IXC can be traded on the Stellar platform against Stellar Lumens (XLM) or DeVCoins (DVC) or really actually against any other asset that is on the Stellar platform. For IXC on the Stellar platform see http://makemoney.knotwork.com/stellar/ixc/ ( Explorer: https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/asset/IXC-GBHAQ252S4Z4AQOM4BWIRC3UHAOJIKCZQBUJGD336YH2O7W2NKRXMHA5 ) For DVC on the Stellar platform see http://makemoney.knotwork.com/stellar/dvc/ (Explorer: https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/asset/DVC-GBHAQ252S4Z4AQOM4BWIRC3UHAOJIKCZQBUJGD336YH2O7W2NKRXMHA5 ) Someone asked why IXC has been climbing in value lately... Part of it initially was probably the simple fact that in the Galactic Milieu IXC is, like many other currencies in the Milieu, a treasury-based currency. That means the Ixians have a "treasury" of other currencies and assets so that the Milieu can add up the total value of that "treasury" and divide the total by the number of IXCoins that have been minted, to calculate a "value per IXCoin". A look at the Latest Rates include-file http://galaxies.mygamesonline.org/latestrates.inc (which by default is denominated in DeVCoins but is formatted for use in scripts to make it simple to re-compute all the values in terms of any of the assets shown or, in fact, in terms of any arbitrary value) is right now showing me IXCrate=557.34637854 meaning that based on the value of IXC's treasury and the number of IXCoins minted, and the value of DVC's treasury and the number of DVC minted, one IXCoin is worth 557.34637854 DeVCoins. Obviously until someone implements a treasury for, for example, BiTCoin or LiTeCoin or Stellar Lumens or American Dollars or whatever other thing you'd like to compare to, we cannot compute values for those not-treasury-based items, so the figures shown for them are necessarily just current prices on exchanges, probably according to some site along the lines of CoinMarketCap, at the time the include-file was generated. I see in that same interation of the Latest Rates include-file BTCrate=116691274.10194629 meaning that at the time the file was calculated one BiTCoin was supposedly worth 116691274.10194629 DeVCoins although of course that would tend to change moment to moment at the whims of spot markets such as "exchanges" since it is not based on a "treasury". It is probably useful to bear in mind that "treasuries" are accompanied by one or more "slush funds" also, if only because we do not count a coin into its own treasury's value. Even if the IXCoin treasury contained any IXCoins, their value for the purpose of computing the total value of the treasury would be counted as zero. Thus the "slush fund", a separate account in which the Ixians can store any IXCoins they happen to own, along with any other "operating capital", "petty cash", assets that are deprecated for "treasury" use such as anything the treasury total value calculation does not take into account (things that are not considered to be "reserve currencies" or "reserve assets" for example) and so on and so on. Just like my policy of only issuing tokens representing half of the coins I actually have, we are also working toward only having half of a nation, Corp etc's wealth go in its treasury; the goal is to build up the "slush funds" to total at least as much value as the "treasury", so that a nation, Corp or whatever that issues a treasury-based currency can buy back every coin it ever minted using just its slush funds, not touching its treasury to do so. That way when/if they ever do manage to buy back all the coins minted those coins will still have the same treasury-based value they had before they bought them all back. -MarkM- |
|
|
|
IXC can be traded on the Stellar platform against Stellar Lumens (XLM) or DeVCoins (DVC) or really actually against any other asset that is on the Stellar platform. For IXC on the Stellar platform see http://makemoney.knotwork.com/stellar/ixc/ ( Explorer: https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/asset/IXC-GBHAQ252S4Z4AQOM4BWIRC3UHAOJIKCZQBUJGD336YH2O7W2NKRXMHA5 ) For DVC on the Stellar platform see http://makemoney.knotwork.com/stellar/dvc/ (Explorer: https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/asset/DVC-GBHAQ252S4Z4AQOM4BWIRC3UHAOJIKCZQBUJGD336YH2O7W2NKRXMHA5 ) Someone asked why IXC has been climbing in value lately... Part of it initially was probably the simple fact that in the Galactic Milieu IXC is, like many other currencies in the Milieu, a treasury-based currency. That means the Ixians have a "treasury" of other currencies and assets so that the Milieu can add up the total value of that "treasury" and divide the total by the number of IXCoins that have been minted, to calculate a "value per IXCoin". A look at the Latest Rates include-file http://galaxies.mygamesonline.org/latestrates.inc (which by default is denominated in DeVCoins but is formatted for use in scripts to make it simple to re-compute all the values in terms of any of the assets shown or, in fact, in terms of any arbitrary value) is right now showing me IXCrate=557.34637854 meaning that based on the value of IXC's treasury and the number of IXCoins minted, and the value of DVC's treasury and the number of DVC minted, one IXCoin is worth 557.34637854 DeVCoins. Obviously until someone implements a treasury for, for example, BiTCoin or LiTeCoin or Stellar Lumens or American Dollars or whatever other thing you'd like to compare to, we cannot compute values for those not-treasury-based items, so the figures shown for them are necessarily just current prices on exchanges, probably according to some site along the lines of CoinMarketCap, at the time the include-file was generated. I see in that same interation of the Latest Rates include-file BTCrate=116691274.10194629 meaning that at the time the file was calculated one BiTCoin was supposedly worth 116691274.10194629 DeVCoins although of course that would tend to change moment to moment at the whims of spot markets such as "exchanges" since it is not based on a "treasury". It is probably useful to bear in mind that "treasuries" are accompanied by one or more "slush funds" also, if only because we do not count a coin into its own treasury's value. Even if the IXCoin treasury contained any IXCoins, their value for the purpose of computing the total value of the treasury would be counted as zero. Thus the "slush fund", a separate account in which the Ixians can store any IXCoins they happen to own, along with any other "operating capital", "petty cash", assets that are deprecated for "treasury" use such as anything the treasury total value calculation does not take into account (things that are not considered to be "reserve currencies" or "reserve assets" for example) and so on and so on. Just like my policy of only issuing tokens representing half of the coins I actually have, we are also working toward only having half of a nation, Corp etc's wealth go in its treasury; the goal is to build up the "slush funds" to total at least as much value as the "treasury", so that a nation, Corp or whatever that issues a treasury-based currency can buy back every coin it ever minted using just its slush funds, not touching its treasury to do so. That way when/if they ever do manage to buy back all the coins minted those coins will still have the same treasury-based value they had before they bought them all back. -MarkM- |
|
|
|
Hi, your thread title says you are, among other things, an NFT protocol, that is what brought me here. I am looking at NFTs for potential use in games. Thus obviously one of the first questions I need to ask of NFT platforms is what free open source tools are available to enable the use of NFTs based on their platform in various kinds of game. The kinds of games I am thinking of currently include CoffeeMUD, FreeCiv, Crossfire-RPG, web-based things such as "O-game clones" and maybe even Battle for Wesnoth, also possibly Spring-based games such as ZeroK. Really this is for the Galactic Milieu; the above examples are merely examples of some of the platforms the Milieu uses or is considering using as viewports/rabbitholes onto/into the Mlieu. Probably most useful to start with would be shell scripts or things useable in shell scripts; tools allowing one to write a shell script to for example monitor a blockchain watching for any NFT items used in any of the games currenlty running, check that their owner is still the same character in the same game, and if not call some other script that will have some way of informing the affected game of the change. Actually something similar dealing with actual player-accounts might be useful too, so if a NFT representing a particular player-account in a particular game changes hands the script can call some other script that knows how to tell that game to kick off the player who no longer owns the token if they are online in that game, and change their password to prevent them logging in. That last part makes me realise also that it would be useful if the NFT platform had already put a lot of thought into how one could use their tokens to let the new owner of the token somehow be sent the password of what they just bought, or have some tool that somehow lets someone present such a token at attempted log-in and get to assign a password to what they just bought themselves. I guess I will be going around in this forum from NFT-platform to NFT-platform posting this or similar, hoping there is an NFT platform here somewhere that is actually "game ready" as it were so I can go ahead and use it... Basically if I am going to use NFT tokens at all I need to figure out which NFT platform's tokens are most suitable to use... -MarkM- |
