Hi,
I need some help: I can't add a pair.
The process:
Edit pairs + kraken BTC/USD
Message: "You already have this pair"
But the pair is not in the list!!!
I have the PRO version
Thanks
|
|
|
Hello everybody. I agree with you, Risto: we could be watching a massive turning point. It's also probable that we'll see the top of the bubble way before the halving (the halving is spected by July 11th, according to bitcoinblockhalf.com)
|
|
|
14 April 2016 update: R 2= 0.900263 a = 2.84737734739566 b = -19.2400124152881 The price today (424 USD/BTC) is 74% undervalued from its Log regression expected value (1607 USD/BCT, calculated HERE) I will upload chart asap.
|
|
|
I published a branch with bip38 encryption on the wallet details tab. Thank you very much! Tip for you!
|
|
|
I had this same idea today, I created a new thread proposing it, and then I found that you had created one thread and developed the idea some days ago.
I give my 100% support to it, because max block size should be dynamically calculated (based on the 2016 previous block sizes) as Difficulty is dynamically recalculated every 2016 blocks.
Go on with it!!!
|
|
|
The max block size could be recalculated every 2000 blocks (or whatever), as de reward difficulty autorregulates itself. The maximum block size would be somewhere between 1 MB and infinite. Simply calculating the median size of the last 2000 blocks and multiplying it by 2x (or by 10x, or whatever), that's the maximum block size for the next 2000 blocks. So every 2000 blocks, the max block size is recalculated. Bigger blocks could be allowed, but with a penalty (Rosenfeld's brilliant solution: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1078521.100) That could be easily implemented in Core. Opinions?
|
|
|
If gold marketcap is about 6 trillion
and
if bitcoin surpasses gold as a store of value
and
that happens by 2020,
then
just do the math: 6.000.000.000.000 / 17.500.000 = 343 k... So the price by 2020 would be or 0 or 100k+
|
|
|
Hello. Good news.
New target: 800-1300 (...)
Any argument? I mean: AT, fundamentals, EW, rumour, crystal ball.. Thanks
|
|
|
Hi, Lord Oliver
1.- The resulting parameters would be almost identical. Dollar and gold relationship is very stable compared to bitcoin...
2.- The logarithmic function is quite nice for a medium term horizon (1 or 2 years from now) and it's much better than the linear one. But it's not as accurate in the long term. As I have stated in former posts, I would prefer an asymptotic function for the long term.
Regards.
|
|
|
Hello everybody. Here is the update (two and a half months since the last one): Donations: bitcoin:1GVyRMXFaSEbXUCMwZKk3CfXgo8wCmympCToday's price of 235 USD/BTC is 81% undervalued from the estimated value of 1234 USD/BTC You can calculate today's trendline value HERE. Projected (dd-mm-yyyy): 1.000 22-03-2015 (former update projected 17-01-2015) 10.000 25-07-2017 (former update projected 10-04-2017) 100.000 17-10-2020 (former update projected 30-04-2020) 1.000.000 30-03-2025 (former update projected 08-07-2024) Thank you all for your donations.
|
|
|
Trolololo thanks for the charts. Are you interested in releasing the spread sheet so that we can easily update the spread per your formula?
I'm working on a public Google spreadsheet that: - auto-updates daily prices, and - auto-executes the "solver" command to find the best parameters. But it will take some time...
|
|
|
El post original es de Livermore y no habla para nada de los 40.000 Sí dice que el escenario más probable es el B, especialmente si bajamos de 210. Si subimos de 330, el escenario A pasaría a ser el más probable.
|
|
|
Con la posibilidad del pruning, que disminuye a poco menos de 2GB el espacio necesario para la cadena de bloques resultante... ¿Veis posible montar un nodo con un Voyo Smart mini PC (RAM 2GB, ROM 32 GB 64 GB, CPU Intel BayTrail, Windows 8.1, fanless, consumo ridículo) que cuesta poco mas de 100 euros? Edito: La ROM no es de 32 GB sino de 64 GB
|
|
|
Please, Sirs, let's keep this thread clean.
There are other threads to talk about Risto or/and Monero or/and any altcoin vs bitcoin.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Since some days ago we are in record undervaluation: -81%
|
|
|
Buen post, dserrano.
Recordar a la afición que hace ahora justo 4 años que la cotización de bitcoin sobrepasaba el 1 USD/BTC. Eso supone que la revalorización media anual es cercana al 300% durante estos últimos 4 años.
Una corrección de un año y medio (hasta la fecha) es perfectamente lógica. Unos meses más de corrección son posibles.
Que el precio baje de 100 es perfectamente posible también.
El nivel que supondría riesgo para la viabilidad de bitcoin es 32 (máximo de la burbuja de 2011).
Así que mi opinión es que el mínimo de esta corrección estará en algún lugar entre 32 y 150. Dentro de ese rango, siento predilección por el 111'11 USD...
La corrección actual es la corrección de toda la Historia de Bitcoin, no sólo del rush de 2013, según esta gráfica histórica:
|
|
|
See, you guys read it all wrong. That chart isn't targeting $.05 for this correction (though I know it looks like that with the box and the note), it means we are correcting the entire history of Bitcoin. Not just the 2013 euphoria phase.
Get it now, wasn't clear to me at first glance. Besides "we won't retrace 100% of wave 1", is there any other price level prediction that can be derived from that parse? Higher than 32 USD/BTC (wave 1)
|
|
|
|