Is this still available.

Anyone with a Temple Coin Wallet, send me your Address in a PM and I will send you ॐ1,000 TMPC for Free.
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/%e0%a5%90-get-your-temple-coin-wallet-%e0%a5%90/

Here is the Coin announcement thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2791745.0



ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ

We will be Starting a Cryptocurrency Company in Armenia Soon.

Temple Coin ॐ[TMPC]ॐ is a Scypt Coin, Proof-of-Stake (PoS) of 8% per year. The ICO started on Facebook, Google+ and Twitter, so we already have a Community and are simply presenting that Community to the Bitcoin World. This may very well be the first Coin that is not about itself, but is part of an existing Community, and tied to something larger than itself, and that larger thing it is tied to is not called Bitcoin.

How to Clone Ethereum (we are also Automating this process)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2806271.0

Graphene (like Bitshares or Steemit)
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/creating-graphene-blockchains/

HyperLedger (Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS), like Bitshares or Steemit)
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/hyperledger-open-source-blockchains-with-uses/

ICO Bounty List (this list is subject to be added to)
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/ico-bounty-list/

Create a Shaligram Node- ॐ10,000 TMPC

Create a Shaligram Mining Pool- ॐ25,000 TMPC

Be the first to post in each of the Sales Sections, with Pictures (No Illegal Sales, 1 per person)- ॐ10,000 TMPC each

Be the first to make a Sale in each of the Sales Sections – ॐ15,000 TMPC each

IRC Channel -done

Subreddit – ॐ5,000 TMPC

YouTube Channel with Wallet Download Tutorial – ॐ10,000 TMPC

Temple Coin Logos – ॐ5,000 TMPC each, will accept many, All Logos should contain the Om Symbol or the Eye of Wadjet in some way, one or the other or both. The Tibetan Ah Symbol can also be used in place of Om.

7 TMPC Banknote Logos with Dollar type imagery (1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 1000) – ॐ15,000 TMPC each if accepted

Temple Coin Faucet – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Dice Game with Temple Coins – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Forum -done

Cryptonote Mining Pool – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Create a Cryptonote for your Home Town or Country – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Ethereum Clone or Fork – ॐ50,000 TMPC

Temple Coin TMPC Point of Sale Wallet with Catalog option – ॐ100,000 TMPC

GetGemz App and Coin Clone – ॐ100,000 TMPC

Bitshares Clone including Cryptofresh, Bitsharestalk & OpenLedger- ॐ100,000 TMPC

Graphene Steemit Type Twitter Clone – ॐ500,000 TMPC

ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ

Несколько советов по созданию криптомонет

Cryptonote/Forknote
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/cryptocurrency-creation-for-dummies/

Ethereum
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/how-to-create-ethereum-blockchains-token-ecosystem-blockchain/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2806271.0

Graphene (например Bitshares или Steemit)
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/creating-graphene-blockchains/

HyperLedger (по технологии "готовые к использованию" (COTS), например Bitshares или Steemit)
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/hyperledger-open-source-blockchains-with-uses/

Tangle: модель криптовалюты не основанной на блокчейне
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/tangle-the-non-blockchain-cryptocurrency-model/

Также мы ищем людей, которые заинтересованы в том, чтобы стать монахами и приехать в США для работы в Храме
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/o-visas-for-shaivite-temple-ministers/

Temple Coin
https://image.ibb.co/ivNtu6/Temple_Coin.jpg

Temple Coin ॐ[TMPC]ॐ это монета, добывающаяся по методу Proof-of-Stake (PoS), скорость добычи составляет 8% в год. ICO стартовало в Facebook, Google+ и Twitter, поэтому у нас уже есть сообщество и теперь мы хотим представить наше сообщество всему криптомиру. Temple Coin, возможно, первая монета, которая не привязана к какому-то одному проекту, а является частью существующего сообщества и связана с чем-то большим, чем она сама, и при этом, в ее основе не лежит биткойн.


Перечень вознаграждений (этот список может быть обновлен)
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/ico-bounty-list/

Создание узла для Shaligram - ॐ10,000 TMPC

Создание майнингового пула для Shaligram - ॐ25,000 TMPC

За первый пост в каждом торговом разделе (с изображениями, без нарушений, 1 на человека) - ॐ10,000 TMPC каждый

За первую продажу в каждом из торговых разделов – ॐ15,000 TMPC каждый

Канал IRC - удалено

Создание раздела (SubReddit) на Reddit.com – ॐ5,000 TMPC

Видео на YouTube с инструкцией по созданию и установке кошелька – ॐ10,000 TMPC

Разработка логотипов для Temple Coin – ॐ5,000 TMPC каждый, требуется много логотипов, во всех должны каким-то образом использоваться символ Ом или Уаджет (глаз Гора), можно совместно. Тибетский символ А также может использоваться вместо Ом.

Разработка 7 логотипов банкнот TMPC с номиналами, соответствующими номиналам доллара США (1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 1000) – ॐ15,000 TMPC каждый, в случае принятия работы.

Создание Temple Coin крана – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Создание игры в кости на Temple Coin – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Форум - удалено

Создание майнинг пула на CryptoNote – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Создание CryptoNote монеты для вашего родного города или страны – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Создание аналога или форка Ethereum - ॐ50 000 TMPC

Создание торговой площадки по продаже Temple Coin кошельков с опцией каталога - ॐ100 000 TMPC

Создание аналога GetGemz - ॐ100 000 TMPC

Создание аналога Bitshares, включая Cryptofresh, Bitsharestalk и OpenLedger - ॐ100 000 TMPC

Создание аналога Twitter (по типу Steemit) - ॐ500 000 TMPC

Anyone else want to do Translations?



ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ ॐ

Несколько советов по созданию криптомонет

Cryptonote/Forknote
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/cryptocurrency-creation-for-dummies/

Ethereum
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/how-to-create-ethereum-blockchains-token-ecosystem-blockchain/

Graphene (например Bitshares или Steemit)
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/creating-graphene-blockchains/

HyperLedger (по технологии "готовые к использованию" (COTS), например Bitshares или Steemit)
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/hyperledger-open-source-blockchains-with-uses/

Tangle: модель криптовалюты не основанной на блокчейне
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/tangle-the-non-blockchain-cryptocurrency-model/

Также мы ищем людей, которые заинтересованы в том, чтобы стать монахами и приехать в США для работы в Храме
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/o-visas-for-shaivite-temple-ministers/

Temple Coin
https://image.ibb.co/ivNtu6/Temple_Coin.jpg

Temple Coin ॐ[TMPC]ॐ это монета, добывающаяся по методу Proof-of-Stake (PoS), скорость добычи составляет 8% в год. ICO стартовало в Facebook, Google+ и Twitter, поэтому у нас уже есть сообщество и теперь мы хотим представить наше сообщество всему криптомиру. Temple Coin, возможно, первая монета, которая не привязана к какому-то одному проекту, а является частью существующего сообщества и связана с чем-то большим, чем она сама, и при этом, в ее основе не лежит биткойн.


Перечень вознаграждений (этот список может быть обновлен)
http://shaivitetemple.org/Forum/topic/ico-bounty-list/

Создание узла для Shaligram - ॐ10,000 TMPC

Создание майнингового пула для Shaligram - ॐ25,000 TMPC

За первый пост в каждом торговом разделе (с изображениями, без нарушений, 1 на человека) - ॐ10,000 TMPC каждый

За первую продажу в каждом из торговых разделов – ॐ15,000 TMPC каждый

Канал IRC - удалено

Создание раздела (SubReddit) на Reddit.com – ॐ5,000 TMPC

Видео на YouTube с инструкцией по созданию и установке кошелька – ॐ10,000 TMPC

Разработка логотипов для Temple Coin – ॐ5,000 TMPC каждый, требуется много логотипов, во всех должны каким-то образом использоваться символ Ом или Уаджет (глаз Гора), можно совместно. Тибетский символ А также может использоваться вместо Ом.

Разработка 7 логотипов банкнот TMPC с номиналами, соответствующими номиналам доллара США (1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 1000) – ॐ15,000 TMPC каждый, в случае принятия работы.

