|
when will be the restock? I bought 5 but I need more
|
|
|
|
To all interested parties: I would like to request gigaminers and other interested parties feedback on the upgrade paths from Gigamining to Teramining. I have outlined my initial thoughts below but this is not final and could be changed based on community feedback. I will offer a trade-up program from Gigamining to Teramining. Below is what each bond looks like from a numbers perspective: GIGAMINING TERAMINING
Total Gh/s 200Gh 4,000Gh
Mh/s per bond 5Mh/s 25Mh/s
Total bonds 40,000 160,000
You will notice that Teramining has 4 times the number of shares as Gigamining. This is to allow for both a free and paid upgrade path. Free Upgrade PathI will offer a 1:1 exchange of Gigamining bonds for Teramining bonds that costs nothing to upgrade. An example would be if you have 400 Gigamining bonds and don’t want to pay to upgrade, you can swap them 1:1 for Teramining bonds. This would represent a 5x increase in the bonds hashing power at no additional cost. So in this case, the 400 Gigamining bonds (2Gh) would be upgraded to 400 Teramining bonds (10Gh). Paid Upgrade PathI will also offer a 1:4 exchange of Gigamining bonds for Teramining bonds. So, if you have 400 Gigamining bonds (2Gh) and pay the upgrade fee, you will receive 1,600 Teramining bonds (40Gh) in return. The fee to upgrade will be .25 BTC per Gigamining bond. So, the upgrade fee on 400 Gigamining bonds would be 100 BTC. Initial Sales of TeraminingThere will be no public or private offering of Teramining to the larger community. The only way to receive Teramining bonds will be to trade-in your Gigamining bonds either through the free or paid upgrade paths. Any bonds not sold will remain in the gigamining sub-account and will not have coupon payments paid out on them. Contract ChangesThe only contract change between Gigamining and Teramining is the amount of Mh/s per bond. Please leave your comments and questions below and I will answer them to the best of my ability. My hope is to solidify this in a timely manner so there is less uncertainty around the future of Gigamining. Best regards, gigavps So even though your upgrade path has already been bought and paid for by your original investors you use this as an opportunity to put even more of these peoples money into your pocket, what a scamming piece of shit. For the intellectually challenged out there the second offering of 100gh/s in the gigaminning venture has already gave him twice as much as was needed to pay for the upgrade to the th/s boxes. In other words you are paying twice for an upgrade offer to what should be your 100mh/s you would have when those already bought and paid for with your money th/s boxes arrive. Oh and BTW just where did those four mini-rigs that were supposed to be bought with that second round of funding go? |
|
|
|
If you already have GPU mining rigs, I assume you (and most people) will switch to Litecoin. In the past few days it's actually been a bit more profitable to mine LTC and sell for BTC then to mine BTC directly. And there are also a lot more Litecoins that can be mined. We just have to keep the interest of people like you a bit longer so that more services can be developed.
Just curious, how difficult is it to modify a ASIC rig to mine LTC? I suppose there's always the possibility of a new xyzCoin based on different hashing algorithm(s), which will screw the ASIC? It is impossible to mine LTC with that ASIC You need to make a new ASIC, make the project, invest some millions $ to start making the chip and then you can mine LTC with your new ASIC. It was supposed to be impossible to mine it on a GPU, look how that turned out they are hashing away right now.. |
|
|
|
You would also have to add in your power to the network if you assumed you were mining the whole time. Thus pushing up difficulty. This sorta thing is really hard to work out. Butterfly effect and all.
