Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 06:24:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 »
1861  Other / Off-topic / Re: My doubts about anarchy on: April 02, 2011, 06:03:23 PM
So you must forever maintain the ability to counteract aggression with the ability to be aggressive yourself.

You are confusing violence with aggression. I'm against aggression, not violence. Aggression is the initiation of violence. I'm against the initiation of violence. I see nothing wrong with responding to aggression with violence.

In other words, "he started it!"
1862  Other / Off-topic / Re: My doubts about anarchy on: April 02, 2011, 05:48:07 PM

Aggression is part of our natural system of life, why do so many think they can "think" it away?

Initiation of aggression?

Aggression is the initiation of force. To say "the initiation of aggression" is to say something redundant. If you are the aggressor and I respond with violence, that's self-defense, not aggression on my part.
1863  Other / Off-topic / Re: My doubts about anarchy on: April 02, 2011, 05:44:37 PM
Aggression is part of our natural system of life, why do so many think they can "think" it away?

You obviously didn't bother to read my entire post since I anticipated such an objection and have already refuted it before you even posted it.

Quote
Of course, anarchism is not a Utopian ideal. There will always be people that wish to use aggression to accomplish their goals. The point of anarchism is to make these people diffuse their power across everyone instead of concentrating it into the hands a single asshole, or a group of them.

Clearly, I don't believe we can "think" away aggression since I just admitted as much and explained why that's not a problem for anarchism.
1864  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Awesome free state project open to bitcoin donations on: April 02, 2011, 05:34:16 PM
3) the rules will in did be "dictated" and once the constitution is written and the Free State Charter is signed these basic rules can't change. BUT then again, no-one is living in that area at the moment. No-one are affected by those rules. The only ones who will be affected by them are the ones who VOLUNTARILY move to the Free State to live under those rules.

I find it hard to believe that you've actually thought about this deeply because that will only last for a generation. After that, the children born into that system will be there but it won't be because they voluntarily moved there. You're doing nothing but creating yet another state. I'm sure in true statist form you'll respond with "love it or leave it". Which of course was already refuted by Hume with his ship analogy. Saying that I'm free to move even though I have no way to do so or survive after having done so is akin to saying that a man kidnapped and taken on aboard a ship is later free to leave that ship when it's at sea by jumping in the ocean to drown, and by not drowning he is thereby consenting to the laws on board that ship. Hogwash!

Your idea, in its current form, is doomed.

Generally speaking the Free State will not be a complete data haven. Piracy ... will not be tolerated.

Right, I think I called it. This is just yet another state. To call it a "free state" is disingenuous at best and a fraud at worse since you're taking in money for it.

If I own a stack of paper then I can do whatever I want with it, including writing a Harry Potter novel on it and then selling the paper. To limit what I can do with my paper amounts to partial theft since you are taking from me the use of my paper.

What exactly makes you think you are justified in claiming partial ownership of my paper and dictating what I can and cannot do with it?
1865  Other / Off-topic / Re: My doubts about anarchy on: April 02, 2011, 05:14:44 PM
I think you're over-complicating things. To draw an analogy. The strict technical meaning of the word atheist literally means someone that lacks a belief in God. However, this strict definition would also include babies, the mentally ill, etc. In practice, an atheist isn't just someone that lacks belief. It's someone that has considered the evidence and found it lacking. In otherwords, they actively disbelieve (note: I'm not claiming atheists are certain or that they are making a knowledge claim, they are just being skeptical) Likewise, just as the strict definition of an anarchist is someone that doesn't approve of rulers, in practice there is something more to it than that. There is a rationalization for WHY rulers are illigetimate.

So far, Stephan Kinsella has put it best for me:

Quote
To be an anarchist only means that you believe that aggression is not justified, and that states necessarily employ aggression. And, therefore, that states, and the aggression they necessarily employ, are unjustified. It's quite simple, really. It's an ethical view, so no surprise it confuses utilitarians.

Accordingly, anyone who is not an anarchist must maintain either: (a) aggression is justified; or (b) states (in particular, minimal states) do not necessarily employ aggression.

Proposition (b) is plainly false. States always tax their citizens, which is a form of aggression. They always outlaw competing defense agencies, which also amounts to aggression. (Not to mention the countless victimless crime laws that they inevitably, and without a single exception in history, enforce on the populace. Why minarchists think minarchy is even possible boggles the mind.)

As for (a), well, socialists and criminals also feel aggression is justified. This does not make it so. Criminals, socialists, and anti-anarchists have yet to show how aggression — the initiation of force against innocent victims — is justified. No surprise; it is not possible to show this. But criminals don't feel compelled to justify aggression; why should advocates of the state feel compelled to do so?

The reason why you can't justify aggression is because by entering into a rational argument you are already presupposing that violence isn't the better way to settle that particular disagreement. Otherwise, why are you bothering with discussion instead of putting a bullet in my head? Aggression ends discussion rather than being an outcome of it.

The rest of anarcho-capitalism and Libertarianism can be condensed into the single idea of the assignment of property rights. Namely, the first person to make a claim on X has the better claim on X because everyone else is a latecomer. This, of course, includes my own body. If some latecomer comes along and says that they have a better claim to my property then what's to stop yet another latecomer from coming along and making the same argument against them? Therefore, anyone that advocates property rights, to be consistent, has to recognize the prior-later distinction. Since the first person to claim X owns X, they can also contractually transfer ownership to another party. So the only two legitimate ways of owning property are homesteading and free trade.

