Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 02:00:46 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
1221  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Bitucopia.com: Grass-fed beef and poultry on: June 12, 2011, 09:27:21 PM
Where does the meat come from? How is it packaged for shipping? What are the shipping rates like?
1222  Economy / Marketplace / Re: up to 50 people, get paid 0.10 BTC to change your signature on: June 12, 2011, 07:04:26 PM
I would do it, but I have to keep the links in my signature there for a month...

That's fine. Bookmark this thread and check back again in a month.
1223  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Bitcoin2Cash.com - Cash-Only Marketplace on: June 12, 2011, 05:38:15 PM
There was a large influx of new accounts which caused our update script to start timing out. I've redesigned the script so it it's about 100 times faster. This shouldn't be an issue anymore. We apologize to anyone that had a delay in their BTC showing up in their account. It should be there now. Please confirm this if you can. Thanks!
1224  Economy / Marketplace / [CLOSED] up to 50 people, get paid 0.10 BTC to change your signature on: June 12, 2011, 05:35:57 PM
I'm offering to pay 0.10 BTC each to 50 people that will make their signatures match mine for 3 months (it must be the only code in your signature, exact same font family, style, size, etc). I'll check your signature periodically until a week from now (6/19/2011 if you do this today) and then pay you. After that, you will be bound by your word to keep it there for the remaining 11 weeks. This offer is only open to people that have registered their forum account before today and have 50 or more posts before today. I will check this so please don't start making new accounts or start posting like mad to bump up your post count. There is no agreement between us until I post your name below in this list. I reserve the right to refuse anyone that I perceive won't honor the agreement or will make a bad impression on my business.

Here is the code for your signature:

Code:
[b]Anonymous Cash-By-Mail Exchange: https://www.bitcoin2cash.com[/b]

There are 38 spots left.

The list of people that are committed are:

  • gamekingx (paid)
  • Insti (paid)
  • GeorgeH (paid)
  • Babylon (paid)
  • Vinnie (paid)
  • The Script (paid)
  • darkpandora (paid)
  • chmod755 (paid)
  • sanchaz (paid)
  • killer2021 (paid)
  • ptmhd (paid)
  • Aqualung (paid)
1225  Other / Politics & Society / Urban Dictionary accepted my definition on: June 12, 2011, 04:25:19 PM
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pissing+kool-aid

This is how I describe statists.
1226  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I will admit something... on: June 12, 2011, 03:30:23 PM
So your saying all agents have an agreed definition of rationality?

There is a difference between definitions and meaning. A definition is which meaning we attach to which word.

Do we all agree on the definition of a dog? Maybe not. You could be using the word dog to refer to tables or salt shakers. However, there is a meaning that refers to four legged things that bark, have tails, sharp teeth, were bred from wild wolves, etc. So when I talk about dogs, that's the definition I'm using. You have to go beyond the words themselves to get at the meaning.

When I say rationality, I mean the ability to use reason, logic, etc.
1227  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I will admit something... on: June 12, 2011, 04:58:01 AM
This is illogical. So when an agent is unconscious, the external agent is suppose to treat them in a rational(1) way; and rational(1) is defined by the unconscious agent, the meaning of which is unknown by the external agent, therefore the course of action to be taken by the external agent is unknown. How is that suppose to work?

No, it's not up to the agent to decide what rationality is. That's presupposed. It's only up to the agent to declare that he or she is rational.
1228  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I will admit something... on: June 12, 2011, 03:55:35 AM
So a child is in the custody of a legal guardian, right. So who grants custodianship over an individual? A community of peers? That seems to violate two libertarian virtues: The individual is "entitled to themselves" and that no "institution" will decide the future of an individual.

Think of it like this. You see a person unconscious and bleeding on a sidewalk. The only thing that will save their life is a blood transfusion. Do you give them one? Well, that depends on what the person would want if they were fully rational i.e. conscious. For most people, the answer would be yes. If they are a Jehovah's Witness then the answer would be no. You treat people how they would want to be treated if they were fully rational.

