Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 04:18:39 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 »
441  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: February 05, 2019, 07:27:13 PM
However if he tried to actually "game" the system to his advantage (not saying he did) should THAT be tagged?

With gaming the system I mean influencing DT list for his own sake or agenda and not for legitimate reasons. See Thule et al.

If the "gaming" takes the form of strategically sending a lot of merit, creating sockuppets, and stuff like that, then no. That sort of gaming might get me to blacklist people, in fact. But if it looks more like politics, then that's OK, and that's what H8bussesNbicycles's thread looks like to me.

Is stingers still a merit source? Sending merits to pad H8's gang to 10 merits so that they would have votes. Not sure if that counts as "strategic".

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103988.msg49590110#msg49590110


Theymos gave already the answer its legit if it comes from free will of real users.
Stinger has posted that he have been abused in the past in his opinion and wishes changes.To achieve changes some people need to get voted up.If sending Merit to people you wish to move up would be forbidden how do you ever wanna implement a communities DT list when majority of merit is being hold by a very small group.


However if he tried to actually "game" the system to his advantage (not saying he did) should THAT be tagged?

With gaming the system I mean influencing DT list for his own sake or agenda and not for legitimate reasons. See Thule et al.

If the "gaming" takes the form of strategically sending a lot of merit, creating sockuppets, and stuff like that, then no. That sort of gaming might get me to blacklist people, in fact. But if it looks more like politics, then that's OK, and that's what H8bussesNbicycles's thread looks like to me.

I might not understand when self-moderation is appropriate.  

I have no problem with your (theymos) conclusion that "H8bussesNbicycles's thread looks like [politics] to me", but isn't there a bit of a problem with the self-moderation aspect of certain kinds of threads, especially when dealing with seemingly meta issues?  

For example, I had 6 posts deleted from that thread (so of course, now I don't even attempt to participate or pay attention, since I could not even contribute if I wanted to, except if I were to exclude Lauda from my trust list, then they might allow my posts), and I thought that my posts were innocuous, even though obviously the contents of my posts distracted from the message that they want to promote in that thread (inaccurate as some other members might find such thread messages).

Nobody would delete your post if you would have Lauda in your trust list.
Posts have been deleted which were bashing the action OP started.


You just need to look at my trust feedback.

Having 5 negative feedbacks for the try to support people into DT list which will lead execute the DT responsibility like me and hopefully the majority of forum members see.
If we wouldn't be allowed to support our view what sense would it make that theymos created a decentralised voting system.
Current DT members have already the advantage of high merits and sticking togther.

Here the 5 people who tagged me for that thread

Timelord2067: Conspiring to manipulate DT for a personal vendetta at the risk of leaving other users vulnerable to known scammers.
yogg: Conspiring to manipulate DT for a personal vendetta at the risk of leaving other users vulnerable to known scammers.
TMAN: Conspiring to manipulate DT for a personal vendetta at the risk of leaving other users vulnerable to known scammers.
Foxpup: Conspiring to manipulate DT for a personal vendetta at the risk of leaving other users vulnerable to known scammers.
asche: Complete moron. Basically defends anyone speaking up against any DT member hoping to fuel his attempt to actually manipulate the system.
This user has his own agenda. Do not trust him.


Quote
- You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again.

TMAN gave me a year a false negative tagg being the alt of Quickseller.I PM'ed him a few days ago asking him to remove the false negative tagg since after a year he should clearly see i have no relation to quickseller and also offered to remove my negative tagg for tagging with a false reason.
His response was an additional negative tagg.

Thats the kind of actions which is frustrating the community.And TMAN even laughing and making jokes he gave me a negative tagg with the explanation that i might be an alt of Quickseller.

So he has completly no evidence at all.I guess everyone can clearly see there is no relationship and when getting asked to remove the false tagg he adds just for his vendetta on me a second one claiming i run a vendetta on all DT.
Thats just a lie but you don't belive i'm going to support a DT member like TMAN who proofed his negative actions in the past ?
442  Economy / Reputation / Re: @Timelord2067 @Timelord2067 @Timelord2067 @Timelord2067 (it's all about me) on: February 05, 2019, 07:07:52 PM
Reposted for xtraelv's benefit:

You just proofed earlier you don't care about trust abuse as you gave me already a negative tagg for being an alt of QS where you of course have no evidence.

...and *this* is what all the Butt Hurt TM is all about:


I'd hate to see how stinging Thule's squeeling would be if I actually said s/he *was* an alt of QS  Roll Eyes



Just to be clear - I didn't say Thule was quickseller... (remind me why you're on the DT list again?)