Создание Temple Coin крана – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Создание игры в кости на Temple Coin – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Форум - удалено

Создание майнинг пула на CryptoNote – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Создание CryptoNote монеты для вашего родного города или страны – ॐ25,000 TMPC

Создание аналога или форка Ethereum - ॐ50 000 TMPC

Создание торговой площадки по продаже Temple Coin кошельков с опцией каталога - ॐ100 000 TMPC

Создание аналога GetGemz - ॐ100 000 TMPC

Создание аналога Bitshares, включая Cryptofresh, Bitsharestalk и OpenLedger - ॐ100 000 TMPC

Создание аналога Twitter (по типу Steemit) - ॐ500 000 TMPC

The Federalist Papers
http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1786-1800/the-federalist-papers/
http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1786-1800/the-federalist-papers/the-federalist-10.php
http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1786-1800/the-federalist-papers/the-federalist-51.php

Free Exercise Clause (US Constitution, 1st Amendment)
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

The text of the Ninth Amendment is very short and states the following:
“The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

Thomas Jefferson
http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-01-02-0222-0002
Resolved, That the statutes 1.E.6.c.1. 5 & 6.E.6.c.1. 1.El.c.2. 23.El.c.1. 28.El.c.6. 35.El.c.1. 1.Jac.1.c.4. 3.Jac.1.c.1. 3.Jac.1.c.4. 3.Jac.1.c.21. and the act of ass. 1705.c.6. & so much of all other acts or ordinances/statutes as prescribe punishments for the offence of opinions deemed heretical> render criminal the maintaining any opinions in matters of religion or the exercising any mode of worship whatever or as prescribe punishments for the same ; and all acts or statutes, acts or ordinances made against ought to be repealed.
Resolved that it is the opn of this Commee that so much of the sd. petitions as prays that the establishment of the Church of England by law in this Commonwealth may be discontinued, and that no pre-eminence may be allowed to any one Religious sect over another, is reasonable; & therefore that the several laws establishing the sd. Church of England, giving peculiar privileges to the it’s ministers thereof, & levying for the support thereof the same contributions on the people independent of their good will ought to be repealed; saving to such incumbents as are now actually seised of Glebe lands, their rights to such Glebe lands during their lives, & to such parishes as have received private donations for the use of support of the sd. Church of England the perpetual benefit of such donations.

https://books.google.com/books?id=ZTIoAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA140&lpg=PA140&dq=but+as+it+was+a+spontaneous+joining+of+members,+it+follows+that+it's+laws+extend+to+it's+own+members+only&source=bl&ots=vblfoRb5PZ&sig=R1cXioJHhOSkIyxaFNKWlQtyv1Y&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjglMzkxIHLAhWHwYMKHfdpD5YQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=but%20as%20it%20was%20a%20spontaneous%20joining%20of%20members%2C%20it%20follows%20that%20it's%20laws%20extend%20to%20it's%20own%20members%20only&f=false
but as it was a spontaneous joining of members, it follows that it’s laws extend to it’s own members only, not to those of any other voluntary society: for then by the same rule some other voluntary society might usurp power over them.
Christ has said ‘wheresoever 2 or 3 are gatherd. togeth. in his name he will be in the midst of them.’ this is his definition of a society. he does not make it essential that a bishop or presbyter govern them. without them it suffices for the salvation of souls.

Rule 5.1. (Overturning Laws with the Constitution)
(a) Notice by a Party. A party that files a pleading, written motion, or other paper drawing into question the constitutionality of a federal or state statute must promptly:
(1) file a notice of constitutional question stating the question and identifying the paper that raises it, if:
(A) a federal statute is questioned and the parties do not include the United States, one of its agencies, or one of its officers or employees in an official capacity; or
(B) a state statute is questioned and the parties do not include the state, one of its agencies, or one of its officers or employees in an official capacity; and
(2) serve the notice and paper on the Attorney General of the United States if a federal statute is questioned—or on the state attorney general if a state statute is questioned—either by certified or registered mail or by sending it to an electronic address designated by the attorney general for this purpose.
(b) Certification by the Court. The court must, under 28 U.S.C. §2403, certify to the appropriate attorney general that a statute has been questioned.
(c) Intervention; Final Decision on the Merits. Unless the court sets a later time, the attorney general may intervene within 60 days after the notice is filed or after the court certifies the challenge, whichever is earlier. Before the time to intervene expires, the court may reject the constitutional challenge, but may not enter a final judgment holding the statute unconstitutional.
(d) No Forfeiture. A party’s failure to file and serve the notice, or the court’s failure to certify, does not forfeit a constitutional claim or defense that is otherwise timely asserted.

Civil Rights Act of 1866
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1866

Civil Rights Act of 1871
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Enforcement_Act_of_1871

Civil Rights Act of 1957
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1957

Civil Rights Act of 1964
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/chapter-21

Civil Rights Act of 1965
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965
https://www.justice.gov/crt/statutes-enforced-voting-section

Pierce v. Society of Sisters
Wall of Separation between Church and State
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/268/510/case.html

Ponce v. Roman Catholic Church
History of the Church/Temples being the State, and how it is now equal to a State
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/210/296/case.html
Treaty of Paris 1763
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Paris_(1763)

Watson V Jones
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/80/679/case.html

Courts can not rule on the truth or falsity of a religious teaching;
Where a previous authority structure existed before the dispute, courts should defer to the decisions of that structure, and;
In the absence of such an internal authority structure, courts should defer to the wishes of a majority of the congregation.

Serbian Orthodox Diocese V Milivojevich
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/426/696/
“Per the Establishment Clause, decisions imposed by hierarchical religious organizations are binding in civil courts”

Gonzales V O Centro
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/546/04-1084/index.pdf
“Under RFRAs more focused inquiry, the Governments mere invocation of the general characteristics of Schedule I substances cannot carry the day. Although Schedule I substances such as DMT are exceptionally dangerous, see, e.g., Touby v. United States, 500 U. S. 160, 162, there is no indication that Congress, in classifying DMT, considered the harms posed by the particular use at issue. ”

Burwell V Hobby Lobby
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-354_olp1.pdf
“In RLUIPA, in an obvious effort to effect a complete separation from First Amendment case law, Congress deleted the reference to the First Amendment and defined the “exercise of religion” to include “any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief”.”

Cutter V Wilkinson
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/04pdf/03-9877.pdf
“officials (respondents here), in violation of RLUIPA, have failed to accommodate their religious exercise “in a variety of different ways, including retaliating and discriminating against them for exercising their nontraditional faiths, denying them access to religious literature, denying them the same opportunities for group worship that are granted to adherents of mainstream religions, forbidding them to adhere to the dress and appearance mandates of their religions, withholding religious ceremonial items…”

Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye V Hialeah
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/508/520/case.html
“The city does not argue that Santeria is not a “religion” within the meaning of the First Amendment. Nor could it. Although the practice of animal sacrifice may seem abhorrent to some, “religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.” Thomas v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Security Div., 450 U. S. 707, 714 (1981). Given the historical association between animal sacrifice and religious worship, see supra, at 524-525, petitioners’ assertion that animal sacrifice is an integral part of their religion “cannot be deemed bizarre or incredible.” Frazee v. Illinois Dept. of Employment Security, 489 U. S. 829, 834, n. 2 (1989).”

Stormans V Weisman
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-862_2c8f.pdf
“In addition, the ordinances restricted religious practice to a far greater extent than required to serve the municipality’s asserted interests. Id., at 538–539. Here, Ralph’s has made a strong showing that the challenged regulations are gerrymandered in a similar way. While requiring pharmacies to dispense all prescription medications for which there is demand, the regulations contain broad secular exceptions but none relating to religious or moral objections;”

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015)
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
(Choosing your Religion)
“The fundamental liberties protected by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause extend to certain personal choices central to individual dignity and autonomy, including intimate choices defining personal identity and beliefs. See, e.g., Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U. S. 438 ; Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 –486. Courts must exercise reasoned judgment in identifying interests of the person so fundamental that the State must accord them its respect. History and tradition guide and discipline the inquiry but do not set its outer boundaries. When new insight reveals discord between the Constitution’s central protections and a received legal stricture, a claim to liberty must be addressed.”

