Promote your faucet on FaucetHub at a low price (maximum is 1000 sats) or add it to their faucet list.
Besides that, you should consider promoting your faucet here in this section, since people are particularly looking here to gather cryptocurrencies.
Thank you man, do you know any good list service. I tried on faucet hub with premium acc. But nothing gained. Did you try through faucet lists? It should be mentioned that faucet links increase the traffic to your faucet - in case there is an incentive to visit your faucet, e.g. referral program. |
|
|
|
|
Promote your faucet on FaucetHub at a low price (maximum is 1000 sats) or add it to their faucet list.
Besides that, you should consider promoting your faucet here in this section, since people are particularly looking here to gather cryptocurrencies.
|
|
|
|
I am curious where these Bitcore stickers are available because I found one on a trash can in my city.  |
|
|
|
Does anyone know HITBtc withdrawal fee for csno last time I checked it was like 15 csno
At the present time, HitBTC charges 85 CSNO withdrawal fee. |
|
|
|
Really depends if you are going to hold the coins for the long term, or you are going to daily use them.
If you are using them daily, I would go with electrum wallet- an open source PC based wallet that allows you to both hold private keys and release transactions, the wallet is being encrhpted with a password that you set on the opening.
On the other hand, if you are looking to hold coins for the long term, then I would suggest you to generate a private key on an offline device and to store it on a piece of paper or a flash drive, that would be the safest way to handle the coins!.
I am not quite sure if Electrum is the safe haven as a wallet. For remarkable amounts, I would reject Electrum. Preferably, I would use the official Litecoin Wallet since the blockchain size of Litecoin amounts to 16 gigabytes, and its features promise more security. |
|
|
|
Looking at the price of the Bitdice token, I thought that something happened to him. (scam., developer escape or arrest as a center). After reading the last few pages, I realized that everything seems to be all right. Is this so? or something I do not know?)
Exactly, everything is right - no scam or anything related to this. Reasons for the downside pressure is the collapse of the cryptocurrency market within the past quarter. Along with other cryptocurrencies, BitDice saw a decline in its price. Perhaps most notably, the awaited low dividends for the first quarter set a decline in the price. |
|
|
|
|
That was a question I have asked myself around a month ago and thereby did a research about Ice Rock Mining.
The director of the project has ties other companies besides Ice Rock Mining. I am pretty sure it is three companies linked to him.
Another point is the ICO in general. Currently, they are running the second fundraising for "Mining" in the rock. Most notably, anything considered to the first fundraising, such as proven payments or customers, was not findable neither here or on another site.
Perhaps the customers did not receive any payment because according to their roadmap, it says that their mining farm will be started in the midst of the year.
In my conclusion, I would decline the project because they are not transparent and their returns are unsustainable.
|
|
|
|
|
I use HitBTC for buying Tokens since it is the only market for Ethereum tokens, second to Etherdelta. I like its design and simplicity of HitBTC. However, the fees when depositing and withdraw are pretty ridiculous, they charge roughly $16 when withdrawing tokens.
|
|
|
|
If no fee is given, a transaction with an optimal fee according to the size and network traffic will be sent. Otherwise, if a custom-fee is given which can be done like the example on the below, you overwrite the fee amount. var transaction = new Transaction()
.from(utxos) // Feed information about what unspent outputs one can use
.to(address, amount) // Add an output with the given amount of satoshis
.change(address) // Sets up a change address where the rest of the funds will go
.sign(privkeySet) // Signs all the inputs it can
var transaction = new Transaction().fee(5430); // Minimum non-dust amount
var transaction = new Transaction().fee(1e8); // Generous fee of 1 BTC To record this transaction on the blockchain, you have to serialize the variable transaction, and thereby, push to the network through https://blockchain.info/pushtx. Source: https://bitcore.io/api/lib/transaction |
|
|
|
Anybody know when BitDice will distribute dividends?
I am excited for the first dividends!
