Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 11:26:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Bitcoin Forum > Other > Meta > Should people who promote ponzis in their signature be given a negative trust?
Poll
Question:  Should people who promote ponzis in their signature be given a negative trust?
Yes
No
Most people know the results of investing in ponzi so won't make a difference
Useless thread, should be allowed

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12]  All
« previous topic next topic »
  Print  
Author Topic: Should people who promote ponzis in their signature be given a negative trust?  (Read 14571 times)
winspiral
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1026


Free WSPU2 Token or real dollars


View Profile WWW
May 10, 2016, 08:46:13 AM
 #221
For pure information...
so far all investors have been paid in time...
As you can see...this system will soon end...and no need to have new investors to pay the old ones...
End of June you will have the proff that all investors will have been paid with profit...
I am wondering why I am not more red trusted for my:
http://u2cloudmining.winspiral.net

Have fun...
http://u2cloudmining.winspiral.net/faucet_wspu2.php
http://u2cloudmining.winspiral.net/bcrm/bcrm_faucet.php
http://u2cloudmining.winspiral.net/wspu2/wspu2_faucet.php [First WSPU2 free faucet]
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12]  All
  Print  
Bitcoin Forum > Other > Meta > Should people who promote ponzis in their signature be given a negative trust?
 « previous topic next topic »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!