Bestchange has been ignoring this thread for some time, because somehow criticisms of them and their partners are being published more and more often. Now I looked at their claim for your case and turning your review into a neutral one. Quite disappointing from them.
It seems rather strange for an exchanger that has been operating for over fifteen years and cared about its reputation to simply abandon the english-language aspect of its project, leaving customers without adequate feedback. This undoubtedly undermines trust in this service, and users will increasingly question whether they should use BestChange with such a level of support.
I would like to hear a proper explanation from them, if possible. Honestly, I don't want to believe that their service level has dropped so low or that it's due to fraud (or something similar). Perhaps it's due to the influence of the regulator?
I hope the project management is aware of all this.
Maybe they decided to concentrate on only Russian exchangers and the Russian board.
I think they should do more to protect the client during the mediation process. There is no point of making the review neutral even before the client has received their funds. I thought the whole purpose of that review section was to also keep the exchanger in check and make sure they resolved the issue as soon as possible
Abandoning the more "rich"english-language market segment for the sake of a local one? That seems foolish.
That didn't stop them from answering user questions in this thread before, did it? Because their support handled both directions (RU and EU).
What is happening leaves me confused and doubtful whether I should use their service if necessary.