Edkemper
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I love to trade
|
 |
May 04, 2015, 08:24:22 PM |
|
And I was happy for have bough around 0.3 between 130 and 170, and now it touched 42!
Hope to see the rise soon to 1k at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
placebo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 04, 2015, 08:29:58 PM |
|
And I was happy for have bough around 0.3 between 130 and 170, and now it touched 42!
Hope to see the rise soon to 1k at least.
Patient... you never know what can happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
ahmed9979
|
|
May 04, 2015, 08:36:18 PM |
|
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo, I just reviewed the old code with the new code... I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some) If you have access to code, could you please send it to me? I've been working on some new layout designs. 1- https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmm15b41cbp4m6r/BTX10-alt.png2-  |
|
|
|
|
fonzerrellie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
Kaspa
|
|
May 04, 2015, 08:41:29 PM |
|
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo, I just reviewed the old code with the new code... I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some) If you have access to code, could you please send it to me? I've been working on some new layout designs. https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmm15b41cbp4m6r/BTX10-alt.png?dl=0NICE!! looks great so far |
#Expanse $EXP 500 transactions 4 .1 EXP 1st Clone of ETH
WAVES
|
|
|
|
Diggio
|
|
May 04, 2015, 08:48:44 PM |
|
Like it too. Restores the orange and removes the text behind the other areas to make it them easier to read. Will expand better as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Meeks
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
May 04, 2015, 08:55:08 PM |
|
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo, I just reviewed the old code with the new code... I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some) If you have access to code, could you please send it to me? I've been working on some new layout designs. 1- https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmm15b41cbp4m6r/BTX10-alt.png2- Wow, that's awesome! |
|
|
|
|
|
ahmed9979
|
|
May 04, 2015, 09:11:42 PM |
|
Thank you all for your kind words. I'm just trying to do my part  |
|
|
|
|
BTXdev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
May 04, 2015, 09:50:30 PM |
|
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo, I just reviewed the old code with the new code... I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some) If you have access to code, could you please send it to me? I've been working on some new layout designs. 1- https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmm15b41cbp4m6r/BTX10-alt.png2- https://i.imgur.com/WePEbxl.pngIt looks really good! |
|
|
|
|
placebo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 04, 2015, 09:56:54 PM |
|
Not bad indeed  |
|
|
|
|
|
SquidsIn
|
|
May 04, 2015, 09:58:20 PM |
|
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block.  BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd It is! Congratulations! Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be. |
Since getting into Cryptocurrency I've had many bags, all but two have varied over time. Those are the two I see in the mirror where my eyes once shone.
|
|
|
BTXdev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
May 04, 2015, 10:09:18 PM |
|
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block. BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd It is! Congratulations! Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be. Of course it is. http://107.170.57.24/tx/f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd55k on input, 60k on output = 5000 WOCX bonus Yes, it's missing few BTX because POS reward is added little bit differently then one would expect, but that's not really a problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
Diggio
|
|
May 04, 2015, 10:09:54 PM |
|
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block. BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd It is! Congratulations! Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be. It can be but the fees would have to be higher than the subsidy to reduce the 5000 reward to less than that. It calculates the subsidy, adds the lucky block amount if you draw a number less than 3 (5000 in this case), and then returns the subsidy plus the fees. If the fees passed in were higher than your subsidy before the lucky block was added, your overall reward will get reduced. Probably makes more sense to simply return the reward (exact amount) if you hit one. |
|
|
|
|
BTXdev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
May 04, 2015, 10:21:29 PM |
|
Got a stake of 4997.66904241. I suppose it is a lucky block. BTX txid: f9327a5d5c9d6fa22b29c50cb24284cf1018991baac68204dccf71083287b9cd It is! Congratulations! Really?, based on the code that's in github I don't see how it can be. It can be but the fees would have to be higher than the subsidy to reduce the 5000 reward to less than that. It calculates the subsidy, adds the lucky block amount if you draw a number less than 3 (5000 in this case), and then returns the subsidy plus the fees. If the fees passed in were higher than your subsidy before the lucky block was added, your overall reward will get reduced. Probably makes more sense to simply return the reward (exact amount) if you hit one. Yes, it's lower because fees are accounted incorrectly, but it's minor problem and probably not worth fixing (it would require hard-fork) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
May 04, 2015, 11:35:32 PM |
|
It looks like someone is trying to buy all existing BTX at C-Cex?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turing
|
|
May 04, 2015, 11:57:59 PM |
|
It looks like someone is trying to buy all existing BTX at C-Cex?
12.5 BTC buywall Do the whales get back in again? |
|
|
|
|
kpierce77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 05, 2015, 01:12:34 AM |
|
Wallet stuck at 366 blocks. Anyone else seeing this? Conf looks like this:
rpcuser=rpcuser
rpcpassword=rpcpassword
rpcport=27270
port=28184
addnode=107.170.57.24
addnode=178.62.235.171
Any other nodes I should have?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diggio
|
|
May 05, 2015, 02:34:56 AM |
|
Not bad indeed Can we see what it looks like with the transparency on for the overlapping windows? It will probably look good since there is no text behind them. |
|
|
|
|
|
prodigy8
|
|
May 05, 2015, 04:09:57 AM |
|
No lucky has be found, i'm not so sure that there should be several... if there is a fully staking network with all coins then there should be indeed several lucky staking blocks, but with only a few people staking it can take a long time, i believe. Someone from the community verify that the code is correct, so i believe it is just a matter of time, more staking people and then the blocks should come.
placebo, I just reviewed the old code with the new code... I had no access to original code because Github was deleted by original dev so I couldn't look at how it was implemented originally. Due to time-constrains, I implemented only simple algorithm. Chance 2% is maybe too low and that's why we aren't seeing many lucky stakes (but there have been some) If you have access to code, could you please send it to me? I've been working on some new layout designs. 1- https://www.dropbox.com/s/nmm15b41cbp4m6r/BTX10-alt.png2- nice layout , good work ! |
|
|
|
|
|
MCDev
|
|
May 05, 2015, 04:27:23 AM |
|
Can't believe I'm asking this but .... At just a few minutes ago my Win Wallet block 3617 1 connetion -- shows syced *nix daemon #1 block 3669 8 connections *nix daemon #2 block 3669 8 connections C-Cex block 3669 http://107.170.57.24/chain/BitcoinTX block 3669 http://178.62.19.234:3001/ block 3669 All 3 of my instances have addnode=107.170.57.24 addnode=178.62.235.171 I've wiped the wallet directory several times and stopped and restarted the wallet several tines. The wallet just won't go past 3617. could it be the number of addresses (50) combined with the number of transactions (<1000) along with the number of coins? right now there's 350k staked |
|
|
|
|
Poll