You gave me a negative tagg and clearly said you give a fuck.
If you don't know if i'm QS you had no right to give a negative tagg.You could add a neutral but without even the simplest proof that would be even invalid....
How does it come that you have no proof of me being QS and giving a negative rating and at the same time give to a known account which should be sold to shitposters but landed to suchmoon just a neutral ?

At least i should thank you since you were the only one tagging that account as everybody else didn't even tagged that sold account
443  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/5/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 05:38:49 PM
Your double standards just have been proofed and the abuse of the trust feedback by you

Quote
The $600 was not a payment for the account, which I had no need for. Can't expect a sockpuppeting scammer to understand that of course.
No it was to pay out the debt 0.13B .
If you get the Glem account after paying Brunos debt its clearly a deal to get that account once you pay his debt.


No matter what you got a new account where a payment was involved.If directly or indirectly doesn't matter.


Quote
Can't expect a sockpuppeting scammer

Oh the personal attacks begin again ?No more arguments when facts about you are being presented ?
A DT calling me a scammer but being such a dick unable to show me even a single person i have scammed during the 7 years on this forum.
Your input is like always high quality /irony off



Quote
Case in point. "PM from somebody" LOL. Whatever justification of your vendetta makes you feel better.



Let's see what kind of information we will get
444  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/5/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 04:53:25 PM
Quote
You do realize that $600 was like 0.1 BTC at the time? The red tags I was concerned about were Bruno's, not mine. I wanted him to be able to use the Gage account in a sig campaign and that obviously didn't work out.

So you activly worked on it that Bruno's red taggs get deleted even he tried to sell a legandary account in 2018?
You are a hyprocat .Giving everyone who tries to buy or sell an account negative feedback since 2017 and if there is a benefit for you you jump in and safe his reputation even there is full evidence he tried to sell a legendary to shitposters.
Makes total sense


Quote
No, I didn't. It was pretty much the opposite - preventing that account from getting into the hands of a shitposting/scamming account buyer.
Tagging that account from all DT members would be enough to make it worthless so everyone would know its a bought account.There was no need to pay $600 for that account.


445  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/5/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 04:05:06 PM
I read the thread and its clear It was a private deal between suchmoon and Bruno for paying his debt and receiving back his other alt.

Even suchmoon fighting to get all the red taggs away was such a laugh to read.

Argumenting that debt is paid there is no reason for a red tagg.No there isn't even somebody tried to sell that account to pay his debt.

Ohhh i forgat now its allowed to offer accounts for sale if you try to pay your debt with it.

Maybe people should not sell accounts directly but indirectly claiming to sell these accounts on private deals to pay their debt.


DOUBLE STANDARD AT ITS FINEST


People should tagg suchmoons alt which was sold by Bruno to suchmoon for $600 .Account sales are discouraged on BCT and lead instantly to red trust

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=349097


Quote
Interesting. And the best method, in your eyes, was to spend more funds than necessary. Instead of posting the service thread yourself, or obtaining a copper membership, or having someone else post the service thread...

You fucking moron at least check for what you are tagging.You tagged a try for an account buy back in 2017.There were no copper memberships.
And asking other people to add images and update it makes completly no sense since you will be always held responsible for that account you have no conrol about or know its full history.
The account offered at that time was
Quote
No loans, No scams, No hacks, Clean Account
.Ideal for a neutral image posting account.



Quote
How quaint. Do you want to spell out why you were buying an account, then? Was it to perhaps prevent the sold account from scamming? You hero.

HA HA HA HA who is going to belive in that shit that suchmoon spending $600 of his own money for a legandary account and removes all its negative taggs just to remove an account which maybe could be used for scams. LOL

Yeah sure funny suchmoon is not buying all accounts.What a samerita.

@actmyname

You are a pisshead and your argumentation are for dumb people.Anyone beliving in that crap must have an IQ like 60.
Even you have no high IQ if you are only able to make up such stupid argumentation


You know cryptohunter is right.Its time to go activly to your escrow thread and inform anyone there that you are a scam escrow who supports account sales and being used as collateral which proof is this thread
446  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/5/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 03:48:31 PM
So you admitted buying that account in june 2018

@DT members where is the tagging ?Double standards again ?
What was suchmoon's intent for buying the account?
What are most users' intentions for buying accounts?

Examine the dichotomy, please.


