[CARBON][SM] Carboncoin | For a Greener Future - Efficient+Secure+Sustainable

[Zebedee23]

Where we can mining of Carboncoin?

Don't bother mining.  It has halved so many times you really won't even make pennies.  They claim this is a good thing to make the coin green that no one mines it.  Fucking stupid.   Not to mention if you tried to sell what you mined you can't even sell at the lowest possible price on only exchange.  If you list at .00000001 which is the lowest price you will have to be in line for months to get it to sell as there is no volume.  Dev was dumb enough to have a coin that bottoms out and becomes unusable.  

Please explain 1 thing dimie.  if it's such a stupid coin,  on life support etc..  Why have you had your dimie  bitcointalk account for years, 100's of posts,  with the sole purpose of badmouthing &  trolling  carbon coin?  It seems like a whole lot of trouble 4 a crap irrelevant coin!  Please enlighten us!

[Carboncoin Trust]

Where we can mining of Carboncoin?

It's possible to support the network by solo mining direct from the client.

It's not cost effective to do this for profit, it is more worthwhile to mine another coin and then exchange into CARBON. This is the model that enables us to be as energy efficient as possible.

[davidjcambra]

Nothing new or interesting, build some innovations to attract traders...

[graviteta]

i think this is an old coin...

is it a rebirth of ICO, is there some bounties?
Thanks

[marilyngroom]

I remember there used to be another coin called carbon coin. It was a cute coin, with a black logo.

[axismundi]

Nothing new or interesting, build some innovations to attract traders...

Hi there, thank you for your interest. We're very much working on it! We've devised a way to make the charity coins at the heart of the project release at a constant rate to alleviate concerns about a large reservoir of coins under the control of a small number of individuals. The release which will make this functionality possible is currently under test

[axismundi]

i think this is an old coin...

is it a rebirth of ICO, is there some bounties?
Thanks

This is the same blockchain that was released anonymously as Carboncoin with the black logo back in February 2014. It was not released with any ICO but their was a modest premine which the current dev team did not have any access to.

The original developer went dark and it fell to myself and the community to take the reigns and we collectively decided to repurpose it for a good cause. The development has been undertaken without formal fundraising with the following priorities:

1) securing the ownership of coins for every coin holder

2) maintaining the ability of individuals to purchase coins (being on at least one exchange) and take delivery of them (keeping the blockchain running)

3) not incentivising competitive use of electricity while not compromising on functionality, with respect to the resources available to us (herein lies our decision not to adopt a proof of stake model)

4) maintaining a legal structure to operations as similar to bitcoin as possible without compromising on any of the above, while having a reservoir of coins donated by the community for our environmental initiatives, mainly biodiverse forestry

Bounties are available to people who wish to add to our infrastructure or otherwise help with development and all are very welcome

[axismundi]

I remember there used to be another coin called carbon coin. It was a cute coin, with a black logo.

Please see previous post. This is an evolution of the same blockchain

[Carboncoin Trust]

Some sizeable bounties coming up for any mobile app developers - we've got some nice ideas to develop. Preferably both IOS and Android.

[axismundi]

511M coins transacted yesterday in 43 transactions https://yobit.net/en/trade/CARBON/BTC

[Carboncoin Trust]

Carboncoin continues to provide reliable transaction facility, without compromising on security

Wallets can be downloaded at www.carboncoin.cc

[CryptoJohn]

Carbon coin has had a 7 day volume of .0002 BTC.  That is a whole .13 USD.  Coin was abandoned because it is crap and Axis is just trying to get suckers to buy his coin that is worth nothing.  BAG HOLDER!!!

I will give you this, you have been consistent in your fudding for what seems forever. Great job, hope you feel good about yourself.

[axismundi]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90CkXVF-Q8M

[fairglu]

I am trying to recompile the explorer's wallet with the latest github code, but under Ubuntu 14 LTS this fails with the following errors


 CXXLD    carboncoind
libcarboncoin_common.a(libcarboncoin_common_a-key.o): In function `CKey::SignCompact(uint256 const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> >&) const':
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/key.cpp:204: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_sign_recoverable'
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/key.cpp:206: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_recoverable_signature_serialize_compact'
libcarboncoin_common.a(libcarboncoin_common_a-pubkey.o): In function `CPubKey::RecoverCompact(uint256 const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&)':
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/pubkey.cpp:194: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_recoverable_signature_parse_compact'
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/pubkey.cpp:197: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_recover'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [carboncoind] Error 1

[Carboncoin Trust]

I am trying to recompile the explorer's wallet with the latest github code, but under Ubuntu 14 LTS this fails with the following errors

Hi fairglu

Thank you for reporting the bug, we'll look into it and let you know.