Of course, anarchism is not a Utopian ideal. There will always be people that wish to use aggression to accomplish their goals. The point of anarchism is to make these people diffuse their power across everyone instead of concentrating it into the hands a single asshole, or a group of them. In fact, the real Utopians are the ones that think they can use aggression to accomplish their goals without it leading to corruption and abuse. Also, just because we have a system of property rights doesn't mean we expect everyone will follow them. I have no doubt that there will always be thieves but that's an issue to be dealt with technologically, better theft prevention, etc. Anarchism makes sense exactly BECAUSE Utopian ideals are nothing but fantasy.
1866  Economy / Marketplace / Zend Studio & Zend Server on: April 02, 2011, 03:28:57 AM
  • Zend Server 5.0 - Development License - Basic - Perpetual license w/web-based support
  • Zend Studio 8.0 - Perpetual License w/web-based support

http://shop.zend.com/en/zend-developer-solution.html

These are just the license keys. You have to download the software and register it yourself. The price is $799 on their website but I'll let them both go for 400 BTC.

1867  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Bitcoin2Cash.com - Cash-Only Marketplace on: April 02, 2011, 03:05:44 AM
Why OpenID?

It makes things easier for me. I don't need to worry about managing passwords, verifying email addresses, recovering lost passwords, etc.
1868  Economy / Marketplace / Bitcoin2Cash.com - Cash-Only Marketplace on: April 02, 2011, 01:44:49 AM
I've just launched the new design of the website which now features an automated system.

https://www.bitcoin2cash.com/

You can open an account by logging in with any valid OpenID login. Once logged in, you can fund your account with BTC by sending to an address tied with your account or with USD by sending cash by mail (no change!) to our business address. Once your account is funded, you can sell BTC by setting an ask amount/price or you can buy BTC by setting a bid amount/price. Trades are performed every 5 minutes. The only fee is a shipping and handling fee when you request a cash withdrawal, which is currently $5.00 but will change as soon I get things running smoothly and figure out a fair price.

So, to start things rolling and generate some interest, I've just opened my own account, deposited 10 BTC and set an ask price for $0.10 for them. The first person that gets a dollar in their account and bids on them will win. On April 15th, I will do the same thing with 100 BTC at a price of $0.20. On May 1st, I will do this yet again with 1000 BTC at a price of $0.40. (assuming BTC prices don't drop drastically, in which case I will lower the price so that it is still far below market price)

The site is brand new and although I've tested it extensively, it's possible that some bugs remain so please be advised.

Also, even if you aren't interested in cash trades, you can still open an account and use it as a safety deposit box for your BTC without worrying about running the Bitcoin client yourself. You also get to take advantage of our automated encrypted backups that are stored on redundant cloud storage services.

Thanks for reading!
1869  Other / Politics & Society / Re: "Anarchists" rioting in London on: April 01, 2011, 04:44:15 PM
Or is it your opinion that someone imposing on your space a violent act?

Yes, entering my house without my permission is an act of violence.

If so, don't ever go to a city.

Why not? I usually confine myself to places where I'm welcome, shopping centers, restaurants, bars, movie theaters, etc. When I visit someplace, I'm not in the habit of climbing through open windows or kicking down doors.
1870  Other / Politics & Society / Re: "Anarchists" rioting in London on: April 01, 2011, 05:51:21 AM
If I supported initiating violence to achieve my goals, I'd be pro-government. Roll Eyes
1871  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Computer Science Tutoring (under 60 BTC per hour) on: March 31, 2011, 02:39:11 AM
If anyone needs math tutoring or homework help with any math up to first year calculus I'm available at 5 BTC an hour.
1872  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Earn bitcoins writing about whatever you know on: March 31, 2011, 02:00:02 AM
I'll probably be sending you my history paper on "Why was the American Civil War fought?" after I get it graded.
1873  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Windows Developer For Hire on: March 30, 2011, 08:05:09 PM
Quote
For example, back-end services that need to periodically perform actions, such as backing up your wallet to some cloud service, etc.
bitcoin2cash, how about a free, open source app to do just that. I'm sure you'd get plenty of tips.

edit: I could even provide a server for that

I'm definitely interested in developing donation funded open source applications that are of value to the Bitcoin community. I just need to find something that's got enough demand behind it.
1874  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Get paid 5 BTC for joining Dropbox [COMPLETED] on: March 30, 2011, 08:00:47 PM
Alright, everyone's been paid. Thanks again and an extra thanks to everyone that was patient.
1875  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Get paid 5 BTC for joining Dropbox on: March 30, 2011, 07:59:52 PM
jose_____@yahoo.com
184XtWo1nq5kQSkGCyVAhu9FhUc3JQk2fR

It says ineligible.
1876  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Windows Developer For Hire on: March 30, 2011, 06:44:59 PM
I am also willing to bid by the project instead of hourly if your budget is really tight and the project isn't too complicated. For example, back-end services that need to periodically perform actions, such as backing up your wallet to some cloud service, etc.
1877  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Get paid 5 BTC for joining Dropbox on: March 30, 2011, 02:47:28 PM
Wow. Some people are really impatient. I haven't been at my computer since the last batch of like 10 people that I paid. I'll take care if it as soon as I'm home. I'll also make sure I pay Ownski last. Tongue
1878  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Get paid 5 BTC for joining Dropbox on: March 29, 2011, 01:06:07 AM
1879  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Get paid 5 BTC for joining Dropbox on: March 29, 2011, 12:37:22 AM
Awesome! Thanks everyone. I've sent Bitcoins to most of you now. There are three people that joined but haven't completed the steps to get the extra space. There is also one person that was ineligible. Sorry but I'm not sure what that's about. I assume you've already done this once or something?
1880  Economy / Marketplace / Get paid 5 BTC for joining Dropbox [COMPLETED] on: March 28, 2011, 11:20:16 PM
Offer completed. Everyone was paid.

Thanks!
Pages: « 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!