Ohhh what was the intention ?I guess giving free money ($600) to someone for an account he/she can't use and thats why he/she fought so hard to get all the negative taggs removed. /irony off

Funny i never saw you asking me for what purpose i tried to buy an account.

DOUBLE STANDARDS YOU FAGGOT


Oh SORRY !!!!! I forgat i told you the reason i tried to buy an account so a friend would be able to add images on his service thread.But you faggot didn't care
447  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/5/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 01:52:19 PM
@suchmoon a lot of dirt you got.

Now i understand why you support Lauda.




@SUCHMOON

DID YOU PAID Brunos loan default and BOUGHT THE GLEM ACCOUNT in June 2018 ?

Am asking cause i can't understand how else it would switch ownership in June 2018 where Bruno officaly said that this account belongs to him.
DID YOU ACTIVLY BOUGHT AN ACCOUNT ?

I mean i got tagged for trying to buy an account in 2017 and you bought one in june 2018.


Now have a look how suchmoon is defending Bruno against global moderators who clearly see that Gleb is not Bruno posting this as feedback comment


Quote
Unless there is any proof that this account is not under Brunos control the neg rating by hilourosandco appears to be based on an incorrect assumption and should be ignored along with this rating
Wow suchmoon you defend Bruno with a claim which you don't use when giving false feedbacks to other members ?


Quote
DarkStar_ tagged Gleb account because the Gage account was the collateral so he knew if he were to tag Gage account then there goes the collateral, you are also asking for negative feedbacks to be removed now for a few times because Gleb is in your hands and as long as it has negative trust it wont worth a buck.
You are trying to side with an account seller while you have been against such behavior yourself.


Quote
As long as you don't suddenly change your mind and give Gleb and his other alts positive trust to say what a good guy he is, I'm fine with it and everybody else is also fine with it other than suchmoon, what you should know is that suchmoon is the one who paid the loan and took Gleb account as collateral in exchange for $600, so she would do anything to restore the said accounts reputations in order to get back her money which is lost forever now.

I wonder what would suchmoon do if her bought accounts are tagged as an account dealer and not a loan defaulter? also where is the usual hypocrite a.k.a The Pharmacist? he's not here to tag these accounts but only he tags people in no position of power or influence. facking hypocrite.

Quote
Two different accounts, two different deals. I control the Gleb Gamow account (my own deal with Bruno), I never touched the Phinnaeus Gage account (DarkStar_'s deal with Bruno).

So you admitted buying that account in june 2018

@DT members where is the tagging ?Double standards again ?
448  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/5/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 01:22:15 PM
if you could round some of those up to the next multiple of 10 would support this effort

To make this work you're gonna need at least a couple of 250-merit accounts. And you don't need more than eight 10-merit votes for each pair of 250-merit votes. But don't get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoy watching how you morons waste your merits in this scheme.

dont know how trust system work ?
many on list have 250 merit votes but need 10s

more 250s will come or i will buy them

No, not a single user in your army of miscreants has 250 earned merits. If you had any you'd have them hooked up to your trust lists already because the "election" could happen any minute now. You have ~20 or so 10-merit votes and you're gonna waste them all. Good show, will watch again.

Are you afraid anyone will get there very soon and put all of you lauda ass-lickers down ?

I can feel your fear by the way! Cheesy

Yeah, I'm quaking in my boots. Please aim between the eyes and make my suffering short. Thank you.

suchmoon you need to understand.Its not our fulltime time job to sit on this forum.
We come slowly but we come.No rush needed.

Here a small anecdote for you from an old known movie i liked when i was a kid.

Son and daddy bull standing on a hill see below a herd of cows.
Son says to dad bull :Daddy daddy let's run down and fuck a cow we catch.

Daddy bull answers : No son we get slowly down and fuck them all !


Wish everyone a nice day as i have some more work to do today.


Btw suchmoon did i mentioned i got a PM from somebody offering to sell me your doxx ?
I just made s very short digging.
How many accounts do you got ?

Gleb Gamow
21000 posts
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=349097
449  Economy / Reputation / Re: @Timelord2067 on: February 05, 2019, 12:44:08 PM
When are you going to delete your false accusations that i'm an alt of QS.I guess after a year its evidence enough that everyone see's that i'm not an old of QS.
Do you have issues recognizing that ?

.
Also you just proofed what a scamback you are.


Sending you a message with the request to remove the false accusation you gave me another one which you didn't do before.
You just copy paste an old one from somebody else.

