[2018-06-19 21:34:12.187] Possible block solve diff 154102402115128.281250 !
[2018-06-19 21:34:12.287] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-06-19 21:34:12.736] Solved block 528272 by 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0
[2018-06-19 21:34:12.736] User 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V:{"hashrate1m": "177P", "hashrate5m": "172P", "hashrate1hr": "167P", "hashrate1d": "157P", "hashrate7d": "104P"}
[2018-06-19 21:34:12.736] Worker 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0:{"hashrate1m": "137P", "hashrate5m": "133P", "hashrate1hr": "129P", "hashrate1d": "118P", "hashrate7d": "82.2P"}
[2018-06-19 21:42:48.523] Hash for block height 528272 confirms block was CONFIRMED
I just realized the difficulty solved was 151T. This would be a block solve 5 years from now. |
|
|
|
|
Next difficulty jump is looking like 10+% again. I wish it would go down for a change.
|
|
|
|
Learn to post in the correct section. This is for alt coin pools. |
|
|
|
Lets see what this photo does 2 full racks of lamb need to be cut and browned after a long slow roast  fully cut ready to eat  Ill bring the beer, where we meeting at?! |
|
|
|
anyone know if i can put the s7 firmware into a v9?  since everyone is claiming they a refurb. s7's anywaysAnd just *where* is this 'everyone' to be found? The s7 and s9 use entirely different chips. V9 not s9 Because the BM1385 and the BM1580 are the same chip and they just overclocked the balls out of 29 less chips (that they manually ripped off the boards with ViceGrips) in the V9 to get the same results as an S7, right?  I mean since we can turn lead into gold nowadays that seems reasonably plausible. |
|
|
|
anyone know if i can put the s7 firmware into a v9? since everyone is claiming they a refurb. s7's anywaysAnd just *where* is this 'everyone' to be found? The s7 and s9 use entirely different chips. V9 not s9 |
|
|
|
|
Paying .06kwh atm so I'm making more than most.
|
|
|
|
|
Still have plenty available
|
|
|
|
Does block song,
Someone please give this man some merit. I just laughed for 5 minutes reading this I gave you some merit. So I guess you can pass it on? Thanks, I passed it on! |
|
|
|
Does block song,
Block a chuck a block a chucka
wooooo wooo wooo
Blocka chucka block a chucka
In the poollll the peaceful pool the variance sleeps tonight wooooooo
In the poolll the mighty pool the variance sleeps tonight woooooooooo.
Hush my miners, no fear my miners , kano guards the pool
Hush my miners, no fear my miners , kano guards the pool
oooooo
( with many apologies to the performers and creators of "the lion sleeps tonight")
come on blocks!
MINE ON!!!
Someone please give this man some merit. I just laughed for 5 minutes reading this |
|
|
|
|
Another block yay! Its a block party!!!
|
|
|
|
Watching the chain to see if we win a double race... likely the only adrenaline-inducing thing left in mining.  Watching the pool you mine in lose that race... likely the worst feeling left in mining.  Alas it was a foregone conclusion. It wasn't much of an orphan race at all, so even the fast block change code in the pool couldn't have prevented us losing that one. For people wondering what he's talking about, we had a block orphaned. What happened was the block had already been solved by another pool, but a miner submitted a stale share 700ms later that was also a block solve. There was almost no chance it was going to be successful, but the pool will try to use it as a block solve anyway, forcing bitcoind to accept the block, in the unlikely event it wins the orphan race (or solves two blocks back to back). Realistically the pool can just ignore it since it was stale but we'll try anything to get a block. Here are the pool logs where you can see it says it's submitting a stale share block solve: [2018-06-14 18:11:25.412] Block hash changed to 00000000000000000037e634734805d4a48f7d50125ecc55a2f137e2722a32f3
[2018-06-14 18:11:26.100] Possible stale share block solve diff 10130992321539.841797 !
[2018-06-14 18:11:26.100] Submitting block data!
