95 accounts for trust bombing? Really?

Why don't we ban as he/she is clearly spamming. I mean there is ban for post_spam and PM_spam, so why not a ban for "trust_spam"? This will increase if no action is taken and of course, never want a trust moderation. The trust feedback can stay there.

Yes, self-moderated threads are bad for sales but there can be good intentions too(not saying FuckIdolPlus has/had good/bad intention).

P.S. You can clearly understand what does the forum warning mean. IMHO you have a few misunderstandings but you aren't ready to ask them.

To try to clear things up. That's what people are supposed to do in a scam accusation. Unfortunately you weren't helpful so I had to give up.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1012548.msg10990891#msg10990891

]haha wow that is a lot of negative feedback. Well I guess we now know who was behind all those spam negatives that Vod got not long ago. None of them have any credibility though, especially considering that they all have negative trust

I just left a review noting symantec hacks websites to steal keys and resell them (after he publicly admitted so) and I instantly got trust spam from several accounts, very similarly as OP. So I'm pretty sure he's the one who left that spam for OP too.

I don't think Skype actually makes you confirm your email address so it is possible that the email was just randomly input when the Skype was created.

Do those Facebook accounts actually have an association with that email address? I understand that Facebook assigns the username based on the name of the person when they sign up so I think it would be unusual for someone to use a Skype handle that is the same of an essentially randomly assigned username by Facebook

You exploit Microsoft too. What's the difference?

Muhammad Zakir - what makes you think this is a false scam accusation? Unless I'm missing something, symantec has provided a good amount of logs proving so.

So status on my PSN card?

I have 0.1btc , what's your rate?

ajw7989 locked his MSDN thread and promised to stop selling keys.  I have removed his negative trust.

You're both wrong.    I don't have a competing business selling MSDN codes and I haven't been paid anything.  

In any case, I feel this debate has resolved itself.  Have a good day.  

I need supplier of steam wallet cards and other codes.
I have a website since 2009, i need a serious person.

My Skype: j.montiel.d

Thanks

Most likely this is dealing in stolen goods...it doesn't take
a genius to figure that out.

Tecshare, you wouldn't know "evidence" if it bit you
in the ass.  What evidence do you have that the world
is round?  Everything is "speculation" according to you.

Blame Vod with all your compliments!

I would like to take a moment to dispell the notion that MSDN keys sold on the forum are taken from stolen retail MSDN accounts that cost some hapless souls thousands upon thousands of dollars.

Please familiarize yourself with the Microsoft Bizspark program. Under the Bizspark program you just need to set up a shell company with a website and declare yourself to be some kind of startup that intends to be a Microsoft soutions provider or ISV. You then send an application to Microsoft's Bizspark program which requires a $100 application fee. If your application looks legit enough, Microsoft will admit your company into the Bizspark program which lasts 3 years.

This entitles you to 1 Bizspark admin account which in turn can invite up to 4 other sub-accounts.  The main account and sub accounts each are entitled to 3 years worth of the MSDN Ultimate subscription, plus $150 of monthly Azure credits. So basically for $100 and a litlle know-how you get 3 years worth of 5x MSDN Ultimate subscriptions easily worth $180K retail if purchased on a yearly basis. Most of if not all of the keys, invites and admin accounts (well, of course) sold on this forum are from the Bizspark program.

So nobody is losing thousands of dollars from the sale of these MSDN keys.