[ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming)

[duboisi]

Better wait for confirmation that snapshot is successful before you move SPR to non HLM exchangeable wallet.

[1714823301]

1714823301

[1714823301]

1714823301

[1714823301]

1714823301

[1714823301]

1714823301

[1714823301]

1714823301

[1714823301]

1714823301

[Lucasgabd]

Better wait for confirmation that snapshot is successful before you move SPR to non HLM exchangeable wallet.

thank you

[rahmad2nd]

From 60k going 15k so much sell... 

[rahmad2nd]

so just Cryptopia snapshoot??

[margana]

I withdrew some SPR from Cryptopia that they say is a completed transaction but there is no record of it on the blockchain.  There have been a *lot* of blocks since it showed up as complete.  Anybody know what to do?  Their support is "unhelpful" to say the least.

[albio87]

I withdrew some SPR from Cryptopia that they say is a completed transaction but there is no record of it on the blockchain.  There have been a *lot* of blocks since it showed up as complete.  Anybody know what to do?  Their support is "unhelpful" to say the least.

right now i've the same issue, maybe it's given by the fact that with the spread between topia and bitterex a lot of people tried to withdrawal at the same time so there could be a lot of transactions that have not yet occurred,  furthermore the spr market was closed due to snapshot so there would be a lot of accumulated transactions and their blockchain is not ready to accommodate all those transactions together, so wait and hope =D

[cinogrin]

Frankly there has already been market shenanigans with HLM's dev team

Care to supply details? I'd like to know more.

Cheers

Graham

Nothing major, but pretty obvious insider trading of SPR based on the delays of the snapshots being pushed back a couple times. If you were paying attention to the market and slack it's clear some people acted on information before the community was given the opportunity to. This is to be expected though, like I said I give them a pass. It's still unethical, but it's just the way of unregulated markets. It's not enough for me to call them scammers, they're just playing the game everyone else is. /shrug

[cryptoking82]

I withdrew some SPR from Cryptopia that they say is a completed transaction but there is no record of it on the blockchain.  There have been a *lot* of blocks since it showed up as complete.  Anybody know what to do?  Their support is "unhelpful" to say the least.

Same here, waiting to see what happens.

[Greaves7]

Guys Where i can see my Transactions?? SPR token have blockchain?

[Greaves7]

I withdrew some SPR from Cryptopia that they say is a completed transaction but there is no record of it on the blockchain.  There have been a *lot* of blocks since it showed up as complete.  Anybody know what to do?  Their support is "unhelpful" to say the least.

Please write how i can see my txid on block?

[cinogrin]

Guys Where i can see my Transactions?? SPR token have blockchain?

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/spr/

[coins101]

Frankly there has already been market shenanigans with HLM's dev team

Care to supply details? I'd like to know more.

Cheers

Graham

Nothing major, but pretty obvious insider trading of SPR based on the delays of the snapshots being pushed back a couple times. If you were paying attention to the market and slack it's clear some people acted on information before the community was given the opportunity to. This is to be expected though, like I said I give them a pass. It's still unethical, but it's just the way of unregulated markets. It's not enough for me to call them scammers, they're just playing the game everyone else is. /shrug

Pushing back snapshots were due to requests made by Cryptopia. Within hours of us knowing, we told everyone.

If you are in the slack channel, you will have noticed that Cryptopia are also active in the slack today to help everyone. Feel free to ask them directly about requests they made to move the dates.

After having spent almost 3 years working on Spreadcoin because the first dev went MIA leaving a bunch of nobs with worthless tokens and then battling to push this project forward, - and I know you know what I mean - I can take pretty much any type of abuse other than casually being labelled a scammer.

Come into the slack, ping me and I'll share the messages we had with Cryptopia and you can then work through the dates we made announcements and then check the trading activities on Bittrex.

[pawlik]

I withdrew some SPR from Cryptopia that they say is a completed transaction but there is no record of it on the blockchain.  There have been a *lot* of blocks since it showed up as complete.  Anybody know what to do?  Their support is "unhelpful" to say the least.

I have the same problem ... hopefully everything will clear up and there will be "lost" coin

[Anastasiya]

Not fully clear, what is the key difference of your project from other p2p platforms that already successfully raised funds.
What are the main factors that may effect or affect the tokens cost?

