False accusations, misinterpretations of intention, speculations regarding liability, etc.
Those are all possibilities you were aware of when you started this thread.
My concern is that many Bitcoin enterprises are already ridiculously opaque. I believe that when they fail, the identities and the actions of those involved with the business should no longer be protected - they should be subject to public scrutiny just as they are in the real world.
Without such scrutiny, people have no idea whether the same people who were associated with one failed enterprise are operating a new one and they have little information on which to judge whether the failure was due to incompetence, malice, or factors which were truly beyond the control of the operators.
I don't believe it is reasonable to expect the community to accept at face value the unexamined claims by service operators of why their business failed.