|
|
|
OK so lets continue that story. Tom, Dick and Harry now each owe Joe some so-called loonies, because they "issued" them to him. Which is to say, he has a bunch of IOUs, or as some call them, tokens, called loonies, a bunch of different loonies in that each of those loonie-IOUs is from a particular "issuer" of loonie-IOUs. Now Joe, as far as we know so far, is not yet an "issuer" of so called "loonies" himself yet. So, thinking about inviting Vlad to the group's next get-together and knowing that Vlad likes to use so called IXC, Joe tells his account to trust Vlad for some number of IXC then sets up buy offers pairing Vlad-IXC against Tom-loonies, Dick-loonies and Harry-loonies, since those are what he currently has on hand. Along comes Vlad. He is going to go to lunch with those guys at their local watering-hole. He has heard the story so he knows those guys use so-called loonies, and he also knows that Joe trusts Tom's loonies and also Dick's loonies and also Harry's loonies. Vlad decides he might as well introduce those guys to IXCoin. So Vlad, knowing that Joe is a "hub" for loonies in that crowd, finds out Joe's account and tells his to trust it for "loonies". Heh heh see what he did there? He made Joe, too, into an "issuer" of loonies! Now that he trusts Joe-loonies, he can set up trade offers involving Joe-loonies. Hopefully since Joe is a hub for all those other issuers of loonies Vlad can get away with only having to set up one trust-line for loonies, trusting Joe for them; Joe can be his gateway in and out of loonieville hopefully so that he does not need to separately trust each and every one of all those other guys who issue "loonies". Afterall he knows Joe trusts them, so he can let Joe field all the loonies business for him. So they all go to lunch. This time it turns out to be Tom's turn to cover the bill. So everyone else needs to send Tom some kind of IOU that he'll accept. Joe, of course, can send back to Tom Tom's own loonies, if he has enough to cover his share of today's bill. Tom decides to trust Dick and Harry for "loonies", just like Joe did last time. They are thus able to issue loonies to him. Ah but Vlad, Vlad. This is when he makes his IXC pitch... ... "Sorry but I am not really into the idea of issuing loonies," he says, "so how about either you trust me for IXC, or maybe Joe will trust me for IXC and I'll trade him some IXC IOUs for some loonies IOUs he issues himself? I should point out though Joe that it can be a very useful practice to use a second account when you issue things, so you can issue them to yourself. If you create a second account, and have that new account trust your current account for loonies, you will then be able to have that new account make buy and sell offers, offering to sell Dick-loonies for Joe-loonies and to sell Harry-loonies for Joe-loonies. Heck, set up an offer to sell Tom-loonies for Joe-loonies too while you're at it. Now if you actually issue yourself - your new account - some Joe-loonies, you will have a Joe-loonies balance so that you can offer to buy Tom-loonies, Dick-loonies and Harry-loonies using Joe-loonies. Presto, you are now a conversion hub! Anyone whose client supports "pathfinding" conversion between IOUs (or maybe they call them currencies, or tokens, whatever) should hopefully be able to ask to convert any of those kinds of loonies into any other of those kinds of loonies and the "pathfinder" will find the cheapest path to go from one to the other. Unfortunately some clients might only do pathfinding through things that have "reasonable" volume and spread, but oh well what can I say, some clients are broken compared to the original vision of how this stuff was meant to work. Now if Joe will set up an offer to buy IXC for Joe-loonies, any time any of you guys wants me to send you any of your various types of loonies I should be able to tell my client I want to send one of your various kinds of loonies and a path should be found whereby my IXC goes through however many people in-between as it takes to end up with the loonies you trust getting to you. That is how it is supposed to work, anyway. If these puny little phone-apps can't handle that, then at least hopefully I can sell Joe enough IXC to have him send Tom my share of the bill in some flavour of loonies that Tom trusts? Oh and by the way, Tom, if I can convince Joe to sell me some Joe-loonies for my Vlad-IXC, I'll be able to buy Vlad-IXC using Joe-loonies in the future so if anyone sends you any Vlad-IXC you can sell them to me for Joe-loonies, so I suggest you set up to trust Joe-loonies even though today he had enough other kinds of loonies to pay his share of the bill thus you didn't have to set up to trust his own-issued loonies..." ... Complicated? Nahhh...  -MarkM- |
|
|
|
