Atlas (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
|
|
October 16, 2012, 08:47:29 PM Last edit: October 16, 2012, 09:55:58 PM by Atlas |
|
How can we get a writing analysis done on all of Satoshi's written works to see if there is consistency among them? I am becoming more convinced we are dealing with an organization here a la Bavarian Illuminati, who started many of the world's revolutions. If we can prove that there is no consistency among the communications of Nakamoto, we can prove that Bitcoin's first implementation is the work of many anonymous individuals. People have said that Satoshi Nakamoto has been very hard to communicate with. The software has been said to be beyond the work of one person. Let's settle this once and for all. Update: http://www.fastcompany.com/1785445/bitcoin-crypto-currency-mystery-reopened
|
|
|
|
hazek
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 16, 2012, 08:51:41 PM |
|
Let's settle this once and for all.
Irrelevant and pointless. I mean name a single good reason why it would matter?
|
My personality type: INTJ - please forgive my weaknesses (Not naturally in tune with others feelings; may be insensitive at times, tend to respond to conflict with logic and reason, tend to believe I'm always right)
If however you enjoyed my post: 15j781DjuJeVsZgYbDVt2NZsGrWKRWFHpp
|
|
|
Nicolai Larsen
|
|
October 16, 2012, 08:52:55 PM |
|
Let's settle this once and for all.
Irrelevant and pointless. I mean name a single good reason why it would matter? Jobs?
|
BTC: 1GUH16sneWgKuE1ArXrnYKN3njuherJQi1
|
|
|
Atlas (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
|
|
October 16, 2012, 08:53:48 PM |
|
Let's settle this once and for all.
Irrelevant and pointless. I mean name a single good reason why it would matter? For history's sake. Historians make a living at this kind of thing. Hmm, Hazek, you wouldn't happen to be associated with Satoshi Nakamoto, would you?
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
October 16, 2012, 08:58:01 PM |
|
Let's settle this once and for all.
Irrelevant and pointless. I mean name a single good reason why it would matter? Irrelevant and pointless. A human doesn't need a reason to know the truth.
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
October 16, 2012, 08:58:14 PM |
|
The third time, Casascius is Satoshi Nakamoto. Everything from timing to ability, style and motive matches.
But I or anybody else can't prove it, so it might as well be somebody else or multiple people.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
October 16, 2012, 09:01:23 PM |
|
The third time, Casascius is Satoshi Nakamoto. Everything from timing to ability, style and motive matches.
But I or anybody else can't prove it, so it might as well be somebody else or multiple people.
It's the 3rd time u mention that Satoshi = Casascius. I got why u do it. U try to hide that Satoshi is YOU!
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
October 16, 2012, 09:03:05 PM |
|
The third time, Casascius is Satoshi Nakamoto. Everything from timing to ability, style and motive matches.
But I or anybody else can't prove it, so it might as well be somebody else or multiple people.
It's the 3rd time u mention that Satoshi = Casascius. I got why u do it. U try to hide that Satoshi is YOU! That would be really nice if it were true
|
|
|
|
robocoin
|
|
October 16, 2012, 09:06:35 PM |
|
I thought Satoshi Nakamoto is a pseudonym for more than one person. I just don't think you can do a simple semantic equation with 'his' writings to find true similarities. I wouldn't expect that from top cryptographers.
|
|
|
|
sturle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1437
Merit: 1002
https://bitmynt.no
|
|
October 16, 2012, 09:08:50 PM |
|
How can we get a writing analysis done on all of Satoshi's written works to see if there is consistency among them?
Writing analysis is remarkably easy to cheat. The easiest way is to impersonate someone else's writing style. E.g. some author or journalist.
|
Sjå https://bitmynt.no for veksling av bitcoin mot norske kroner. Trygt, billig, raskt og enkelt sidan 2010. I buy with EUR and other currencies at a fair market price when you want to sell. See http://bitmynt.no/eurprice.plWarning: "Bitcoin" XT, Classic, Unlimited and the likes are scams. Don't use them, and don't listen to their shills.
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
October 16, 2012, 09:17:15 PM |
|
How can we get a writing analysis done on all of Satoshi's written works to see if there is consistency among them?
Someone already did it. I read about it more than a year ago, but can't find that paper now.
|
|
|
|
MysteryMiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1049
Death to enemies!
|
|
October 16, 2012, 09:33:58 PM |
|
The analysis first must answer is Satoshi a single person or group. Or probably group that used only single spokesperson. As far as I know only Seppuku Fujitsu used Satoshi's identity to communicate. The software has been said to be beyond the work of one person. Not all programmers are noobs. The original client is very well written but I have seen even more impressive code made by single person.
|
bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
|
|
|
Atlas (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
|
|
October 16, 2012, 09:42:38 PM |
|
How can we get a writing analysis done on all of Satoshi's written works to see if there is consistency among them?
