CoinWallet.eu Stress Test Cancelled + Bitcoin Giveaway

[Seal]

Tomorrow’s test will not occur as planned. CoinWallet.eu will not be sending a single transaction. Instead, we will be giving away over 200 Bitcoins to the community. Previous tests have involved splitting bitcoins into hundreds of thousands of tiny outputs. Now, as a gift to the community, all of the private keys that contain those outputs will be posted publicly, making the coins free for the taking.

I think this is genius. Clever thinking....

[oni.saori]

dont know From last day my balance reduced from 2 BTC to 0.8 BTC and all balance gone to this address

1aamWKicYga3AN8UgywedHzEG12KbUUJJ

and when try to send any amount all address saying already address has been spent some error coming

[roslinpl]

dont know From last day my balance reduced from 2 BTC to 0.8 BTC and all balance gone to this address

1aamWKicYga3AN8UgywedHzEG12KbUUJJ

and when try to send any amount all address saying already address has been spent some error coming

Well if you swept those private keys which were posted during "Stress Test" and you didn't transfered those coins to your address this is the case coins are not yours as someone did it faster than you.


Best regards

[tjweb]

These coins cannot be spent without using some custom software (you can't spent them with your ordinary wallet, I tried with Electrum, CPU usage sky-rocketed, I cannot imagine what happened to the Electrum server).

[worhiper_-_]

Who said that f2pool is helping? They're mining blocks that are far from full while the mempool is still ~150k transaction.

[underbridge]

Does anyone know if CoinWallet are a real company?
I find it a little odd that a UK-based exchange with an English-language website doesn't deal in GBP.
Also, with no AML and a withdrawal option of "Cash in mail" (no verification needed)... are they taking the P?

Any actual members of CoinWallet here?

[everaja]

Does anyone know if CoinWallet are a real company?
I find it a little odd that a UK-based exchange with an English-language website doesn't deal in GBP.
Also, with no AML and a withdrawal option of "Cash in mail" (no verification needed)... are they taking the P?

Any actual members of CoinWallet here?

Well not Much is Known about the site , i heard the name first time here only , they are just Crashing the bitcoin network and calling it a stress test.
So far i haven't been able to sweep a single Private key.
Has anyone able to spend the coins given in Giveaway??

[Lauda]

Has anyone able to spend the coins given in Giveaway??

I was able to temporarily send the coins. However, the problem occurred when another party was using the same private key. Basically after using coin control to successfully create (not send) a transactions, they activated their bot/scripts. They started sending out a lot of transactions in the same time interval and my transaction got the status conflicted.

I would advise everyone to stop even trying this. It is not worth your time and is damaging the network in the process.

[CoinWallet.eu]

This is a good one with 1.97 btc

L5WfGz1p6tstRpuxXtiy4VFotXkHa9CRytCqY2f5GeStarA5GgG5

Others

L1bMa8BNKLJigbF5CH5WBsBcniH8D1PtwPDTG4a9UHPi9dfSTibD
L2BZyYuDrFTBgLUhqR2jhuwUGFpDbgSrjGAfAqc1Czgcd1A1LEZD
L1h9Qbb1FqA4r8hYwAQahN2U1AZK8vRe4q9AHEfK6DWDi9G16JsA
L4CystuemP3BLn6zVTg1U9gsnwuRcXjJntV5YTUizPUpEjc49tnG
L4E7u1Zkn6gY5PR5caVmqHaiEdgyMw774ZjTxMynHUtECVS9Hagn
KyWZyGG9KtWRkLvVYmRirAN6RAURk3LoGcstLXD26VcdqmbggN4w
KxnQwYbrd1PidBsCfDjreoaPruHqty7ktoU9TL8RxGZ9dgrUoqPG
L5M42ZU2nmKiJWp7q4RVvchQjZQADCFC5Y26PwBNjFsHMCUj5Rtk
L1gHoXzXN9jP18SVtNPNUGoCVw8A5kWEbLT4cKjhdaaUfAbHPnpa
KxPxQTabZuZXCXryGHW6VgJNFaCxaHP8aKMfzLiH8f6YavHZ8cXs
L4S7LxhDkrhKnpPWR1eGW9pUvkx8Vmq7PbXBQjs4YA7VpMkDbpwm
KwGpWR9ZuhoDACHBre8eeR9vGzUE9UQsspR1YDyAd4GXf6av1wqA
Kwqbv8Mjh8VcXY6UQHjHfKvF2KvQWdtzJp2WunRgeYACN2yuJ9zX