Yikes!!! Well, i try to remove my corn and do underground super cold storage.  That said, when do you think there’s gonna Be an easy app for regular Joe to use stellar and horizon? If you do not leave at least the buy-side coin on the exchange though, then all the reporting sites and such are going to say your coin is worthless, because they do not see a strong buy-side; most of them seem to show the highest buy offer, not the last actual trade that happened maybe weeks or months ago, as the current price/value I think? I suspect that for an easy app, the app has to basically point users at specific assets. For example there are very likely Stellar apps that are extremely easy to use to send and receive XLM, Stellar Lumens, Stellar's native currency. Desktop and web-based apps I have seen also tend to list some trusted token-issuers and/or some trusted tokens, based on what the app creators trust; though probably if they are not themselves those issuers likely they have fine-print of some kind warning that they do not legally actually recommend those things, certainly not as "investments", and their lists should not be mistaken for "investment advice" and so on. So maybe you just need to get an app-developer to make an app that does not confuse users by admitting any tokens other than yours exist, and maybe doesn't even bother providing them with the option of trusting any others but yours, even maybe requiring an update of the app to make any more tokens you later want to add become accessible to them. Any off the shelf app that does allow the user to decide what account to trust for what label/ticker/token/asset/coin though is just as simple to use for our tokens as for any other tokens that the app it not basically "pushing", although the more volume of trade a token has, and the less the gap ("spread") between its lowest sell offer and its highest buy offer, the more likely it is that users will be able to "discover" the token by searching, since some only show in searches "reasonably high-use low-spread" tokens, requiring the user to already know of a token+issuer pair to specify if that particular token from that particular issuer does not meet the criteria for discovering it by searching for it. Given that you know the issuing account and label of the asset you want to work with though, which in my case you can discover by browsing http://makemoney.knotwork.com/ , there are several clients that work just fine. So I think more important than ease of use of clients is ease of discovery that our tokens even exist and what account issues them. Given that, I do not think which client someone uses is much of a problem, other than clients that do not allow users to specify the label and issuer to use and/or do not give access to markets. (The Stellar wallet built into Keybase does not seem to do either; if you have set up trust lines for an account it can receive and send the assets the account does trust, but you cannot add arbitrary trust-lines as far as I can tell and does not seem to provide access to trading, just to sending and receiving.) Bear in mind that the original concept behind Ripple and thus Stellar, before Ripple Corp bought the name Ripple and the concept from its original developer, was that a bunch of average Joes sitting around drinking beer or having lunch can say "who brought cash or card to pay the bill?" and one of them can say "oh thats me today, here, I'll tell my app to trust each of you for, uh, what do we want to measure this in? Should I trust each of you for some number of meals? Or some number of beers? Or shall we track it in dollars? Oh heck lets just call it loonies being as how we are in Canada, eh? Each of you tell me your account and I'll trust it for oh lets say one hundred loonies. OK, done, now when you go to send me something it should tell you that one of the possibly many things I accept is called loonies. See it there in your apps? OK, now what your app is probably not telling you is that you are an issuer of those loonies! You can each send me up to 100 of them even though your balances do not show you have any of them, and very likely your app is not even telling you that you are able to issue them and maybe also not how many of them my account is willing to accept from you. So anyway, divvy up the bill and send me your share in these so-called loonies that you have magically gained the ability to issue due to my having chosen to trust each of you for some of them..." -MarkM- |
|
|
|
But that would mean exchanging my ixc coins for ixc tokens. Not a good deal for me. And until stellar and horizon become user friendly I doubt many people will go for it. I got my corn buried deep and wide so not too worried unless the feds want them, but then again, they print and steal trillions with no questions asked so buying what they want is trivial.
