Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 03:18:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 [223] 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 ... 479 »
4441  Other / Off-topic / Re: Tl;dr? what does it mean? on: August 07, 2016, 06:03:06 PM
This will explain: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=tl%3Bdr&l=1
4442  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: How to bypass exchange fees on: August 07, 2016, 05:57:29 PM
Currently, with exchange fees in the 2-4% its difficult to make any profitable short sell because the price change needs to be 2-4+% in order to make profit.  Coinbase just increased their fees from 1% to 1.5% which makes a big difference for margin trading.  1.5% fee when buying bitcoin, then another 1.5% fee converting it to USD for a total of 3%.  Does anybody have any suggestions on how to make margin trades more effectively and not get reamed by exchange fees?
I tried playing different exchanges off each other, but in the end, when taking into consideration the fee differences, its about a wash.
Thank you very much!

When you buy bitcoins at Coinbase, you are not buying at an exchange. You are buying coins from Coinbase, and they charge you a 1.5% premium for the convenience.

If you want to trade, set up an account at an exchange such as Gemini, or GDAX (run by Coinbase), or Bitstamp, or BTC-e, or Bitfinex (lol). The fees for buying and selling at an exchange are much lower than 1.5%.
4443  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Credit Suisse Identifies 8 Barriers to Blockchain Adoption on: August 07, 2016, 05:26:12 PM
Here is my assessment:

  • Security vs Cost Trade-off: Bitcoin is more secure.
  • Misconception on the Relevance of Blockchain: Bitcoin won't solve this.
  • Network Consensus: Not a problem with Bitcoin. Bitcoin is already up and running.
  • Data: It depends on how banks decide to use block chains.
  • Vulnerability: Bitcoin is more secure.
  • Securing Data: Bitcoin has the same problem.
  • On and Off-Chain Identity: Bitcoin has the same problem.
  • DAO Attack: Bitcoin has an advantage, though no block chain can guarantee 100% immutability.
4444  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: BTC wallet with interest? on: August 07, 2016, 07:03:03 AM
Any bitcoin wallet or site that claims to pay you interest on your bitcoins is probably a scam. That doesn't include exchanges where you can loan to other traders.
4445  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What determines the price of a currency, when it enters to the first exchange? on: August 05, 2016, 06:55:39 AM
It is important to understand that there really is no "current" price.

There are three prices -
  • "bid" price: the highest price someone is currently offering to pay for the item
  • "ask" price: the lowest price at which someone is currently willing to sell the item
  • "last" price: the price of the last trade

Usually, the "last" price is considered the current price, but that doesn't mean the next trade will happen at that price. The price of the next trade is at either the bid or ask price.

Not only are there 3 different prices in one market, but the bid, ask, and last prices are different for every market.
4446  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why is this transaction unconfirmed? Multibit vs. Blockchain.info on: August 03, 2016, 11:55:11 PM
Please note that blockchain.info is not like wallets hosted by other providers. Only you have access to the bitcoins in your blockchain.info wallet. The wallet is encrypted in your browser. Blockchain.info only sees the encrypted wallet.
4447  Other / Archival / Re: . on: August 01, 2016, 09:22:38 PM
If there is a public address on the coin and no hologram, where is the private key?  Wink

Exactly. And not only that, but every coin has the same bitcoin address.
4448  Other / Archival / Re: . on: August 01, 2016, 08:39:09 PM
I do have the coin and have to admit i like this design. Cool
if someone still wants one, shoot a pm -EU-

It's a fake. I hope you didn't pay too much for it.
4449  Economy / Economics / Re: Why the US is funded by the FED and is not funded by taxes? on: August 01, 2016, 08:32:06 PM
Bitcoin is funded by money-printing, too. What do you think?
4450  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2016-08-01] Bitcoin users suggest removing Coinbase from recommended wallets li on: August 01, 2016, 08:29:11 PM
Articles about random opinions posted by insignificant people are stupid.

Furthermore, proposing the removal of Coinbase from a list of Bitcoin wallets because of their position on Ethereum is ludicrous.
4451  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Incredible stories of Bitcoin millionaires on: August 01, 2016, 08:22:03 PM
I was looking at https://blockchain.info/address/1Fd8RuZqJNG4v56rPD1v6rgYptwnHeJRWs Stefan Molyneux's bitcoin adress :
Final Balance   521.24590891 BTC

He accumulated quite a lot of bitcoins through donations, it will eventually buy a lot in a few years and it is incredible. Do you have other stories of people accumulating large amount of bitcoins without investing any fiat ?

