I'm a Rocket Scientist 🚀

[talkinonnbtc]

well i still dont think that earth is flat

[bikbik2]

OK not really but I've read the "rocket scientists" have been lying about how rockets work; I've learned that rocket engines don't actually work in a vacuum.

Of course you ask "but why would they lie, I don't understand". They lie because they're hiding the fact the Earth is flat and there is no space to travel to or in. We're inside a giant underwater terrarium and atmospheric life is an artificially created novelty.

Need proof? Differently shaped rocket nozzles produce varying degrees of thrust depending on atmospheric pressure.

And what will be the real proof of this plan? If you take balesticheskie missiles, they are designed for omelets in the atmosphere, and space rockets to the two types, one for the main vacuum and a carrier who brings into orbit. So they have a different purpose.

[Mirconome]

well i still dont think that earth is flat

So many followers of the ideas or thoughts on flat ground, making it a community of people in a large sect that is not clear why the idea promoted in society. But these people are incredibly actively defend the flat ground.

[coszy]

good work dude

To work and to think that we live like guinea pigs, this is too much.

[Winter1986]

Jerry Pournelle talks about China's orbital tests of the EMDrive as a bigger than Sputnik moment

Jerry Eugene Pournelle (born August 7, 1933) is an American science fiction writer, essayist and journalist who contributed for many years to the computer magazine Byte. Pournelle was an intellectual protégé of Russell Kirk and Stefan T. Possony. Pournelle wrote numerous publications with Possony, including The Strategy of Technology (1970). The Strategy has been used as a textbook at the United States Military Academy (West Point), the United States Air Force Academy (Colorado Springs), the Air War College, and the National War College.

Pournelle worked in the aerospace industry includes time he worked at Boeing in the late-1950s. While there, he worked on Project Thor, conceiving of "hypervelocity rod bundles", also known as "rods from God". He edited Project 75, a 1964 study of 1975 defense requirements. He worked in operations research at The Aerospace Corporation, and North American Rockwell Space Division, and was founding President of the Pepperdine Research Institute. In 1989, Pournelle, Max Hunter, and retired Army Lieutenant General Daniel O. Graham made a presentation to then Vice President Dan Quayle promoting development of the DC-X rocket.

Read more at http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2016/12/jerry-pournelle-talks-about-chinas.html.


[Note that properly designed, the EMdrive can propel things on earth, as well.]

At this rate, the Chinese are ahead of the rest will master the very first space and distant planets. It is their task they perform.

[lilit]

Opportunities to conquer the space is very large. According to experts, to reach the orbit of Mars, astronauts will be able to 2033, and by 2039 they will make the first landing on the planet's surface.

[cryptocoinplay]

Just go POP and sleep 

[ivan.daineko23]

It was recently released information about that Mars found clay, which cracked from water. This is the greatest discovery of even a confirmation of photos depicting this fact.

[manyuta]

Not everyone tells a lie but i think the government lie to protect the citizens from panic. Not everyone can handle something like am extra terrestrial beings or just plain old flat Earth.

I can understand them lying about aliens but a flat earth? I think we would all know its flat now for 5000 years if it indeed was flat.

At the expense of a plane I'm sure it was a joke, but some people perceive it seriously.

[Gilf]

I'll just leave this here, it's an uncensored version of Maxwell's Equations.

http://posner.library.cmu.edu/Posner/books/pages.cgi?call=537_M46T_1873_VOL._2&layout=vol0/part0/copy0&file=0263

Do you think that these things someone can understand? If a person has one or two drops, and the idea that the earth is flat, you probably already owes nothing to help. Even the equation too.

[pyata4ok]

Private moon rovers may visit the Apollo 17 landing site

The Apollo 17 landing site has been abandoned since the last lunar astronauts went home in 1972. Now the site could get its first visitor in 44 years, as private companies race to the moon in the Google Lunar Xprize competition. A German team known as the PartTimeScientists plans to send its rovers to the Apollo 17 landing site and examine the moon buggy left behind by astronauts Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.

