Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 11:17:28 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: ANTMINER S5+ is available to order, 7.722TH/S 0.445J/GH  (Read 40035 times)
sajidfbi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2015, 08:42:28 PM
 #61

For me there's ROI in about 180 Days as my Electricity rate is about 0.08    Grin
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714864648
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714864648

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714864648
Reply with quote  #2

1714864648
Report to moderator
1714864648
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714864648

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714864648
Reply with quote  #2

1714864648
Report to moderator
1714864648
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714864648

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714864648
Reply with quote  #2

1714864648
Report to moderator
jstefanop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2095
Merit: 1396


View Profile
August 14, 2015, 08:49:32 PM
 #62

BITMAIN please offer the option to split this into 1/3 miner with these specs: 2.6TH@1150 watts for about 800 USD.

Is very easily doable with the design of this since its essentially 3 miners stuck together.

Project Apollo: A Pod Miner Designed for the Home https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4974036
FutureBit Moonlander 2 USB Scrypt Stick Miner: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2125643.0
edonkey
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1150
Merit: 1004



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 09:00:15 PM
 #63

...

There are other things you may find which are a priority for you, but fortunately both of those guys are very helpful and most importantly honest. They will tell you if you pick something which doesn't make sense even if it costs them a sale. You cannot buy that kind of honesty, it is there or it isn't.

Wow! Thanks for the great info. Very helpful.

I'm in the US. If I go through with this then the S5+ would be in a data center, so fan noise isn't a problem. The louder the better Wink

Since noise isn't a problem and I don't need anything fancy like load balancing, it's looking like a pair of 2880 watt units might be the way to go. But I'll also take a look at what gekkoscience has. I'm already fan of theirs (ordered my sidehack sticks minutes after they went on the market).

Was I helpful?   BTC: 3G1Ubof5u8K9iJkM8We2f3amYZgGVdvpHr
kodokbuduk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2015, 09:03:13 PM
 #64

BITMAIN please offer the option to split this into 1/3 miner with these specs: 2.6TH@1150 watts for about 800 USD.

Is very easily doable with the design of this since its essentially 3 miners stuck together.

this spec is for upcoming S7? probably...
edonkey
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1150
Merit: 1004



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 09:16:27 PM
 #65

Can this be rack mounted?  Does anyone know?  Looks like brackets on the front sides but they seem funky
Please folks -- ears on rack mount chassis are NOT the only thing you use to mount them! Or better not be.
All heavy rack mount gear is supposed to be sitting on a support shelf/brackets. The ears are mainly only to keep them in position.

Anyone know if the S5+ is strong enough to be placed on rail style shelves? Or does it need to be on a full shelf (i.e. supported across the middle)?

It's hard to tell from the picture how physically strong across the middle this unit is. Is it really just 3 units bolted together, or are they integrated in a single piece of sheet metal?

Now that I look at the dimensions though, I'm not sure it's wide enough for some rails. Looks like it's only 14.6" wide.

Was I helpful?   BTC: 3G1Ubof5u8K9iJkM8We2f3amYZgGVdvpHr
Sine(X)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2015, 09:24:13 PM
 #66

ROI Huh? newer Sad


AntMiner S5+ Batch 1 7.722TH/S  2375 USD 11 kg x 1 8.905 BTC
 ( 2375 USD )   
 0 BTC
(0 USD)    No Coupon   8.905 BTC
 ( 2375 USD ) 
     
Shipping Cost 0.787 BTC
 ( 209.872 USD ) 
Total 9.692 BTC
 ( 2584.872 USD )
 


here's your RIO Answer.




What is the monthly growth of difficulty? Zero? If yes  then calculations are not useful.
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2015, 09:35:31 PM
 #67

You can use as many PSUs as you want as long as you don't have multiple PSUs powering the same individual board (of which there is 9).

Do all PCI ports need to be powered?  Or will it run with 2 on each board? 

2 is fine, still only about 165W per PCI-E.

notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 10:11:28 PM
 #68

When is batch 2 planned?

Looks like batch 1 already has been sold out for sure, has not shown up with available again.
Prelude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 10:29:12 PM
 #69

Crap, looks like I missed out on batch 1.
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 10:53:27 PM
 #70

So how many https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=000201505040743496917U7kGsCm0694 does it take?  Also how many PCI-e cords does each one have?

It seems like it would be 3 of those.  But I could not tell if they had 6 or 8 PCI-e cords from pictures.
Tupsu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 11:12:16 PM
 #71

So how many https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=000201505040743496917U7kGsCm0694 does it take?  Also how many PCI-e cords does each one have?

It seems like it would be 3 of those.  But I could not tell if they had 6 or 8 PCI-e cords from pictures.

12x PCI-E
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 11:34:08 PM
 #72

So how many https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=000201505040743496917U7kGsCm0694 does it take?  Also how many PCI-e cords does each one have?

It seems like it would be 3 of those.  But I could not tell if they had 6 or 8 PCI-e cords from pictures.