You do realise that unless there is some kind of "atomic swap between blockchains" app that supports the IXCoin blockchain and some other blockchain you want to trade against, you always ARE exchanging your IXC coins for at best IXC tokens and at normal mere database entries in an undistributed database at the exchange's site or server? That is to say, on normal exchanges when you deposit IXCoins they usually do not even give you IXC tokens to play with, all you usually get is a "balance" recorded in a MySQL or PostGres or whatever kind of database they use to record customer info and balances. So if tokens are not a good deal for you presumably mere database entries are a far worse deal? -MarkM- |
|
|
|
I wonder how much they would pay for each IXC...
Divide the value shown for each other item into the value shown for IXCrate to find the value of IXC in terms of that other thing. Note though of course that things that do not have a "treasury" to calculate their value from, but instead find their value by volume-averaging the prices on a bunch of "exchanges", cannot be relied upon to still be worth the same amount as they were back when the Latest Rates were last uploaded, and also of course that different nations / currencies / Corps / players / etc have different things in their purses or Slush Funds or whatever with which to buy stuff; and quite likely many will prefer to use their own currency such as if you want to sell to the Brits they are likely to want to pay you with United Kingdom Britcoin (UKB), General Mining Corp would probably assume they'd be buying with GMC, the Canucks would likely tend to use Canadian Digital Notes (CDN) and so on; also of course those that have their currency on a normal web-based "exchange" such as you are likely used to, will probably already have committed all that they have of whatever it is paired against into building a buy-side there for their coin, assuming they even bother about such "exchanges" instead of simply placing their offers on the HORIZON or even the Stellar platform... Currently on Stellar hardly any of these coins have sold much against XLM yet, so hardly any of them have managed to build up their XLM buy-sides. Very few of the coins are on versus-BTC exchanges currently, you presumably already know about DVC, IXC and I0C on FreiExchange, you can see there that so far the amount of bitcoin that has so far been spent there to buy them has not so far been enough to build up theier buy-sides to the Latest Rates values yet. As has been demonstrated repeatedly in the past though it is just a matter of time to get them built up more, and unfortunately historically it seems likely it is also just a matter of time before the exchange runs off with both sides of the pair, possibly claiming it was hacked... So who knows how might we will manage to build them this time around before the coins all go "poof"... The nice thing about Stellar is we can build our buy-sides there wih XLM and there is no "third party" that can fly by night with our XLM. So at least one side of those pairs is secure as long as the Stellar platform itself, and whatever client we use to acces it, is secure. For me, both sides are secure in the cases where I am the issuer of the token side of such a pair. -MarkM- |
|
|
|
It is still possible that oodles of IXCoin lost to fly-by-night or hacked exchanges are "out there" still yet to be dumped, yes. But a lot of dumping has happened overall already, so maybe quite a bit of the stolen IXCoin has already long been dumped. Then too, bear in mind that IXCoin is one of the "treasury based" currencies of the Galactic Milieu. Because the game cannot rely upon always having enough actively-arbitraging players constantly active on all the markets, each currency paired against each other currency, the "treasuries" system is used so the game can compute the relative values of all the currencies. It does this by adding up the values of everything in the currency's "treasury" and dividing that total by the number of that coin that has been minted. Notice that is the number MINTED, not the number still actively in play / in circulation. That means for purposes of the Milieu's calculation of a currency's relative value keeping a bunch of that currency out of circulation does NOT affect the calculation, despite the fact doing so might well put upward pressure on "spot market" prices by limiting the available "supply" able to get onto such "spot markets" to be sold and thus the "supply" available on spot markets to be bought. This calculation of values based on "treasury" holdings is run over and over and over again, comparing its resulting " Latest Rates include-file" against