It just shows what a poor human garbage you are

Did you say you'd promote Quark and get it on the reddit front page? Did that happen?
What work did you acutally do to justify keeping the Quarks sent to you in good faith.

Wouldn't returning the 10,000 Quarks (perhaps 1000 more!) be the right thing to do?


You are aware that 10.000 quarks are $25 ?
And yes i did said it with the execption that i will instantly stop if one of the known scammers would return.
Since they returned i'm not going to promote a coin which in my opinion is still in their hands so they can scam people.
And seeing that quark have been delisted everywhere approves my decission.
But if you wanna talk we can talk about digitalindustry and his team one of the biggest scammers on bitcointalk which have been hunted by me cryptohunter and some other people.
Maybe the current DT members could learn something about catching real scammers

Today's monetary value of 10,000 QRK is of no consequence, this is about returning what was paid to you to do a job.
You really could accuse anyone of being a scammer to try and justify not honouring a contract, how convenient for you.
Didn't another poster send you a further 1,000?
Quark is listed on many exchanges, you might want to check the daily volumes on AEX.
You seem obsessed with scammers, I wonder why??



No no other member sent to me 1000 quark.
And no this wasn't paid for doing a job.
If you would at least spent some time and read that old forum if it still exists you would see i was holding at that time quarks from 2013 or 2014 and offered my help for free since some high reputated member convinced me that all the scammers are gone (there was a big debate about it between me and them) and there is only the community left which is trying to get that coin back on track.
I offered my help for free asking only for the cost of servers and proxies and also instantly made it clear should i see a scammer getting back active on Quark i will instantly leave.
Server and proxies have been bought and what happened is that digitalindustry came back who scammed houndred of thousand USD or even millions and who always coworked with Max doing this scam on diffrent coins.
The reputated members guaranteed me that Max isnt working with digitanindustry anymore and that he claimed himself that working with him was a big mistake.
Everything was a poor lie to get the community back and increase the demand via fake update promises like they did always.
As soon as i saw digitalindustry being back i instantly knew its the same scam they did twice on quark before and i left.
I clearly said why i'm leaving and all the crooks jumping on me attacking how i could attack Max and calling him a scammer left themself 6-12 months later seeing there is not a single progress at all.
The only legit guys on Quark were cryptohunter who was way more positiv on Quark than myself and we always had hard debates about it in the past and the chinese investor who tried to take control over it.

But you know what ?Max has the only control over it and he is not willing to give it away.How do i know it ?Because the dev's who worked on the masternodes contacted me asking about my honest opinions and informing me about everything what is going on internal even i didn't wanted to know it.
The masternodes for Quark were a long time ready to be implemented.The dev contacted me upset saying that Max would not allow the implementation of the masternodes even they have been successfull tested
but wanted to switch to something else.If i remember it correctly using masternodes of Dash.

So if i see punks like you accusing me of scamming where it was me and some high ranked members on this board who actually exposed that scam back in 2012/13 where Bill Still got bribed,a big marketing campaign has been bought by digitalindustry and everyone waiting for Max Kaiser where these same scumback dumped coins and stoll all peoples money when Quark was on CMC #3 than i'm asking what is wrong with you ?
Pissed that you lost all your money on quark ?
Before leaving quark i mentioned it many times to people to leave quark as its going to die and i had right a second time.
Back in 2013 i was also attacked for being a bankster,psyop etc when warning about Quark and these scammers.
Not many listened but these who listened sent me PM's thanking to make them aware of it so they started digging deeper.


So if you punk wanna accuse me of not helping promoting a coin where people would have lost all their money you can go on.
Since from my leaving many years passed at least show me a single update Max made during these years ?
Didn't you guys promoted that major updates is going to be released soon during the time i left and even had to create a new self moderated thread for quark so you could delete all negative comments?
450  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/5/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 12:19:58 PM
My avatar not the highest one but at least my name is the boldest one.  

I would call it funny wouldn't i see the missuss of ill people by degenerates.

Making fun of other people illness is not something i support.
451  Economy / Reputation / Re: @Timelord2067 on: February 05, 2019, 07:17:57 AM
I make no income from that forum.

Oh don't be shy. How's your ITO marketing business going? Rumor has it that you have two large customers.