At its peak last year around the time he talks about the network was 15th/s his 15gh/s would have added 1/1000 to the network diff. |
|
|
|
DILLIGAF, it seems to be a problem with git: fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
I built it successfully on 64-bit Linux Mint 13 (which is based on Ubuntu) from this package: http://i0coin.bitparking.com/i0coin-v32509.tar.gzEDIT: Sorry, I just noticed that v32509 is ANCIENT (2011-12-22). I thought it was the latest version.Yes the old version builds that is what I have running now, the newer was where I was getting the errors and that was from the tar file that has since been taken down/link removed. |
|
|
|
How did you build it? I'm on Ubuntu and used: make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=1 bitcoind Or are you building the GUI? I haven't tried that. I'll look into it. No GUI just the daemon and a fresh source tree results in the same error, 64bit system if that makes difference.
miner2@miner2:~/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src$ make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=1 i0coind
/bin/sh ../share/genbuild.sh obj/build.h
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
g++ -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-unused-parameter -Wformat -Wformat-security -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src -I/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=1 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -o i0coind obj/auxpow.o obj/version.o obj/checkpoints.o obj/netbase.o obj/addrman.o obj/crypter.o obj/key.o obj/db.o obj/init.o obj/irc.o obj/keystore.o obj/main.o obj/net.o obj/protocol.o obj/bitcoinrpc.o obj/rpcdump.o obj/script.o obj/util.o obj/wallet.o obj/walletdb.o obj/noui.o -Wl,-Bdynamic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l boost_program_options -l boost_thread -l db_cxx -l ssl -l crypto -l miniupnpc -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread
obj/db.o: In function `Unserialize<CDataStream>':
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/main.h:1242: undefined reference to `int ReadWriteAuxPow<CDataStream>(CDataStream&, boost::shared_ptr<CAuxPow>&, int, int, CSerActionUnserialize)'
obj/db.o: In function `Serialize<CDataStream>':
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/main.h:1242: undefined reference to `int ReadWriteAuxPow<CDataStream>(CDataStream&, boost::shared_ptr<CAuxPow> const&, int, int, CSerActionSerialize)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [i0coind] Error 1
miner2@miner2:~/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src$ make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=1 bitcoind
make: *** No rule to make target `bitcoind'. Stop.
Oh and if you leave out the upnp you get extra errors.
miner2@miner2:~/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src$ make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP= i0coind
/bin/sh ../share/genbuild.sh obj/build.h
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
g++ -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-unused-parameter -Wformat -Wformat-security -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src -I/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/obj -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -o i0coind obj/auxpow.o obj/version.o obj/checkpoints.o obj/netbase.o obj/addrman.o obj/crypter.o obj/key.o obj/db.o obj/init.o obj/irc.o obj/keystore.o obj/main.o obj/net.o obj/protocol.o obj/bitcoinrpc.o obj/rpcdump.o obj/script.o obj/util.o obj/wallet.o obj/walletdb.o obj/noui.o -Wl,-Bdynamic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l boost_program_options -l boost_thread -l db_cxx -l ssl -l crypto -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread
obj/db.o: In function `Unserialize<CDataStream>':
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/main.h:1242: undefined reference to `int ReadWriteAuxPow<CDataStream>(CDataStream&, boost::shared_ptr<CAuxPow>&, int, int, CSerActionUnserialize)'
obj/db.o: In function `Serialize<CDataStream>':
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/main.h:1242: undefined reference to `int ReadWriteAuxPow<CDataStream>(CDataStream&, boost::shared_ptr<CAuxPow> const&, int, int, CSerActionSerialize)'
obj/net.o: In function `ThreadMapPort2(void*)':
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:859: undefined reference to `upnpDiscover'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:866: undefined reference to `UPNP_GetValidIGD'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:938: undefined reference to `freeUPNPDevlist'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:897: undefined reference to `UPNP_AddPortMapping'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:940: undefined reference to `FreeUPNPUrls'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:902: undefined reference to `strupnperror'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:872: undefined reference to `UPNP_GetExternalIPAddress'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:924: undefined reference to `UPNP_AddPortMapping'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:929: undefined reference to `strupnperror'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:909: undefined reference to `UPNP_DeletePortMapping'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:911: undefined reference to `freeUPNPDevlist'
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/net.cpp:912: undefined reference to `FreeUPNPUrls'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [i0coind] Error 1
uname -a
Linux miner2 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
|
|
|
|
Source for i0coin version v60300 is available at http://i0coin.bitparking.com/. This is rebased on top of bitcoin v0.6.3 to pick up recent important fixes for security issues in bitcoin. It is based on kr105's work with his recent rebase and some fixes of mine. A checkpoint was added at block 367,000. The activation times for BIP 16 and BIP 30 are the same as what kr105 set them at. In the rebase I squashed everything into one commit to ease rebasing on top of future bitcoin changes. No binaries yet, but once I've worked out how to build bitcoin with Qt on my windows system I'll get a windows binary up. It fails to build on Ubuntu 11.04, I installed the version 1.7 of miniupnpc from here when it first failed on that http://miniupnp.free.fr/files/.