the previous one until "diff latestrates.inc latestrates.old" finds the previous one and the current one are identical. That means if any of the "reserve currencies" used in the "treasuries" change value, their changed value is applied to all the other "treasuries" and the calculation is run again; if any of those changed, their change is reflected in the next run around the loop, effecting all currencies having the changed one(s) in their own "treasuries"; and so on, round and round and round until they all come out unchanged from one run to the next. That looping simulates an "efficient market", that is, a market in which everyone has full information and in which arbitrageurs efficiently balance out discrepancies. The resulting "Latest Rates include file" thus shows values that work in all directions between all pairings of the currencies; for Open Transactions we had shell-scripts that included that file and automatically posted buy and sell offers of each currency against each other currency on three scales of how many coins in a bundle, so that like with porkbellies or cans of soup you could have different price-per-unit depending on whether you were buying individual items, packages of ten, packages of 100, packages of 1000 and so on. That way players could buy, say, 100000 at a time on the large scale market and resell at a profit in batches of 10000 at a time on the next-smaller market, or 1000 at a time on the next-next-smaller market and so on. The scripts used three scales for each pair and marked up their asking price or marked down their offering price from the values in the include-file by a smaller percentage the larger the market, like maybe 1% if you buy 100,000 at a time, 2% if you buy only 10,000, 3% if you buy 1000 at a time kind of thing. Having these conversion-rates means all the major entities in the game can freely convert between currencies without having to somehow keep enough players active on each and every currency-pair's markets for organic "price-discovery" to take place. It means sellers of things and services in the game can accept any of the currencies they choose to, and, perhaps unfortunately, debtors can pay off their loans using any of the currencies without having to go through "spot markets" to try to convert their payment into the currency their loan is denominated in. I said "perhaps unfortunately" there because for years now we in the DeVCoin project (DVC, another coin merged-mined right alongside BTC, IXC, I0C, CLC, GRP XGG etc) have speculated that if the vast amount of DeVCoin-denominated debt insisted on being paid IN ACTUAL DeVCoins, the amount of debt-paying constantly going on would likely cause massive pressure on any "spot markets" where folks can buy DeVCoins using other coins or currencies. On the other hand, even if all the DeVCoins being constantly minted were all made available in the game for debtors whose loans are denominated in DeVCoins to buy up and use to make loan payments, there might not be enough! So basically the Latest Rates include-file came about partly because waiting for players to actively trade each and every currency against, for example. DeVCoin so that debtors owing DeVCoins could use whatever coins they were earning to buy DeVCoins to make loan payments was simply not practical. Now another thing to consider is that the calculation of value based on "treasury" does not count a currency's own coins if any of its own coins did happen to be in its treasury. Nowadays probably all the treasuries don't actually contain any of their own coin, but even if they did the calculation treats the value of their own coin as zero when adding up the value of their own treasury. That means each currency has at least one "Slush Fund" account: a place where it can store any of its own coin that it owns. Then, once they had at least one "Slush Fund" account anyway, many started to use their "Slush Fund" as a kind of catch-all petty (or not-so-petty) cash account. So many of the currencies have pretty darn large amounts of stuff in their "Slush Funds", kind of like the way that when I tokenise coins I only tokenise half of them so I can keep the other half available to buy the tokens back without without needing to actually use the coins that "back" the tokens to "redeem" the tokens. I suppose ideally we should start trying to get everyone to keep at least as much value in their "Slush Fund" as they have in their "treasury", so that we/they do not need to dip into their actual "treasury" in order to "redeem" their coins at the values calculated from their "treasury". (Afterall we do not wish to have to constantly change the contents of the treasuries