Who decides what a rational adult is?

Each of us does, by declaring ourselves to be rational and fending for ourselves.

Who decides what abuse is?

Again, each of us does. If we aren't fully rational then we should treat them how they would want to be treated if they were fully rational. Obviously, that can't be done perfectly but that's what we should strive for.
1229  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I will admit something... on: June 12, 2011, 02:52:11 AM
So where does parenting fall into this?

Parents are custodians of their children until those children demand to be free by leaving home and living on their own. Also, if you abuse a child or otherwise treat him or her in a way that he or she wouldn't want to be treated if he or she were a fully rational adult then you lose custodianship and someone else can take over that responsibility.
1230  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I will admit something... on: June 12, 2011, 01:05:23 AM
Why replace a system, with some faults, with another with different but equally big or bigger faults?

I can't accept any system if one of its faults is that it allows for initiating violence against persons or property as being legitimate when done by certain groups. All human interactions should be voluntary. In my opinion, the current system has such a flaw and it more than outweighs any technical difficulties imposed by competing jurisdictions.
1231  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Silver stackers hate Bicoin? on: June 11, 2011, 04:39:42 AM
BTC is a commodity. Bitcoin is a proof-of-work system. It's useful because it proves that you've spent resources generating BTC. This means someone can charge for otherwise relatively free actions such as signing up to a website, posting on a forum or sending an email. This forces spammers to incur higher costs, making spam less profitable and reducing the overall amount.
1232  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Fact: Taxation is violent. on: June 11, 2011, 02:01:03 AM
If you have sex with 1,001 people and 1,000 consent but 1 does not, you're a rapist.

If you take money from 1,001 people and 1,000 consent but 1 does not, you're a thief.

1233  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I will admit something... on: June 09, 2011, 09:06:01 PM
I'm not sure which great thinkers you refer to, but I did read a few articles that was offered to me, and watched a few youtube films that people suggested, and if that represented the great thinkers I'm not impressed.

A few articles and YOUTUBE? Come on... Read some books. I'll suggest some if you don't know how to use Google. I think it's just easier for you to reject ideas that you are ignorant of.

Fences? Really? Visible border? Go have a look at a large farm. They have no fences around their crop fields and it would be very impractical and expensive to have it.

The crops themselves act as a border. It's pretty obvious where a plowed field ends and the forest begins. It's pretty obvious where a wheat field ends and the forest begins.

It becomes even more absurd with forests.

So because owning a forest would be difficult you think that is a death blow to the entire system? There are many other ways to mark a boundary. Post some signs every half mile, stake the corners, have a radio transmitter. The common thread here is that this is a technological problem, not a theoretical one.

I assure you that I could claim enough land anywhere to go around and inspect it every 10 years or so, making sure it's doing it's job acting as a carbon sink. I see so many ways to abuse the system you're proposing. So you have to prove that you own your property to anyone who shows up?

No just in court if you evict someone and they sue you or you use force against them and there is an investigation.

Credit rating is a bit like IP isn't it. It's not "scarce".

That's a non sequitur.

I was in Greece not too long ago. I came across a guy who built a house there. He assumed that the road outside was a public road, which it wasn't it'd turn out. When his house was built some guy came up with a document showing that he owned the road and now wanted to be compensated. Our hero had nothing to do but to pay the fee that the man asked for. Then another man came, with another contract claiming the HE owned the road, then another and another. All with valid documents. And the fee was low enough to not bother going to court about.
He fully expects someone to come one day with a paper claiming to own the land that the house stands on, but then the stakes will be higher.
Turns out that this isn't uncommon in Greece. A country with a more or less failed state. That's what I'd expect without a central authority.