[2018-06-14 18:11:26.107] SUBMIT BLOCK RETURNED: inconclusive
[2018-06-14 18:11:26.171] Hash for block height 527471 confirms block was ACCEPTED
[2018-06-14 18:11:26.176] Solved block 527471 by 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0
[2018-06-14 18:11:26.176] User 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V:{"hashrate1m": "142P", "hashrate5m": "142P", "hashrate1hr": "136P", "hashrate1d": "83.7P", "hashrate7d": "56.6P"}
[2018-06-14 18:11:26.176] Worker 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0:{"hashrate1m": "107P", "hashrate5m": "107P", "hashrate1hr": "102P", "hashrate1d": "73.4P", "hashrate7d": "54.6P"}
[2018-06-14 18:11:26.272] Block hash changed to 0000000000000000001bc87b3d85516a0b00bf873a43dbef986125c269c210d8
[2018-06-14 18:32:31.978] Hash for block height 527471 confirms block was ORPHANED
At the end the pool sees that it lost the orphan race and moves to the new block. Unfortunate, but one of the realities of mining. The only fortunate part is the pool code already takes into account what should happen in the case of an orphan, to prevent the interleaved payouts getting out of sync. It will also NOT artificially reset the diff back to 0% since we didn't win a block. You can see the full details of what would have been a block in this sadly named block file: http://ckpool.org/blocks/527471.orphanedWhat happens during an orphan block? Do coins appear in our wallets (as unmatured) then get taken away when its officially orphaned? |
|
|
|
Wallet fully synced and yet no TX for latest payout? strange.
"17zyuMZzuD4cd4WCP24WcnnMcBkYiRc3es": 0.01627649
I got my payout |
|
|
|
|
Would have been a double block day if not for the orphan!
|
|
|
|
Highest PPS that I know of is connectbtc 110% instead of Via and f2p at 105%(?) Also isnt via PPS+?
@110% im getting paid for shares for a 13.75BTC block which we havent even come close to hitting in the past 4+ months.
CK takes my halong T1 miners though as connect btc is bitmain owned and they wont be implementing ASICBoost anytime soon, so I happily split my miners between the 2. With luck, CK could be more profitable, or have more profitable months, but if TX fees stay low PPS seems to be the most profitable way to go.
If fees stay low, PPS from the pools will not be sustainable at that rate anyway since the money has to come from somewhere and the blocks won't be reimbursing them for the amount they give out, and it's not like they'd pay you to mine there unless they actually wanted your extra hashrate for nefarious purposes or something stupid. There was an analysis done many years ago by Organofcorti, who unfortunately is no longer active on the forums due to his family, that showed how much money in reserve a PPS pool would have to have to cope with the worst possible luck stretches and it was astoundingly high. Add to that the fact that PPS pools are the number one potential target for block withholding attacks, it's amazing that more haven't gone under (there are plenty of pools that have come and gone though.) How does block withholding work? I always thought it would be the pool that did the withholding, is it the miner that does it instead? What nefarious purposes can hashrate be used for (besides block withholding)? |
|
|
|
|
Highest PPS that I know of is connectbtc 110% instead of Via and f2p at 105%(?) Also isnt via PPS+?
@110% im getting paid for shares for a 13.75BTC block which we havent even come close to hitting in the past 4+ months.
CK takes my halong T1 miners though as connect btc is bitmain owned and they wont be implementing ASICBoost anytime soon, so I happily split my miners between the 2. With luck, CK could be more profitable, or have more profitable months, but if TX fees stay low PPS seems to be the most profitable way to go.
|
|
|
|
What would be the benefit of joining a smaller pool like ck, over a larger pool like slush or kano. Is it just because reward share is higher when a block is solved? If so, does this just mean we are hoping to get lucky and go on a hot streak? I was under the impression that it all "evens out" over the long run. I am new to this and still learning !
0% fee, so saves more money over the long run. And yes, since you get paid for higher dif shares you can potentially earn more (or less) than other pools. In theory this pool is the 2nd most profitable. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