PartTimeScientists is the fourth team to book a flight to the moon. A rocket rideshare company called Spaceflight Inc. is handling the launch contract. Exactly which rocket it will ride on (and when) is still up in the air.

Read more at http://www.popsci.com/private-moon-rovers-may-visit-apollo-17-landing-site.

It seems to me that people do not knowingly repeat trips to the moon after the first glad. After all, there is even commercial interests, but all that it takes. And nobody says anything public. What is the problem.

The problem might be that we never went there. It seems there is a lot of evidence that the moon shots were faked.

So all the people that have shown a solid nonsense and lies. Probably cinema greatly succeeded, if this movie took off the landing Americans on the moon. About Mars will no longer speak. Although the technology is not what it used to be. But the theory of the structure of the earth completely redraw all.

[BADecker]

Private moon rovers may visit the Apollo 17 landing site

The Apollo 17 landing site has been abandoned since the last lunar astronauts went home in 1972. Now the site could get its first visitor in 44 years, as private companies race to the moon in the Google Lunar Xprize competition. A German team known as the PartTimeScientists plans to send its rovers to the Apollo 17 landing site and examine the moon buggy left behind by astronauts Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.

PartTimeScientists is the fourth team to book a flight to the moon. A rocket rideshare company called Spaceflight Inc. is handling the launch contract. Exactly which rocket it will ride on (and when) is still up in the air.

Read more at http://www.popsci.com/private-moon-rovers-may-visit-apollo-17-landing-site.

It seems to me that people do not knowingly repeat trips to the moon after the first glad. After all, there is even commercial interests, but all that it takes. And nobody says anything public. What is the problem.

The problem might be that we never went there. It seems there is a lot of evidence that the moon shots were faked.

So all the people that have shown a solid nonsense and lies. Probably cinema greatly succeeded, if this movie took off the landing Americans on the moon. About Mars will no longer speak. Although the technology is not what it used to be. But the theory of the structure of the earth completely redraw all.

If we really DID go to the moon, the expense was so great that it isn't profitable to do it frequently. Otherwise we would be doing it regularly right now.

Someday the expense might come down, and it might be profitable. But it won't happen until we eliminate poverty in the world. Why not? There are too many people who fight the stupidity of a moon shot while there is poverty around the world.

[tripplewarz]

Private moon rovers may visit the Apollo 17 landing site

The Apollo 17 landing site has been abandoned since the last lunar astronauts went home in 1972. Now the site could get its first visitor in 44 years, as private companies race to the moon in the Google Lunar Xprize competition. A German team known as the PartTimeScientists plans to send its rovers to the Apollo 17 landing site and examine the moon buggy left behind by astronauts Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.

PartTimeScientists is the fourth team to book a flight to the moon. A rocket rideshare company called Spaceflight Inc. is handling the launch contract. Exactly which rocket it will ride on (and when) is still up in the air.

Read more at http://www.popsci.com/private-moon-rovers-may-visit-apollo-17-landing-site.

It seems to me that people do not knowingly repeat trips to the moon after the first glad. After all, there is even commercial interests, but all that it takes. And nobody says anything public. What is the problem.

The problem might be that we never went there. It seems there is a lot of evidence that the moon shots were faked.

So all the people that have shown a solid nonsense and lies. Probably cinema greatly succeeded, if this movie took off the landing Americans on the moon. About Mars will no longer speak. Although the technology is not what it used to be. But the theory of the structure of the earth completely redraw all.

If we really DID go to the moon, the expense was so great that it isn't profitable to do it frequently. Otherwise we would be doing it regularly right now.

Someday the expense might come down, and it might be profitable. But it won't happen until we eliminate poverty in the world. Why not? There are too many people who fight the stupidity of a moon shot while there is poverty around the world.

I do not think anyone is interested in poverty, people around the world. So much lately sounded information that any rich vlazhivayut money in different projects, which do not carry an important character for humanity at this time. Even the recent statement of the colonization of Mars and preparing to fly to the planet.

