No one learns trading from mother’s womb. Trading is a skill that you need to acquire. You will master in trading as the time passes or when you gain more experience. On the other hand if you make losses then it doesn’t mean you are really bad in trading. Just you need to gain more knowledge and skills and you need to practice and gain experience. I know many gave up in trading when they encounter big losses. But you would love the taste of profit, once you try the loss.

Exactly! it's absolutely just self preference and their belief of which one has more value not just today but n te future. For some, they belive that crypto will be gone in the future. Those are the once who invest in gold and silver instead. For other, bitcoin is the future, so they even use their savings just to accumulate cryptocurrency. Is there anything wrng with that? None.

The most important is both parties are trying to wants to make generatinal wealth by investing in an asset that they believe in.

This has been one of the most common ways of getting access to one’s Wallet by phishing. All these airdrops and testnets like always requires you to connect your wallet to a particular site, some might have paid off in the past but most are definitely not worth the hassle. Do not connect your wallet to any website no matter how trust worthy they claim to be.

If at all you would like to engage in airdrops which you should know is no longer worth your time or risk anymore then I would suggest you use a different wallet entirely from your personal wallet where your coins are stored. If there is even a way to use a different device then kindly do that, because most of these sites instill malware like Clipboard Malware which would not only affect that particular wallet but also the entire wallets on that device

Gold is a great store of value, but you'll never achieve the same gains over the long term than investing on Bitcoin itself. You see, crypto brings huge profits due to its extremely unpredictable nature. Some people trust Gold and Silver more than crypto simply because they've been around for ages. Crypto is relatively new to the world, so there's a long road ahead before it gains the confidence among everyday people. Ultimately, it's all about diversifying your investment in order to minimize as much risks as possible. As long as you do that, you'll be on a road towards non-stop financial success. Just my opinion

In any case, experience is invaluable, and this is no exception when it comes to realizing the points I mentioned earlier. I didn't realize it right away either, but it has been a long process for me to be able to say things like this.
And if we talk about risk, or the consequences of what we do, then it is very clear that everything has that risk, whether it is a small risk or a big risk. and again it is experience that helps us determine whether the risk is worth taking or we should avoid it.

Trading has both profits and losses. If you only focus on profits, your emotions will influence your judgment. You are not wrong about making profits, but you need to learn to lose too. If you think about profit even before you start, you will never get profit. Instead, you will be making losses. Learn the process first. In this learning process, you will make losses. That doesn't mean you should give up on it.

Learn the process and learn to lose. When you master it, you will be making more than what you have lost. It's a process and you have to trust it. Only then you can become a good trader.

what should be solved from the problem of rich people, they are capable enough in many ways, why should we help someone who is basically capable in financial terms. if it's poor people, even they only think about how to eat today or tomorrow, they don't think about how they will enjoy their life. I think it's more appropriate to help the poor first.

Diversification does not help us get the maximum profit, but only helps us to reduce risk, so depending on the risk tolerance of each person, there is the most suitable option. When we have $100k and invest $50k in bitcoin and $50k in gold, gold doesn't fluctuate too much, how can we get the maximum return if compared to the investment 100k dollars into bitcoin?

Because I don't have a lot of money, investing in gold for me is a barrier to increasing profits. So I will accept the risk when investing in bitcoin. Although the risk will be higher, but if successful, my profit will be maximum than investing in gold.

I think that you are referring to my example of a $1,200 budget and placing them in 4 different price locations.

I think that I largely addressed this as a way that some kinds of buy order structures and plans are deficient and they may well cause panic because of their deficiencies, so merely dividing them into equal parts would not necessarily improve the deficiencies that I was trying to point out, but I agree with you that there are some benefits in terms of trying to stay somewhat consistent with amounts, once we might figure out other details, such as what are our increments, how much we have in our budget and how far down we want our buys to go in order to attempt to account for what we believe to be worse case scenarios (and perhaps even having enough of a budget to go beyond what we consider to be worse case scenarios).