just to do day to day things like buying back our coins from who-ever has somehow managed to get hold of some of them; it is nice to only put into our treasury things we hopefully never need to take back out of the treasury, or at least never to take anything out of the treasury without replacing it with something of greater or equal value. So if there is any chance that a currency might need to buy back every one of its coins at the value computed from its treasury it would be able to do that using its "Slush Fund", no need to actually "liquidate" anything that is actually in the treasury. Currently however that ideal is not yet enforced, so it is currently possible that some of the currencies might have to liquidate stuff from their treasury if enough of a "bank run" on their coin were to somehow happen.) The germ of the idea behind this "treasuries" system began back when I was using eggdrop IRC-bots to allow access to the coin-daemons of the "big seven" Galactic currencies, many years ago. Basically each daemon (coin) had a named account in its built-in simplistic accounts system (that maybe bitcoin still might have? Not sure. Older coins certainly still have it) named for each other coin. So for example in IXCoin's daemon there were accounts for I0Coin and for DeVCoin and each other coin, so that each other coin could own some IXCoin. Then the IRC bot could use the Latest Rates Include-file, adding a small fee to cover any blockchain fees and maybe a small stipend for itself, let folks buy back any of the coins using any of the other coins subject only to how many of each other coin each coin had. That is, IF anyone had bought any IXC using, say, DVC, resulting in IXC's DVC-account having some DVC in it, THEN IXC was able to sell that DVC. Basically each coin thus could own some of each other coin, and users could only buy from each coin as many of each other coin as that particular coin actually had on hand. Thus IF anyone bought any IXC using BTC, THEN that amount of BTC (minus any blockchain-fees) would be available to be bought FOR IXC. In other words each coin would be redeemable in each other coin only up to however much of that other coin had been used to buy the coin in the first place. In other other words, you could not expect to be able to buy BTC with IXC unless someone, even if only you yourself, had at some previous time already bought IXC with BTC. Does that make sense to you? Unfortunately over the years some BTC did get sent to third-party "exchanges" which ended up "flying by night", claiming to be hacked, and so on and so on. Thus over the years such activities have periodically crippled our ability to buy back every single one of each coin USING the exact same coin as was originally used to buy it from us. That is sad, but what can we do about it? We are still waiting for various coins from various "bankruptcy proceedings" of exchanges and suchlike things. But meanwhile, each and every IXCoin, including ones in long-lost wallets that are totally and forever lost, can be redeemed at the rates shown in the Latest Rates include-file, albeit how many of which of the currencies shown it would take to do it necessarily varies according to how many of which currency who-ever you go to to redeem them happens to have on hand. For a currency such as IXC, which only has 21 million coins yet each is currently shown as being worth so little, likely there are some other currencies that would be able to buy the entire lot of them from you, maybe without even needing to dip into their own actual "treasury" to do so... -MarkM- |
|
|
|
|
Its target time between blocks is only a minute and a half, not ten minutes like bitcoin. So it has a lot of blocks compared to some other coins. Plus of course it has been running many years, it is one of the oldest coins.
-MarkM-
|
|
|
|
|
I0Coin and IXCoin are both excellent coins, unlike DeVCoin they have very little minting, which really helps build the prices.
It has over and over again been just a matter of time to build them up to $1 per coin, it is mostly fly by night exchanges claiming to be hakced that keep crushing the price again. Already we are months in toward building buy-sides back up again though maybe this time we will get them up higher than $1 each before the exchanges again run with all the funds claiming to have been hacked.
Also though we now can trade them on the HORIZON and STELLAR platforms so yay no matter what the other exchanges do hopefully this time we can just keep on keeping on onward and upward.
-MarkM-
|
|
|
|
The MMO you are thinking of is known as the Galactic Milieu and has been running for years...  -MarkM- Is this an inactive Altcoin?