What are you talking about ?The next false claim from you ?
I'm a dev and not a marketer even i have the same kind of knowledge like most marketers do.
452  Economy / Reputation / Re: @Timelord2067 on: February 05, 2019, 01:26:25 AM

Re timelord -- I have not really come across this person timelord  (probably not an alt board poster) all that much in the past ( to my memory), but if he has accused thule of being QS and red trust him with no evidence to support that then that is simply trust abuse in my opinion and should be reduced to neutral (max) as a suspicion only which is all it is as far as I know.


I have no doubt that both QS has alts and Thule has alts. But Thule and QS have very different writing styles.


I already posted before i have an alt from 2012 where i lost the details and thats why i created this account.
I have no other accounts even i have been accused of diffrent accounts like QS,cryptohunter and all the smaller accounts which took activly part in threads i participated.

Maybe you don't have realised it but i don't wear signatures,have no buy or sell thread or anything like that.
I make no income from that forum.So any alt would be no use for me.
453  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/2/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 01:11:15 AM
You left my reply there for so long! Why delete it now?

Making money online is no shame.Its just about the way you get it.
And how does suchmoon get it?


which reply ?I haven't deleted anything
454  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/2/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 01:04:59 AM
Since you are spending most of the time on that forum it must be benficial for you.Else i doubt you would be able to spend so much time here.
Based on your info it seems you live in a country with lower average income.
Would make sense to spend so much time here to create an online income.

Isn't it ?

What are you babbling about? Post it in your native language, I bet Google Translate will make more sense.


Making money online is no shame.Its just about the way you get it.
455  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q1) on: February 05, 2019, 01:03:22 AM
Timelord you must be so dumb its hard to belive.

Thank-you ... you've misspelled believe...

Quote
I already posted to cryptohunter days ago when asking for permission that some dump member will claim i'm his alt.
Congrats you are that dumb member

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5102556.msg49488496#msg49488496

Cue the slow clapping...

Quote
Anyone with a working brain can instantly see that my english and cryptohunter are 2 total diffrent ones.Same goes with QS.

Your poor attempt just proofed what a big IDIOT you are even unable to check these easy points.

But these are the exect kind of proof the community needs to see which you use for your negative tagging.

Let's the community see how DUMB you are unable to even distinguish our diffrent kind of english and writing skills.


You mean like how The Pharmacist and his alt (used to blow off steam) Huge Black Woman have different vocabulary skill sets?
...and the rest of your spelling needs attention too...


keep defending your idiotism.....


Maybe we will add Lauda and theymos here.
They could be just acting not being the same person heh ?  Grin Grin Grin Grin


Sorry to say but i'm disappointed by you.I checked your ratings and had a hope you are diffrent than these scumbacks.
You just proofed earlier you don't care about trust abuse as you gave me already a negative tagg for being an alt of QS where you of course have no evidence.
I offered you to remove after a year your false tagg in exchange me removing for the false tagging.
But you decided to proof you are a moron and added another false tagg.

Big disappointment you are
456  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/2/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 05, 2019, 12:50:04 AM
How similar it is isn't it ?

It's hard to say. Are you a monumental moron on that forum as well? Do they have a rambling lunatic like cryptohunter?


They had a similar moron like you on that forum.

He was the so called "youtube" guru.
Made thousands of posts without real value had tons of reputations thanks to his buddies and sold crap services.

Since you are spending most of the time on that forum it must be benficial for you.Else i doubt you would be able to spend so much time here.
Based on your info it seems you live in a country with lower average income.
Would make sense to spend so much time here to create an online income.

Isn't it ?


Oh forgat to mention it.
He tried hard to get a Mod but never made it.
You know services of Mod's are highly trusted and increase massivly the demand.
457  Other / Meta / Re: 270 trust.7 trust.3 trust compared to minus 128 trust on: February 05, 2019, 12:39:23 AM
Have a look it happened


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg49588830#msg49588830



 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
458  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q1) on: February 05, 2019, 12:32:14 AM
Is "Bruno" QS?

? 2 Accounts Connected: ?

cryptohunter, Thule,

Proof:

Might be just my imagination, but...

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz


http://archive.fo/KnVgR


http://archive.fo/91fGd

Related Addresses:

Both have the exact same "Picture/Text"

Quote
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

Both have the exact same signature:

Quote

Miscellaneous #1:

Same Butt Hurt TM attitude to life; same (non signature campaign) as each-other.

Miscellaneous #2:

First thread started by quickseller (and Thule says he isn't QS  Roll Eyes )
Second thread started by Deena who has been part of the collective trying to manipulate the DT
Third thread started by wtf_is_going_on a sock puppet with just one post.
Fourth thread by cryptohunter one of the two above...

