: Update:
1 2017-01-04 1045.93 EUR
2 2017-02-17 990.91 EUR
3 2017-02-08 983.77 EUR
4 2017-01-03 978.51 EUR
5 2017-02-07 977.62 EUR
6 2017-02-16 974.94 EUR
7 2017-01-05 969.07 EUR
8 2017-01-02 967.42 EUR
9 2017-02-15 959.22 EUR
10 2017-02-14 953.93 EUR
11 2017-02-06 953.52 EUR
12 2017-02-04 951.30 EUR
13 2017-02-11 949.68 EUR
14 2017-02-12 946.24 EUR
15 2017-02-05 945.54 EUR
16 2017-02-03 942.26 EUR
17 2017-01-01 937.48 EUR
18 2017-02-13 937.09 EUR
19 2017-02-09 932.77 EUR
20 2016-12-29 927.36 EUR
|
|
|
|
You are already to the 18th, while it seems as if dooglus is waiting until after midnight UT for the daily candle of the 18th to close before posting about the 18th, and then I thought that dooglus was using a daily average that is determined after the candle closes (correct me if I described that wrong).
My numbers are the UTC daily volume weighted BitStamp prices, so I post after midnight UTC each day. It's still the 18th all over Europe at the moment so I don't know what 600watt's numbers represent. |
|
|
|
Yes exit scams happen, but only with small sites, because they can't get enough players to be profitable.
Again, that's not true. Several pretty large dice sites have stolen their investors' coins. |
|
|
|
I've been unable to log in to my account for some months now. Has it been locked? How do I regain access to it?
Currently the only way to log in is via our PC Client. If you need help recovering your account, drop an email to: support@swcpoker.eu and we will sort it. I just tried again from a Windows VM and it worked this time. I was able to log in to SwC for a couple of days, but this morning when I tried it was back to not working again. I took a look at the GameClientLog.txt log file and saw it was full of errors like this: Any idea what's wrong? |
|
|
|
An exit scam would not be profitable for the site owners. They can make more money if the site is keep growing and there are more players and investors. + This is not some deepweb site, so there would be legal consequences, so I think it's very unlikely.
You must be new here. Exit scams happen all the time in Bitcoin. There have been dice sites that exit scammed without legal consequences. As for your claim that "They can make more money if the site is keep growing", let's look at it. Someone recently suggested that the site makes 6% per month returns on its bankroll. The site itself only takes a 10% commission, so the site is earning 0.6% per month. That means that if things stay at their current state it will take 100/0.6 = 167 months = 14 years for the site to earn as much as is currently in the bankroll. So the choice is between stealing the bankroll right now, or working hard for 14 years, for the same return. I realize I'm ignoring the fact that a lot of the bankroll isn't real money, but is leveraged funds, that the 6% per month if real is unsustainable, and that the site is currently paying more in referral payments than it is collecting as commission but I think my point is still illustrative of the fact that exit scamming is lucrative compared to running an honest site. If the site does keep growing, then presumably so does the bankroll along with the betting volume. The amount that can be stolen increases along with the weekly commission amount. Perhaps your statement would be better written like this: "They can make more money by growing the site for a year before stealing the bankroll than if they steal it right now" I'm not saying that YoloDice is planning to exit scam. I don't know if they are or not, and neither do you. All I'm saying is that your argument is invalid, that exit scamming pays well, that it has happened before, and that the scammers were never (to my knowledge) caught. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