They are going to distribute the dividends between the 20 and 25 of January. |
|
|
|
Bitdice has a good price now. After ICO, the price did not sink, but - on the contrary - it increased. A great development team.
Yes. Price has always been good. The only problem is volume is pretty low and the token is only on one exchange HitBTC. I don't really like that exchange and I wish it was on another platform. But, I am not looking to sell anytime soon. Particularly HitBTC and EtherDelta are the exchanges whose fee is not the lowest in the market - a barrier for small investors who may be willing to put nuts in CSNO. |
|
|
|
|
I bought this package a couple of weeks ago and I'm satisfied how quickly the order went through. Any cloud app is available to use, as described.
|
|
|
|
BitCaptcha has been integratedBesides reCaptcha, you can enable BitCaptcha as your second captcha or main captcha. It is available to download on JaguarBitcoin. To join BitCaptcha, go to the website http://bitcaptcha.io. You can find the demo here.
|
|
|
|
|
You should think about restarting your wireless router, that might set a new IP address, and you can visit BTC.com without a barrier.
|
|
|
|
To be honest, it's a shame to remove the original fee license and set own fees, as it is a violation and considers as stealing.
Leaving the original fee - as others do - in the script or doing a one-time payment clears this situation.
I've contributed the script to the publicity in order for a compensation and thereby keeping the service alive.
No it's not considered stealing. What service are you keeping alive? I could (no offense) care less about your personal faucet. You don't deserve compensation for what is, at this point, considered to be a new application. That compensation should be, and currently is, mine. Read your own license in your GitHub if you don't believe me. I have done no wrong, and the real members of the open source community will back me up. If your license doesn't prohibit something, I am free to do it as long as it is open source. I made a legitimately useful derivative work of yours, which I believe is better, and I can do whatever I want with it. If people want to modify yours to include my functionality, they can and I have no problem with that. But if they want to use my pre-created one, that's their choice to make. It's not like nobody else can do what I have done. I am just dedicated to make it super convenient to switch. In addition, I created more useful features that people may want in a faucet, and have fixed your buggy code quite a bit (although there is still more work I need to do on it). If so, I could simply delete the project and/or provide a script with a backdoor. That's why there is the fee, openly on Github and declared. However, the license (MIT) requires the license and copyright which includes the fee. At all, part of the compensation should belong to me because the most part of the script, the structure, is coded by me and not your. Mentioning "hard work" is the wrong way. |
|
|
|
|
To be honest, it's a shame to remove the original fee license and set own fees, as it is a violation and considers as stealing.
Leaving the original fee - as others do - in the script or doing a one-time payment clears this situation.
I've contributed the script to the publicity in order for a compensation and thereby keeping the service alive.
|
|
|
|
|
These people are mixing their BTCs in a complex process which makes unable to trace the funds in this process and/or in which address they will end up. You have to trace using their domain name because there are associated data.
|
|
|
|
It's simply not all effort you put in this script because the backend of the script is this or my original script. |
|
|
|
Strange that ICN price is tanking further.
November AMA is not really convincing, but I didn't really expect anything to be honest.
Probably there will be a bit of a delay in releasing the platform. I hope to have some good news by jan/feb next year...
Strange? Have you seen the Q3 numbers? With Q3 rate it will take 222 years to burn all the ICN tokens but only a few years to use all ICO money for operational expenses and only if they will not use more ICO money to fund their pet project and not loose more money due their technical incompetence. They have already spent $57M ICO money to launch their private companies Columbus Capital and Cofound.it from which ICN investors have nothing, no fees, nothing. You basically gave your money so they can play with it and you are getting no return. They've also lost all Eth, $36M due to Parity bug, so from $120M ICO money they have less than $30M left. That's not true. Iconomi said in the Q2 to use less money to burn tokens for the Q3 and what happened? More Tokens were burnt in the Q3 than Q2, although the allocated money is much lower but the low price played the big role. |
|
|
|
Is this still working with faucethub api and everything?
Yes. it is still working the script. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