[gjhiggins]

Nothing major, but pretty obvious insider trading of SPR based on the delays of the snapshots being pushed back a couple times. If you were paying attention to the market and slack it's clear some people acted on information before the community was given the opportunity to. This is to be expected though, like I said I give them a pass. It's still unethical, but it's just the way of unregulated markets. It's not enough for me to call them scammers, they're just playing the game everyone else is. /shrug

Oh okay. I understand the perception but you're on very weak ground with the unsupported “pretty obvious”, surely there's a statistics exercise here which would give some hard grounding to your speculations?

Cheers

Graham

[cinogrin]

Nothing major, but pretty obvious insider trading of SPR based on the delays of the snapshots being pushed back a couple times. If you were paying attention to the market and slack it's clear some people acted on information before the community was given the opportunity to. This is to be expected though, like I said I give them a pass. It's still unethical, but it's just the way of unregulated markets. It's not enough for me to call them scammers, they're just playing the game everyone else is. /shrug

Oh okay. I understand the perception but you're on very weak ground with the unsupported “pretty obvious”, surely there's a statistics exercise here which would give some hard grounding to your speculations?

Cheers

Graham

It was obvious if you were watching the news and markets daily. You can go back and compare timestamps if you wish or don't believe me. I don't really care if you believe me or not, and furthermore I said it's minor and expected behavior in crypto. Also, coins101, I never once implied you were a scammer in fact I explicitly stated the opposite and I didn't for one second assume it was you. We're talking 10's of thousands of dollars at worst, not millions. It's not that big of a deal and it's IMO side effect of trying to run a distributed team.

[gjhiggins]

You can go back and compare timestamps if you wish or don't believe me. I don't really care if you believe me or not

No, you have it reversed. You claim to perceive a correlation where no-one else does, so it's up to you to demonstrate that one exists. I care because I was aware of the progress of discussions.

Cheers

Graham

[cinogrin]

You can go back and compare timestamps if you wish or don't believe me. I don't really care if you believe me or not

No, you have it reversed. You claim to perceive a correlation where no-one else does, so it's up to you to demonstrate that one exists. I care because I was aware of the progress of discussions.

Cheers

Graham

That'd be true if I was out to prove it to you. I'm not.


Think I'm lying or incorrect? Cool with me! I'm not out to tear down HLM, I mentioned my observation, many weeks after the fact, and how I had written it off. It didn't have to be a conversation.

[gjhiggins]

That'd be true if I was out to prove it to you. I'm not. Think I'm lying or incorrect? Cool with me! I'm not out to tear down HLM, I mentioned my observation, many weeks after the fact, and how I had written it off. It didn't have to be a conversation.

It remains important to the people whose reputation you have casually impugned, including me. I don't want it said later that I failed to act with propriety so I must press you for some details. You claim to see a correlation but in what? How did those with inside knowledge profit from this insider trading? Can you narrow down the period of time to a specific day or couple of days at least?

Cheers

Graham

[cinogrin]

That'd be true if I was out to prove it to you. I'm not. Think I'm lying or incorrect? Cool with me! I'm not out to tear down HLM, I mentioned my observation, many weeks after the fact, and how I had written it off. It didn't have to be a conversation.

It remains important to the people whose reputation you have casually impugned, including me. I don't want it said later that I failed to act with propriety so I must press you for some details. You claim to see a correlation but in what? How did those with inside knowledge profit from this insider trading? Can you narrow down the period of time to a specific day or couple of days at least?

Cheers

Graham

Oh sweetie, you are a very professional and cordial soul - and I honestly appreciate/respect that despite not being capable of such class myself, but if my off-hand comment is going to throw a wrench in the team's morale we've got a lot bigger issues than someone making 12 grand in August before anyone else could. I suppose it could've just been coincidence. I'm not going to scroll back through slack to find timestamps for you. I'm not nearly as invested in my claim as you are, and maybe it was just bad timing and I'm a guy who assumes the worst. I figured it was clear, but to make it explicit people sell when they know there is a delay, because they know some percentage of speculators will also do the same thing and re-enter later, so when you see some decent volume move in a counter-intuitive direction, and then find out a short time later there has been a delay, and then the previously counter-intuitive volume trend continues and now makes sense with the revealed information, you may be able to appreciate why my assumption was the worst. We're talking chump change in the grand scheme of things and hey maybe it was indeed just bad timing.