obj/db.o: In function `Unserialize<CDataStream>':
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/main.h:1242: undefined reference to `int ReadWriteAuxPow<CDataStream>(CDataStream&, boost::shared_ptr<CAuxPow>&, int, int, CSerActionUnserialize)'
obj/db.o: In function `Serialize<CDataStream>':
/home/miner2/src/doublec-i0coin-6fef194/src/main.h:1242: undefined reference to `int ReadWriteAuxPow<CDataStream>(CDataStream&, boost::shared_ptr<CAuxPow> const&, int, int, CSerActionSerialize)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [i0coind] Error 1
|
|
|
|
Fud, man. Oh, and gigavps is kenyan i hear. Don't deny it Giga, I feel it in here *chest pound*.
I'm in on it too. look back at all our posts DILLIGAF, its a huge web of cOnSpIrAcY...
Well his is certainly not producing any back up for his claimed facts nor are you for that matter just some ass kissing. The burden of proof is yours. The bottom line is, if you don't like it don't invest in it. Oh, and stop spreading FUD. It is on him as he is the one claiming I have the facts wrong when he is the only one who can prove that, fairly handy the old your facts are wrong I have the proof they are but I am not going to bother proving it just claim it is so.. And sock puppet just where did I talk about investing in anything, enough of you. |
|
|
|
Fud, man. Oh, and gigavps is kenyan i hear. Don't deny it Giga, I feel it in here *chest pound*.
I'm in on it too. look back at all our posts DILLIGAF, its a huge web of cOnSpIrAcY...
Well his is certainly not producing any back up for his claimed facts nor are you for that matter just some ass kissing. |
|
|
|
Don't know about the rest of you but I can produce receipts for $50 purchases within minutes let alone a supposed $60k purchase.
lol anal retentive unrepentant miser. So you think that the things in the photographs are cardboard mockups? Or what? Next thing you will tell us is that UFOs are real because you have a receipt for one.  Yes I am tight fisted SOB no denying that I like to get value for my money. No I think they were purchased on a day that does not conform with the official line being spouted here. But we will never know for sure because I will lay dollars to donuts we do not have hope in hell of ever seeing the receipt being produced. |
|
|
|
I doubt I would just the idea he won't produce it though leads me to believe he has something to hide, as in it does not exist and he is telling lies. And he gives an enough of a crap to be shooting his mouth off about it.
I certainly have nothing to prove to you. I do find it interesting that you keep talking about me in the forums without the proper facts. You are border line obsessive which is getting weird to be honest. Of course I am crazy could not have anything to do with you claiming these facts as real then providing no proof of them. Don't know about the rest of you but I can produce receipts for $50 purchases within minutes let alone a supposed $60k purchase. So put up or shut about your supposed facts and it certainly is the easiest way to prove me wrong and shut me up. But you cannot do that can you as the date on the receipt does not support your lies already told. |
|
|
|
Produce the receipt for payment and I just might believe you. And if what you say is true you certainly now have not purchased them with your own funds they have been bought with other peoples money with the balance of them funds raised going straight into your pocket.
