Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 04:39:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 317 »
121  Other / Meta / Re: [Discussion] Forum tipping service on: January 01, 2024, 07:58:55 PM
Will you be controlling all the funds? I was hoping this to be implemented on forum itself. It is actually a brilliant idea and further more it could be used even to pay campaign participants all through the use of LN, I think the LN shills need to invest in this idea with financial support, a great opportunity to introduce LN to the masses. Where do I sign up?
122  Other / Ivory Tower / Re: Dangers, exploit methods and countermeasures regarding Collisions!!! on: January 01, 2024, 05:58:09 PM
I had this for a long time wanting to share but had other things to do, here is the method on how to find sha256 hashes with any leading hexadecimal characters. And this is based on elliptic curve alone, I haven't tried randomly hashing strings like how Bitcoin miners doing it.



Here are some examples, perform double sha256 on the following:
Code: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Here is the method :

"We make a fake WIF in any desired range, even out of EC range, we give it a fake checksum, then we use wifsolver cuda with a stride of for example 100000000 and we give it our desired checksum, for example 00000000 then it will start grinding to find us a wif with our set checksum, though we would need to leave target blank, we could use either -c or -u for compressed/uncompressed, optional. we will  then  decode the found wif and remove the last 8 characters and then perform a base 58 checksum encode, the resulting wif will have a checksum like 00000000 or anything we have already set."
123  Economy / Reputation / Re: Should Ratimov aka Symmetrick be in DT1? on: January 01, 2024, 04:57:29 PM
I know he was rude, abusive, and essentially what we call a c*nt around these woods, but I'm pretty much certain he was a bigger man than some people around here. But don't mind me, by all means continue your off topic circle jerking on his fresh grave. Damn even his corps has more honour "comparing" to some people.

 Grin happy new year  Grin
124  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin have behaved like a fine wine 🍷 on: January 01, 2024, 04:48:55 PM
Debatable though, because I have heard that persian carpets and most notably women get better as they age and mature, on the other hand, we have Bitcoin, as it ages more and more people realize there is something they haven't screwed yet, so they come and try their best, one could mention ordiballs, erc20 whatnot and other garbage out there. 😉
125  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Powerful Crypto Screener on: January 01, 2024, 02:02:56 PM
Hey OP, glad to see you are succeeding in your work, may I use your link in my sig space for 24 hours? I like to support startups. I don't ask for anything in return though. 😉
126  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What course can one study in university that can build potential in bitcoin? on: January 01, 2024, 01:50:32 PM
Depends on what area of the technology you are gonna focus more, if you want to be a Bitcoin dev, no need to go to university, in fact you don't need academic education, because what good our educated community members have done for us? They all learned whatever good they have ever contributed outside the universities.

First lesson, go to bounty's board, read the posts for a week, you'd learn some hard lessons and realize you'll end up developing one of those useless projects with scam being the end game. Lol
127  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] BitMixList.org - Bitcoin Mixer List on: January 01, 2024, 12:08:05 PM
Now you are safe, lets see who is gonna attack your site from now on, though they might do it, but eventually they will run out of money and drop it. And if there is any issues in the future I'm sure you will find sponsors/donation supporters to keep this up. 😉
128  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Ordinals website is under a DDoS attack on: January 01, 2024, 06:48:55 AM
Finally some good news, they should be DDOSed to oblivion, I don't care about the legality of DDOSing etc, if it's bad for the things you mentioned, yes we should call it that, but when it's used to cut the access of leeches to Bitcoin, it's a good thing. Here are some kisses for the attacker. 😘😗😘😗 Bitcoin refuses to be a submissive little bitch.
It is not cool to appreciate something wrong and praising hackers for DDOSing just because we are not happy with Ordinals.
what is wrong will still be wrong.
and btw we don't know what was the intention of the hacker for DDOSing the servers. do you think hackers would care about common people and doing that to support Bitcoiner. No. they are just doing this to harm Ordinal servers and cause lose for them and maybe ask for some ransomware money too.
Oh honey, I would say ddos them 24/7 if it were up to me, there is nothing good for us in ordiballs, maybe there is a good amount of money to take from unsuspected newbies, but scam is scam. Even though I respect anyone's rights to use Bitcoin network, but there should be a price to pay if they wish to launch their garbage spams on Bitcoin.
129  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Understanding BIP 39 as a layperson - offline seed generation on: January 01, 2024, 06:40:32 AM
How do you perform sha256 by hand? That's not called being genius but rather stupid, because you could just use a script to do that for you. Also there is no need to generate seeds manually, just use a standard and secure wallet to do all of that. Manipulating things like that is bound for disaster.
130  Other / Meta / Re: We are going to miss the Mixer Campaign in Bitcointalk forum on: January 01, 2024, 05:39:49 AM
There is another forum advertising such services, everyone should teleport over there and participate, it's a good earning opportunity and you must not miss this chance. Just remember, Bitcointalk made you who you are now, so no betrayals. 😉
131  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk 2023 in retrospect on: December 31, 2023, 05:32:14 PM
I'm pretty much certain that what you just posted was GB 2023 in retrospect. But that's just me, you know? 😉
132  Other / Archival / Re: [banned mixer] - Bitcoin mixer | 50+ BTC in reserves are confirmed! on: December 31, 2023, 04:38:31 PM
You saw through our marketing ploy, confirming your importance as a trusted forum member. Our respect Smiley. But you and other users, understand... The new conditions of the forum contributed to this cunning move on our part. Our competitors spent significant amounts per month on a subscription company, and we had such goals. But blocking branches devalues costs, and it was necessary to remain in history and raise coverage at the end of existence. An aggressive marketing strategy does not make our mixer fraudulent. Yes, this fact of staging for someone will mean stopping working with our service, but others will see this as a non-standard approach to solving the problem. It was just the "yellow press" and that was it. It is inherent in all businessmen, and we are no exception. This is not a scam and we are not scammers. This proves the fact that there is not a single victim.