Is "Bruno" QS?



*edit*

Might want to add H8bussesNbicycles to that list...



The only ones who merited H8bussesNbicycles's post are cryptohunter, thule and deena...

Timelord you must be so dumb its hard to belive.

I already posted to cryptohunter days ago when asking for permission that some dump member will claim i'm his alt.
Congrats you are that dumb member

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5102556.msg49488496#msg49488496


Anyone with a working brain can instantly see that my english and cryptohunter are 2 total diffrent ones.Same goes with QS.


Your poor attempt just proofed what a big IDIOT you are even unable to check these easy points.


But these are the exect kind of proof the community needs to see which you use for your negative tagging.

Let's the community see how DUMB you are unable to even distinguish our diffrent kind of english and writing skills.
459  Economy / Reputation / Re: @Timelord2067 on: February 05, 2019, 12:08:01 AM
When are you going to delete your false accusations that i'm an alt of QS.I guess after a year its evidence enough that everyone see's that i'm not an old of QS.
Do you have issues recognizing that ?

.
Also you just proofed what a scamback you are.


Sending you a message with the request to remove the false accusation you gave me another one which you didn't do before.
You just copy paste an old one from somebody else.

It just shows what a poor human garbage you are

Did you say you'd promote Quark and get it on the reddit front page? Did that happen?
What work did you acutally do to justify keeping the Quarks sent to you in good faith.

Wouldn't returning the 10,000 Quarks (perhaps 1000 more!) be the right thing to do?


You are aware that 10.000 quarks are $25 ?
And yes i did said it with the execption that i will instantly stop if one of the known scammers would return.
Since they returned i'm not going to promote a coin which in my opinion is still in their hands so they can scam people.
And seeing that quark have been delisted everywhere approves my decission.
But if you wanna talk we can talk about digitalindustry and his team one of the biggest scammers on bitcointalk which have been hunted by me cryptohunter and some other people.
Maybe the current DT members could learn something about catching real scammers
460  Economy / Reputation / Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ LIST UPDATED 2/2/19 ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄π on: February 04, 2019, 11:58:28 PM
Theymos to me is not dirty or corrupt

To me he is. All the trust system and merit system designs were and are constructed to keep the scamming clique on top a the hierarchical ladder, even at the cost of the on this forum well cherised decentralisation. He's not a total idiot, is he? He can see the faul games that are being played on this forum. He's fully aware of it, no doubt. And he supports it to the full! He's got no principles and no integrity. Sad but true.

He is not dirty.He allowed to buy ad space for the special thread.I would claim myself he has not much experience in running big forums even he runs BCT since every owner which forum gets main stream has the same issues like BCT.
And its always the same what is happing.A small group (mainly losers) who are abusing the reputation system to gain massiv reputation in the community for only 3 purposes.
1)Milking the community
2)Destroying competition
3)Controlling their market and defaming anyone who is a threat.

I mean i'm working online fulltime since 1998 and have seen so many forums getting successfull and onces it goes mainstream these rats always come and try to take a big part of the cake.
I remember the marketing forum which is now the biggest online marketing forum in the world.I was a member there since 2007 (it was created 2006) and what happened is the owner changed and the forum went thanks to massiv marketing and its high quality content to the mainstream.Since noob flooded the forum people started selling their massivly overpriced marketing shit and every of these shit sellers tried to look like the biggest king who knows everything and has the biggest success where everyone of the senior knew these are just punks trying to milk the community.What they did is they created a reputation cycle and the reputation points started to explode.Normly people had to gain these points for really awesome posts.If you made an awesome post you got like 2-7 rep points depending on how good the thread was.
They instantly changed it and a single reputation vote of them was worth first 50 and later 100 reputation points.These fuckers had the highest reputation points and most amount of posts and thanks because of rehashed shit content they posted.
Its like a 1:1 copy with BCT.

And what happened at the end was that the abuse was so massiv so many old seniors got false banned that all seniors stopped posting on that forum.That forum turned completly into a noob forum cause seniors are not going to post for the benefit of a small group of punks.
Just have a look at that forum a few years ago you paid $100 for access to VIP Content produced by seniors.Today you pay $100 to support that forum since the content in the VIP Section is now worth shit.
The owner of that forum banned all of these abusers which later have been proofen there were in reputation cicle and made a lot of big scams where members mostly Buy/Sell/Trade members how been scammed out of big money and were all sitting calm because they knew once they say something they will lose their income.

How similar it is isn't it ?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!