Congrats, all good things come to those who wait

If this block took a while to stake, I suggest you merge the two blocks that got generated. It will mean a likely qiucker stake next time.

It would be if you were certain to stake after 9 days. However, you start gaining weight at 9 days, and will stake "some time later". If you're unlucky and wait for some time before staking, you can hit that ceiling. Originally, presstab selected 1600 as being a block size which can stake after a month while still not hitting the ceiling. The intent was that people who run their wallet every few weeks don't get their interest clipped. Since the network difficulty is going up, it's getting harder and harder to stake, so 5000 blocks are likely to get clipped even now, so 4000 is better than 5000 if you want to avoid it.

I've read somewhere in the previous pages that there's some IP blocking based on proximity (only one allowed per small block), so if someone else in your IP block is also running a wallet, that might be it. How your ISP allocates IP addresses is specific to your ISP though, but typically it'd be someone in your city or something. Not saying that's the reason, but it looks like a plausible explanation to your problem.

Hah. I had not.
The instructions in the first post has it lowercase:


I imagine that my problem must have been just that
Hopefully also works for snakecoin.

This one appears to be derived from the one I linked, so it would have the same flaw, and would need the fix too.

Pool owners should update the pool software (or at least merge the relevant patch). There's an exploit that's been fixed, where a miner can send duplicate shares that aren't detected. Relevant patch is c5e7aefc1ff6d5ed082dabc727f77f7676dbc1c2 from https://github.com/zone117x/node-cryptonote-pool.git.

This is "just" a pool exploit and has no other impact on darknote/ducknote in any way.

A bit late, sorry. As of the 25th:

Posts: 124, +7 (+4 within the campaign rules)
Activity: 112
SSRC: SeCJkBRKg5Xs6pyGRBXTY51CT5EQs7kDXj

Why not ? If it affords a way for people to set their buy and sell orders with more granularity that the current 3% or so, it seems like a good thing. You do not have to use it if you do not want to. Other exchanges such as Poloniex still trades the majority of the volume anyway so you don't lose anything if you don't want to use this new exchange.

A few mistakes in that graphic that you'll want to correct:

- merchatns (on the first image, on the bottom right)
- XDN massives (not sure what you wanted to say here ?)
- to your or your -> to you or your
- implementstions -> implementations (or even without the final s)
- interraction -> interaction
- scratching -> not sure what you wanted to say here either, it sounds weird :p
- proved spending -> I think "provable" is better here, but subjective
- messanging -> messaging
- ask you questions -> ask your questions
- spread xdn infromation -> spread xdn information
- tell your friend -> tell your friends


Well done on all the impressive work!    _o<

Thanks. Port's accessible, I just checked.

In the end I actually just bit the bullet and hacked the source to hardcode that IP. It's syncing now. It seems that IP, despite trying to put it both in the config file and the command line, does not get tried... Hardcoded it in the source (src/net.cpp, ConnectNode) worked. I hope that once it's done, I can revert to the original source, we'll see. I think it should be OK, because the wallet is showing 16 connections now

Thanks for the help!

Thanks, but that's the one I've been trying from the OP. If it's still current, then I guess my problem is elsewhere...

Hi, I got the qibuck wallet a couple weeks back, and transferred some from Poloniex.
I've not been able to sync the blockchain though. I tried multiple times, with and without the conf contents in the OP. Every time, no connections to the qibuck network.
The log shows that it finds 39 IPs, but fails to connect to any.
Other wallets work fine (HYP).

Any idea ? I'm guessing it tries to connect to stale nodes. Anyone has working ones ?

Do you really mean "Right-click on the name and it selects the address" ? Instead of "Right-click on the name and you get a menu with a few selection commands" ? I get a menu here (Linux), with both copy address and copy label commands (and some others). It'd have copied the label if you selected copy label in that menu. If you select copy address, it copies the address.

I'd pushed a small patch to github for the table header to read "Addres/Label" instead of just "Address", since the table can contain both. This may make more explicit that this column can contain both.

I've made a small change to add a menu comnmand to copy txid from the trasnactions window.
That helps when trying to use the new in-wallet block explorer. You can directly copy a tx's txid and paste that in the block explorer. Feel free to use or modify.