Those sound like the kinds of mistakes that you should be able to learn your way out of, and for sure I understand that they happen because they used to happen with me, and I think that part of the way out of those kinds of mistakes is to create plans that go beyond expectations, and sure you might have to readjust the plans after the BTC price might end up moving close to your limits, so then your expectations would end up changing.

Let's say that you had $1,200 that you had set up for BTC buys, and you set them up as follows:

$27,500 = $400

$26,000 = $400

$23,500 = $200

$22,000 = $200

Those seem to be fairly reasonable placements of orders, even though I probably would spread them out more evenly, and maybe every $500 in equal increments down to $20k or so, and sure that might only leave me with less than $50 per buy order, and even if you go every $1,000, you still run out of money quickly if you ONLY have $1,200 that is available for buying on dips.  Of course, you are going to have cashflow coming in too, so you might be able to add to your buying on dips, but if the dip ends up coming in faster than you expected, then surely, you could end up not having additional money to add to the dip buys.

Maybe you really did not expect any orders below $26k to get filled, so you were not even very serious about those below $26k orders - however, when you saw the BTC price dropping so fast, you started to think that it might be better to pull your $26k buy order because the BTC price drop had been happening in such a ways that seems much more severe than you thought could even be possible... so surely part of your problem may well be that you do not have enough in reserve and you have not structured your buy orders well, and sure you even admit that you may well be trying to be too greedy, which is a kind of sign of gambling and/or being overly invested.. you are likely investing beyond your budget and trying to be overly strategic about your buy orders in such a way that is not even healthy for your own psychology.

You are the ONLY one that can really fix it, and I would suggest that the most logical fix is to either spread out your buy orders more and/or to make them smaller and stop trying to catch the exact bottom because the exact bottom does not likely matter as much as you think it does, even if other people are engaged in those same practices and have those same kinds of gambling style mentalities.

I think we can all agree with the fact that City didn't look great at all last night even if they won the game. They lacked pace , speed , focus and Newcastle was actually close to get 1 point. I know it's just the start of the season but City is looking a bit tired after all these years of pushing 110% every season.

I also think that United is the worst team of the big 5 clubs of EPL and by the way they play  , I can already see another season without achieving any trophies or big international performance. 

The word "donations" is misused in my opinion. Politicians who were willing to accept that money and thus seek to change legislation to suit the case could be considered complicit. This is called "bribery" and has no other designation. But we have not heard that any of these members have been suspended or held accountable.
Even before the collapse of Ftx, Sam Bankman Fried was known to give money to some MPs and politicians without any legal reason for doing so. I find it strange that this is not punishable and is considered a "donation".

You are meant to have set your buy orders while you wait for the dip to go down. One can wait to buy at a lower price, and the market can just begin to recover again. Some weeks ago, I was just giving an example of someone who expected to buy Bitcoin at $25k, but after their desired price was reached, they still decided to readjust the order so they could buy at $23k. It could happen that the price does not drop to the new expected level.

Although I usually set my buy order before hand, recently I have had no buy order. Just yesterday I saw how the Bitcoin price was behaving, and I decided to set an order to buy at $25,500. Surprisingly, to me, it got executed. Even if the price goes a bit low, at least I took advantage of what I consider a price dip yesterday.

Ini ga ada hubungannya dengan Pasal 510 tsb gan yang isinya tentang kesengajaan seseorang membuat orang lain kehilangan hak pilih, kek misalnya ane bos di PT XYZ lalu tidak meliburkan dan tidak memberikan waktu karyawan nyoblos pada waktu Pemilu...

Kalau di Indo kan PNS, TNI & Polri diharuskan netral. Nah TNI & Polri udah ga bisa nyoblos, ini benar agar netral. Sayangnya PNS masih bisa nyoblos jadi kalo dibilang netral ya ga bisa 100%. Makanya disamakan saja agar kalau rezim ABC yang berkuasa lalu naekin gaji PNS, tidak ada pengaruhnya ke suara ABC.