Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 08:00:03 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 »
601  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoins Can Inflate Too - Stop worrying about deflation. on: December 11, 2012, 01:27:52 PM
You don't need fancy economics to tell you that inflation is possible. Inflation is going to happen when quantum computing arrives on the scene, plain and simple.
602  Other / Meta / Re: [WTB/S] [MTGOX USD CODE] [PPUSD/Dwolla/p2p][OPEN] on: December 11, 2012, 01:12:49 PM
+1

BTC <-> MP
603  Economy / Economics / Re: What would happen if everyone got 1000 USD every month? on: December 09, 2012, 11:24:11 PM
Increased money supply will not directly result inflation.

Oh, yes, it will and here is why.

Take for example state of Georgia where minimum wage is less then $5.15. A person who earns that for living and works full-time makes about $824.00 a month. The $1000 incentive gives him a pretty good reason to quit his job. You can say that a person might keep his job after he receives the check. I highly doubt this though. In my experience, people usually choose their dignity if circumstances allow. Who would want to work a crappy job if they have money rolling in guaranteed?

Now, a person who makes minimum wage usually works somewhere maintaining a business asset (cleaning it or what have you). If a whole bunch of people leave their jobs or posts rather, a whole lot of business assets are going to be unattended losing value even faster. I hope I do not have to illustrate the connection between inflation and asset devaluation to prove to you that you're wrong.
604  Economy / Securities / Re: NASTY MINING on: December 09, 2012, 10:50:09 PM
Ok - a dodgy email arrived claiming to come from Nasty's mining op and I pop here to find it's aparently legit and since the whole glbse mess - it appears a lot has changed with Nasty Mining..

Shares are now called seats?
Back dividends have now been used? and Nasty now holds onto the unsold shares?
With the purchase of new kit from our dividends - how does this reflect our ownership?  Originally wasn't one share equiv to x hash/s?

I understand your feeling uncomfortable with having a large chunk of btc in your wallet - but I've not seen any explanation yet as to how this will make our current ownership any more valuable.

I'm annoyed at having to fill in another damn website with a bunch of stuff, run by somebody I don't know and having to give out my info again.
I understand you wanna verify things - but it's not even Nasty that's verifying it - it's a 3rd party site that uses a self signed cert with some bogus reasons as to why (a) it's self signed and (b) it doesn't validate.  

Now I'm forced into visiting a fan-club where I have to login frequently or I'll be kicked out of my shares/seat?


Clearly, not a fan of fun...
605  Economy / Economics / Re: What would happen if everyone got 1000 USD every month? on: December 09, 2012, 10:40:35 PM
A Super-Duper-Hyperinflation and consequences of thereof...
606  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: December 09, 2012, 10:37:27 PM
What are the plans for MOORE?
607  Economy / Securities / Re: Diablo Mining Company [shutting down] on: December 09, 2012, 10:33:43 PM
I hear the market calls for 1 BTC per.
608  Economy / Services / Re: Gigamining / Teramining on: November 24, 2012, 05:24:42 PM
May I ask that if James is taking the legal route that everyone else does the same.

He is requesting information via PM on this forum and at the same time asking everyone to correspond with his lawyer. Do not help him fuck you over.

The request for PM is for if you need to know if you are on the GLBSE list.

Do not the two emails I've received from him already confirm that I am on the list?
609  Economy / Services / Re: Gigamining / Teramining on: November 23, 2012, 09:03:29 PM
The contract says he pays the amount 5Mhash/s gives.

Right... When pigs fly...
610  Economy / Services / Re: Gigamining / Teramining on: November 23, 2012, 08:55:04 PM
I call it getting GLBSE'D

Definition: You invest coins in a bitcoin project and that project uses your coins to hire a lawyer who proceeds to use legal avenues to make it practically impossible you will get your bitcoins back.

GLBSE'D
Can anyone point my to the post where gigavps tells if he pays the lawyer with the bitcoins invested by other people? I can't seem to find it.

You gotta read between the lines! *doh*
611  Economy / Services / Re: Gigamining / Teramining on: November 23, 2012, 05:34:13 PM
612  Economy / Services / Re: Gigamining / Teramining on: November 21, 2012, 10:32:00 PM
To all Gigaminers:

Late yesterday I received an asset holder list from GLBSE. Per the email received, the list may grow some more so it may not be the final list.

This is good news as it means step one is near completion. I will be working with counsel later today and possibly into next week to finalize the next steps and to clarify what has to be done and why.

Best regards,
gigavps

Bomb news!
613  Other / Off-topic / Re: Black Holes and The Internet on: November 05, 2012, 05:34:45 PM
@fergalish, I do not know how the conversion process works. Maybe I am trying to descride it. I am going of a bunch of studies and looking to establish some sort of an idea exchange about the main 'what if' post which is 'black holes/internet(mind) are interrelated. Your feedback is appreciated a great deal...

Now, there is principle in the physics world called Landauer's erasure principle that states whenever a bit of information is erased energy is released. Well obviously if you think that general relavity is a solid theory you can agree that mass can be converted into energy. I am not sure if general relativity allows energy to convert to mass. For this argument let's say it does alike to situation with water and ice at 0 degrees. So if a black hole fullfills two functions one to erase information and two provides a setting for energy to become mass then I can see how information becomes gravity. This is probably the main reason I struggle to accept that information is preserved in a black hole. Maybe I am considering a different kind of a black hole something ala information sink. Once again I want to point you back to the article the heart of their idea is what happens to information when it enters a black hole.
614  Other / Off-topic / Re: Black Holes and The Internet on: November 03, 2012, 09:53:38 PM
@fergalish, I am actually going of the article that I linked to above. The authors are claiming that information is destroyed and gravity appears as a result of a gradient between entropies in two different places.

As far as all the posts go mobodick is closest to define how entropy and information are connected that relates.

if you take all information out of a system you are left with pure entropy.

To summarize the main article there is always an interaction going between regions of low entropy (some information) and high entropy (less information) that causes gravity to arise.

Black hole is an entity with high gravity that sucks shit in. So basically overtime the information inside a black whole would increase and rather than become a massively more gravitational singularity it would become the opposite. The accepted fact is that the more stuff goes into the black hole the more massive it becomes. So either there is not enough information information that goes in to equalize the growth or the information is destroyed on the inside.
615  Other / Off-topic / Re: Black Holes and The Internet on: November 03, 2012, 07:20:52 PM
Just to add:
The way information is destroyed in a black hole, as far as I understand it now, is.

Something enters a black hole and all the quantum information is converted into gravity.
So the following example is not applicable...

An egg on the table has structure and pattern. Assuming all eggs are exactly alike, I can convey the structure of it to you with the term 'egg'. A broken egg on the floor cannot be conveyed as precisely. I might have to use words like this: "There is a fragment of a shell 1/4" in size over here, a splattering of yoke over there, and so on."
Each broken egg is different.

Particles as unique entities disappear. What was an electron/proton or what have you becomes gravity. So you can't go back and do "take that electron and put it back into this place". That electron is out of existence. So if you have a group of electrons that encode some information undergo a similar process. Where does the information go? (other than emerge on the internet by some mysterious process Tongue)

Also, thank you all for solid ideas!
616  Other / Off-topic / Re: Black Holes and The Internet on: November 03, 2012, 06:29:32 PM
Next, when something falls into a black hole, its information is preserved.
What exactly makes you draw this conclusion? I think it is rather the opposite. Information is destroyed inside the black hole actually it is the only place where destruction can happen.

Quote
Eventually, however, the pile will be so dense that it will collapse into a black hole, and the surface area of the black hole will be directly proportional to the amount of information in the pile.
You are assuming two things. 1) you definitely need mass to store information 2) there is a limit to how much information could be stored in a given amount of mass

Quote
Now, after that tangent, OP is confusing correlation for causation. Just 'cos transistors are getting smaller and using less mass, therefore decreasing the gravity due to a single bit of human-stored information, doesn't indicate that the lesser gravity is due to information itself somehow requiring less 'gravity', but due to humans requiring less 'gravity' in order to encode information.  Think, once upon a time you needed a 10kg stone to write 100 bytes or so (think Moses).

I was not suggesting gravity decreases because information goes up. I was only stating the fact that less mass is need to store the same amount of information and hence there is a drop in gravity per. I was trying to illustrate the point that the opposite process happen in a black holes - a black hole minimizes the amount of information to increase gravity (also conversion).

Quote
The 'internet' is not creating information. It is merely storing information (very inefficiently, at that) that is already available, if only we could somehow understand it.
Just like a black hole I guess, which merely stores gravity? According to the article information is converted into gravity. I was using term internet as a black-box term for supermind something capable to produce information. This discussion for example is the product of the internet (our minds or what have you). So yes, internet produces information.
617  Other / Off-topic / Re: Black Holes and The Internet on: November 03, 2012, 05:15:52 PM
I think people still use term entropy just like they did in the 19 century. They did not think about it in terms of information.

I would be disinclined to claim that the inverse of entropy is information.
I agree with this. The more entropy there is the more information.
618  Other / Off-topic / Re: Black Holes and The Internet on: November 03, 2012, 03:28:12 PM
As far as 2nd law of thermodynamics goes it only applies to classically behaving things.
When you get to quantum I think this law does not apply...

2nd law of thermodynamics hold macroscopically but it is definitely not the entire picture. I think the public is completely off the chart when they say "But wait! The laws of thermodynamics!"

Take, for example, quantum entanglement, according to this....

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428670/entangled-particles-break-classical-law-of-thermodynamics-say-physicists/
entanglement breaks laws of thermodynamics...

Black holes are quantum entities.

For the sake of argument let's say that entropy is actually information itself, ("Hey, this egg is broken"). If its the case then black holes decrease entropy (also information) and convert it to a simple particle of gravity (graviton, Higgs, what have you). I think it is an established thing that the more stuff goes in the more pull a black hole has.
619  Other / Off-topic / Re: Black Holes and The Internet on: November 03, 2012, 02:58:11 AM
What do you mean? The change itself is new information of sort "Hey, this is what changed!"
620  Other / Off-topic / Re: Black Holes and The Internet on: November 03, 2012, 01:57:52 AM
Nice, thanks for sharing!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!