12x PCI-E

Thanks! Could not find this.   To bad they did not make it only use 2 of these PSU's it's close on watt's.   

But I guess PSU's were not big decider on when they made this unit.
edonkey
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1150
Merit: 1004



View Profile
August 15, 2015, 12:38:04 AM
 #73

[2 is fine, still only about 165W per PCI-E.

So each of the 9 hash boards draws about 330 watts apiece?

So the remaining 500-sh watts is for the fans and the controller?

Was I helpful?   BTC: 3G1Ubof5u8K9iJkM8We2f3amYZgGVdvpHr
Meech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 15, 2015, 12:44:58 AM
 #74

I see 8.9BTC not 6.6BTC. 

you are mistaking my post on bitmaintech's hashnet division.

 they are offering 10th for 6.66btc

they opened the cloud contract and the beast miner on the same day.


I purchased the cloud contract as the beast will not work for me until winter power rates start in OCT

It is not cloud mining contract.
This is a BTC loan with very small percentage .

Exactly!  I don't see any benefit in helping give Bitmain an advance on their operating costs.  I enjoy mining as much as anyone.
But only if after the principal is paid you walk away with used S5's or some collateral, other than that it's a loan. 
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2015, 01:32:08 AM
 #75

[2 is fine, still only about 165W per PCI-E.

So each of the 9 hash boards draws about 330 watts apiece?

So the remaining 500-sh watts is for the fans and the controller?

Itll be about 90W for the fans, 20W for the controller and the rest is PSU inefficiency. I calculated with 90% PSU efficiency so at 93 it makes it 170W per PCI-E when using 2 a board.

cniht
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 15, 2015, 02:40:35 AM
Last edit: August 15, 2015, 08:25:12 AM by cniht
 #76

I'm a noob here so feel free to correct anything I say.  Also forgive the grammar mistakes and spelling, just off surgery and painkillers and typing don't go together.

Question 1:  Does anyone know the size of Batch 1 production run?  (In other words how fast is the network going to explode with centralization and difficulty through the roof)  
Question 2:  Does anyone know when the Batch 2 Production run will be available and its size?  (Are they doing reserves? in small stock (IE I don't buy 100 of em))

Comments and analysis on the Hashnest offer.  I looked at the contract (and going over legal contracts is part of what I do for a living).

I'm agreeing with most other people on the Hashnest deal.  That's basically a loan so you can finance their capital costs on revamping/retooling their own data centers (probably with beefy miners we haven't even seen yet), and perhaps production operations.  While doing that you get a small 'bonus' (in the financial world we call that interest) in the meantime until that principal is paid back.  And the 'bonus' is variable rate they are paying YOU for that loan is a lot lower then what a bank would give them (variable interest/bonus rates they are letting a volatile market decide).  And they have the ability to STOP paying you if bitcoin takes a crap, their costs skyrocket, or some other disaster happens.  Which is a big no no.  

Go to a bank and try taking a short term business loan out.  Tell the bank you want the clause put in that if your business model becomes unprofitable and you haven't paid them back after 120 days that you stop paying them back and they do not get any accrued interest or principal payments during that time period.  But should your model recover, you will start payments again.  Oh and that YOU not the bank gets to decide when that period starts and stops, and that it can start and stop at multiple times.  And the stopping can include the time period of forever.  IE  Never paid back with no collateral.  See how fast you get laughed out of the building, if not escorted out by security.  Hench why they are trying the cloud mining contract deal.  Sucker born every minute as they say.

Second thing, or are we at three at this point (Hell I don't know):

I also did a quick comparison between their second hand S5's they are selling (of which I just purchased two literally a day ago).  And the new S5+  All these things are from the bitmain post or their own website.


First Warranty:

Second hand unit, (don't know what they it through)  Only get 30 days. | S5+  New unit, 90 days.  However these are Solid State devices.  If taken proper care of they should technically last forever.  (We all know that's not true but you get the point.)

Hash Rates:

S5:    1155 GH/s      70.4 or so dB fan (AKA Loud as F)
S5+   7722 GH/s   6x70.4 or so dB fan (AKA Data Center Unit, Loud as F x 6  Never gonna be a home miner unless you got a sound proof basement)  

Only good thing is the cooling system of individual sinks seems much more efficient on the S5+.  That's also probably partly why the operating conditions increased from 35C to 40C as a maximum over the S5 as well.  It also means the product can likely stand up to a lot more wear and tear before components start giving out due to heating and cooling.  IE they just improved their manufacturing processes.