Church of the Holy Trinity V United States
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/143/457/case.html
&
United States V Kirby
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/74/482/case.html
“All laws should receive a sensible construction. General terms should be so limited in their application as not to lead to injustice, oppression, or an absurd consequence. It will always therefore be presumed that the legislature intended exceptions to its language which would avoid results of this character. The reason of the law in such cases should prevail over its letter. The common sense of man approves the judgment mentioned by Puffendorf, that the Bolognian law which enacted ‘that whoever drew blood in the streets should be punished with the utmost severity’ did not extend to the surgeon who opened the vein of a person that fell down in the street in a fit. The same common sense accepts the ruling, cited by Plowden, that the statute of 1st Edw. II which enacts that a prisoner who breaks prison shall be guilty of felony, does not extend to a prisoner who breaks out when the prison is on fire, ‘for he is not to be hanged because he would not stay to be burnt.’ And we think that a like common sense will sanction the ruling we make, that the act of Congress which punishes the obstruction or retarding of the passage of the mail, or of its carrier, does not apply to a case of temporary detention of the mail caused by the arrest of the carrier upon an indictment for murder.”

People V Philips
https://blog.lrrc.com/churchstate/case/people-v-phillips-n-y-ct-of-genl-sessions-1813-reprinted-in-1-western-l-j-109-1843-and-1-cath-law-199-1955/

Walz v. Tax Comm’n, 397 U.S. 664 (upholding property tax exemption for religious organizations); Corporation of the Presiding Bishop v. Amos, 483 U.S. 327 (1987) (upholding Civil Rights Act exemption allowing religious institutions to restrict hiring to members of religion); Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005) (upholding a provision of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 that prohibits governments from imposing a “substantial burden on the religious exercise” of an institutionalized person unless the burden furthers a “compelling governmental interest” and is the “least restrictive means of achieving that interest”); Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709, 724 (2005) (quoting Corporation of the Presiding Bishop v. Amos, 483 U.S. 327, 338 (1987)); Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993) (law aimed at restricting ritual of a single religious group);

Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 63
Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)
Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306, 317 (1952)

Larson V Valente
Although the solicitation cases have generally been decided under the free exercise or free speech clauses,205 in one instance the Court, intertwining establishment and free exercise principles, voided a provision in a state charitable solicitations law that required only those religious organizations that received less than half their total contributions from members or affiliated organizations to comply with the registration and reporting sections of the law.206 Applying strict scrutiny equal protection principles, the Court held that by distinguishing between older, well-established churches that had strong membership financial support and newer bodies lacking a contributing constituency or that may favor public solicitation over general reliance on financial support from the members, the statute granted denominational preference forbidden by the Establishment Clause.

Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 63
A big theme of Religion in the Supreme Court is that once the Government starts regulating Religion, it breaks down the wall between Church and State, which then brings Religion in to school. Both of which are Unconstitutional.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc A/810 at 71 (1948).
http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/b1udhr.htm
Article 18

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, G.A. res. 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171, entered into force Mar. 23, 1976.
http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/b3ccpr.htm
Article 18

Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, G.A. res. 36/55, 36 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 51) at 171, U.N. Doc. A/36/684 (1981).
http://www.unesco.org/most/migration/full_dec_elim1.htm
Article 1, Article 2, Article 4, Article 6 (definitely pay attention to sections C & H), Article 7

Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief (1986)
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomReligion/Pages/FreedomReligionIndex.aspx
Mandate

Human Rights Committee, General Comment 22, Article 18 (Forty-eighth session, 1993). Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.1 at 35 (1994).
http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/gencomm/hrcom22.htm
2, 3, 4

Hymn of the Rig Veda
https://books.google.com/books?id=lqKwteD19U8C&pg=PA137&lpg=PA137&dq=rig+veda+long-hair+drug&source=bl&ots=MKyMx6Gofj&sig=oxfr2HCbnVxNqUp-TucDazbJJkI&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiXno_AmLLPAhUOzGMKHUS7AdgQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=rig%20veda%20long-hair%20drug&f=false

NCBI Article about this
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22742944
“…Cannabis Indica has been used for literally thousands of years in the worship of the god Shiva. Cannabis is used in an orally administered form called bhang which can be either the wet resinous leaves formed into pills of a drink made of milk, cannabis, and various spices consumed by worshipers of Shiva on festival days or by smoking the flowering buds of cannabis-a practice generally reserved for holy men who dedicate their lives to ascetic practice and the worship of Shiva. This practice is codified in the Vedas as well as in legends about the origin of cannabis and its relationship to Shiva.”

This is the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission Report (1893-94) it was done by the British in India because they thought there might be a link between insanity and Cannabis, as well as moral degradation and Cannabis. But it was found to be completely safe, and they started taxing it.
http://digital.nls.uk/indiapapers/browse/pageturner.cfm?id=74908458

DEA Judge Francis Young, findings of fact
http://www.ccguide.org/young88.php
“the record on marijuana encompasses 5,000 years of human experience.”

Pew Research
http://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-hindu/
“There are about 1 billion Hindus around the world, representing 15% of the global population. Major traditions within Hinduism include Vaishnavism, which is devoted to worship of the god Vishnu, and Shaivism, organized around worship of the god Shiva.”

The Encyclopedia of Religion
Vol. 1
http://www.e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133762/Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.01_of_14(AARON-_ATTENTION).pdf

Vol. 2
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133768/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.02_of_14%28ATTRIBUTES_OF_GOD-_BUTLER%2C_JOSEPH%29.pdf

Vol. 3
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133769/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.03_of_14%28CABASILAS%2C_NICHOLAS-_CYRUS_II%29.pdf

Vol. 4
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133770/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.04_of_14%28DACIAN_RIDERS-_ESTHER%29.pdf

Vol. 5
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133771/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.05_of_14%28ETERNITY-_GOD%29.pdf

Vol. 6
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133758/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.06_of_14%28GODDESS_WORSHIP-_ICONOCLASM%29.pdf

Vol. 7
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133759/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.07_of_14%28ICONOGRAPHY-_JUSTIN_MARTYR%29.pdf

Vol. 8
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133760/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.08_of_14%28KA%26%23039_BAH-_MARX%2C_KARL%29.pdf

Vol. 9
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133761/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.09_of_14%28MARY-_NDEMBU_RELIGION%29.pdf

Vol. 10
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133763/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.10_of_14%28NECROMANCY-_PINDAR%29.pdf

Vol. 11
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133764/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.11_of_14%28PIUS_IX-_RIVERS%29.pdf

Vol. 12
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133765/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.12_of_14%28RNYING_MA_PA_SCHOOL-_SOUL%29.pdf

Vol. 13
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133766/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.13_of_14%28SOUTH_AMERICAN_INDIAN_RELIGIONS-_TRANSCENDENCE_AND–NENCE%29.pdf

Vol. 14
http://e-reading.club/bookreader.php/133767/Jones_-_Encyclopedia_of_religion.vol.14_of_14%28TRANSCENDENTAL_MEDITATION-_ZWINGLI%2C_HULDRYCH%29.pdf

In August 2016, the DEA opened up Registration for Federal Marijuana Growers, Importers, and Researchers.
Federal Register
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/08/12/2016-17955/applications-to-become-registered-under-the-controlled-substances-act-to-manufacture-marijuana-to

Catalent has already been approved to Import Tons of Marijuana
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/fed_regs/imprt/app/2017/fr0918_4.htm

Orrin Hatch and Jeff Sessions had a discussion about it the other day, there are 26 new companies that are waiting to be approved (we submitted our Religious Exemption in there too, so now it’s 27)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOU7kVRwFxw

Here is what the Senate has to say about Marijuana
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/07-13-16%20Weiss%20Testimony.pdf

Kratom not Scheduled after massive Twitter Response
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/10/13/2016-24659/withdrawal-of-notice-of-intent-to-temporarily-place-mitragynine-and-7-hydroxymitragynine-into

Lipomed can pretty much import anything
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/fed_regs/imprt/reg/2016/fr0119_2.htm

DOJ Anti-Trust Division says that the DEA has to accept new Manufactures and Importers so as not to be creating Monopolies.
https://www.justice.gov/atr/memorandum-antitrust-division-united-states-department-justice-amicus-curiae-support-application