In other words, since there's no final authority that you can appeal to, no dispute is ever truly resolved. That's actually the same case with our current system. Even if you get all the way up to the Supreme Court the issue isn't settled because then you can just petition Congress to pass a law so that your case is won that way.
1234  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I will admit something... on: June 09, 2011, 01:28:58 PM
I'd claim all land and use it to increase biodiversity, study long term effects of global warming or anything else that would be very hard to actually check. I mean, how can you actually check what I'm doing? My forests might be in a growth period, no action required on my part. My fields might be resting for a few years to yield bigger crops in the future. How can you tell?

Do you really think that you, off the top of your head, can come up with objections that many great thinkers haven't (a) already thought of or (b) already offered solutions to?

At the very least, you need to fence in the land. There has to be some kind of visible border around your property. Also, if someone moves into land that you own, you can't just say "oh I own that", you have a burden of proof. In the case of ecology, it would be some kind of historical data, survey maps, a deed whatever.

And another thing that interests me. How do you keep track of which land actually belong to whom? A central land authority that registers all owners? Doesn't seem like something you'd like. Several registers? Something else?

How do you keep up with your credit rating? Is there a single government agency that does that? No, actually its several different agencies. I'm also not against central authority or even monopolies, as long as they are voluntary. If everyone decides to use Bob's Land Registration because they are honest and it's convenient to have only one, fine with me. However, if Bob's Land Registration starts getting abusive, the door is open for competition, which somewhat assures that abuses aren't that tempting in the first place. It's a sort of business suicide.
1235  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Deepbit Approaching 50% Once Again on: June 08, 2011, 03:11:23 AM
I put together a Deepbit DDOS kit: http://www.mediafire.com/?b7gnz418m1w947d

That's definitely immoral and probably illegal depending on where you live.
1236  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Deepbit Approaching 50% Once Again on: June 07, 2011, 09:52:26 PM
All this panic is amusing to me. I'd rather see what attacks can be accomplished and how the community can recover from a successful attack. That way, when people ask "what happens if..." we can say "it did happen and we survived it". Of course, some people are a little over-invested and don't find it amusing at all.
1237  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I will admit something... on: June 07, 2011, 01:53:57 PM
WE own everything perhaps, but that includes you.

I subscribe to a different theory of property rights than you.

Yes, I suppose you do.
"I own whatever I use" was it? Homesteading and stuff?
I'd be rich if I lived in your world.  Grin

I'm not sure if you're joking or if you are actually ignorant of Libertarian property rights. There's two way to obtain property, homesteading, which is mixing your labor with unowned property, land, natural resources, whatever, and legitimate title transfer, barter, gifts, gambling. It's hard to see how you'll be rich through mixing your labor with anything unless it's just through diligent hard work. You can't go plant four flags at the corners of Nevada and claim you own it. You actually have to do something with the unowned property you claim, farm, mine, or even study ecology by recording it but not altering it. So, how exactly would you be "rich" in "my" world? You'd be richer since you wouldn't be forced to give money to the government which does everything inefficiently and has little to no incentive to improve.
1238  Other / Politics & Society / Re: I will admit something... on: June 06, 2011, 11:25:04 PM
WE own everything perhaps, but that includes you.

I subscribe to a different theory of property rights than you.
1239  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Secession of the Confederate States of America on: June 06, 2011, 05:46:31 PM
I agree with that statement.

Then the debate is over. We agree.
1240  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Deepbit Approaching 50% Once Again on: June 05, 2011, 11:49:56 PM
DDoSing? Man, you're thinking small. A pool that has 51% of the hashing power, besides everything else mentioned here, can also simply ignore blocks made by anyone else, effectively making their pool the ONLY way to mine. And this is the scariest attack their is, since unlike double-spending which is short-term, this would cause long-term problems if a pool was able to maintain their majority hashing power long enough to stop people from mining for nothing in other pools.

The reason why people join pools is to make money. If you shake confidence in BTC, it will become worthless. Why would any pool do this? You can say that the pool operator might start doing it but miners would leave in droves.
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!