Someone already did it. I read about it more than a year ago, but can't find that paper now. Have any defunct links for it?
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2264
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
October 16, 2012, 09:49:32 PM |
|
For history's sake. Historians make a living at this kind of thing.
Historians make a living a)Teaching new historians and 2)Selling cars and real estate.
|
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
October 16, 2012, 09:52:44 PM |
|
How can we get a writing analysis done on all of Satoshi's written works to see if there is consistency among them?
Someone already did it. I read about it more than a year ago, but can't find that paper now. Have any defunct links for it? http://www.fastcompany.com/1785445/bitcoin-crypto-currency-mystery-reopenedI started with some amateur textual analysis of Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin paper, extracting fragments of phrases and running them through Google. I figured I'd see if any of the ones in the paper appear elsewhere online. People tend to repeat themselves. The trick is to plug in unique-sounding fragments and place them in quotes. That way you only get a handful of results to comb through. I struck out on the first few, which all appeared solely in the Bitcoin paper, and there was one irrelevant link. Then I tried the term "computationally impractical to reverse." It resulted in 26 results... EDIT: ...and some info here - http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/10/10/111010fa_fact_davis
|
|
|
|
Atlas (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
|
|
October 16, 2012, 09:53:30 PM |
|
How can we get a writing analysis done on all of Satoshi's written works to see if there is consistency among them?
Someone already did it. I read about it more than a year ago, but can't find that paper now. Have any defunct links for it? http://www.fastcompany.com/1785445/bitcoin-crypto-currency-mystery-reopenedI started with some amateur textual analysis of Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin paper, extracting fragments of phrases and running them through Google. I figured I'd see if any of the ones in the paper appear elsewhere online. People tend to repeat themselves. The trick is to plug in unique-sounding fragments and place them in quotes. That way you only get a handful of results to comb through. I struck out on the first few, which all appeared solely in the Bitcoin paper, and there was one irrelevant link. Then I tried the term "computationally impractical to reverse." It resulted in 26 results... Wooo. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Boussac
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1221
Merit: 1025
e-ducat.fr
|
|
October 16, 2012, 10:33:17 PM |
|
Limechat is a well known IRC client, especially on iOS. Many devs in the core team use a Mac to code and communicate via IRC. The publisher of Limechat is a developper named Satoshi Nakagawa. Any other question ?
|
|
|
|
MysteryMiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1049
Death to enemies!
|
|
October 17, 2012, 12:29:50 AM |
|
Casascius is a reasonable person but I probably remember that moronic Bitcoin 2.0 proposal too. Such scamcoin 2.0 proposals pop up from time to time but for most part they are a result of spending too many bitcoins on Silk Road weed, not attempt to hide who is Satoshi.
|
bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
|
|
|
Portnoy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1000
My money; Our Bitcoin.
|
|
October 17, 2012, 01:06:25 AM |
|
I am becoming more convinced we are dealing with an organization here a la Bavarian Illuminati, who started many of the world's revolutions...
Ooookay...
|
|
|
|
bg002h
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1464
Merit: 1047
I outlived my lifetime membership:)
|
|
October 17, 2012, 02:03:21 AM |
|
The third time, Casascius is Satoshi Nakamoto. Everything from timing to ability, style and motive matches.
But I or anybody else can't prove it, so it might as well be somebody else or multiple people.
I remember a thread Casascius started, way back when, about his idea for Bitcoin 2.0 (because of the early adopter having too many easily gained Bitcoins). His idea had something to do with the block reward being based on difficulty, and you would be able to convert your Bitcoins into Bitcoin 2.0 by destroying them. The early low difficulty coins would exchange for fewer Bitcoin 2.0 and the later high difficulty coins would exchange for more. This is all going from memory, apologies if I made a mistake somewhere. Anyway, I suppose his motive for making such a suggestion and being so adamant about it (at the time) was to help hide his identity? I also remember when he quit Bitcoin because of perceived conflicts with his profession (something about handling payrolls). I guess that was a clever ruse as well! Edit: It wasn't Bitcoin 2.0, it was something like Bitcoin+. I don't think Mike is Satoshi...lol. Mike is a guy with a well known full name and address. Sure, he's clever, but clearly we have lots of clever folks in our community and we don't think them all to be Satoshi. Also, I presume Satoshi is rich. If Mike were rich, he would hire people to write his code
|
|
|
|
|