Here is the contact email to ask questions for the Registration department at the DEA
ODLP@usdoj.gov

United States v. E. C. Knight Co. 156 U.S. 1 (1895)
Counsel contend that this definition, as explained by the derivation of the word, may be applied to all cases in which “one person sells alone the whole of any kind of marketable thing, so that only he can continue to sell it, fixing the price at his own pleasure,” whether by virtue of legislative grant or agreement; that the monopolization referred to in the act of Congress is not confined to the common law sense of the term as implying an exclusive control, by authority, of one branch of industry without legal right of any other person to interfere therewith by competition or otherwise, but that it includes engrossing as well, and covers controlling the market by contracts securing the advantage of selling alone or exclusively all or some considerable portion of a particular kind or merchandise or commodity to the detriment of the public, and that such contracts amount to that restraint of trade or commerce declared to be illegal. But the monopoly and restraint denounced by the act are the monopoly and restraint of interstate and international trade or commerce, while the conclusion to be assumed on this record is that the result of the transaction complained of was the creation of a monopoly in the manufacture of a necessary of life.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/faqs_policy_statement_regarding_marijuana_issues_in_indian_country_28jan15.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/resources/3052013829132756857467.pdf

https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/house-amendment/332

You may have heard some crazy quotes about how safe Marijuana is, such as “Aspirin is more dangerous than Marijuana” or “Potatoes are more dangerous than Marijuana” or “It would take 100 tons of Marijuana, smoked in 15 minutes to Overdose” and other crazy quotes. Those actually came from a DEA Judge, Judge Francis, and he backed up everything he said.

https://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/sourcefiles/Young1988.pdf

https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/pubs/rfra_exempt012209.pdf

The way this works is that the DEA has absolutely no Obligation to refuse Religious use of Substances which are not on the UN Psychotropics Convention.

The DEA used to say “Everyone is banned, so Religion is banned”. But then in Gonzales V O Centro, they pointed to DEA Form 225, and showed that not everyone is banned. And the Supreme Court said that if they are doing it, then Religion can do it. And the DEA said “But we have the UN Psychotropics Convention” and the Court said “This substance is not covered by that Treaty”. And the DEA had to stand down and create this process.

If anyone is confused about how I am going to get a DEA Exemption, this explains how it actually works. The Controlled Substances Act is what we are talking about, and first off, is it called the “Banned Substances Act” or the “Controlled Substances Act” and are they “Banned” or are they “Scheduled”?

Mallinkdrot is literally allowed to sell Medical Cocaine online, here is the link.
http://www2.mallinckrodt.com/Active_Pharmaceutical_Ingredients/Controlled_Substances/

So what Mallinckrodt has is an exemption. A Medical Exemption. Yet no where in the Constitution is there a “Medical Clause”, but there is a “Free Exercise Clause”; which forced the DEA to create the process in this link:
http://www2.mallinckrodt.com/Templates/Pages/productdetail.aspx?id=1597

https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/pubs/rfra_exempt012209.pdf

Here are email contacts for people within the Colorado Department of Revenue, who openly told me that they are in Violation of Federal Law (in person when I went up there for a Scheduled meeting), and when I told them that our Temple is not in Violation of Federal Law, they were confused and just said "We do Recreational and Medical, not Religious", which is why they are part of the Human Rights Case.

jim.burack@state.co.us,
cindy.perkins@state.co.us,
dominique.mendiola@state.co.us,
kyle.lambert@state.co.us,
matthew.heap@state.co.us,
corrie.martinez@state.co.us,
henry.hasler@state.co.us,
richard.hollar@state.co.us,
william.lukela@state.co.us,
penny.paxton@state.co.us

We have also contacted these people within the USDA and will make them aware of any results in our Religious Cases with the DEA

Answers@ars.usda.gov,
ottmarketing@ars.usda.gov,
agref@nal.usda.gov
AskLPS@ams.usda.gov,
joan.avila@ams.usda.gov,
ruihong.guo@ams.usda.gov,
Sonia.Jimenez@ams.usda.gov,
arthur.neal@ams.usda.gov,
David.Tuckwiller@ams.usda.gov,
melissa.tharp@ams.usda.gov
FSIS.Outreach@usda.gov
FMSC.help@usda.gov
asknies.products@aphis.usda.gov
AskNCIE.Products@aphis.usda.gov,
VS-Live.Animals_Import.Permits@aphis.usda.gov,
ASAP@aphis.usda.gov,
OV@aphis.usda.gov
Joan.Avila@ams.usda.gov

Here is how the IACHR works
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpN2R3hp-E0

I also received a response from the NSA today asking me to take them to Federal Court, and we already have a Petition in with the DEA that we need to take them to Federal Court for as well.

Earlier today:
I just got off the phone with the NSA, and they said that they sent my Appeal letter to me already, which is simply not True. So they are seeing if they can send it out again.

For anyone who is not in the loop. October 2016 I asked the NSA for all records on me that Edward Snowden told us they have (From the PRISM Program), they said "We can neither Confirm nor Deny the existence of records, or else we would have to tell Terrorists things too". So then they said I could appeal, and today the Lady on the phone tried to tell me "We don't own those records" and I said "I called the NSA FOIA Liaison office, if you can't hand out records, what is your job??? Just to tell people that you don't own Records?" then I let her know that I already filed an Administrative Claim over 1 year ago now, so I have standing to sue and am simply being nice to them and have given them 2 years to correct this.

So she asked where to send the Appeal.

Then just a minute ago
I got a call from the NSA from a blocked number, and I didn't answer so they called from a non-Blocked number, and it said Maryland, so I answered.

They asked what email to send the Appeal Response to, and I just got a response that ended with this:

You are hereby advised of your right pursuant to 5 U.S.C. S 552(a)(4)(B) to seek judicial review of our determination in the United States District Court in the District which you reside.

Then they said I can contact the:

Office of Government Information Services (OGIS)
National Archives and Records Administration
8601 Adelphi Rd - OGIS
College Park, MD 20740
ogis@nara.gov
877 684 6448 / 202 741 5770

Signed by someone named

David J Sherman



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2808179.0

Everyone thinks #ReleaseTheMemo is Partisan, but it is not. It is part of a Larger, Historical, Problem within the FBI and CIA. We have all heard "Conspiracy Theories" about "Them", but sometimes there really are people in rooms filled with Cigar Smoke (metaphorically).

Call your Congress person and tell them you want to know what your tax Dollars are paying for the FBI to do

202-224-3121

Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968)

The "Intelligence Community" uses more Cryptography and Dark Web Applications than anyone in the World, that is why they didn't care what Hillary was doing, they do the same thing all the time.

They used to put like a News Paper or something at your house, with a Clock on the third page with the Hands pointing to the time you were supposed to go sit on the Bench.

Now they use the same Apps they try to tell you not to use because they are for ISIS.

These are articles about the NSA's Program called PRISM, where they use Google, Facebook, Yahoo, etc servers to collect information about you:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/06/12/heres-everything-we-know-about-prism-to-date/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(surveillance_program)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/08/fbi-changes-privacy-rules-accessing-nsa-prism-data
http://www.vocativ.com/295204/nsa-prism/
http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/nsa-prism.htm

If you want to submit a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act request in order to get record from the NSA about you) here is how to do that. The Privacy Act Request is the Normal one to use (the 3rd one here) but you can file both. The top is a sample letter so that you have a template.
http://www.nfoic.org/sample-foia-request-letters
http://m.nsa.gov/resources/everyone/foia/submit-foia-request/
http://m.nsa.gov/resources/everyone/foia/submit-privacy-act-request/

This is how to file a Consumer Complaint about any Company that has given away your information, this must be filed before a lawsuit.
https://www.usa.gov/consumer-complaints

EPCA (Privacy Act)
https://epic.org/privacy/ecpa/
https://epic.org/privacy/laws/privacy_act.html
"Individuals who violate ECPA face up to five years in prison and fines up to $250,000. Victims are also entitled to bring civil suits and recover actual damages, in addition to punitive damages and attorney's fees, for violations."

