905
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Christians are a hate group.
|
on: November 26, 2015, 02:19:49 PM
|
He's not Christian if he's threatening anyone.
Sweeping under the carpet the fact that Christians endlessly threaten people with the old "believe in my cult or burn in hell" tiresome sketch. Christians want to save atheists from hating people and going to hell but most of them won't listen until it's too late
|
|
|
907
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Who will win WW3?
|
on: November 26, 2015, 02:04:01 PM
|
USA does not have a dead hand system. If all or most of the US nukes and people are destroyed it can't srike back.
They don't have an Area 51 either... Most nonsense argument I have ever seen.
|
|
|
908
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Who will win WW3?
|
on: November 25, 2015, 07:18:38 PM
|
nonsense
Precautionary nuclear strike to completely destroy the adversary before it make it to strike back will left the winning side with totally life-sustaining continent. It will be a short war. You think people are required to be alive to launch nukes? Living people are required TO PREVENT nukes from launching on their own... It's designed this way because of what you just suggested... The mantra was "you either launch first, or convince your enemy that you can launch retaliatory after you're dead." The problem is that in the absence of human discretion, they will launch against multiple targets, not just the aggressive nation who launched the preliminary strike. If one country were disabled by a nuclear attack, the nukes will launch themselves at targets permanently flashed into onboard hardware. Some from unknown locations in the oceans, some from satellite orbit... There are nuclear weapons small enough to launch from a cannon, how many nukes do you think are orbiting the Earth right now? What you're suggesting is childish and out of touch with reality... USA does not have a dead hand system. If all or most of the US nukes and people are destroyed it can't srike back.
|
|
|
909
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Who will win WW3?
|
on: November 25, 2015, 06:43:17 PM
|
nonsense
Precautionary nuclear strike to completely destroy the adversary before it make it to strike back will left the winning side with totally life-sustaining continent. It will be a short war.
|
|
|
912
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin halving to be canceled?
|
on: November 25, 2015, 03:17:22 PM
|
I'm against the halving too. I think all major pools should fork bitcoin to not-halving version which will be supported in the future to maintain miners profits.
|
|
|
915
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Alert about a possible coming false flag in Syria
|
on: November 25, 2015, 03:03:58 PM
|
3. Russia and China are buying gold and selling their US Treasuries on the regular basis. This is actually confusing. Enough evidence exists to suggest that both Russia and China are selling their United States treasury bonds and accumulating gold bullion bars, for the last 2-3 years. But who is purchasing all the treasury bonds which they are selling? It can't be the Middle Eastern countries, as they are broke due to the low oil prices. Source, please
|
|
|
919
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Who will win WW3?
|
on: November 22, 2015, 08:27:06 AM
|
I am USA all the way, but I am sorry if there is a war where we are against china, I think that the sheer numbers will defeat us. There is a small possibility that we may win, because we own china so much money, they may not have enough money to buy the supplies and all to beat us. Whoever the winner is, there will be no winner, we will all be screwed.
"money" doesn't matter, China and Russia have huge gold reserves.
|
|
|
|