Your trust score has nothing do with whether your feedback shows up as trusted or not.
For your feedback to show up as trusted, you would need to appear in one's trust list, or extended trust network (ie joe has bob in his trust list, bob has you in his trust list, then you are in joe's trust network and your feedback would be trusted).
Here is a case where Vod's personal ego was hurt and hence he is denying to remove a -ve feedback, though three people on DefaultTrust (QuickSeller, Shorena, Dooglus) agreed that it is not a scam...
Otherwise, logically you should leave -ve feedback on every dice site operator that accepts investment in the bankroll.
I hope I don't have to do that - it would be a lot of needless work.
I'm trying to work out a personal policy to determine when a ponzi should be flagged as a ponzi - so that everyone is treated equally. One of the ways they wouldn't be flagged was if they
clearly stated for a reasonable person that they could lose all their money and that a return is not guaranteed. (OP does not do that.)
Since the OP called me out as an abuser and contacted my default trust sponsors, I don't feel removing the trust until my policy is developed is an appropriate thing to do - I think the community should stay involved.
Edit: It appears the OP has increased the minimum playing amount by
tenfold.
Just increased the minimum bet amount from 0.001 BTC to 0.01 BTC. Hopefully it does NOT affect anyone and make the game more interesting for all...
Vod is trusted by Dooglus & Tomatocage and already untrusted by HostFat. In this scenario, if another user of DefaultTrust level 1 untrust Vod in their trust list, then will Vod's feedbacks lose its power to turn someone red/green ?