FISA (Foreign Surveillance law where the FISA courts come from)
http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title50/chapter36&edition=prelim
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr6304/text


Applications of the Privacy Act
https://www.rosen.com/divorce/divorcearticles/electronic-communications-privacy-act/
http://www.jurist.org/hotline/2014/01/khaliah-barnes-privacy-act.php


42 U.S. Code § 1983 (Lawsuit for Violation of Rights)

18 U.S. Code § 242 (Criminal Charges for Government Officers using their status to infringe on personal Rights)

28 USC § 1442 (Bringing a Lawsuit against Government Officers)

Title II Rule 3 & 5 (Procedure for Suing Government Agencies)

Flast V Cohen (You can sue the Government for misuse of tax funds)

Katz V United States (Reasonable expectation of Privacy)

United States V United States District Court (Wiretapping)

Riley V California (Cell Phone Records)

United States V Guest (Protection from Government Conspiracies)

Watkins V United States (Congress' Power is not Unlimited)

Buckley V Fitzsimmons (No Immunity for Illegal investigations)

Hanrahan V Hampton (Example of an Extensive Government Conspiracy hashed out in Court for 20 years)

Include facts and damages in your claim. Your administrative claim must include the exact amount of money damages you are claiming, as well as enough facts about your case to allow the federal agency to investigate the merits of your claim. Using a SF 95 form will help ensure that you've included all of the necessary information.

The agency has six months to respond. Once your claim is submitted, the federal agency has six months to rule on it. In some cases, the federal agency may "admit" your claim (that is, agree that your claim is valid) and agree to pay you some or all of the money damages you demanded, and you may not need to go to court.

You then have six months to file a lawsuit. If the federal agency rejects your claim or refuses to pay all the money damages you demanded, you have six months from the date on which the decision is mailed to you to file a lawsuit. Again, file your lawsuit as soon as possible after receiving this decision to avoid any chance of having your lawsuit dismissed as untimely.

You don't have to sue until the agency rules on your claim. If the federal agency fails to rule on your administrative claim within six months, you have the choice of either awaiting the agency's decision or going ahead with your lawsuit. As long as the federal agency is still considering your claim, there is no time limit for you to file a law suit in federal court; the six-month time limit only begins to run once the agency has ruled on your claim.

Once you have gone through the procedures listed above -- a process known as "exhausting your administrative remedies" -- you are eligible to file a lawsuit in court to pursue money damages from the government.

Examples of Government Corruption
https://www.aclu.org/news/fbi-audit-exposes-widespread-abuse-patriot-act-powers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/james-whitey-bulgers-capture-could-cause-trouble-inside-the-fbi/2011/06/24/AGis2cjH_story.html

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks
“The discovery that the US military is developing false online personalities – known to users of social media as "sock puppets" – could also encourage other governments, private companies and non-government organisations to do the same.
The Centcom contract stipulates that each fake online persona must have a convincing background, history and supporting details, and that up to 50 US-based controllers should be able to operate false identities from their workstations "without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries".”
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ec5_14273491

ECPA Case law
Steve Jackson Games, Incorporated, et al. v. Secret Service, et al., 36 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. 1994)
Microsoft Corp. v. United States, No. 14-2985 (2d Cir. 2017)

4th Amendment Case Law
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
Soldal v. Cook County 506 U.S. 56 (1992)
United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012)
Florida v. Jardines 569 U.S. ___ (2013)

There is no immunity for investigative activities Buckley v. Fitzsimmons 509 U.S. 259 (1993)

Government Agencies may not reveal private information during investigations Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957)

They are known to spy on the citizens on the United States
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr6304/text
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/06/12/heres-everything-we-know-about-prism-to-date/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(surveillance_program)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/08/fbi-changes-privacy-rules-accessing-nsa-prism-data
http://www.vocativ.com/295204/nsa-prism/
http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/nsa-prism.htm

both have the capability to turn cell phones and other devices into spying devices Riley v. California 573 U.S. ___ (2014); United States v. United States Dist. Ct. 407 U.S. 297 (1972)
https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/

both have the capability to spy through walls using FLIR technology Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)
http://www.flir.com/home/

Warrants can be retrieved and acted on illegally (Overbroad warrants, Malicious Warrants, etc), and those acting on them are liable for doing so Messerschmidt, et al. v. Millender, et al. 565 U.S. ___ (2012)
Defendant and Defendant 2 are both known to abuse their capabilities and retrieve illegal warrants to do so
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/02/23/court-invalidates-cell-phone-warrant-as-overbroad/
http://archive.wired.com/politics/law/news/2007/07/exigentinvestigation
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/418/323/case.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Kurtz
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Mayfield
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_invocations_of_the_Patriot_Act
https://www.aclu.org/news/fbi-audit-exposes-widespread-abuse-patriot-act-powers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/james-whitey-bulgers-capture-could-cause-trouble-inside-the-fbi/2011/06/24/AGis2cjH_story.html
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/30/politics/what-happens-if-the-patriot-act-provisions-expire/
http://highered.mheducation.com/sites/0072564938/student_view0/chapter4/chapter_outline.html
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse_of_process

Government Agents must be held to a higher standard than other citizens due to the fact that they are acting under Color of Law Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
Color of Law
The act of a state officer, regardless of whether or not the act is within the limits of his or her authority, is considered an act under color of law if the officer purports to be conducting himself or herself in the course of official duties. Under the civil rights act of 1871 (42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983), color of law is synonymous with State Action, which is conduct by an officer that bears a sufficiently close nexus to a state so that the action is treated as though it is by the state.


Types of Police misconduct include false confession, false arrest, false evidence, false imprisonment, intimidation, police brutality, police corruption, racial profiling, surveillance abuse, witness tampering, and off-duty misconduct.
Others include:
1. Noble Cause corruption, where an officer believes that a good outcome justifies his bad behavior.
2. Selective Enforcement, allowing friends, family and other officers to break the law.
3. Abuse of Power, using the badge to get in to places you would otherwise not be invited or allowed, discounts, etc.
4. Police Perjury, blatant lying under oath and/or to other authorities to cover wrongdoing.
5. Violation by Officers of police procedural policy.
Laws intended to protect against abuse of authority include the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures; the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which includes due process and equal protection clauses; the Civil Rights Act of 1871; and the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Noble Cause corruption:
Corruption caused by the adherence to a teleological ethical system (ex: By their fruits you shall know them; pulling over anyone with larger rims on their car), suggesting that the person "will utilize unethical, and sometimes illegal, means to obtain a desired result," a result which appears to benefit the greater good.

Flast V Cohen

https://epic.org/privacy/ecpa/
Individuals who violate ECPA face up to five years in prison and fines up to $250,000. Victims are also entitled to bring civil suits and recover actual damages, in addition to punitive damages and attorney's fees, for violations.

1. If a Party or the World Health Organization has information relating to a substance not yet under international control which in its opinion may require the addition of that substance to any of the Schedules of this Convention, it shall notify the Secretary-General and furnish him with the information in support of that notification. The foregoing procedure shall also apply when a Party or the World Health Organization has information justifying the transfer of a substance from one Schedule to another among those Schedules, or the deletion of a substance from the Schedules.

2. The Secretary-General shall transmit such notification, and any information which he considers relevant, to the Parties, to the Commission and, when the notification is made by a Party, to the World Health Organization.

3. If the information transmitted with such a notification indicates that the substance is suitable for inclusion in Schedule I or Schedule II pursuant to paragraph 4, the Parties shall examine, in the light of all information available to them, the possibility of the provisional application to the substance of all measures of control applicable to substances in Schedule I or Schedule II, as appropriate.

4. If the World Health Organization finds:

a) That the substance has the capacity to produce

i) 1) A state of dependence, and

2) Central nervous system stimulation or depression, resulting in hallucinations or disturbances in motor function or thinking or behaviour or perception or mood, or

ii) Similar abuse and similar ill effects as a substance in Schedule I, II, III or IV, and

b) That there is sufficient evidence that the substance is being or is likely to be abused so as to constitute a public health and social problem warranting the placing of the substance under international control, the World Health Organization shall communicate to the Commission an assessment of the substance, including the extent or likelihood of abuse, the degree of seriousness of the public health and social problem and the degree of usefulness of the substance in medical therapy, together with recommendations on control measures, if any, that would be appropriate in the light of its assessment.

