Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 03:22:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 »
101  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Nerds & Geeks will rule the world. Soon on: May 08, 2013, 09:07:45 PM
Don't they already?
102  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [ANN] Bitcoin on Blueseed, the international waters startup ship on: May 08, 2013, 09:05:04 PM
Cool stuff...
103  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Coingig.com Beta - The New Bitcoin Marketplace has Arrived on: May 08, 2013, 03:45:34 PM
We've improved our store ranking algorithm. If you don't see your store among the top you are doing something wrong! Happy coingiging! Cheesy
104  Economy / Speculation / Re: How would a thousand or so alt coins affect Bitcoin? on: May 08, 2013, 03:25:15 PM
It comes down to mining power. Something akin to the "real" financial world is going on. Dollar is on top because US got the biggest share of military power. Bitcoin  is number one because of the hashing power it got and will continue building. Other currencies are irrelevant considering what they got backing them up especially the new ones where its just hype.

But hashing power isn't proportional to user base, is it?  Wouldn't the number of users be more important than the number of miners?  Otherwise, putting more hash power online would assure the rising value of BTC?
Hashing power is proportional to miners not users. Well actually to combined capacity of all miners not the number. Bitcoin has the most, other alt coins combined can't touch it.

And yes Bitcoin also has the most users. If you think that some other coin can muster the amount of users or mining resources than Bitcoin you are dreaming.
105  Economy / Speculation / Re: How would a thousand or so alt coins affect Bitcoin? on: May 08, 2013, 01:46:17 PM
It comes down to mining power. Something akin to the "real" financial world is going on. Dollar is on top because US got the biggest share of military power. Bitcoin  is number one because of the hashing power it got and will continue building. Other currencies are irrelevant considering what they got backing them up especially the new ones where its just hype.
106  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Diablo Mining Company [shifting gears] on: May 08, 2013, 12:14:26 AM
Just did the transfer. Please CC me to PM to friedcat. Thanks and good luck.
107  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Diablo Mining Company [shifting gears] on: May 07, 2013, 09:35:33 PM

Dude wtf?
600 / 50000 TIMES 1000 = 12 and on... is the math

Times 1000 for per share? What are you on? Seriously, it looks like fun.

Okay... I'll do the math for you.

Debt: 600BTC
Total BTCMC: 10K
DMC holding: 1000
Total DMC: 10K

You get
600 / 10000 * 1000 / 10000 = 0.006 per DMC

I have 700 DMC shares and that makes 4.2 BTC of unrealized gains for me..

Anyway, man, I have made you a pretty good offer (I am asking 64 AM for 700 DMC). I don't want to deal with depositing anything extra into BitFunder to buy extra 4 shares to make it whole. You can have all the equity you call "valueless" for the price of 0.4 AM share.

As far as it's concerned the whole DMC thing ain't gonna happen. You don't have what it takes.
108  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Diablo Mining Company [shifting gears] on: May 07, 2013, 08:59:51 PM

There is something like 50k shares of BTCMC, we have 1k.

600 / 50000 / 1000 = 0.000012 BTC per DMC share

Dude wtf?
600 / 50000 TIMES 1000 = 12 and on... is the math
109  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Diablo Mining Company [shifting gears] on: May 07, 2013, 02:53:10 PM
Grr... I am not telling you not to follow regulations. I am telling you that the deal you put on the table is shit.

Let's recollect.
1) You took people's money, lost it and blamed nefario for your fuck up (for some reason all other corps are doing fine)
2) You promised to do buyback but you don't want to do that anymore because "fuck it?"
3) You ripped people of their BTCMC equity because you "feel" they are valueless
4) Your trade back is not fair because you force people to accept your rounding policy.
5) You change the rules mid-game whenever you feel like it regardless of what you put down in writing.

Now, you want to extend this sweet deal further by doing this bond thing and paying back in fiat 5 years from now when BTC will be worth way more than that.

Anyway I made you a fair offer in PM.
110  Economy / Securities / Re: The end of DMC 1.0, and the transition to DMC 2.0. on: May 07, 2013, 01:35:41 PM

Not cheaper. Right now, ASICMINER is worth around 1.1 BTC. Which makes, by raw assets, DMC worth 0.1 BTC per share. I am offering a 0.5 BTC credit if you convert to DMC 2.0 bonds when the time comes, or 5 times more. If you think I'm offering a bad deal either way, sell your DMC shares on the open market to someone doing choice A or B.
The fact that you make it USD denominated makes it a bad deal.

Unfortunately, theres no way around that. Feel free to run for Congress to change that, though. My hands are otherwise completely tied.

