Do you agree with ChatGPT on the club that might win the premier League?

[Doan9269]

All what ChatGPT gave are all generic  answers based on past performances, and sport relying 70% of past data will always give suggestions of last best performing teams and in this case Liverpool, Manchester City  and Manchester United .
If you look at the names its given Liverpool is nowhere near the top four which tells me ChatGpt isn't  really up todate with current affairs and just relies on historical data.

Btw is this chatgpt 3.5 or 4.0?

If am betting on premier league then just know it that I can't work by strictly on what ChatGPT tells or forecast, these are nothing than the collection of previous performances from individual teams and general opinions collected from different sources and people across the world, that may not really work as the real situation being applicable to, i will rather take the opportunity to gather more required informations i needed and arrived at my own judgement or final conclusion and not from ChatGPT.

[jostorres]

You will be shocked if you lose your money in the end, do not bet with a higher amount of money because this prediction comes from ChatGPT, that doesn't make it the best predictor because Chatgpt has nothing but data, past data of performance, you still have not gotten out of luck area to win this bet, so I don't believe that AI can favor you with betting, AI will be more beneficial for workers in casino business than the gamblers.

ChatGPT was exaggerated and so are other AI out there, nothing can predict the outcome of anything, that power belongs to God himself.

If we talk about 100% accurate predictions, that is obviously not possible to be done by a human, AIs come way after humans when it comes to that because they lack the ability to think and decide but they simply evaluate data and provide answers based on the questions asked by humans. One might be able to make a correct prediction when there are only 2 outcomes and you have a 50% chance of getting it right.

In sports betting, the chances of you perfectly predicting the outcome of a match are 50%, and the same is for an AI model, so the guesses can sometimes be right and sometimes be wrong, they can mostly be right if you or the AI does ample research and analysis and base the prediction on that.

[LUCKMCFLY]

If you have used ChatGPT, the old and free version, you need to understand that it provides outdated information since the data it has is already outdated and it doesn't have access to any data that is recent, and for that feature, you will need to buy their subscription which will provide you access to the latest version of ChatGPT called GPT-4.

It will be interesting if someone does a comparison between both free and paid versions of the AI model and post the results here for us to see. The paid version will probably provide a more accurate answer since it has access to the recent data available on the internet.

In that you are right, however if the chatgpt-4 can make predictions then sports betting and everything that is lottery would go into a big stage of bankruptcy, because all the casinos would be lost from the map, no casino likes to lose , and they would obviously take care of that, unless they use an AI stronger than Chatgpt-4, which probably does exist because I imagine that the big hackers have more development in it to achieve their purposes, then that would become an eventual war of AIs good and bad...

I think people mainly exeggarate about chatgpt 4. It can obviously be lot more better than 3rd version because it's new and not outdated. But I don't think it can become all knowing machine in a year or month or something. AI developments will obviously improve in next 5-10 years but its still at baby phase. I also consider that, even with maximum amount of statistics ai may fail to correctly guess results. Humans are emotional machines. You may try sports betting and one player may perform bad and everything can go wrong.

Yes, the AI is really one of the things that we as players are always going to take into consideration, first of all I agree with how you say it, because I know that's the way it is, the AI phase is just under development, and it may be that many people marvel at what it does, but I know that they have a lot to develop, just as it is difficult to say that the things that humans do are done by humans and not with AI, because when you focus on it there can be many inconsistencies maybe 5 years? No, we think that there will be fewer years where the AI will be perfected, if we see the future, how can it be with the I? It will obviously improve it, apart from the fact that there are many devs that work on very specific AIs, eventually all those programming can be integrated into one and can form a super AI that can handle many things, and hopefully at that time it will not attack humans .