Price to GH/s:

Second hand:  $351 (when I got it, now 348 today, but I'll work these off my price.)
S5+:              $2375  On their website

Now remember this is basically 6.5 S5 miners or so strapped together, units with three boards each.  So lets to a Gh/S to $ comparison.  Also I'm looking at a brand spanking new unit vs a second hand, but both do have at least some warranty coverage and can be tested and nailed out of the box.
$351 gets me 1155 GH/s
$2,375 gets me 7722 GH/s

$351 goes into $2,375 = 6.766x  (I know you cannot buy a .766 of a miner but humor me)

So I could buy 6.766 S5's for the price of an S5+  Simple math 1155 Gh/s x 6.766 = 7815.17 Gh/s  Then let us do the math of that between the two:  7815 Gh/s / 7722 Gh/s  = 1.012  

[b]IE  You're actually getting 1.2% better return on Gh/s for $$$$ spent with the simple S5 over the S5+.[/b]


Power efficiency comparison:
(I'm not doing power consumption comparisons because where I'm at that's irrelevant.  Maybe where other people are that is important.  Efficiency is the key for me.)

Now here is the bright spot where the S5+ seems to really shine though and where all those engineering dollars went.

S5:     unit is 0.51W/GH
S5+:   unit is 0.445W/GH

Math:  .445W/GH / .51W/GH = 0.8725

This means you're using almost almost a full 13% less power from an S5+ than running multiple S5's.  12.75% less power to be exact. Tongue  That would be a significant impact on your electrical bill if you're in a high kW/h area.  Then again, if you're looking for a fat tax write off because you're smash and grab bitcoin seller paying ordinary US tax rates (which will be most home people) and you're working this as a cottage business in your basement, that's a business write off you're going to lose.  

PS:  Regardless I'd take the lower operating costs, but this is definitely for people who have committed space for serious mining operations.

Overall Summary:  GH/s ain't that great for the price, but the 12.75% discount on the power usage isn't too shabby.  Someone mentioned breaking these up into multiple units.  I'd have to see the specs and re-run the analysis over on that single unit to see i that was worth it.  Especially at the price of $800 per single unit they quoted, which is a slight premium over the 3 stacked units.

Cniht   Undecided
cniht
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 15, 2015, 04:18:49 AM
 #77

[2 is fine, still only about 165W per PCI-E.

So each of the 9 hash boards draws about 330 watts apiece?

So the remaining 500-sh watts is for the fans and the controller?

Itll be about 90W for the fans, 20W for the controller and the rest is PSU inefficiency. I calculated with 90% PSU efficiency so at 93 it makes it 170W per PCI-E when using 2 a board.

Do you think it's going to work at 90% efficiency with their own PSU power supply APW3-12-1600-B2 https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=000201505040743496917U7kGsCm0694  (Note they claim 93.8% efficiency)

Or is that thing just a POS under normal working conditions and we should stick to normal computer PSUs?
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 15, 2015, 04:29:12 AM
 #78

[2 is fine, still only about 165W per PCI-E.

So each of the 9 hash boards draws about 330 watts apiece?

So the remaining 500-sh watts is for the fans and the controller?

Itll be about 90W for the fans, 20W for the controller and the rest is PSU inefficiency. I calculated with 90% PSU efficiency so at 93 it makes it 170W per PCI-E when using 2 a board.

Do you think it's going to work at 90% efficiency with their own PSU power supply APW3-12-1600-B2 https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=000201505040743496917U7kGsCm0694  (Note they claim 93.8% efficiency)

Or is that thing just a POS under normal working conditions and we should stick to normal computer PSUs?

I'm guessing you are wanting to hid from 1 activity.  But when looking at watts this high going from ATX to server psu's can save you a lot.

Someone can go out there and compare.  But unless there is a big deal/bargain on a good ATX server PSU's win on price anymore.
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2015, 04:43:45 AM
 #79

[2 is fine, still only about 165W per PCI-E.

So each of the 9 hash boards draws about 330 watts apiece?

So the remaining 500-sh watts is for the fans and the controller?

Itll be about 90W for the fans, 20W for the controller and the rest is PSU inefficiency. I calculated with 90% PSU efficiency so at 93 it makes it 170W per PCI-E when using 2 a board.

Do you think it's going to work at 90% efficiency with their own PSU power supply APW3-12-1600-B2 https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=000201505040743496917U7kGsCm0694  (Note they claim 93.8% efficiency)

Or is that thing just a POS under normal working conditions and we should stick to normal computer PSUs?

Its pretty accurate, single voltage PSUs tend to be very efficient and the power measurements are taken from the wall.

sloopy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 501


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=905210.msg


View Profile
August 15, 2015, 05:50:05 AM
 #80

[2 is fine, still only about 165W per PCI-E.

So each of the 9 hash boards draws about 330 watts apiece?

So the remaining 500-sh watts is for the fans and the controller?

Itll be about 90W for the fans, 20W for the controller and the rest is PSU inefficiency. I calculated with 90% PSU efficiency so at 93 it makes it 170W per PCI-E when using 2 a board.

The product page specifies the controller board must be powered on after the hash boards.

I will use a seperate smaller gold or platinum atx unit, or put a time delay relay inline with the second 2880.
The relay wouldn't void warranty would it? It is still being powered on after the hash boards.

Transaction fees go to the pools and the pools decide to pay them to the miners. Anything else, including off-chain solutions are stealing and not the way Bitcoin was intended to function.
Make the block size set by the pool. Pool = miners and they get the choice.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!