dominatro
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 07, 2011, 04:25:41 PM |
|
Last Block June 27 is this right? Is everything working? I joined now but I'm a little worried.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lowentropy
|
|
July 07, 2011, 04:27:53 PM |
|
Last Block June 27 is this right? Is everything working? I joined now but I'm a little worried.
We're a smallish pool and this round is running a little long  But we regularly test the code, both with unit tests and against testnet, so there is nothing to worry about. |
Mine @ <http://pool.bitp.it>
Chat with us @ irc://irc.freenode.net/#bitp.it
Learn more about our pool @ <http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=12181.0>
|
|
|
dominatro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2011, 04:40:02 PM |
|
Looks like its 95% 6 days and average about 2 days. I like the lack of rejects though. How can you afford the bonus?
|
|
|
|
|
|
lowentropy
|
|
July 07, 2011, 04:42:56 PM |
|
Looks like its 95% 6 days and average about 2 days. I like the lack of rejects though. How can you afford the bonus?
I've had a 2GH/s miner since before the difficulty was quite so crazy It's more fun for me to use them on a project like this, as a bonus, than to just cash them in  |
Mine @ <http://pool.bitp.it>
Chat with us @ irc://irc.freenode.net/#bitp.it
Learn more about our pool @ <http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=12181.0>
|
|
|
DaNmarner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2011, 05:35:10 PM |
|
Love Node.js, so you have my 740Mhash/s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lowentropy
|
|
July 07, 2011, 05:37:09 PM |
|
Love Node.js, so you have my 740Mhash/s.
Thanks  We love Node as well! |
Mine @ <http://pool.bitp.it>
Chat with us @ irc://irc.freenode.net/#bitp.it
Learn more about our pool @ <http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=12181.0>
|
|
|
DaNmarner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2011, 05:47:02 PM |
|
Love Node.js, so you have my 740Mhash/s.
Thanks We love Node as well! IMO, the biggest new-comer blocker is the current round duration. I'm sure once we get pass round #6, more and more people will jump in. Especially in a botnet-DDoS-causing-big-pools-down time like this. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tx2000
|
|
July 07, 2011, 08:02:30 PM |
|
55,980,000,000 hashes/sec and counting!
|
|
|
|
|
|
willphase
|
|
July 07, 2011, 09:33:02 PM |
|
how is bitp.it handling the DDOSes? Does running on node.js provide more resilience to this?
Will
|
|
|
|
|
TurdHurdur
|
|
July 07, 2011, 10:04:12 PM |
|
The decreased stale rate has evaporated recently with the increase in pool hash rate. Will I see those low stale rates ever again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
lowentropy
|
|
July 07, 2011, 10:06:12 PM |
|
The decreased stale rate has evaporated recently with the increase in pool hash rate. Will I see those low stale rates ever again?
Definitely We're working on it right now. |
Mine @ <http://pool.bitp.it>
Chat with us @ irc://irc.freenode.net/#bitp.it
Learn more about our pool @ <http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=12181.0>
|
|
|
|
lowentropy
|
|
July 07, 2011, 10:07:32 PM |
|
how is bitp.it handling the DDOSes? Does running on node.js provide more resilience to this?
There are some properties of node.js that make it resilient to attack. For instance, it is fast, it has low per-connection overhead, and it is fully asynchronous (it's quite difficulty to make it block on I/O). Of course, there's no magic bullet for protecting against DDoS. We'll be talking more with the community about that issue soon. |
Mine @ <http://pool.bitp.it>
Chat with us @ irc://irc.freenode.net/#bitp.it
Learn more about our pool @ <http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=12181.0>
|
|
|
|
TurdHurdur
|
|
July 07, 2011, 10:21:23 PM |
|
The decreased stale rate has evaporated recently with the increase in pool hash rate. Will I see those low stale rates ever again?
Definitely We're working on it right now. Good to hear. The stale rate is currently about the same as BTCGuild before the DDoS. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tx2000
|
|
July 07, 2011, 10:22:41 PM |
|
The decreased stale rate has evaporated recently with the increase in pool hash rate. Will I see those low stale rates ever again?
Hmm, I'm still running at a decent ratio. 2352:5 (0.2%). What card/drivers/SDK/miner you running? I'm on a 5850, 11.4, SDK 2.4, GUIMiner v2011-7-1 on Windows 7 x64 running poclbm OpenCL with Ma tweaks reapplied. |
|
|
|
|
|
lebuen
|
|
July 07, 2011, 10:36:10 PM |
|
Good to hear. The stale rate is currently about the same as BTCGuild before the DDoS.
My ratio is 98/40089 (0.24%), that's honestly better than I ever did on BTC Guild. |
|
|
|
|
|
TurdHurdur
|
|
July 07, 2011, 10:44:06 PM |
|
The decreased stale rate has evaporated recently with the increase in pool hash rate. Will I see those low stale rates ever again?
Hmm, I'm still running at a decent ratio. 2352:5 (0.2%). What card/drivers/SDK/miner you running? I'm on a 5850, 11.4, SDK 2.4, GUIMiner v2011-7-1 on Windows 7 x64 running poclbm OpenCL with Ma tweaks reapplied. It may be too small a sample size, just something I've noticed in the past couple hours. |
|
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 08, 2011, 12:38:22 AM |
|
It may be too small a sample size, just something I've noticed in the past couple hours.
I appreciate you mentioning it never-the-less. We aim to keep our stales as low as possible, so this is definitely something we're looking into at the moment. Even before this came up, we'd been talking about ways to make our stale rate even lower. In a couple of hours lowentropy and myself are going to work through a few of our ideas. I will keep everyone up-to-date once we have anything noteworthy. On a different note; Thanks everyone for your help. We've experienced a good deal of growth today, and appreciate all our new users. Additionally, to everyone with bit pit messages/links in your signatures, and who'ev generally helped spread the word for us, we are eternally grateful! |
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 08, 2011, 01:20:45 AM |
|
Also, I just wanted to let everyone know that we've made it on the Bitcoin Watch pie chart!!!  |
|
|
|
|
TurdHurdur
|
|
July 08, 2011, 02:01:29 AM |
|
It may be too small a sample size, just something I've noticed in the past couple hours.
I appreciate you mentioning it never-the-less. We aim to keep our stales as low as possible, so this is definitely something we're looking into at the moment. Even before this came up, we'd been talking about ways to make our stale rate even lower. In a couple of hours lowentropy and myself are going to work through a few of our ideas. I will keep everyone up-to-date once we have anything noteworthy. So it seems, 0 stales over 6 miners with the most accepted being 400+ since an idle warning triggered aids.pl to switch to BTCGuild then back to bitp.it ~1h ago. |
|
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 08, 2011, 02:31:55 AM |
|
So it seems, 0 stales over 6 miners with the most accepted being 400+ since an idle warning triggered aids.pl to switch to BTCGuild then back to bitp.it ~1h ago.
That is excellent! I am glad to hear things settled down. We did change our key pool size, which should help too. We're also working out some ideas of how to decrease them even more. I take it you're back with us  Do let us know if they pop back up. |
|
|
|
|
