|
CloudStrife
|
 |
July 30, 2016, 06:42:42 PM |
|
Interesting, I'll see some of the documentaries.
The do have videos of lab experiments conducted, they simulated a galaxy formation in a lab, seems kinda way out their but check it out. Pretty hard to do that, you need a black hole in the middle that swirls the gas around it and creates the disk shape of the galaxy. I'm sure you don't want to make a black hole on earth  These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around. |
|
|
|
|
|
RealBitcoin
|
|
July 30, 2016, 06:46:30 PM |
|
These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.
Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please! |
|
|
|
|
CloudStrife
|
|
July 30, 2016, 06:54:46 PM |
|
These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.
Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please! lol I'm not the one doing this. I think these guys know what they are doing anyway.  |
|
|
|
|
|
RealBitcoin
|
|
July 30, 2016, 07:00:24 PM |
|
These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.
Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please! lol I'm not the one doing this. I think these guys know what they are doing anyway. I'm not so sure about that, i think the Cern guys are crazy and reckless, they should setup their dangerous experiments on the Moon or Mars, not in the middle of Europe, where anything could go wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Megaquake (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2016, 07:05:03 PM |
|
What is the cause of the gravitational lense effect if there is no space time topology? Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fePQdJNVF9g |
Mines at Kano.is best profit in the world!
在Kano.is的BTC
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1373
|
|
July 30, 2016, 08:54:57 PM |
|
These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.
Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please! lol I'm not the one doing this. I think these guys know what they are doing anyway. I'm not so sure about that, i think the Cern guys are crazy and reckless, they should setup their dangerous experiments on the Moon or Mars, not in the middle of Europe, where anything could go wrong. Besides, nobody knows that the Cern guys aren't creating the particles rather than simply finding them.  |
|
|
|
criptix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
|
|
July 30, 2016, 09:23:21 PM |
|
Please point me to just one gravitational lens that was not achromatic. The nobel prize with some million dollars are waiting. Btw. You could also try to tell me what the size of the lens for refraction would be for example our sun. |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1373
|
|
July 30, 2016, 09:35:46 PM |
|
^^^ He should answer the question of course, but you have to show that there even is a gravitational lens, now that we have seen that it is simple aberration of light through particles near a star or other object. |
|
|
|
criptix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
|
|
July 30, 2016, 09:46:07 PM
Last edit: July 30, 2016, 10:01:43 PM by criptix |
|
Please point me to just one gravitational lens that was not achromatic. The nobel prize with some million dollars are waiting. Btw. You could also try to tell me what the size of the lens for refraction would be for example our sun.^^^ He should answer the question of course, but you have to show that there even is a gravitational lens, now that we have seen that it is simple aberration of light through particles near a star or other object. I bolded what is important to answer your post. The material that is needed for the refraction doesnt exist. If we take our sun for example and do some calculations then the thickness of the lens has to be around 20.000 km and more of water or air. Or some other material with 700.000 km thickness. It just doesnt work. |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1373
|
|
July 30, 2016, 10:03:22 PM |
|
Please point me to just one gravitational lens that was not achromatic. The nobel prize with some million dollars are waiting. Btw. You could also try to tell me what the size of the lens for refraction would be for example our sun.^^^ He should answer the question of course, but you have to show that there even is a gravitational lens, now that we have seen that it is simple aberration of light through particles near a star or other object. I bolded what is important to answer your post. The material that is needed for the refraction doesnt exist. If we take our sun for example and do some calculations then the thickness of the lens has to be around 20.000 km and more of water or air. Or some other material with 700.000 km thickness. It just doesnt work. Personally, I am not into this enough to answer your points. But the people in the videos seem to think that the material is there. Didn't they say that it exists in the form of nutrinos? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Megaquake (OP)
|
|
March 09, 2017, 11:41:10 PM |
|
|
Mines at Kano.is best profit in the world!
在Kano.is的BTC
|
|
|
|