I'm surprised that programers don't merge Inactive (MMO) massively multi-player online games and Inactive Altcoins together into a cool MMO that makes you Altcoin.
This would resurrect both projects and make it a stronger product.
Beautiful idea. I am sure we will get there over time. Is there still someone mining this coin? |
|
|
|
Evidently so, by the latest Latest Rates file! Which just came out... Right after it comes out is a good time to run around looking for new bargains, as things that people placed for sale in the past become bargains at the new rates... ...And maybe place them for sale at some higher price that will be profit to you when someone notices that changing prices have turned it into a bargain. That way the gradual drift upward in values that seems to be pretty common can serve to profitably drive active trading to make the markets lively. -MarkM- |
|
|
|
|
Version 3 of GPL, known in some circles as GPL as distinct from the old version 2 which those circles refer to as GPL Classic, IS what we refer to as GPL2 since we still refer to "GPL Classic" as simply GPL.
I believe the Latest Rates should show how much BiTCoin ought to be acceptable in lieu of GPL or GPL2, but since BiTCoin changes value constantly obviously one cannot really rely on that file for current moment to moment prices. The Rates are calculated for "treasury" based coins whose relative value can be computed by adding up their "treasury" and dividing that total by the number of coins minted; for coins lacking a "treasury" the best that can be attempted is to show a rate based on some exchange or exchanges at the moment the file was generated, or a value compiled by CoinMarketCap or something along those lines.
In practice one usually finds that entities tend to accept things like BiTCoin, LiTeCoin, Lumens and such in lieu of the other coins but maybe not be looking to sell or spend such coins since such coins tend to vanish into limbo frequently because those are the kinds of coins one ends up having to use on typical web-based public "exchanges" to create and build the "buy sides" of one's coins, and such "exchanges" tend far too frequently to "fly by night" taking all the coins with them, including the coins used to build the "buy sides" which aggregators like CoinMarketCap tend to look at to come up with their ideas of what various coins are worth.
So basically things like BiTCoin, LiTeCoin and so on, things found on many public "exchanges" as the buy-side of many trading pairs, tend to be at a premium since everyone needs those to build their own coin's "buy sides" on such exchanges yet constantly keep losing them all as such exchanges pretend to be hacked (or, who knows, maybe some of them actually do get hacked?) and vanish with all those buy-side coins as well as whatever coin one is trying to build the buy-side of.
So most likely if you are looking for coins commonly found as the buy-side of many trading pairs on public "exchanges" you will tend to find most folks are looking to sell their coin for such coins rather than to buy their coin using such coins ... except on those "exchanges", where you will find that the more of a coin you are trying to "dump" the more you will tend to drive the price down.
Similarly on the "spot price" trading pairs on HORIZON and Stellar you will typically see a column of buy offers so that the more of a coin you want to dump the more you will drive the price down by dumping.
So the advantage of converting to the tokens used for such pairs on the platforms is you can put your sell offer in place and wait for a taker, instead of being a liquidity-destroyer by dumping onto buy offers.
I suppose to avoid tokens you could just try posting here how many GPL new style ("GPL2" in my nomenclature, "GPL" in Vampirus's, confusingly the code's release version is 3 somehing) or GPL classic style ("GPL" in my nomenclature, "GPLC" in Vampirus's, confusingly the code's release version is 2 something) you want to sell for how many of what and wait for a taker to take you up on your offer.
-MarkM-
|
|
|
|
Possibly. Traxo has provided a cool tool that can re-arrange the Latest Rates include file in various ways, such as to show how many of each of the other things one GPL2 coin is worth according to the Latest Rates: https://latestrates.traxo.me/?from=GPL2&to=GPLIt also allows you to provide a Latest Rates file of your own for it to work from. I usually at home like to re-cast the Rates the opposite way myself, that is, in this case, to show everything else's price-in-GPL2; but I am not sure Traxo's tool provides that approach. -MarkM- |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