5. The Commission, taking into account the communication from the World Health Organization, whose assessments shall be determinative as to medical and scientific matters, and bearing in mind the economic, social, legal, administrative and other factors it may consider relevant, may add the substance to Schedule I, II, III or IV. The Commission may seek further information from the World Health Organization or from other appropriate sources.

6. If a notification under paragraph 1 relates to a substance already listed in one of the Schedules, the World Health Organization shall communicate to the Commission its new findings, any new assessment of the substance it may make in accordance with paragraph 4 and any new recommendations on control measures it may find appropriate in the light of that assessment. The Commission, taking into account the communication from the World Health Organization as under paragraph 5 and bearing in mind the factors referred to in that paragraph, may decide to transfer the substance from one Schedule to another or to delete it from the Schedules.

7. Any decision of the Commission taken pursuant to this article shall be communicated by the Secretary-General to all States Members of the United Nations, to non-member States Parties to this Convention, to the World Health Organization and to the Board. Such decision shall become fully effective with respect to each Party 180 days after the date of such communication, except for any Party which, within that period, in respect of a decision adding a substance to a Schedule, has transmitted to the Secretary-General a written notice that, in view of exceptional circumstances, it is not in a position to give effect with respect to that substance to all of the provisions of the Convention applicable to substances in that Schedule. Such notice shall state the reasons for this exceptional action. Notwithstanding its notice, each Party shall apply, as a minimum, the control measures listed below:

a) A Party having given such notice with respect to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule I shall take into account, as far as possible, the special control measures enumerated in article 7 and, with respect to that substance, shall:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution as provided in article 8 for substances in Schedule II;

ii) Require medical prescriptions for supply or dispensing as provided in article 9 for substances in Schedule II;

iii) Comply with the obligations relating to export and import provided in article 12, except in respect to another Party having given such notice for the substance in question;

iv) Comply with the obligations provided in article 13 for substances in Schedule II in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import;

v) Furnish statistical reports to the Board in accordance with paragraph 4 a) of article 16; and

vi) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

b) A Party having given such notice with regard to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule II shall, with respect to that substance:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution in accordance with article 8;

ii) Require medical prescriptions for supply or dispensing in accordance with article 9;

iii) Comply with the obligations relating to export and import provided in Article 12, except in respect to another Party having given such notice for the substance in question;

iv) Comply with the obligations of article 13 in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import;

v) Furnish statistical reports to the Board in accordance with paragraphs 4 a), c) and d) of article 16; and

vi) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

c) A Party having given such notice with regard to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule III shall, with respect to that substance:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution in accordance with article 8;

ii) Require medical prescriptions for supply or dispensing in accordance with article 9;

iii) Comply with the obligations relating to export provided in article 12, except in respect to another Party having given such notice for the substance in question;

iv) Comply with the obligations of article 13 in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import; and

v) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

d) A Party having given such notice with regard to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule IV shall, with respect to that substance:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution in accordance with article 8;

ii) Comply with the obligations of article 13 in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import; and

iii) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

e) A Party having given such notice with regard to a substance transferred to a Schedule providing stricter controls and obligations shall apply as a minimum all of the provisions of this Convention applicable to the Schedule from which it was transferred.

8. a) The decisions of the Commission taken under this article shall be subject to review by the Council upon the request of any Party filed within 180 days from receipt of notification of the decision. The request for review shall be sent to the Secretary-General together with all relevant information upon which the request for review is based.

b) The Secretary-General shall transmit copies of the request for review and the relevant information to the Commission, to the World Health Organization and to all the Parties, inviting them to submit comments within ninety days. All comments received shall be submitted to the Council for consideration.

c) The Council may confirm, alter or reverse the decision of the Commission. Notification of the Council's decision shall be transmitted to all States Members of the United Nations, to non-member States Parties to this Convention, to the Commission, to the World Health Organization and to the Board.

d) During pendency of the review, the original decision of the Commission shall, subject to paragraph 7, remain in effect.

9. The Parties shall use their best endeavours to apply to substances which do not fall under this Convention, but which may be used in the illicit manufacture of psychotropic substances, such measures of supervision as may be practicable.

For more info here is the "What does Temple Coin Have to do with the DEA??" thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2799696.0

Here is our Case number with the International Commission on Human Rights

P-2098-17

Organization of American States
17th Street and Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, D.C., 20006-4499
United States of America

Main Telephone: 1 (202) 370 5000

I will post in this thread a bunch of stuff that is in our Petition that went to them.

So now there is a Human Rights case for the Temple. Here is the process now, now they see if it is Admissible, Admissible means: Is one of the Parties a State/Nation? Is that Party a Signatory to the OAS? (Yes we are btw). On its face, is there a claim that said State has violated some Human Right Guaranteed Under International Treaty?

So it is Admissible.

From there, they go into the Merits phase. What part of this case is something they can handle, and what parts they can't really touch, and might need to be passed back to the State/Nation to be decided in Court. But at this time, any Claim that has Merit under the International Treaties, and has Evidence that "On it's Face" actually happened, can at that time be settled between the State/Nation (their Representative) and myself, or we can go to the actual Human Rights Court (this is all done by the Commission up until this point). Then the State/Nation has to stay in Contact with us, so that we can make sure that things like this don't happen anymore.

And currently I am only asking the IACHR to make a Statement about the UN Psychotropics Convention, and cause the DEA to follow their own Rules in whatever way they can. So I am not even asking for much, and no one should fight against this.

1. If a Party or the World Health Organization has information relating to a substance not yet under international control which in its opinion may require the addition of that substance to any of the Schedules of this Convention, it shall notify the Secretary-General and furnish him with the information in support of that notification. The foregoing procedure shall also apply when a Party or the World Health Organization has information justifying the transfer of a substance from one Schedule to another among those Schedules, or the deletion of a substance from the Schedules.

2. The Secretary-General shall transmit such notification, and any information which he considers relevant, to the Parties, to the Commission and, when the notification is made by a Party, to the World Health Organization.

3. If the information transmitted with such a notification indicates that the substance is suitable for inclusion in Schedule I or Schedule II pursuant to paragraph 4, the Parties shall examine, in the light of all information available to them, the possibility of the provisional application to the substance of all measures of control applicable to substances in Schedule I or Schedule II, as appropriate.

4. If the World Health Organization finds:

a) That the substance has the capacity to produce

i) 1) A state of dependence, and

2) Central nervous system stimulation or depression, resulting in hallucinations or disturbances in motor function or thinking or behaviour or perception or mood, or

ii) Similar abuse and similar ill effects as a substance in Schedule I, II, III or IV, and

b) That there is sufficient evidence that the substance is being or is likely to be abused so as to constitute a public health and social problem warranting the placing of the substance under international control, the World Health Organization shall communicate to the Commission an assessment of the substance, including the extent or likelihood of abuse, the degree of seriousness of the public health and social problem and the degree of usefulness of the substance in medical therapy, together with recommendations on control measures, if any, that would be appropriate in the light of its assessment.

5. The Commission, taking into account the communication from the World Health Organization, whose assessments shall be determinative as to medical and scientific matters, and bearing in mind the economic, social, legal, administrative and other factors it may consider relevant, may add the substance to Schedule I, II, III or IV. The Commission may seek further information from the World Health Organization or from other appropriate sources.

6. If a notification under paragraph 1 relates to a substance already listed in one of the Schedules, the World Health Organization shall communicate to the Commission its new findings, any new assessment of the substance it may make in accordance with paragraph 4 and any new recommendations on control measures it may find appropriate in the light of that assessment. The Commission, taking into account the communication from the World Health Organization as under paragraph 5 and bearing in mind the factors referred to in that paragraph, may decide to transfer the substance from one Schedule to another or to delete it from the Schedules.

