The silent majority is silent. Stop trying to speak for us, NO2X. Your Twitter brigade doesn't represent millions of Bitcoin users.
That's hypocritical, you also can't speak for the silent majority, and you're not silent. Not only that, casting the opinions of twitter users as 'brigading' is disingenuous, an outright lie unless you have any proof. |
|
|
|
|
$100 fees - that's IF no consensus is reached. You have taken it out of context. Did you even listen to the discussion?
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, 'far superior' was stretching it a bit. Let's see how the S5s actually perform seeing as they haven't shipped yet.
|
|
|
|
|
The Conversation? Reads more like tabloid fluff, certainly not up to their normal standards. Possibly it (The Conversation) was the worst performing intellectual asset of 2014, and 2015 not likely better.
|
|
|
|
He doesn't say 'replaced',
"I think we evolve to Bitcoin 2.0 or 3.0, using the same blockchain technology, but with a way to make the
new currency a truly stable medium of information that can be easily exchanged for goods and
services."
and "But will it be Bitcoin? My best guess is that it will not be Bitcoin as currently constructed but rather an evolved version."
Isn't that the idea - as with most software - to evolve?
Well, to a degree, if such software aspires to be at least a currency. Dollar is still a dollar, there was no dollar 2.0 or 3.0 I guess what I am getting at is bitcoin has to stay bitcoin with 21 mil units just as a 1930 dollar bill could be redeemed now for goods and services. If bitcoin changes, evolves, mutates, sublimates into something else entirely-most will feel betrayed IF "old bitcoin" would not be accepted at par (or better) with bitcoin 2.0 or 3.0. Yes I agree with that, mostly, despite Dollar 2014 being worth only about 3% of Dollar 1914. |
|
|
|
Anyone 5 years behind the curve in their own professed field of expertise needs not be taken seriously. Would you go to a doctor that hasn't read any new medical information in 5 years?
In fact I smell a sales pitch for a "sure thing" investment if I click on anything in his blog. It's looks like one of the oldest scams about making money by writing books about making money.
He's not professing to be a Bitcoin expert, just " offer a few of my own thoughts on the relationships among gold, fiat money,
Bitcoin, and financial transactions". |
|
|
|
|
He doesn't say 'replaced',
"I think we evolve to Bitcoin 2.0 or 3.0, using the same blockchain technology, but with a way to make the
new currency a truly stable medium of information that can be easily exchanged for goods and
services."
and "But will it be Bitcoin? My best guess is that it will not be Bitcoin as currently constructed but rather an evolved version."
Isn't that the idea - as with most software - to evolve?
|
|
|
|
|
Western Union CIO: Bitcoin automobiles no solution; we have horses, they can go anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitillionaire? Sure sounds better than Microbitillionnaire!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