[Hugroll]

This is a good one with 1.97 btc

L5WfGz1p6tstRpuxXtiy4VFotXkHa9CRytCqY2f5GeStarA5GgG5

Others

L1bMa8BNKLJigbF5CH5WBsBcniH8D1PtwPDTG4a9UHPi9dfSTibD
L2BZyYuDrFTBgLUhqR2jhuwUGFpDbgSrjGAfAqc1Czgcd1A1LEZD
L1h9Qbb1FqA4r8hYwAQahN2U1AZK8vRe4q9AHEfK6DWDi9G16JsA
L4CystuemP3BLn6zVTg1U9gsnwuRcXjJntV5YTUizPUpEjc49tnG
L4E7u1Zkn6gY5PR5caVmqHaiEdgyMw774ZjTxMynHUtECVS9Hagn
KyWZyGG9KtWRkLvVYmRirAN6RAURk3LoGcstLXD26VcdqmbggN4w
KxnQwYbrd1PidBsCfDjreoaPruHqty7ktoU9TL8RxGZ9dgrUoqPG
L5M42ZU2nmKiJWp7q4RVvchQjZQADCFC5Y26PwBNjFsHMCUj5Rtk
L1gHoXzXN9jP18SVtNPNUGoCVw8A5kWEbLT4cKjhdaaUfAbHPnpa
KxPxQTabZuZXCXryGHW6VgJNFaCxaHP8aKMfzLiH8f6YavHZ8cXs
L4S7LxhDkrhKnpPWR1eGW9pUvkx8Vmq7PbXBQjs4YA7VpMkDbpwm
KwGpWR9ZuhoDACHBre8eeR9vGzUE9UQsspR1YDyAd4GXf6av1wqA
Kwqbv8Mjh8VcXY6UQHjHfKvF2KvQWdtzJp2WunRgeYACN2yuJ9zX

its almost impossible to sweep these keys

[RealMalatesta]

If I were coinwallet, I'd prepare some transactions, then release the pub keys and run my scripts, so that everyone believes the greedy dust-collectors are creating the backlog, instead it is coinwallet...

[Lucky7btc]

This is a good one with 1.97 btc

L5WfGz1p6tstRpuxXtiy4VFotXkHa9CRytCqY2f5GeStarA5GgG5

Others

L1bMa8BNKLJigbF5CH5WBsBcniH8D1PtwPDTG4a9UHPi9dfSTibD
L2BZyYuDrFTBgLUhqR2jhuwUGFpDbgSrjGAfAqc1Czgcd1A1LEZD
L1h9Qbb1FqA4r8hYwAQahN2U1AZK8vRe4q9AHEfK6DWDi9G16JsA
L4CystuemP3BLn6zVTg1U9gsnwuRcXjJntV5YTUizPUpEjc49tnG
L4E7u1Zkn6gY5PR5caVmqHaiEdgyMw774ZjTxMynHUtECVS9Hagn
KyWZyGG9KtWRkLvVYmRirAN6RAURk3LoGcstLXD26VcdqmbggN4w
KxnQwYbrd1PidBsCfDjreoaPruHqty7ktoU9TL8RxGZ9dgrUoqPG
L5M42ZU2nmKiJWp7q4RVvchQjZQADCFC5Y26PwBNjFsHMCUj5Rtk
L1gHoXzXN9jP18SVtNPNUGoCVw8A5kWEbLT4cKjhdaaUfAbHPnpa
KxPxQTabZuZXCXryGHW6VgJNFaCxaHP8aKMfzLiH8f6YavHZ8cXs
L4S7LxhDkrhKnpPWR1eGW9pUvkx8Vmq7PbXBQjs4YA7VpMkDbpwm
KwGpWR9ZuhoDACHBre8eeR9vGzUE9UQsspR1YDyAd4GXf6av1wqA
Kwqbv8Mjh8VcXY6UQHjHfKvF2KvQWdtzJp2WunRgeYACN2yuJ9zX

its almost impossible to sweep these keys

yep...I dont know why he keeps posting on here. Its almost impossible to sweep

[Wendigo]

The 1.97 priv key balance is almost gone, this address is getting everything out of it 1aamWKicYga3AN8UgywedHzEG12KbUUJJ  


Each TX is 0.0011 BTC  with Transaction Fee 0.00109  lol   It's probably a script running because doing this manually is impossible.

