|
buddu
|
 |
December 27, 2015, 04:06:16 PM |
|
There is no such a strategy neither in dice nor most of the games which are casino based except some.All I will say is just go straight on luck based and play naturally believe me you will have much more chances to win and follow your instinct is that simple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jangloos
|
|
December 27, 2015, 04:08:09 PM |
|
Martingale works fine for some people and for others not.what is my experience although I didn't win big so far but a mixture of random and martingale can make things go in your favor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
electronicfactura
|
|
December 27, 2015, 04:11:52 PM |
|
Martingale works fine for some people and for others not.what is my experience although I didn't win big so far but a mixture of random and martingale can make things go in your favor.
This is good way to roll dice and random bets work more effectively than martingale.I personally turned some tiny giveaways amount in some cents quite few times and all was just random bets sometimes minimum and sometimes maximum and I ended up with some nice profit with this strategy . |
|
|
|
|
dishku
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 27, 2015, 04:15:06 PM
Last edit: July 08, 2016, 12:07:33 PM by dishku |
|
For me martingale's strategy proved to be useful for a short-term period, made some bucks with it. It might've been the luck that i had...  I agree with this. I tried this Martingale strategy, but it didn't work for me. I can't say that this is even 80% effective. So if anyone want's to play dice, it's not about strategy, it's pure luck. Every strategy included martingale actually works for shorter periods. Real problem comes when we stick to same way and keep playing. We should apply different tricks to not let the house understand our game plan in order to win. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis7777
|
|
December 27, 2015, 04:24:20 PM |
|
Every strategy included martingale actually works for shorter periods.Real problem comes when we stick to same way and keep playing.We should apply different tricks to not let the house understand our game plan in order to win. The house wins not because it is studying how you played but because the existence of house edge always make the bet slightly favourable to the house. Changing your bet size randomly or switching between "over" and "under" do not help reducing the house edge at all. |
|
|
|
grandFX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1007
|
|
December 27, 2015, 04:34:03 PM |
|
For me martingale's strategy proved to be useful for a short-term period, made some bucks with it. It might've been the luck that i had... yah we can winning for a short term, but cant win all the time. its good for a short term but so bad for a long run and need to have huge bankroll for this a strategy.  yah cuz for most method, it is just winning like a small porpotion of the bankroll. like today u need to win like 10% etc. however to really profit, you need to win at least consecutive like 10 days in a row for things to work out well. so the chances seems very low in the long run. have huge bankroll to uses this a strategy and it's possible martingale strategy will working well. but dont bet with a big amount (I sometimes use this method) |
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
December 27, 2015, 05:20:02 PM |
|
For me martingale's strategy proved to be useful for a short-term period, made some bucks with it. It might've been the luck that i had... I agree with this. I tried this Martingale strategy, but it didn't work for me. I can't say that this is even 80% effective. So if anyone want's to play dice, it's not about strategy, it's pure luck. Martingale is actually effective but in very very short-term and you need a large balance. For example its almost 100% possible to make 0.000000100 Sats with a 100 BTC account, is it worth the risk however? No |
|
|
|
|
BTCevo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1008
|
|
December 27, 2015, 07:04:26 PM |
|
For me martingale's strategy proved to be useful for a short-term period, made some bucks with it. It might've been the luck that i had... I agree with this. I tried this Martingale strategy, but it didn't work for me. I can't say that this is even 80% effective. So if anyone want's to play dice, it's not about strategy, it's pure luck. Martingale is actually effective but in very very short-term and you need a large balance. For example its almost 100% possible to make 0.000000100 Sats with a 100 BTC account, is it worth the risk however? No Martingale is effective and you need a large balance that is for sure and martingale works on every balance that you have. the point is you just need to know how much base that you need to set to get profit using martingale, if you know that you should get the profit for sure |
|
|
|
|
|
jt byte
|
|
December 27, 2015, 07:16:17 PM |
|
Every strategy included martingale actually works for shorter periods.Real problem comes when we stick to same way and keep playing.We should apply different tricks to not let the house understand our game plan in order to win. The house wins not because it is studying how you played but because the existence of house edge always make the bet slightly favourable to the house. Changing your bet size randomly or switching between "over" and "under" do not help reducing the house edge at all. Exactly, there is no winning strategy, because the edge stays the same. Changing you playing 'algorithm' does not contribute to a successful strategy. In fact you will be lose more compared to your previous bets. |
|
|
|
|
sahliano
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 27, 2015, 08:06:12 PM |
|
Every strategy included martingale actually works for shorter periods.Real problem comes when we stick to same way and keep playing.We should apply different tricks to not let the house understand our game plan in order to win. The house wins not because it is studying how you played but because the existence of house edge always make the bet slightly favourable to the house. Changing your bet size randomly or switching between "over" and "under" do not help reducing the house edge at all. Exactly, there is no winning strategy, because the edge stays the same. Changing you playing 'algorithm' does not contribute to a successful strategy. In fact you will be lose more compared to your previous bets. there is no strategy in dicegames your winning and loosing depend on luck because sometimes you can have 15+ loosing strike and your max winning strike will be less then 7 or 6 times in my experience with dice games |
|
|
|
|
matete
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
=> Buying Bitcoins Everyday !