[BADecker]

Private moon rovers may visit the Apollo 17 landing site

The Apollo 17 landing site has been abandoned since the last lunar astronauts went home in 1972. Now the site could get its first visitor in 44 years, as private companies race to the moon in the Google Lunar Xprize competition. A German team known as the PartTimeScientists plans to send its rovers to the Apollo 17 landing site and examine the moon buggy left behind by astronauts Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.

PartTimeScientists is the fourth team to book a flight to the moon. A rocket rideshare company called Spaceflight Inc. is handling the launch contract. Exactly which rocket it will ride on (and when) is still up in the air.

Read more at http://www.popsci.com/private-moon-rovers-may-visit-apollo-17-landing-site.

It seems to me that people do not knowingly repeat trips to the moon after the first glad. After all, there is even commercial interests, but all that it takes. And nobody says anything public. What is the problem.

The problem might be that we never went there. It seems there is a lot of evidence that the moon shots were faked.

So all the people that have shown a solid nonsense and lies. Probably cinema greatly succeeded, if this movie took off the landing Americans on the moon. About Mars will no longer speak. Although the technology is not what it used to be. But the theory of the structure of the earth completely redraw all.

If we really DID go to the moon, the expense was so great that it isn't profitable to do it frequently. Otherwise we would be doing it regularly right now.

Someday the expense might come down, and it might be profitable. But it won't happen until we eliminate poverty in the world. Why not? There are too many people who fight the stupidity of a moon shot while there is poverty around the world.

I do not think anyone is interested in poverty, people around the world. So much lately sounded information that any rich vlazhivayut money in different projects, which do not carry an important character for humanity at this time. Even the recent statement of the colonization of Mars and preparing to fly to the planet.

Google "anti poverty charities."   

[horace08122]

Why discuss the invention of the last century. For the era of the atom and other high technologies. Can not you try to make a nuclear engine for space rockets. It's quite likely.

[pyata4ok]

Private moon rovers may visit the Apollo 17 landing site

The Apollo 17 landing site has been abandoned since the last lunar astronauts went home in 1972. Now the site could get its first visitor in 44 years, as private companies race to the moon in the Google Lunar Xprize competition. A German team known as the PartTimeScientists plans to send its rovers to the Apollo 17 landing site and examine the moon buggy left behind by astronauts Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.

PartTimeScientists is the fourth team to book a flight to the moon. A rocket rideshare company called Spaceflight Inc. is handling the launch contract. Exactly which rocket it will ride on (and when) is still up in the air.

Read more at http://www.popsci.com/private-moon-rovers-may-visit-apollo-17-landing-site.

It seems to me that people do not knowingly repeat trips to the moon after the first glad. After all, there is even commercial interests, but all that it takes. And nobody says anything public. What is the problem.

The problem might be that we never went there. It seems there is a lot of evidence that the moon shots were faked.

So all the people that have shown a solid nonsense and lies. Probably cinema greatly succeeded, if this movie took off the landing Americans on the moon. About Mars will no longer speak. Although the technology is not what it used to be. But the theory of the structure of the earth completely redraw all.

If we really DID go to the moon, the expense was so great that it isn't profitable to do it frequently. Otherwise we would be doing it regularly right now.

Someday the expense might come down, and it might be profitable. But it won't happen until we eliminate poverty in the world. Why not? There are too many people who fight the stupidity of a moon shot while there is poverty around the world.

I read about flying to the moon and on what benefits it can bring us. The fact that the moon can extract valuable minerals, and other important things for the industry. It can lift the global economy, and more resources for fighting poverty.

[dimonchik13]

For travel or study deep space financing of one country is very small. Only together all developed countries will be able to achieve great results and break new conquest of the universe technologies. But since all the feuding, it is not feasible.

[bikbik2]

good work dude

I agree that the work is good. We need to throw komus information to the masses, and the people in general will soon be fools. And so at least they know what is being done and that the earth is still read a planet and not a piece of rock in the world.

[olyaru]

well i still dont think that earth is flat

I even thought such a head did not attend, even on such a probability. I do not even think that people generally are thinking about this. But I have already honored a lot of information, and I am sure that this society people flat as flat and thought about the flat land, utter nonsense.

[notbatman]