[finbad]

some stress test,   everything is working just fine,  including the 18 dust transactions from last night, confirmed and already spent.

[kevinjulio]

giveaway is a popuritas favored by many people and it can be done by a person generous or charitable, 2 BTC is a large number , I never had BTC much !

[RealMalatesta]

The 1.97 priv key balance is almost gone, this address is getting everything out of it 1aamWKicYga3AN8UgywedHzEG12KbUUJJ  


Each TX is 0.0011 BTC  with Transaction Fee 0.00109  lol   It's probably a script running because doing this manually is impossible.

IF this is a script, then I have a couple of questions to people who are more inside the blockchain technology than I am.

First of all: There are a lot of dust transactions to and from this address. Some of these transactions took place around the time of the past stress tests.

This may be pure coincidence. However, here is a question I found regarding an unrelated transaction:

https://github.com/coinbase/toshi/issues/199

Transaction with hash: 96845af476897c7729e462fc5980f258e868d9452465f6df3651d82bc65f1c5c has an output that is a escrowed. (The 4th output)

The API result from https://bitcoin.toshi.io/api/v0/transactions/96845af476897c7729e462fc5980f258e868d9452465f6df3651d82bc65f1c5c

Shows the output's addresses array with only one address:

"addresses":[
"1C7zdTfnkzmr13HfA2vNm5SJYRK6nEKyq8"
]

I think it should be as below:

"addresses":[
"1C7zdTfnkzmr13HfA2vNm5SJYRK6nEKyq8", "14p5cGy5DZmtNMQwTQiytBvxMVuTmFMSyU"
]

The same couple of addresses can be found in a lot of the transactions of 1aamWKicYga3AN8UgywedHzEG12KbUUJJ. So what does this mean? The address 14p5cGy5DZmtNMQwTQiytBvxMVuTmFMSyU, for example, can be found in Peter Todd's python-bitcoinlib:

 

def test_from_bare_checksig_scriptPubKey(self):
        def T(hex_scriptpubkey, expected_str_address):
            scriptPubKey = CScript(x(hex_scriptpubkey))
            addr = P2PKHBitcoinAddress.from_scriptPubKey(scriptPubKey)
            self.assertEqual(str(addr), expected_str_address)

            # now test that CBitcoinAddressError is raised with accept_non_canonical_pushdata=False
            with self.assertRaises(CBitcoinAddressError):
                P2PKHBitcoinAddress.from_scriptPubKey(scriptPubKey, accept_bare_checksig=False)

        # compressed
        T('21000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ac', '14p5cGy5DZmtNMQwTQiytBvxMVuTmFMSyU')

        # uncompressed
        T('4100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ac', '1QLFaVVt99p1y18zWSZnespzhkFxjwBbdP')

        # non-canonical encoding
        T('4c21000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ac', '14p5cGy5DZmtNMQwTQiytBvxMVuTmFMSyU')

Would anybody mind to help me understand this?

[amaclin]

Would anybody mind to help me understand this?

Everything is clear for me. I can explain any line in your message.
But I do not know what is unclear to you.
(And it is a little bit difficult for me to write in good English)

[RealMalatesta]

Would anybody mind to help me understand this?

Everything is clear for me. I can explain any line in your message.
But I do not know what is unclear to you.
(And it is a little bit difficult for me to write in good English)

Don't worry, my English is far from being perfect, too.

As I mentioned before: IF I were coinwallet, I would release some of the priv keys and blame any ddos on the greedy users.

However, there is one address which seems to be most successfull in collecting the dust:

1aamWKicYga3AN8UgywedHzEG12KbUUJJ

Another address which is also collecting a lot of dust:

1aajpztNecNzGBDjJhGfkrsUJFgeyhBgY

My guess is that this has somehow to do with a p2p-pool and not with my suspicion, but just want to be sure....

[worhiper_-_]

If it's Todd's tool that confused you try reading the description on github. It has a pretty good explanation.

[amaclin]

My guess is that this has somehow to do with a p2p-pool and not with my suspicion, but just want to be sure....

These addresses do not have any relation  to p2p-pool.
What is your next question?