|
|
December 28, 2015, 05:40:57 AM |
|
I followed his strategy two months ago and I gained 2 BTC from 0.2btc. When I tried again another day, I lost all the 0.3btc I had invested. I tried two more times and was not successful. Just like any other dice strategy, you need a bigger bankroll to earn something. It totally depends on luck but not the strategy. |
|
|
|
|
|
Odien
|
|
December 28, 2015, 05:42:07 AM |
|
Just follow your gut instincts... No fun gambling with a strategy  |
|
|
|
|
BAGOBO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1163
Merit: 1005
|
|
December 28, 2015, 06:06:54 AM |
|
Just follow your gut instincts... No fun gambling with a strategy I'm usually play with low chance like Hui did, although it's tough bet but I've ever hit that 9900x when I auto roll on PrimeDice. Surely it was best experience when playing dice |
|
|
|
|
|
ajrah
|
|
December 28, 2015, 06:10:35 AM |
|
For sure if there's a strategy those dice site owners are willing to pay developers to find a loop hole in their system just to make sure all are taken care of, no strategies, no bugs or whatever. They may have dogs out here to snoop around and see if anyone is earning through any kind of strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
asuryan180
|
|
December 28, 2015, 06:38:05 AM |
|
Just follow your gut instincts... No fun gambling with a strategy I'm usually play with low chance like Hui did, although it's tough bet but I've ever hit that 9900x when I auto roll on PrimeDice. Surely it was best experience when playing dice That is quite boring IMO and you might end up losing everything you have if you just get wrong in selecting the first base bet. Hui got busted 20+ coins in it. |
|
|
|
sakinaka
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
Decentralised Amazon & ICO Hub
|
|
December 28, 2015, 06:40:12 AM |
|
Hui has lost over 15 coins going for the 9900x however his hits are very impressive when they do hit. But that's not fun, is it? Watching a bot run algorithms over and over again.
|
|
|
|
|
Windpower
|
|
December 28, 2015, 06:57:10 AM |
|
Gambling in general is based on your luck. There is really no strategy for dice games. Just get some good luck and you will earn some BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
nydiacaskey01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1036
|
|
December 28, 2015, 07:19:38 AM |
|
Strategies don't exist, the only one's who will get rich with those strategies are the one selling those strategies. If anyone here won from a certain strategy, then lady luck maybe sitting right by your side.
|
|
|
|
|
hua_hui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1016
|
|
December 28, 2015, 09:00:51 AM |
|
Hui has lost over 15 coins going for the 9900x however his hits are very impressive when they do hit. But that's not fun, is it? Watching a bot run algorithms over and over again.
well i have tried extreme low odd bets and it is quite enjoyable too. of course u have to prepare quite a bankroll to play. when u win, the amount is quite shocking and u will end up looks at the past bets etc. u need not look at the autobet all the time too. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pony789
|
|
December 28, 2015, 09:19:15 AM |
|
Hui has lost over 15 coins going for the 9900x however his hits are very impressive when they do hit. But that's not fun, is it? Watching a bot run algorithms over and over again.
Hui's total net loss is only 5.7 btc now. Considering that he has wagered 650 btc, he is supposed to lose 6.5 btc and so he is actually having a better than average luck. I haven't tried it myself and so I cannot comment if it is fun or not, but Hui definitely seems to be having fun. If not, he would not be doing it over and over again.  |
|
|
|
|