7. Any decision of the Commission taken pursuant to this article shall be communicated by the Secretary-General to all States Members of the United Nations, to non-member States Parties to this Convention, to the World Health Organization and to the Board. Such decision shall become fully effective with respect to each Party 180 days after the date of such communication, except for any Party which, within that period, in respect of a decision adding a substance to a Schedule, has transmitted to the Secretary-General a written notice that, in view of exceptional circumstances, it is not in a position to give effect with respect to that substance to all of the provisions of the Convention applicable to substances in that Schedule. Such notice shall state the reasons for this exceptional action. Notwithstanding its notice, each Party shall apply, as a minimum, the control measures listed below:

a) A Party having given such notice with respect to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule I shall take into account, as far as possible, the special control measures enumerated in article 7 and, with respect to that substance, shall:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution as provided in article 8 for substances in Schedule II;

ii) Require medical prescriptions for supply or dispensing as provided in article 9 for substances in Schedule II;

iii) Comply with the obligations relating to export and import provided in article 12, except in respect to another Party having given such notice for the substance in question;

iv) Comply with the obligations provided in article 13 for substances in Schedule II in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import;

v) Furnish statistical reports to the Board in accordance with paragraph 4 a) of article 16; and

vi) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

b) A Party having given such notice with regard to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule II shall, with respect to that substance:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution in accordance with article 8;

ii) Require medical prescriptions for supply or dispensing in accordance with article 9;

iii) Comply with the obligations relating to export and import provided in Article 12, except in respect to another Party having given such notice for the substance in question;

iv) Comply with the obligations of article 13 in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import;

v) Furnish statistical reports to the Board in accordance with paragraphs 4 a), c) and d) of article 16; and

vi) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

c) A Party having given such notice with regard to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule III shall, with respect to that substance:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution in accordance with article 8;

ii) Require medical prescriptions for supply or dispensing in accordance with article 9;

iii) Comply with the obligations relating to export provided in article 12, except in respect to another Party having given such notice for the substance in question;

iv) Comply with the obligations of article 13 in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import; and

v) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

d) A Party having given such notice with regard to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule IV shall, with respect to that substance:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution in accordance with article 8;

ii) Comply with the obligations of article 13 in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import; and

iii) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

e) A Party having given such notice with regard to a substance transferred to a Schedule providing stricter controls and obligations shall apply as a minimum all of the provisions of this Convention applicable to the Schedule from which it was transferred.

8. a) The decisions of the Commission taken under this article shall be subject to review by the Council upon the request of any Party filed within 180 days from receipt of notification of the decision. The request for review shall be sent to the Secretary-General together with all relevant information upon which the request for review is based.

b) The Secretary-General shall transmit copies of the request for review and the relevant information to the Commission, to the World Health Organization and to all the Parties, inviting them to submit comments within ninety days. All comments received shall be submitted to the Council for consideration.

c) The Council may confirm, alter or reverse the decision of the Commission. Notification of the Council's decision shall be transmitted to all States Members of the United Nations, to non-member States Parties to this Convention, to the Commission, to the World Health Organization and to the Board.

d) During pendency of the review, the original decision of the Commission shall, subject to paragraph 7, remain in effect.

9. The Parties shall use their best endeavours to apply to substances which do not fall under this Convention, but which may be used in the illicit manufacture of psychotropic substances, such measures of supervision as may be practicable.

1. If a Party or the World Health Organization has information relating to a substance not yet under international control which in its opinion may require the addition of that substance to any of the Schedules of this Convention, it shall notify the Secretary-General and furnish him with the information in support of that notification. The foregoing procedure shall also apply when a Party or the World Health Organization has information justifying the transfer of a substance from one Schedule to another among those Schedules, or the deletion of a substance from the Schedules.

2. The Secretary-General shall transmit such notification, and any information which he considers relevant, to the Parties, to the Commission and, when the notification is made by a Party, to the World Health Organization.

3. If the information transmitted with such a notification indicates that the substance is suitable for inclusion in Schedule I or Schedule II pursuant to paragraph 4, the Parties shall examine, in the light of all information available to them, the possibility of the provisional application to the substance of all measures of control applicable to substances in Schedule I or Schedule II, as appropriate.

4. If the World Health Organization finds:

a) That the substance has the capacity to produce

i) 1) A state of dependence, and

2) Central nervous system stimulation or depression, resulting in hallucinations or disturbances in motor function or thinking or behaviour or perception or mood, or

ii) Similar abuse and similar ill effects as a substance in Schedule I, II, III or IV, and

b) That there is sufficient evidence that the substance is being or is likely to be abused so as to constitute a public health and social problem warranting the placing of the substance under international control, the World Health Organization shall communicate to the Commission an assessment of the substance, including the extent or likelihood of abuse, the degree of seriousness of the public health and social problem and the degree of usefulness of the substance in medical therapy, together with recommendations on control measures, if any, that would be appropriate in the light of its assessment.

5. The Commission, taking into account the communication from the World Health Organization, whose assessments shall be determinative as to medical and scientific matters, and bearing in mind the economic, social, legal, administrative and other factors it may consider relevant, may add the substance to Schedule I, II, III or IV. The Commission may seek further information from the World Health Organization or from other appropriate sources.

6. If a notification under paragraph 1 relates to a substance already listed in one of the Schedules, the World Health Organization shall communicate to the Commission its new findings, any new assessment of the substance it may make in accordance with paragraph 4 and any new recommendations on control measures it may find appropriate in the light of that assessment. The Commission, taking into account the communication from the World Health Organization as under paragraph 5 and bearing in mind the factors referred to in that paragraph, may decide to transfer the substance from one Schedule to another or to delete it from the Schedules.

7. Any decision of the Commission taken pursuant to this article shall be communicated by the Secretary-General to all States Members of the United Nations, to non-member States Parties to this Convention, to the World Health Organization and to the Board. Such decision shall become fully effective with respect to each Party 180 days after the date of such communication, except for any Party which, within that period, in respect of a decision adding a substance to a Schedule, has transmitted to the Secretary-General a written notice that, in view of exceptional circumstances, it is not in a position to give effect with respect to that substance to all of the provisions of the Convention applicable to substances in that Schedule. Such notice shall state the reasons for this exceptional action. Notwithstanding its notice, each Party shall apply, as a minimum, the control measures listed below:

a) A Party having given such notice with respect to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule I shall take into account, as far as possible, the special control measures enumerated in article 7 and, with respect to that substance, shall:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution as provided in article 8 for substances in Schedule II;

ii) Require medical prescriptions for supply or dispensing as provided in article 9 for substances in Schedule II;

iii) Comply with the obligations relating to export and import provided in article 12, except in respect to another Party having given such notice for the substance in question;

iv) Comply with the obligations provided in article 13 for substances in Schedule II in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import;

v) Furnish statistical reports to the Board in accordance with paragraph 4 a) of article 16; and

vi) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

b) A Party having given such notice with regard to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule II shall, with respect to that substance:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution in accordance with article 8;

ii) Require medical prescriptions for supply or dispensing in accordance with article 9;

iii) Comply with the obligations relating to export and import provided in Article 12, except in respect to another Party having given such notice for the substance in question;

iv) Comply with the obligations of article 13 in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import;

v) Furnish statistical reports to the Board in accordance with paragraphs 4 a), c) and d) of article 16; and

vi) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

c) A Party having given such notice with regard to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule III shall, with respect to that substance:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution in accordance with article 8;

ii) Require medical prescriptions for supply or dispensing in accordance with article 9;

iii) Comply with the obligations relating to export provided in article 12, except in respect to another Party having given such notice for the substance in question;

iv) Comply with the obligations of article 13 in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import; and

v) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

d) A Party having given such notice with regard to a previously uncontrolled substance added to Schedule IV shall, with respect to that substance:

i) Require licences for manufacture, trade and distribution in accordance with article 8;

ii) Comply with the obligations of article 13 in regard to prohibition of and restrictions on export and import; and

iii) Adopt measures in accordance with article 22 for the repression of acts contrary to laws or regulations adopted pursuant to the foregoing obligations.

e) A Party having given such notice with regard to a substance transferred to a Schedule providing stricter controls and obligations shall apply as a minimum all of the provisions of this Convention applicable to the Schedule from which it was transferred.

