Nice concept   Men or woman.. We all love expensive stones right?  

Can you take a photograph of the picasso documents and the "gems" with your bitcointalk username and date on a piece of paper?


Edit:

You really have some good looking diamonds there mate..

No thnx... Not interested  I just want to see a sourcecode.. nothing more... nothing less...

Dude... That is the timelimit you are able to withdraw your btc.. Isnt it? 

Lol... After last night when the dev anounced the source and other wallets will be online within 24hrs I already dumped my little giftbag. No source.. No party dev   Uploading the source takes 5 minutes max.. not 24hrs.. Updates or not.. One must never release the wallet without the sourcecode!

You do realise a lot of people in crypto use Linux and Macs and compile themselves right? Creating a github and pushing the source only takes about 5 minutes... I only have about 5000 Coins which I recieved from a good friend as a gift. But I really need the source to compile for linux...

Source dev?

And maybe a website with some more future related info?

Sighs... One of the basic things you need to change when forking a coin... How is it possible nobody noticed this sooner?  

Hardfork it is then..

edit:

How about we add a few more hardcoded seeds?




And are we certain these are Karma only? Or do other coins have these as well.. Google didnt help me much on this one



All located here: https://github.com/karmateam/karma/blob/master-0.8/src/net.cpp

Misschien moet ik dan toch maar eens GuldenCoin gaan aanschaffen.. Ik lees behoorlijk goede dingen hier De prijs lijkt zeer stabiel.. Al maanden met kleine ups and downs. Petje af voor de NLG Community


Cheers,

Banzai

No Im not a paid fudder... Can you get paid for that nowadays? awesome!  


"it is my last post in the thread"
I did typ this, and I did delete the line... I dont see any reason for you to take the effort of looking that up..   Sometimes people change their minds.. That is how the world works

Anyway.. The dev is ignoring all serious questions, I think that answers all of our questions at once atm


Oh yeah, perhaps you should quote my entire post. But I will speculate some more... np.


1. Like I said... It might be a complete new "bug" in the code...
2. Or if we should believe the dev team, they really paid $40K for renting hashes   If that is true.. A dump is on its way
3. Dev team is owner of a cloudmining company. Looking for alternative ways to generate profit nowadays  

I think option 3 is possible... When you think about it... It isnt even a strange idea... Many cloudmining companies went bust the last few months because of the low btc prices

A code review has nothing to do with speculating where the hashes are coming from at this point

He already said he checked the code. Even if there is something wrong in the source, it might be a thing that has never been seen before.. Time will tell right?  

I agree with you dude... Exact same story as BitcoinT   Probably the same guy... Take a look at the op.. Created in the same "style" as BitcoinT

And dont forget their self claimed $40K rented hashing power from "on hold" cloud mining companies Even if that is true... Prepare for a $40K rented hashing coin dump

But hey... People we're calling me a fudder on BitcoinT too  

Take a look at this.. It will crack you up  



Such imagination!  

LMAO! BitcoinT all over again! Same style used in the OP.. Same free vectors used for desiging the OP!  

Goodluck losing money guys!  

Truth is you are aiming for a 60btc marketcap. Else you would not price the coins at 150 sat each. Having said that, you are asking $13K for a simple clone coin, which takes about 1 hour to create.

I can create you a coin with all kinds of crazy and not needed walllet functions for ~1btc, and then I am already overpriced compared to the others on here. 

Think twice before investing randomly in ICOs people!

The more reason for people not to buy this. You think we trust Yobit's judgement on the sourcecode? You mad?  If its a copy paste and the source is clean on bad intentions, yes of course they will list it. That does not mean you delivered a high quality code and worked your ass off to deserve these 60btc ICO funds 

If a chain is stuck for 7 hours because there are no POS blocks generated. There are a few options that can cause this.

1. A bug in the code (Did you check Placebo?)
2. The amount of people staking is almost 0
3a. The min stake age is set to high (with almost nobody staking, it takes a damn while before the handfull of people have mature coins again)
3b. Teach people about coin control! Instead of staking with your full balance, and generating 1 stake block. People can select smaller inputs for staking which causes the network to generate more pos blocks 

This came to mind very quick. I might have missed a few other points



Cheers,


Banzai

Lol that is some funny stuff


You know the next bitcoin could be created by a newbie account right? It is your choice if you mine/buy it or not... There is nothing wrong with a newbie creating an announcement... The people who are wrong are the ones who mine/buy every shitcoin that gets released.






So this is 100% ICO right? Why the fuck cant we see the sourcecode then? Who on earth keeps buying ICO coins without a chance to look at the sourcecode? For all we know this is just a simple copy/paste clone which takes about 1 hour to create 

any news dev?

HAHAHAHA This cracked me up big time 

Look at the way they talk.. OUR CRYPTOWOLD, OUR INVESTORS, OUR MONEY

LMFAO! Thanks to dumb shits like them crypto is still an embryo.

Still holding all my GEO, en not planning to sell them any time soon! 

Thnx for the PM dev  Really usefull for lazy people like me who dont check threads everyday 

Wallet and masternode updated