Right, Congress is going to fix this deal...
111  Economy / Securities / Re: The end of DMC 1.0, and the transition to DMC 2.0. on: May 07, 2013, 12:40:59 PM

Not cheaper. Right now, ASICMINER is worth around 1.1 BTC. Which makes, by raw assets, DMC worth 0.1 BTC per share. I am offering a 0.5 BTC credit if you convert to DMC 2.0 bonds when the time comes, or 5 times more. If you think I'm offering a bad deal either way, sell your DMC shares on the open market to someone doing choice A or B.
The fact that you make it USD denominated makes it a bad deal.
112  Economy / Securities / Re: The end of DMC 1.0, and the transition to DMC 2.0. on: May 06, 2013, 10:50:32 PM
In 60 days, DMC will no longer be honoring shares that have not taken either choice A or choice B. There are several users who have NOT claimed their shares on BitFunder, in 60 days from this date if you have not claimed them and traded them for ASICMINER or been added to the list for conversion into DMC 2.0 bonds, they will no longer be valid.

Choice A: 11 shares of DMC for 1 share of ASICMINER, whole integer amounts only.
Friedcat hasn't put ASICMINER shares onto an exchange because of the passthrus, and I think everyone is tired of waiting.

If you intend to take advantage of this offer, use https://bitfunder.com/transactions and send a multiple of 11 DMC shares to Diablo-D3, and then PM on the forum and give me the email and Bitcoin address you want friedcat to use.

Choice B: Trade 1.0 shares in for 2.0 bonds
The exact wording for the bond has not been worked out yet, but the offer will be for a zero-coupon original issue discount 5 or 10 year callable bond, or in English, it will not pay dividends and will be sold for less than the face value and you will get paid back in 5 or 10 years unless they are paid back in full at an earlier time at the company's choosing.

The bonds will earn an equivalent of 15% APY, 20% APY if paid in BTC or DMC share trades.

15% APY for 5 years: $100 -> $201.14
15% APY for 10 years: $100 -> $404.56
20% APY for 5 years: $100 -> $248.83
20% APY for 10 years: $100 -> $619.17

Due to the massive fluctuation of BTC prices and the finer details of US Federal law, bonds will be denominated in USD. However, I will still accept payment for the bonds in BTC, and at the maturity date any bonds paid in BTC or DMC shares will be paid in BTC according to the market price of BTC on that date.

I will be offering a credit of 0.5 BTC per share of DMC towards a DMC 2.0 bond.

If you intend to take advantage of this offer, please PM me so I can add you to the list of people who are interested. If, at any time in the future you wish to take choice A instead, even after the 60 day period, you may do so.


For history's sake.

Quote
I will be offering a credit of 0.5 BTC per share of DMC towards a DMC 2.0 bond.
What exactly does this mean?

Also, I do not understand how choice B is fair.
 
This is how your business plan is looking to me.

Force shareholders to liquidate now or buy them cheaper out in 5 years.

This is nice and dandy for you but it's a trap for the investors. Are you serious? lol

Also, besides the fact that you are rounding in your favor 10675/1000 is 10.6 DMC per AM.
Your are also dropping BTCMC and BTC-MINING equity completely.

I prefer buyback to any of the listed options. Thanks!

Unless the options you list apply only to  those who have not claimed. Please clarify.
113  Economy / Services / Re: I want to review the amazing products you sell for Bitcoin! on: May 06, 2013, 08:57:44 PM
Yes, please! www.coingig.com Cheesy
114  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Coingig.com Beta - The New Bitcoin Marketplace has Arrived on: May 06, 2013, 05:02:32 PM
Folks, the issue with renaming stores has been fixed. We've identified two stores that have been affected. Let us know if you are someone experiencing problems. We will fix right away if we already haven't. Sorry for the inconvenience.
115  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: My girlfriends house in Germany on: May 06, 2013, 02:55:55 PM
Haha, neat!
116  Economy / Securities / Re: S.DICE - SatoshiDICE 100% Dividend-Paying Asset on MPEx on: May 04, 2013, 02:51:55 PM
I agree with EV, the focus of SD should be on BTC. SD has a (56.4%) share of all BTC txns. This translates into 56.4% share of all fees paid to miners. What you are asking for is to get SD into a similar arrangement inside a competing world? (Pay miners to keep the network going.)

Why in the world would you want to help your competition?

The focus should be on making SD the best game out there, not spreading it thin. That's what drives profits. To a gambler it does not matter whether its BTC or LTC they are there for the game.

Exclusivity FTW!
117  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Announcement] Block Erupter USB on: May 04, 2013, 02:15:59 PM
About time!
118  Economy / Auctions / Re: Single ASICMINER Blade Auction - 48 Hours - Ships immediately on: May 04, 2013, 01:22:59 AM
0.5
119  Economy / Auctions / Re: Single ASICMINER Blade Auction - 48 Hours - Ships immediately on: May 04, 2013, 01:03:51 AM
0.1 btc
120  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-05-03 Wired/Kaminsky: Bitcoin Is Not as Secure, Unregulated, or Lucrative a on: May 04, 2013, 12:19:36 AM
Pretty good read.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!