From 4e5ca9d431430ea15245f4335ffeca97dd7a45a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: moneromooo <moneromooo@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:18:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] transactionview: add a menu command to copy txid

Useful for use with the new block explorer window
---
 src/qt/transactionview.cpp | 8 ++++++++
 src/qt/transactionview.h   | 1 +
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/qt/transactionview.cpp b/src/qt/transactionview.cpp
index 5dd55db..ef574a0 100644
--- a/src/qt/transactionview.cpp
+++ b/src/qt/transactionview.cpp
@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ TransactionView::TransactionView(QWidget *parent) :
     QAction *copyAddressAction = new QAction(tr("Copy address"), this);
     QAction *copyLabelAction = new QAction(tr("Copy label"), this);
     QAction *copyAmountAction = new QAction(tr("Copy amount"), this);
+    QAction *copyTXID = new QAction(tr("Copy txid"), this);
     QAction *editLabelAction = new QAction(tr("Edit label"), this);
     QAction *showDetailsAction = new QAction(tr("Show transaction details"), this);
 
@@ -139,6 +140,7 @@ TransactionView::TransactionView(QWidget *parent) :
     contextMenu->addAction(copyAddressAction);
     contextMenu->addAction(copyLabelAction);
     contextMenu->addAction(copyAmountAction);
+    contextMenu->addAction(copyTXID);
     contextMenu->addAction(editLabelAction);
     contextMenu->addAction(showDetailsAction);
 
@@ -154,6 +156,7 @@ TransactionView::TransactionView(QWidget *parent) :
     connect(copyAddressAction, SIGNAL(triggered()), this, SLOT(copyAddress()));
     connect(copyLabelAction, SIGNAL(triggered()), this, SLOT(copyLabel()));
     connect(copyAmountAction, SIGNAL(triggered()), this, SLOT(copyAmount()));
+    connect(copyTXID, SIGNAL(triggered()), this, SLOT(copyTXID()));
     connect(editLabelAction, SIGNAL(triggered()), this, SLOT(editLabel()));
     connect(showDetailsAction, SIGNAL(triggered()), this, SLOT(showDetails()));
 }
@@ -323,6 +326,11 @@ void TransactionView::copyAmount()
     GUIUtil::copyEntryData(transactionView, 0, TransactionTableModel::FormattedAmountRole);
 }
 
+void TransactionView::copyTXID()
+{
+    GUIUtil::copyEntryData(transactionView, 0, TransactionTableModel::TxIDRole);
+}
+
 void TransactionView::editLabel()
 {
     if(!transactionView->selectionModel() ||!model)
diff --git a/src/qt/transactionview.h b/src/qt/transactionview.h
index 4ade3ec..57f59e7 100644
--- a/src/qt/transactionview.h
+++ b/src/qt/transactionview.h
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ private slots:
     void editLabel();
     void copyLabel();
     void copyAmount();
+    void copyTXID();
 
 signals:
     void doubleClicked(const QModelIndex&);
--
1.9.3

If you build your own, there is a fix for this at https://github.com/moneromooo/HyperStake/commit/e34fe0798306ad8aac6ef53e849377d15788cbe9

I've been idly wondering the last week or so what are the dynamics between, eg, Monero, and Bitcoin price. After the Monero specific speculation, what additional effect on Monero price is Bitcoin price expected to have ? In other words, does a decrease in Bitcoin price tend to push Monero price higher (if the price of Monero tends to be viewed in fiat terms), have close to no effect (if the price of Monero tends to be viewed in Bitcoins), or push it lower ? And conversely when the price of Bitcoin goes up.

I'd guess a first psychological reason of the main Monero markets being priced in bitcoin would mean no change, but the fiat price is a major consideration when a currency can't be universally used as such, and I'm curious whether experience with other strong alt coins has anything to say here, and whether Monero is expected to match such experience.

Forgot to add - my activity switched to member sometime in the last couple weeks, and I changed my signature to that level.

I'm guessing dNote was just referring to the few comments like "OMG, price will dump" that came in quack succession (sorry, I just couldn't resist the pun) and that weren't particularly useful. So not you or others reporting the wallet issue

It was fixed pretty fast, so all is good now. We can wait for the next block

  _o<

It's that time of the month again


Current posts: 117 (+40, 31 of which meeting the campaign rules)
SSRC: SeCJkBRKg5Xs6pyGRBXTY51CT5EQs7kDXj

Thanks

Yes, you're right it's 4 hours, sorry.

And I think it answers my questions, thanks a lot.

Your example falls within less than an order of magnitude with what I get, which is easily accounted by variations of difficulty, which seems to flail around a fair bit, at least in the last day or so.

Thanks!