I had the same thing happen to me when we jumped up to $1200. Puts a whole new perspective on life. Even now.

You go through your whole life with the idea that you have to work to make money, you need to upgrade your skills so you can get further in your career, you plan on working the rest of your life.

Then this happens and that is all thrown out the window. At the very least you can stop working at a job you don't like and start doing things you do like.

For me I want to work on something else and I keep falling into the old way of thinking of looking at how profitable it will be. Obviously if I'm working I want to get compensated but it is not as important. But if I work at some fun job that only pays me $10-$20 per day there's really no reason to make money, may as well do voluntary work.

I have been considering doing some blockchain work like Satoshi and not going the ICO route to make big bucks...just create something that will help the world and set it out there to grow on its own.

I just wanna go surfing  

My ultimate dream is a sign in front of my business:  "Gone swimming" !

Guys, i can´t comprehent my sudden wealth, please help me.

This no joke. It´s probably, because i have no use of lambos, don´t know . . .

Reading all bullish posts always gets me scared. Where the fuck are the bears when we need them? Go post some FUD so we can keep going, damn it!

I'm pretty sure you read Mark Yusko's tweet right. Because that's basicly what he was saying!

I'd wait for their Gen 2 SUV, personally. I've heard anecdotally from owners that the first batch of Model X's had numerous issues.

TBH, though, I'm looking forward to Porsche's EV offering near 2020.

this shit is going up 

Wee.

And if the idea you oppose is a good one?

Did Adam leave? If so, when where and why?

Here comes $6000 again!

Take your time

^^^ see how he is trying to twist the language around like a pretzel so that Bitcoin becomes S1X ... a slippery shit on our hands here.

There is no s1x, it is simply bitcoin, your propaganda is not going to work here.

Since we are discussing politics, we might as well discussing Bitcoin politics.  As people may know already, BCH is set to hard fork on Nov. 13, 2017 to change their EDA/DAA.  
https://bitsonline.com/bitcoin-cash-hard-fork/
Now while people may laugh it off as just another joke from an ALT.  I believe the date is chosen to deliberately cause max disruption.  

As we know, the S2X fork is set to happen around Nov 14, 2017 and that the next BTC difficulty adjustment will likely increase difficulty by at least 10%.  So with another difficulty adjustment around Nov 10, we would likely see difficulty rise to at least 15~20% higher than the current level.

As we discussed before, S2X coin is now trading far below the S1X/Core at the current rate (6:1).  So the NYA miners are looking at 80%~90% mining loss right off gate if they choose to follow the S2X chain.  There is no EDA either, so as more miners bail, the remaining miners would face an impossible task in getting to 100 blocks to collect their pay at the current projected difficulty.  We also know that at least 30% of current hashrate is "mercenary" in that they are profit seeking and will jump to the currently most profitable chain, based on BCH experience.  

So by changing the BCH algorithm on Nov 13, it seeks to draw in the most opportunistic miners right before the S2X fork, so that remaining miners would have a better chance of enforcing a NYA outcome and make S2X succeed.  We already know that F2Pool pulled out of NYA and that ViaBTC would offer its miners the option to mine either S1X or S2X chain.  By making BCH profitable to mine on Nov. 13, miners who would have bailed on NYA on Nov 14 because S2X price is so unprofitable, would be unavailable on S1X/Core chain.

By trying to draw as much of profit-seeking hashrate to BCH instead of having them jump over to S1X chain right from the start, I presume the purpose is to try to crash the S1X price, or at least try to narrow the huge price difference between S1X and S2X so that people like Roger Ver, who make the 1000 BTC swap bet, can at least cover their ass and not look as bad.  It could also make the forking debacle more drawn out than expected, as its ultimately a power struggle between miners and hodlers.  Miners have to pay for electricity and depreciation, while it's free for hodler to hodl and not making any tx.  So narrowing the price difference between S1X and S2X would make miners' struggle easier.  

I remember when he started it. I trolled and I trolled. And no one listened. I think they saw it as a way of bootstrapping an economy. But right, a blind man could have seen it coming.

^^^^
Much better, awesome! 

I've been panic buying every deep dip and panic hodling in between since early 2013. It's become an obsession.

It's started to interfere with things in my life like mindless consumerism, squandering, poverty, etc. I feel I'm not doing my part to help transnational corporations and name-brand advertisers.

All that money I could have spent on trinkets and status symbols dumped into that bottomless pit called a Bitcoin stash.

What do I have to show for it? A few dozen QR codes and a tiny little USB dongle? Oh the shame.  

Looks like Lauda had a total body make over.  

I consider only C to be correct.  The other two assertions are not correct.

We have the next likely resistance points in the $6800 to $7800 range, so if we go to $8100 that woudl be bullish and would have likely broken through the likely resistance range.

Conservative would be prices going in the lower end of the range or not quite making the range.

It is difficult to imagine exactly what is bearish - since we are already into amazing price territories - but I would think that bearish would be to experience another correction here that goes beyond 60%.  

Since we have quite a bit of ongoing upwards price pressures and recently having had broken through $6k, it seems to me to be quite against the odds to even have a 10% price correction - without some major FUDding.  Also, even though I believe that BTG is not driving this run, except perhaps on the margins, any 10% or more correction would be more likely to occur after the Oct. 25 forkening, no?

is this the s-curve take off?