Your rants are tiring at best. If you do not believe me, then you do not believe me. Your constant babbling about me has only hurt your reputation, not mine. I wish you the best in life, but it looks like you'll only squander those opportunities with your negative attitude and denial of basic facts. Ah so the deflect as you cannot produce it, for you to claim a fact you need actual evidence to prove an act on your part has occurred, just like I thought all talk no action. My guess is that giga just doesn't give a crap. Even if he did produce it, you'd probably just say it was doctored. I doubt I would just the idea he won't produce it though leads me to believe he has something to hide, as in it does not exist and he is telling lies. And he gives an enough of a crap to be shooting his mouth off about it. |
|
|
|
Produce the receipt for payment and I just might believe you. And if what you say is true you certainly now have not purchased them with your own funds they have been bought with other peoples money with the balance of them funds raised going straight into your pocket.
Your rants are tiring at best. If you do not believe me, then you do not believe me. Your constant babbling about me has only hurt your reputation, not mine. I wish you the best in life, but it looks like you'll only squander those opportunities with your negative attitude and denial of basic facts. Ah so the deflect as you cannot produce it, for you to claim a fact you need actual evidence to prove an act on your part has occurred, just like I thought all talk no action. |
|
|
|
Hi DILLIGAF,
Can I ask why you like to talk about me so much? Am I that interesting?
I don't like rip-off artists. |
|
|
|
It was April when he came up with his mining bond for the ordering of them from the proceeds raised by the sale.
For someone with the name "Does It Look Like I Give A Fuck" you sure do take an interest in getting the facts mixed up. I was the first to purchase Mini Rigs before they were mini rigs. My original order was for TWO 50Gh/s RIG BOXES. I purchased these long before knowing what a perpetual mining bond was and with my own funds. I would appreciate that if you are going to constantly talk about me on the forums that you at least get your facts straight. Produce the receipt for payment and I just might believe you. And if what you say is true you certainly now have not purchased them with your own funds they have been bought with other peoples money with the balance of them funds raised going straight into your pocket. |
|
|
|
Sonny said on the weekend that I should see a rig shipped this week... as soon as I get a confirmation I will update here.
Does anyone know when giga ordered his? I saw someone say February, but that can't be right.
It was April when he came up with his mining bond for the ordering of them from the proceeds raised by the sale. So: Fefox paid January. Giga paid April. Fefox has 0 units. Giga has 4. Guess we all know who will be receiving the first ASIC shipments. How can I invest with giga's company? I've said as much already about the cosy little setup there, was first to receive the singles as well had rack full of them when everyone else could not get their hands on them. Company wise if you like over 50% of your money invested going straight into his pocket not hardware purchased for your benefit, as all his offerings so far have had that as their main feature, go for it. |
|
|
|
Does anyone know when giga ordered his? I saw someone say February, but that can't be right.
It was April when he came up with his mining bond for the ordering of them from the proceeds raised by the sale. |
|
|
|
Something going on? My miners have been going insane the last hour...
The hash rate jumping up/down from normal speed to about a tenth of normal? If so then yes have seen that as well. My miners are having hard time staying connected. need to get BAMT working smarter with backup pools... I see the odd communication failure in cgminer but nothing where it goes to the backup pools I have set. Should I be worried if cgminer reports near 3.2 gh all the time, but gpumax goes up and down (anywhere from 200 mh to 2.8 gh) as often as every 15 seconds? Been seeing this for a couple of days. I've been watching the shares trying to gauge any reduction. Seems a little slower and they're split across public and private. I'm thinking that idea is the load balancing we are seeing, here it does not seem to lower my btc return so not too worried about it. Before that extreme up/down I used to get a swing of sometimes 1-1.5 gh/s up/down but I see that on a normal pool all the time. |
|
|
|
Something going on? My miners have been going insane the last hour...
The hash rate jumping up/down from normal speed to about a tenth of normal? If so then yes have seen that as well. My miners are having hard time staying connected. need to get BAMT working smarter with backup pools... I see the odd communication failure in cgminer but nothing where it goes to the backup pools I have set. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