8. a) The decisions of the Commission taken under this article shall be subject to review by the Council upon the request of any Party filed within 180 days from receipt of notification of the decision. The request for review shall be sent to the Secretary-General together with all relevant information upon which the request for review is based.

b) The Secretary-General shall transmit copies of the request for review and the relevant information to the Commission, to the World Health Organization and to all the Parties, inviting them to submit comments within ninety days. All comments received shall be submitted to the Council for consideration.

c) The Council may confirm, alter or reverse the decision of the Commission. Notification of the Council's decision shall be transmitted to all States Members of the United Nations, to non-member States Parties to this Convention, to the Commission, to the World Health Organization and to the Board.

d) During pendency of the review, the original decision of the Commission shall, subject to paragraph 7, remain in effect.

9. The Parties shall use their best endeavours to apply to substances which do not fall under this Convention, but which may be used in the illicit manufacture of psychotropic substances, such measures of supervision as may be practicable.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/HinduHashLab/
In this group what is about to start happening is that I am going to start posting a ton of Tutorials about making Aryuvedic Medicine starting with Charas (Hash) and from there we will add extractions of other Plants to the Hashes. And this is a group for Soma Drinkers and Shaivites, we will be creating various forms of Soma, Charas, Kumkuma, etc, and we will be creating Perfumes and Essential Oils. After the Harvest I will be making Bubble Hash and Solvent Hash, but not BHO, it will be Golden and Amber Oils, and Hopefully Clear Liquids with the Distillates, and doing the same thing to other Plants, and combing them with the various Hashes.

So we will be getting into Terpenes on a Religious Level, and creating things that are not currently being created in the Medical Marijuana Industry, because this is not the Medical Marijuana Industry, it is the Religious Marijuana Industry.



We will be doing things like this, but with various molecules, just to see what happens.

This is 5-MeO-MIPT: NOT ILLEGAL, ESPECIALLY FOR RELIGIOUS USE
To a solution of 1.40 g 5-methoxy-N-methyltryptamine (5-MeO-NMT, see separate recipe) in 50 mL methanol there was added 1.0 mL acetone and 0.5 g 10% Pd/C. This mixture was shaken under a hydrogen atmosphere at 50 psi for 15 h. The catalyst was removed by filtration through a bed of celite Celite, the filtrate stripped of solvent under vacuum, and the solid residue recrystallized from Et2O/hexane to give 1.45 g N-isopropyl-5-methoxy-N-methyl-tryptamine (5-MeO-MIPT). This was isolated as the hydrochloride salt by dissolving it in a small amount of IPA, neutralization with concentrated HCl, and dilution with Et2O. This had a mp 162–163 °C. Anal: C15H23ClN2O. C,H,N. MS (in m/z): C5H12N+ 86 (100%); indolemethylene+ 160 (5%); parent ion 246 (4%).

If you ever have a family member dying in a coma, go ahead and use this:


Caryophyllene,. It is a Marijuana Terpene used in the Perfume industry to give things a Marijuana smell, and it actually connects with the CB2 (Cannabinoid) receptor, even without any Cannabinoiids. So Caryophyllene has cannabis effects, even when taken outside or without Cannabis. Sources of Carryophyllene include Uziza Pepper 50% of Essential oil) and Indian Bay Leaves (25% of Essential Oil). So taking either of these things can and will increase the effects of the Cannabinoids.


Indole-3-Carbinol can be found in many common vegetables, and it breaks down to activate the CB2 receptor.


Common Rue Essential Oil activates the CB2 receptor.

Using Lemonene or some other non-Polar solvent, make your Cannabis extract. Then add some kind of Alcohol (Ethanol, Isopropyl or Methanol) let that sit and eventually the Lemonene and Alcohol will separate. Use a Separatory funnel to separate these layers. St this point you have Cannabis absolute, aka medical grade hash in alcohol.


If you add a few drops of Sulfuric acid at this time, all the Cannabinoids will turn into THC Cannabinoids, and all the THC cannabinoids will become pure Delta-9-THC.

"Picamilon", this is a Nootropic which you can buy in America and they actually prescribe it to people in Russia. What it is is GABA powder and Niacin powder, these are both Amino Acids so they both have the properties of both an acid and a base depending on the situation. So during my research over the past few days, I decided to find out how Picamilon is made, and I found something out that may lead to some new Nootropics. Picamilon is just about the easiest Chemical reaction in the world. From what I learned, when you mix to Amino Acids together and apply heat, they will release H20 and form what is called a "Peptide Bond". So simply by putting GABA powder and Niacin powder in water (in equal amounts) and evaporating all the water away, you are creating "Picamilon". This substance has the ability to cross the blood brain barrier better than regular GABA, so it has a much stronger effect on those receptors. But it's not hard to make at all. So I am going to make some of that, and then maybe get some other Amino Acids and see what happens. Usually people wouldn't "invent" new molecules and eat them, but I am following in the footsteps of Sasha Shulgin. I will get some Amino Acids sometime in the next month or 2. Oilahuasca and Marijuasca come first.



Now, let's look at a THC Molecule.




On it are a bunch of Hydrocarbons, a Hydroxide and 2 Hydrogens. Meaning, any Oxygen, Fluorine or Nitrogen could alter it pretty completely. So I wonder if anyone has ever tried pickling their THC (adding Calcium Hydroxide aka Edible Lime to it). Or has anyone ever let Marijuana sit in a Hydrogen Peroxide solution, with maybe an Amino Acid? This could Change it completely also. Or letting it sit in some kind of Nitrogen solution. Morpholine is a Nitrogen and Oxygen, when someone adds morpholine to THC we are going to see some cool new medical applications, maybe.


Also, since Marijuana obviously forms Isomers with Acids (Sulfuric acid and Acetic acid), it might be worth testing other acids. I am pretty sure no one has ever treated THC with Tartaric acid, which is used in some medical applications. And I am almost positive it has never been treated with Malic acid, which is used in some foods and beverages, as well as occurring naturally.


THC could have all kinds of different forms that no one has even tried yet. And I am pretty sure no one has made any kind of 5-MeO-THC or anything like that yet, and from what I understand all it takes it some Methanol and something to activate the reaction in order to Methylate the THC into some X-MeO-form, unless I am mistaken.

A lot of people think that the Horoscopes are just random star system that people decided "That one looks like a goat" and "That one looks like a lion" and "That one looks like a guy carrying water", then they randomly assigned months to stars. But that is not what happened. Those specific constellations are the specific constellations that the Sun seems to pass though as we go around it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology


Astrology is actually a distorted misused form of Ancient Religions. Most of the time Ancient people didn't look to Horoscopes for things like dating or changing jobs, but instead they looked to it for things like farming. Where the could "predict" when to plant their crops, and "predict" when they were going to be able to harvest. We still do this today in the form of  "Almanac"s the Almanac can predict the weather and the planetary alignments and everything.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almanac


All of this is based on the Ancient "Ogdoad" which goes all the way back to at least 2000 BC, so it is 4000 years old at least. And we still use it today, without it (the Almanac) we would not be able to farm properly. Unless you expect Texans and Idahoans and Nebraskans, etc to grow all your food without ancient Egyptian secrets.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogdoad


Hindus Worship Gods that Correspond with the Planets. If you look up "Hindu Equivalent to Mars" you will find it. If you look up "Hindu Equivalent to Luna" you will find it. The Greeks and Romans had a similar faith, which the Egyptians and Sumerians had first.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_deities

Obviously once Humans had the Ogdoad it was easy to farm, using the planets to figure out when to plant and harvest. But humans were farming something before that, we didn't start farming around 2000 BC, it was more like 10000 BC.


Humans got where we are by watching cycles. The planets, the stars, the seasons, the civilizations. And farming started the same way. You have probably heard of a "Fig", and you have probably even heard of the Fig in relation to religion pretty often. Well, there is a bug called the "Fig Wasp" and the Fig wasps life cycle is tied to the Fig Tree.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fig_wasp#Life_cycle


Figs are one of few trees that NEEDS an animal or bug to pollinate it, which is where the Fig Wasp and Farming comes in. If the Fig Wasp and other pollinators like Bees did not exist, Figs would die out. And ancient humans would have seen the fig wasp, laying eggs (human food), eating figs (human food) and basically using the Fig tree to live out its entire life, just going from tree to tree and flower to flower to make sure the fruits came. Voila, Farming, Circa 10,000 BC-ish

The Knapp Commission
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoNkmAUKWEg