Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 05:45:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 85 »
61  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Evolution has run off with all user's funds on: March 21, 2015, 12:38:54 AM
This has nothing to do with smart or dumb, EVO just took off, after being the most succesfull dark market. Very smart people lost money too Wink.

>Very smart people
>People who leave money in a darkwallet run by unknown criminals

Pick one.
62  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Evolution has run off with all user's funds on: March 19, 2015, 10:18:11 PM
This issue is the single biggest threat to bit coin. People don't lose faith over chinese banks and potential regulations. They lose faith when their currency is stolen.

You mean like people stopped using dollars after Bernie Madoff's scam was revealed?

All Bitcoin being stolen means is it's worth enough to make stealing it worthwhile.  Stupid people will continue to get swindled.  Smart people will protect their money.
63  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 16, 2015, 04:22:38 AM
Having badacey follow badeucy in the 12game seems like a mistake.  IMO no game should follow a game of the same type (draw/stud/omaha/texas holdem).

HORSE follows stud with stud/8.  Arguably, razz is also a stud game.
64  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 11, 2015, 03:23:21 AM
Well, you wouldn't. But why not develop your first client using an open platform like HTML5 such that it works on every operating system whether proprietary, free, desktop or mobile? Deliberately limiting your userbase to just those using Windows seems to me like leaving money on the table.

Because you're already working on pre-existing software (the Grid Poker software) that is Windows-based, and while in the middle of this, dudes with guns from the Nevada Gaming Commission suddenly raid you, you flee the country, and want to get the site back up in a matter of days rather than months?
65  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 10, 2015, 10:03:59 PM
Just here to post my weekly crybaby gripe about the fact that apparently swc is windoze only Sad  Seriously, how many people actually still run windowz?

About 90% of desktop users.
66  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 08, 2015, 06:20:24 PM
Oh, thanks, I just saw this reply.  Thanks for the education!  So, in general, you're not allowed to muck on a showdown.  I didn't know this.

No, you're allowed to.  The other player has to affirmatively demand you show.  And it's often considered rude, and in some circumstances, extremely rude, so most people don't do it without good cause.

But many sites show them in the hand histories, because there's no mechanism to make the demand and it's a lot easier to collude online.
67  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 07, 2015, 11:44:21 PM
Seems like this is one of the funny places where software poker collides with in-person tradition.  As far as I know, if someone calls me into a showdown, and they show first then I have the right to muck and walk away from the showdown (maybe this is stupid cos I lose the chance to win on whatever's coming, but still, I believe it's allowed if the action is to me).  However, most poker software is going to have you flip your cards on that call no matter what the other person shows.  Am I wrong?

You have the right to demand to see at showdown (at least traditionally).  The last player to bet or raise has to show first, and can demand the loser show.  It's generally considered rude to do this excessively or sometimes at all, since it's basically an implicit accusation of collusion or cheating.

Also, in some games like jacks or better (does anyone even play that any more), you have to keep your "openers" to show you had the right to even play the hand.
68  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 07, 2015, 08:34:28 PM
In the same way you don't get to see my folded or mucked hold'ed hole cards.

Folded, no, but most sites' hand histories have all hole cards if it went to showdown and you were in it at the time.  PokerStars does, for instance.
69  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 06, 2015, 04:53:05 PM
Agreed.  However, I'm dumb and cautious... I was comfortable running the app and the web browser, but don't want to run an exe.

But you'll run Flash?  Yeah, I know in theory it runs in its own little sandbox, but in practice, there's a new exploit every week or so to run arbitrary code and that's just the ones they announce.  I don't see how in practice it's actually any more secure.  I'm sure if HTML5 (what SwC will probably use for the web client eventually) becomes as popular as Flash, it will be just as exploitable.

If you can't trust a source enough to run software that it issues, you shouldn't even be visiting its website much less running active content like Flash/scripts/etc.

Most of these concerns can be allayed somewhat by running it on a virtual machine anyway.  Even that isn't perfect, but unless there's malware specifically designed to claw its way out of a virtual machine, you should be safe enough.  (And if SwC itself wants to steal your money, they'd do it on the server side and none of your precautions would be worth shit anyway.)
70  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 06, 2015, 05:28:32 AM
MAJOR issue.  Some stud games have ZERO bring-in.  In tournaments, this is especially bad because players with few chips or who just get bored will sit out and never blind off.  I was in a razz tournament where this happened.

Here's an example.

71  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 06, 2015, 04:56:12 AM
(Oops, posted this to the old SwC thread instead of here.)

Just noticed something really neat under Options.  You can customize the bet slider so that each button does an action of your choice, both for preflop and postflop decisions.  So you could have the first button bet 40% of the pot, the second 60%, etc.  Set a button to "max" for the all-in that some people want.

Just click Options anywhere (under File-->Options or wherever such as the button on the table window), and "Bet Slider."

Some other little things that impress me include 4-color deck by default and tournament breaks on the 55.  I don't know why 4-color decks aren't the default on every site, since that's always the first thing I change on any poker site, and it's nice to be able to take a break even while playing multiple tournaments with different start times, since that always pissed me off on the previous site.

-- peppered with 5 chip freerolls in many different disciplines as well as the good 'ole 2 card holdy

I hope these itty bitty freerolls stick around for a while.  They're pretty fun and may introduce people to these new games without the pressure of playing for high stakes at first, because many of the fans of the bad*i style games are high stakes players.  Nobody wants to lose their shirt to learn a game.

Also if krillrolls are ever introduced again, it might be neat to see some of them in oddball formats or dealer's choice.  Most of the people who qualify for these things in the first place are veterans and can probably stand to pick up a new game or two if they don't know it.

ETA:  eliminating a multipost.
72  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 05, 2015, 04:00:13 AM
4 minute levels on non-freeroll OFC/p games is pretty bad.  Needs to be 8 minutes minimum, 10 would prob be better.

There should be a mix of slow, normal, turbo and super turbo type games.  Some people like fast tournaments and don't like sitting around 8 hours for a 5 chip tournament.  Some people want hours of play for their money.

4 minutes is definitely turbo though.  I just played one of these (freeroll) and there was basically one hand at the final table.
73  Economy / Gambling / Re: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts on: March 04, 2015, 11:31:29 PM
Obviously, he could've just taken the BTC and run so I give him that, but surely if a raid action were taken there would be some evidence of it since the government has open records requirements and all of that stuff, right?

Ongoing investigations are usually exempt from public records requirements.
74  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: March 04, 2015, 02:08:28 AM
I love you guys.  I just think that you're missing the point if you keep on developing .exe files that no one with half a brain about security would ever run, ever.

So run it in a VM with nothing else on it.

Yes, it sucks they just have Windows now, but that's the bulk of people out there.  The other clients are not far behind and it's a workable interim solution.
75  Economy / Gambling / Re: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts on: March 01, 2015, 11:58:40 PM
We'll see new owner is waiting for their affiliate stuff next week.

It is simple math, their affiliate stuff hasn't changed (20% for life).

The old site ending in .com had roughly 100-200 visits a day, that equated to X number of sign ups per day and a $XX,XXX per year in btc revenue (proven).

This name will be no different Smiley

Why anyone can say the exact match name in dot com with good natural traffic and affiliate conversion potential is worthless or worth just X shows how little they actually know.



What a load of hooey.  Fuck off, scammer.
76  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: February 28, 2015, 02:20:31 AM
Full tilt wasn't the only one just the biggest.  I lost money on another regulated site.  Again there have been many regulated sites over the years that closed without paying the players and the only thing the regulators did was shrug their shoulders.

That's because they aren't even really regulators.  They're just a barely plausible legal fig leaf to make what would otherwise be illegal pass legal muster enough not to get the people running the site arrested.  Sort of like the bullshit "Kahnawake Gaming Commission" that sat with its thumbs up its ass doing nothing while Absolute/UB ran a blatant scam for years.
77  Economy / Gambling / Re: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts on: February 27, 2015, 07:23:05 PM
Reasoning being is ownership directly of this name by swcpoker would mean approx $75,000 per annum in revenue roi in 1-2 years!

Kill yourself.
78  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 is LIVE on: February 27, 2015, 05:53:37 PM
Will u launch a MAC version too ?

In the interim, you could set up a VirtualBox machine and run it under that.  Works fine.
79  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 Coming Soon on: February 27, 2015, 02:39:26 AM
And I was premature saying it worked fine under CrossOver.  It has serious stability issues.  Trying it on VirtualBox now, and will report on my success/failure after I've got XP installed and the client running.

Okay.  On an old Mac 32 bit Intel machine, I just got VirtualBox to run the client and play a few hands of the 8 game mix as well as play one of the freerolls.  If there are instability issues, they aren't anywhere near as bad as with running it under Wine.

Specifically, I ran it in VirtualBox running XP Pro.

So I'd recommend that as a solution for anyone on Mac, at least for the moment.
80  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 Coming Soon on: February 27, 2015, 12:33:08 AM
No mac client?

No.

And I was premature saying it worked fine under CrossOver.  It has serious stability issues.  Trying it on VirtualBox now, and will report on my success/failure after I've got XP installed and the client running.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 85 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!