521 BTC is currently worth about $320,000, and not $1 million.

"without investing any fiat" makes no sense to me because you can trade BTC for fiat at any time.  Stefan Molyneux currently has $320,000 worth of fiat invested in BTC. Where the $320,000 came from makes no difference. He is investing $320,000 in BTC.
4452  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: PumpTeam.Net - Elite Group of Pumpers on: July 25, 2016, 07:34:11 PM
... There used to be some really good honest pump groups ...

Ha ha. What an oxymoron! You are claiming that there used to be really good honest scammers? Pump-and-dump is a scam. Honor among thieves is not honesty.
4453  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Newbie Question on: July 25, 2016, 06:23:11 PM
can i just if anyone can give red trust or it depends on your rank??

It Needs to be justified as it takes a while to actually Show up in your Profile. Otherwise you could just give everybody you don't like a negative trust without any real reason.

You can give everybody you don't like a negative trust without any real reason.

If you give some positive or negative trust, then only you and people that see you with a positive trust rating will see a change in that person's trust rating. Nobody else will see a change.
4454  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Newbie Question on: July 24, 2016, 10:32:55 PM
Answer3:- No bro Mining is Not profitable Now because if the halving....

If mining is not profitable now, then why are so many people mining?
4455  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Would it be principle possible to own all bitcoins? on: July 21, 2016, 05:54:23 AM
I just got the following thought. If you would find a wallet that could hold all bitcoin addresses incl. there Private Keys, you should have all available Bitcoins in your wallet, or am I wrong? (It's just a theory)

All the bitcoin addresses that contain bitcoins (and that have ever contained bitcoins) are listed in the block chain. You just need to get their private keys.
4456  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Blockchain.info Updating of Wallet - What does it entail? on: July 21, 2016, 02:01:16 AM
Updating changes the wallet to an HD wallet. If you update the wallet, then you will have to send your bitcoins from the old wallet to the new wallet. That will cost time and a little bit of money.

The main advantage of an HD wallet is that you can back up all the keys that the wallet will ever use by backing up the "seed". You can also set up another copy of the wallet on another device.

4457  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Would you feel safe with 1 in 60,000,000 chance of collision attack? on: July 21, 2016, 01:53:54 AM
Just a simple question, if the answer is no please tell me the minimum number you'd feel safe at.

EDIT: If no also, would 1 in 2,176,782,336 be enough or still no?

It isn't clear what you mean by "collision attack". I'm going to assume that you mean the chance of randomly guessing a key would be 1 in 60 million.

You specified the risk, but what about the loss, and the cost of the attack? If the loss is 1 satoshi, then I wouldn't feel safe, but I also wouldn't care.

On the other hand, if the loss is 1 BTC, then no. My laptop can check 60 million addresses in just a few seconds.

To protect 1 BTC, I would feel safe with at least a 1 in 1.5 x 1020 chance, because then it would be more profitable to mine 1 BTC than to steal mine.
4458  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What if someone bought up all the existing bitcoins? on: July 20, 2016, 08:05:34 PM
...

...

This thread was started years ago. Anything worthwhile to be said has already been said.

Oh sorry! I didn't realize that you are posting spam in order to increase your post count. Carry on!  Angry
4459  Economy / Speculation / Re: How will halving affect the value? on: July 20, 2016, 07:52:17 PM
10 months after the halving in 2012, the price rose about $50 times. So this time, could rise about 10 times.

I realize that this is a speculation thread, but do you believe that the conditions in 2012 are the same as they are now, so that history will repeat itself?
4460  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: PumpTeam.Net - Elite Group of Pumpers on: July 19, 2016, 06:36:56 PM
For anyone thinking "pump" groups are anything other than a scam --

"Pump" comes from "pump-and-dump". Basically, the operator of a pump-and-dump scheme buys an altcoin at a cheap price and then announces to the group that a "pump" is occurring. The members begin buying at higher and higher prices. The "pump" is announced in the troll box and more suckers start buying.

The operator sells his coins on the way up and makes a nice profit. Eventually, the buying frenzy fizzles, the coin crashes, and the participants (including members) are holding worthless coins.

From Wikipedia:

"Pump and dump" (P&D) is a form of microcap stock fraud that involves artificially inflating the price of an owned stock through false and misleading positive statements, in order to sell the cheaply purchased stock at a higher price. Once the operators of the scheme "dump" sell their overvalued shares, the price falls and investors lose their money.

While fraudsters in the past relied on cold calls, the Internet now offers a cheaper and easier way of reaching large numbers of potential investors.
Pages: « 1 ... 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 [223] 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 ... 479 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!