Bitcoin Forum
November 04, 2024, 06:51:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Which is better
FCX - 6 (30%)
FNX - 14 (70%)
Total Voters: 20

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Fantom | CPU Mineable | DarkSend | Masternode | Tor+I2P | sMP Releasing Sn  (Read 77897 times)
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 06:30:04 AM
 #961

I guess this was quite the experiment  Roll Eyes, dev should refund electricity costs to everyone who mined this crap.

Ummm... No, so I know that the Algorithm can be Hardened even more! Thank You!
stacey2911
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 07:06:03 AM
 #962

I guess this was quite the experiment  Roll Eyes, dev should refund electricity costs to everyone who mined this crap.

Ummm... No, so I know that the Algorithm can be Hardened even more! Thank You!

Hi dev, now that your online, when you have the time, could I get you to look at my previous posts? Just a few ideas and stuff I'd like to be discussed.
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 07:10:28 AM
 #963

I guess this was quite the experiment  Roll Eyes, dev should refund electricity costs to everyone who mined this crap.

Ummm... No, so I know that the Algorithm can be Hardened even more! Thank You!

Hi dev, now that your online, when you have the time, could I get you to look at my previous posts? Just a few ideas and stuff I'd like to be discussed.


I have posted the functional makefile
stacey2911
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 09:01:39 AM
 #964

I guess this was quite the experiment  Roll Eyes, dev should refund electricity costs to everyone who mined this crap.

Ummm... No, so I know that the Algorithm can be Hardened even more! Thank You!

Hi dev, now that your online, when you have the time, could I get you to look at my previous posts? Just a few ideas and stuff I'd like to be discussed.


I have posted the functional makefile

My issue wasn't with the make file, it was with getting an exchange, a public block explorer, and some form of POD.

Would anyone be interested in helping me get this coin added to Bittrex? I've just been sussing out what we need to get Fantom listed, I just don't have all the info\resources available. If anyone else can chime in and help, that'd be greatly appreciated, I need all the info that is bolded.

Coin Name - Fantom  (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH FANTOMCOIN)
Coin trading symbol - FNX  

A logo for your coin - png format with a transparent background.  The logo should be square with dimensions of 1000x1000 pixels with no white space on its border and no taglines.  It should only be a logo and expect it to show up in multiple spots in the Bittrex UI.

Launch Date -
Github Link - https://github.com/LordOfTheCoin/fantom
Exchanges you are currently on? None
Official blockchain explorer?
What is your TxFee for a transaction? 0.01 FNX
Any social media information such as your official website, twitter account, facebook page, subreddit, etc?

Optional information that heavily influences us:

Have a clearly stated purpose for your coin.
Proof of dev:  Contact coinssource.com or www.cryptocertify.com to get rated.  We can also provide identity verification if you are willing to provide verifiable identification documents directly to us.  
Get your source code reviewed by a trusted member of the community
Information about your coin:  What is the concept behind your coin? If you have previously been listed on Bittrex, what has changed with your coin since then?


EDIT: It also appears that having a public block explorer and some form of dev certification is going to help us greatly when it comes to exchanges.
Bitdonator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1223
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 11:00:20 AM
 #965

I guess this was quite the experiment  Roll Eyes, dev should refund electricity costs to everyone who mined this crap.

and CPU amortization  Smiley
Sir_Astral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 11:28:53 AM
 #966

Why you guys are complaining? No exchange? Will be there soon.  Smiley
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 11:57:28 AM
 #967

Why you guys are complaining? No exchange? Will be there soon.  Smiley

Actually, we could have gotten an exchange within 24 Hours if it weren't for the makefile, here it is:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219043.msg12903879#msg12903879 (The Makefile)
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 12:02:10 PM
 #968

I guess this was quite the experiment  Roll Eyes, dev should refund electricity costs to everyone who mined this crap.

and CPU amortization  Smiley

How about, immortalization, that's fine?
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 12:12:05 PM
Last edit: November 07, 2015, 12:49:27 PM by DuckYeah!
 #969

I guess this was quite the experiment  Roll Eyes, dev should refund electricity costs to everyone who mined this crap.

and CPU amortization  Smiley

How about, immortalization, that's fine?

LoL  Grin

New Update Coming, also started Experimenting with Ring Signatures
Sir_Astral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 02:11:24 PM
 #970

Keep working, dev.  Smiley
This coin already has some useful features inside wallet but without errors will be better.
Shkembe
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1560
Merit: 1001

Epic Private Internet Cash


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 03:06:04 PM
 #971

Lol, fast trade, someone was faster than me! Smiley
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828



View Profile
November 07, 2015, 03:36:04 PM
 #972

I want to sell 11500 coins for $50 total
Send me a PM if you want them.

sold

So, it appear the going rate is about 1100 sats per coin?
Bitdonator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1223
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 03:49:12 PM
 #973

I want to sell 11500 coins for $50 total
Send me a PM if you want them.

sold

So, it appear the going rate is about 1100 sats per coin?

Thats soooooo low  Sad
You are on the loss dude!
Bobekko
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 07, 2015, 03:50:17 PM
 #974

I want to sell 11500 coins for $50 total
Send me a PM if you want them.

sold

So, it appear the going rate is about 1100 sats per coin?

Surprised no exchanges have picked this up yet. Was CCex not posting earlier in the thread?

DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 04:02:43 PM
 #975

I want to sell 11500 coins for $50 total
Send me a PM if you want them.

sold

So, it appear the going rate is about 1100 sats per coin?

Surprised no exchanges have picked this up yet. Was CCex not posting earlier in the thread?

Sent him (or her or Samaritan (PoI)) and no reply *yet*
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828



View Profile
November 07, 2015, 04:03:07 PM
Last edit: November 08, 2015, 01:56:52 AM by bones261
 #976

I want to sell 11500 coins for $50 total
Send me a PM if you want them.

sold

So, it appear the going rate is about 1100 sats per coin?

Surprised no exchanges have picked this up yet. Was CCex not posting earlier in the thread?

Yes, but there was something wrong with the makefile so they couldn't compile a daemon. Dev states that it is fixed it now.
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828



View Profile
November 07, 2015, 04:08:03 PM
 #977

I'm surprised no one made a gpu miner for this coin and raped it. If they did, they sure have done it on the down low. Is the algo really gpu resistant?
zoneout
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 07, 2015, 04:19:17 PM
 #978

I'm surprised no one made a gpu miner for this coin and raped it. If they did, they sure have done it on the down low. Is the algo really gpu resistant?

Looks like it is...but why no exchanges yet?
DuckYeah! (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 04:21:30 PM
 #979

I'm surprised no one made a gpu miner for this coin and raped it. If they did, they sure have done it on the down low. Is the algo really gpu resistant?

Nothin' is truly resistant, I can try, what I did was first study a normal GPU Miner, then I studied the X11 GPU Miner, then I studied the Quark GPU Miner and finally I studied the Magi M7 CPU Miner.....

My results told me that to make an Algorithm that is so retarded that making a miner wouldn't be possible so I took the power of the *shitty* X17 Algo + the *less shitty* Quark and finally the *not so shitty* Magi M7 and made an *extremely shitty* algorithm.... with a decent name Wink

EDIT: I haven't updated the Makefile on Github because I still have untested fixes on that commit, so here it is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219043.msg12903879#msg12903879
Bitdonator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1223
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 07, 2015, 04:40:26 PM
 #980

is it possible to use specified command and force wallet to
use all balance for staking, not only one part?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!