We are still testing the latest version and have yet to release it publicly, even though I see your site has the very useful feature of letting everyone know! Always impressive!

The update is not critical and all Carboncoin services are fine to run on the previous (current) version (0.9.2) until we've finished the testing. If it's easy to disable the notification for the time being could you do that? We got a pool hashing on the new version a few hours ago, and we've probably some days to go before testing is completed and the new wallets are released.

Thanks you!

[fairglu]

If it's easy to disable the notification for the time being could you do that?

Ok! The notification is tied directly to the getinfo message, so if disabled it could end up disabling other messages and alerts as well (so all regular wallets are likely getting this message as well)

[Carboncoin Trust]

If it's easy to disable the notification for the time being could you do that?

Ok! The notification is tied directly to the getinfo message, so if disabled it could end up disabling other messages and alerts as well (so all regular wallets are likely getting this message as well)

Only when they run a getinfo command from the console, until we send out the notification

[axismundi]

I am trying to recompile the explorer's wallet with the latest github code, but under Ubuntu 14 LTS this fails with the following errors


 CXXLD    carboncoind
libcarboncoin_common.a(libcarboncoin_common_a-key.o): In function `CKey::SignCompact(uint256 const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> >&) const':
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/key.cpp:204: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_sign_recoverable'
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/key.cpp:206: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_recoverable_signature_serialize_compact'
libcarboncoin_common.a(libcarboncoin_common_a-pubkey.o): In function `CPubKey::RecoverCompact(uint256 const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&)':
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/pubkey.cpp:194: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_recoverable_signature_parse_compact'
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/pubkey.cpp:197: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_recover'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [carboncoind] Error 1

Hi there

you need to make sure the correct dependencies are installed first, especially db4.8

manual:
https://github.com/carboncointrust/CarboncoinCore/blob/master/doc/build-unix.md

to get the db4.8 from the repository use
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libdb4.8-dev libdb4.8++-dev

Best

AM

[fairglu]

I am trying to recompile the explorer's wallet with the latest github code, but under Ubuntu 14 LTS this fails with the following errors


 CXXLD    carboncoind
libcarboncoin_common.a(libcarboncoin_common_a-key.o): In function `CKey::SignCompact(uint256 const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> >&) const':
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/key.cpp:204: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_sign_recoverable'
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/key.cpp:206: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_recoverable_signature_serialize_compact'
libcarboncoin_common.a(libcarboncoin_common_a-pubkey.o): In function `CPubKey::RecoverCompact(uint256 const&, std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&)':
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/pubkey.cpp:194: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_recoverable_signature_parse_compact'
/wallets/CarboncoinCore/src/pubkey.cpp:197: undefined reference to `secp256k1_ecdsa_recover'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [carboncoind] Error 1

Hi there

you need to make sure the correct dependencies are installed first, especially db4.8

manual:
https://github.com/carboncointrust/CarboncoinCore/blob/master/doc/build-unix.md

to get the db4.8 from the repository use
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libdb4.8-dev libdb4.8++-dev

Best

AM

The problem is from libsec256k1, not db48.
The general makefile is incomplete BTW, and I had to go into the secp256k1 and build it separately,  however as the error seems to indicates, the version in the repository may not be the one used by the wallet (or it needs specific build options ?)

secp256k1 libs are a big mess with multiple incompatible versions, so there is a version of Linux dll hell when makefiles are not explicitly using static versions... could be what is happening here if the wallet is developed on a machine where another version of libsec256k1 was "installed".

[axismundi]

The problem is from libsec256k1, not db48.
The general makefile is incomplete BTW, and I had to go into the secp256k1 and build it separately,  however as the error seems to indicates, the version in the repository may not be the one used by the wallet (or it needs specific build options ?)

secp256k1 libs are a big mess with multiple incompatible versions, so there is a version of Linux dll hell when makefiles are not explicitly using static versions... could be what is happening here if the wallet is developed on a machine where another version of libsec256k1 was "installed".

Thank you for looking at it, we're focussed very much on making the network operate securely while we make these changes. We have compiled a windows wallet and we're testing the timelock feature in particular, so not finished yet by any means.

Your help is greatly appreciated.