Quote
Quote
The reason for today's problem: a technical glitch that caused the suspension of transactions in our system. It's nothing serious.
What a convenient way to end your thread 2 days before it gets locked by Admin and all mixer owned accounts get banned from posting!

Exactly!  Wink

Umm... this is you confirming that you're astroturfing? You create a fake complaint by your own account to boost credibility from an impression that you're trustworthy enough to solve such big transaction in a very short time?

Yes, it is. But we can't understand why "in a very short time"? This kind of problem is solved very quickly when two parties (the operator and the client) have contacted each other. There's nothing here that could take a lot of time.  Wink
Quoted for prosperity, so fu*king lol, you even blink at the end like it's totally OK to deceive people in this way? You either don't understand what you are saying or you have gone nutz since this is the last day of your scammy service. Both deserve a lol at the same time. 😉
133  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk Cheers: Celebrating the Start of 2024 with Crypto Hopes on: December 31, 2023, 04:26:51 PM
Is 2024 the year of dragon? If yes, then here we come. @the world. But on the other hand "The Year of the Dragon is bringing in some special chances for Rats." From google, so whatever that means, I'm still optimistic about the year of the dragon.😉
134  Economy / Reputation / Re: [Discussion] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆 on: December 31, 2023, 01:39:13 PM
Guys, so I was wondering since multiple accounts could vote for the main account to win the moneyz, is there a way to do KYC for voters? Instead we call it KYV, know your voters. I bet half of those alts don't even know why they are voting me as anti hero, I am willing to bet they don't even know what anti hero means, they just seem to go with the flow since it looks like I'm against their lovely campaign managers or something.

I heard somewhere, I can't recall where exactly, maybe on some gas station toilet wall, that sh*t floats on water. But what is it's relevance to this topic I have yet to discover.😂🤦‍♂️

Also obvious alts should not be allowed to cast a vote, I mean those with low merits and same post and activity counts.

Ps, I'm advocating against banning mixers in my sig space, so you weasels can continue milking them with your generic 4 liners, but it's out of my hands.😅
135  Other / Meta / Re: Decentralize Bitcointalk on: December 31, 2023, 10:37:18 AM

(already asked the forum not to advertise mixers).

This is an odd and bold statement from a traitor, after all you above all should know this is not true, no government agency asked this forum to stop facilitating the advertisement of mixers, as a moderator of altcoinhack forum you should know this.
Unless your garbage forum and it's KYC verified admin is not hosted in US and the admin is not actually KYC verified as stated on his profile, which makes him a liar. And one has to wonder as to why they hired you as a moderator without doing any background checks on you. I guess they were too desperate and as soon as they saw you are a DT here, they thought it's the best move to make. While they have no idea that you have zero influence here, at least they didn't count on me to be active around these woods. Only if I manage to figure out who the admin is over there. None of you traitors will be safe here then.
136  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Blockchain design wins: where are they? on: December 31, 2023, 07:24:33 AM
What more design win you want other than the fact that after appearance of Bitcoin which is based on blockchain technology we are witnessing the demise of dollar as the first world currency and the most powerful currency in the world? And this is the first step in a bigger change that will come in the next decade. And there is nothing stopping it.
137  Other / Meta / Re: Decentralize Bitcointalk on: December 31, 2023, 06:54:12 AM
@OP, the reason as to why Bitcoin will never be banned worldwide is because us Bitcoiners are more dangerous without Bitcoin, while as long as we are happy and friendly with having Bitcoin, which means by having it, we'd have a seat around the table of big guns in the world, and as soon as they take away our seat, we will destroy the table. So either they play along, or there will be no game for them to play either.

So there is no need to decentralize this forum, now that they know who they are dealing with.
138  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why gcd between base point and any other point will give us one or three? on: December 31, 2023, 06:35:12 AM
@j2002ba2, can you explain why do we get y= 0x8 when we set x= 0x7, y= 0x8 and k= lambda on secp curve? There was a raccoon around here, he couldn't satisfy me with his answer. Apology for the humor.
139  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [exit scam waiting to happen] [banned mixer] self-vouching | Type 1 Flag on: December 31, 2023, 04:26:11 AM
Fu*king lol. So they admitted it was a show to buy legitimacy? This is why I raised the question about their motives of hiring GB at the nearing end of the period in which the mixers were about to get banned, it was obvious that they were trying to buy legitimacy by doing that. And now this is the last nail on their coffin, they are untrustworthy and should not be trusted with a single satoshi. Not to mention that they merited a post where a member offered the noose in a meme to me, supporting the suggestion that I should kill myself. Untrustworthy scum move.

Nice job.👏👏
140  Other / Archival / Re: 🌀 [banned mixer] - CoinJoin Mixer | Your Anonymity Is Our Priority! on: December 28, 2023, 11:03:25 PM
Are you guys a partner of [banned mixer] ? I'd advise caution as they have shown all the red flags of an exit scam, they haven't answered our questions for more than 10 days, it seems they don't care anymore about legitimate questions. Better be careful.
Unijoin is an independent platform, built on a completely different technology in contrast to Mixers that use Jambler software.

The thread name contains the keyword "CoinJoin" Lol.
Well thanks for clarification, I thought every mixer you represent as manager is under the same mother company. If they are not, then no need to worry about anything.

I had no idea mixers produce cards, nice one btw.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 317 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!