Nominate (insert name here) to the default trust list

[legendster]

I noticed that Shdvb has traded big amounts of bitcoins and he is not even in Depth 4. That's weird.
Same goes with many others.

The quality of the trade doesnt matter here. The number of trades do.

[1714906705]

1714906705

[1714906705]

1714906705

[1714906705]

1714906705

[1714906705]

1714906705

[TheGr33k]

I noticed that Shdvb has traded big amounts of bitcoins and he is not even in Depth 4. That's weird.
Same goes with many others.

The quality of the trade doesnt matter here. The number of trades do.

And what if I tell you that he has done a lot many trades. Go through his thread in currency exchange section dude.

[Blazed]

I do not see the point of this thread...anyways the people I would vote for are already in the default list. If you are going off of trust scores than I should be in the list  

1 - Remove DeadTerra
2 - Maybe add some people into trust lvl 2
3 - Not sure we need any more level 1 memebers

[DiamondCardz]

Meh, even as one of the people in the poll I don't really see the point in this (and I did previously get highly involved in scambusting and slightly am now, so I don't know if you'd classify me as a "forum cop"). It's a nice idea and I'm definitely not dissing it, but as I'm sure you're aware it's very easy to just create a bunch of new accounts and vote.

[legendster]

Meh, even as one of the people in the poll I don't really see the point in this (and I did previously get highly involved in scambusting and slightly am now, so I don't know if you'd classify me as a "forum cop"). It's a nice idea and I'm definitely not dissing it, but as I'm sure you're aware it's very easy to just create a bunch of new accounts and vote.

Yes it is, hence this is not to be taken seriously.
In the ideal world only Default trustees should be able to vote who gets to that rank. But it'd have to be a strictly monitored business, with this forum becoming more populated every day we do need more people to be trusted, else its just a bunch of guys at the top dumping on the lower ranked people. Not implying that its happening now, but could happen.

[legendster]

I do not see the point of this thread...anyways the people I would vote for are already in the default list. If you are going off of trust scores than I should be in the list  

1 - Remove DeadTerra
2 - Maybe add some people into trust lvl 2
3 - Not sure we need any more level 1 memebers

Yes your name should be there. I'll consider this as a nomination.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

devthedev absolutely 100% but I haven't really spoken to or know any of the other ones in the poll.
I could probably put a few other users forward though, in my honest opinion you could trust the following -

Carra23
inca
macsga
shorena

I'll edit & add some more in if I remember any names lol.

[Muhammed Zakir]

devthedev absolutely 100% but I haven't really spoken to or know any of the other ones in the poll.
I could probably put a few other users forward though, in my honest opinion you could trust the following -

Carra23
inca
macsga
shorena

I'll edit & add some more in if I remember any names lol.

Shorena is in default trust list depth 2.

[Vod]

If I nominate myself, would I be bumped up from level 2 to level 1?

I know a few honest members here that I would add to level 2.   

[dogie]

As this is a non serious thread and its been misunderstood by at least half of people, can we get a [non-serious] tag in the title please?

[theymos]

All of those people except Blazedout419 and Bees Brothers have basically-empty trust lists, so adding them to the default trust list would be pointless. Good candidates for addition to the default trust list will bring several additional good, trustworthy people into the default trust network.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Dumb question maybe but what stops people creating socks to leave themselves lots of positive trust?
If it's possible I bet loads of people will have done it?

[Vod]

Dumb question maybe but what stops people creating socks to leave themselves lots of positive trust?
If it's possible I bet loads of people will have done it?

Their socks would not be on default trust, so their positive trust would mean little.

[Xialla]

ohh I opened it, checked first in list, told to myself "who the fuck is legendster" and then I realized that OP.))

I hope that this is some kind of trolling thread to make some special flavor of fun..

[Lauda]

This is a joke right?
Most of the people on that list are a joke, including yourself OP. That minimum 55 trust score is ridiculous. You even have negative trust yourself and are a classified scammer.
Picking people based on trust score is wrong. CanaryInTheMine anyone? 

[Bicknellski]

NO ONE.

Dump the default. Let the community set the list. Stop playing games let the community decide who to trust.

[DiamondCardz]

NO ONE.

Dump the default. Let the community set the list.

And how do you propose we deal with shills?

That's the problem. You can scream for justice and total decentralization but at the end of the day it's extremely hard to properly implement. I haven't really seen an idea that would actually work better than DefaultTrust in implementation, so really it's either DefaultTrust or allow all members above a certain rank to give trusted feedback.

[Bicknellski]

NO ONE.

Dump the default. Let the community set the list.

And how do you propose we deal with shills?

That's the problem. You can scream for justice and total decentralization but at the end of the day it's extremely hard to properly implement. I haven't really seen an idea that would actually work better than DefaultTrust in implementation, so really it's either DefaultTrust or allow all members above a certain rank to give trusted feedback.

Holy fook? How do you deal with them now?

Let them get on the default trust I guess?

Name all the anonymous members on the Default Trust list please. Are you 100% sure the default list is free of people you wouldn't trust? See Quickseller as an example.

[DiamondCardz]

NO ONE.

Dump the default. Let the community set the list.

And how do you propose we deal with shills?

That's the problem. You can scream for justice and total decentralization but at the end of the day it's extremely hard to properly implement. I haven't really seen an idea that would actually work better than DefaultTrust in implementation, so really it's either DefaultTrust or allow all members above a certain rank to give trusted feedback.

Holy fook? How do you deal with them now?

Let them get on the default trust I guess?

Name all the anonymous members on the Default Trust list please. Are you 100% sure the default list is free of people you wouldn't trust? See Quickseller as an example.

Oh no, I'm not saying DefaultTrust doesn't have corrupt people who use it for their own benefit. I'm very aware of that and I've seen it be used quite heavily as a tool to manipulate and advance personal interests.

But what's the best alternative?

[shorena]

I noticed that Shdvb has traded big amounts of bitcoins and he is not even in Depth 4. That's weird.
Same goes with many others.

The quality of the trade doesnt matter here. The number of trades do.

I think this is where your approach has it wrong. Someone said it earlier - IIRC Welsh - the number of trades one does is not as relevant as why and how they leave feedback ratings. The feedback by a known scammer can be valueable.