150ltc?
Would you buy bitcoins.com for 150 BTC? That's a very but very bad rhetoric. |
|
|
|
|
I am looking to populate 7 empty slots I have, and because of power requirement mainly (and looking at the possibility of cheaper alternative), I am wondering, as there been any significant reports (across this thread probably) about 7870 LE (XT) Tahiti LE? I have heard a couple people claim 500khs no OC. If that is the case, it might be my next purchase, but they really need to do 500khs guaranteed to be profitable.
|
|
|
|
|
Also, that would have been fun to do when bitcoin got first adopted too. What would it have proven to your beloved bitcoin? At least if you wanna prove something, prove something that can't be done in what you defend.
Mr. Precious Time.
|
|
|
|
Even if this was possible, wouldn't placing a bounty on this potentially be deemed as criminal behaviour?
This is like hotmail saying their encryption is uncrackable and then you offer someone $500 to hack into their network and damage it to prove it's 'faulty'
Bitcoin isn't on the legal map. |
|
|
|
|
The fact you offered 500$ to someone who could make millions speaks a lot about your level of stupidity and how butthurt you are litecoin is +1000% in the last 2 weeks while bit coin stayed the same. (I love bitcoin, I am a litecoin user. Not everything has to be black and white, right or wrong)
|
|
|
|
Hey calm down lol
The description here is "General marketplace discussion.", so it don't qualifies Bitcoin only, BUT if you want to make sure that LTC user read that you should put on Alternate Cryptocurrencies and in the "official" LTC forum
There was no yelling/caps/bad words involved, don't know what's not so calm. LTC users read bitcointalk, its where it all started, from my point of view, at this point its pretty much a misnomer ''the cryptocurrency'' forum. I don't know why SOME (not all) get so butthurt when they see ''ltc''. Guess they are mad ltc made money lately vs being plummeted by ASIC. Now, with all that said, I'll even sell them for 70 ltc (LTC, Litecoin, litecoin) |
|
|
|
If you want to sell for Litecoin, shouldn't it be moved to Alternative Cryptocurrencies?
So you want sales thread to go in the single already cluttered not-marketplace category? And should we move people asking for USD to overclockers.com? I think its appropriate here. |
|
|
|
I just want to advice people, although the gigabyte 7950 WF3 looks like a good buy, its complete POS. They come with a hardware locked core of 1.25 (default is supposed to be 1v ish) none of them over clocks higher than 1000/1450 and they run at 80c.
I have 5 of them unfortunately So getting roughly 580khs from cards that could get much more.
None of mine are hardware locked.  I'll try and post a pic of my pcb after, wondering if they did a silent revision. I googled and apparently its most that have been bought after December. Has the fx0 bios flashed on both CMOS. Should also note this crappy new revision also comes with 8pin + 6pin vs 6pinx2 I'm trying to return them and get 3x7970 instead. Will be 300$ more for basically 500khs more, and better resale value. And probably much less hassle too. These 7950s are awful all around. Their temps are alarming, and cause instability. I'd always feel on the edge when leaving for a week (which I often do) |
|
|
|
|
I just want to advice people, although the gigabyte 7950 WF3 looks like a good buy, its complete POS. They come with a hardware locked core of 1.25 (default is supposed to be 1v ish) none of them over clocks higher than 1000/1450 and they run at 80c.
I have 5 of them unfortunately So getting roughly 580khs from cards that could get much more.
|
|
|
|
Will keep you guys updated!  I don't know, it doesn't look like jasinlee wants you as his PR guy, so... who are you? |
|
|
|
What would you offer me for a 7970 that mines perfectly overclocked to 1100/950mem or so @ 660MH/s, but artifacts in Windows? I'm currently mining with it, which makes a few bucks a day, so I'm not dying to part with it.
Because of natural artifacts (dying leg pretty much), I am not willing to give more than 150$. Sorry. |
|
|
|
|
Pretty straight forward. No cards with weak bearing, broken fans and whatnot. Will pay market price, so no, not 325$ for a 7970 that was mined on for 6months.
Price quoting in USD, paid in btc.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a OCZ power stream 520w, barely used although its an old model its a cream in psu's. I am no hurry to sell, will do 1.8btc from Canada shipped and guarantee no duty.
|
|
|
|
i guess a guy cant go to work and not be on bitcointalk all day. im very glad i checked bitmit before i sent this out and no i wont be selling this again becuase rockso cant wait for anything. so im sorry that i didn't post the tracking number and then because i was at work you decided to not wait for me to be able to send it.
Sorry to intrude, but no matter what, if you don't send on the planned date, don't blame the buyer for cancelling. Everyone has a life and work, but not everyone keep their engagements. It's on you, not him. |
|
|
|
|
cgminer doesnt work for me, in the console display it just says "started" and never goes beyond that. its a 7870 and using your settings (7870(cgminer)) to make sure. Dont know what it could be.
Something I cant seem to find is default lookup, and an option for it would be neat too.
|
|
|
|
Just a thought, but if everyone is experiencing the same number of stales and invalids and it is pplns, then it stands to reason that you are still getting the same payout if never a single invalid or stale was submitted. Think about it like this:
You submit 1000 total shares with 15% stale or invalid
Someone else submits 500 shares with 15% stale or invalid
Amount given per block is 50
850+425= 1275 total shares
Your cut of the 50 will be 50 * (850/1275) = 33.333
Their's would be 50 * (425/1275) = 16.666
If no invalids or stales were submitted
1000+500 = 1500 shares
Your cut of 50 will be 50 * (1000/1500) = 33.333
Their's would be 50 * (500/1500) = 16.666
Now if this was just PPS, then there would be a problem.
Please let me know if my assumptions are wrong.
it also means the pool finds less block per potential has power. So it means you get less. |
|
|
|
they really should up the limit to 1GB and be done with it...  Two problems with that: - Miners in countries where internet access is poor (or bitcoin is outlawed so they have to use Tor) become unable to mine, because they'll never download the big block in time (= 100% stale).
- If the block size limit is so large as to be effectively limitless, a big part of the design for the 0-reward endgame gets ruined (since no scarcity of slots for transaction inclusion in block = no incentive to outbid other transactions' fees).
Countries with scarce internet access have much bigger problems than bitcoin. And also, let's not start fixing a "problem" (its not) with the target people being non-users.... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
