Time to stand up to the XT shills here!

[CIYAM]

You can read the stuff here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1240388.0

There are forum members that are clearly acting as shills for XT trying their hardest to push the XT agenda.

I think it is time for those of us that care about Bitcoin being what it should be (not controlled by control freaks) to make that clear to these shills.

If you are against the XT "corporate takeover" attempt then let them know!

[knight22]

Yeah lets be totalitarian. It sure does fit bitcoin's vision 

[CIYAM]

Yeah lets be totalitarian. It sure does fit bitcoin's vision 

Totalitarian is exactly what XT is trying to do.

What I am doing is simply pointing this out.

[hdbuck]

Fork off bitchez!

[Lauda]

Well you could start a public shame list in this thread. It's about time they get what they deserve. I think that this thread is more suited for Meta though.

[brg444]

There's a whole 100+ pages thread that serve exactly this purpose 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162684.0

[knight22]

I would like to have a rational explanation about why you people think free choices must be fighted. And how does that fit bitcoin vision.

[CIYAM]

I would like to have a rational explanation about why you poeple think free choices but be fighted. And how does that fit bitcoin vision.

If you would stop shilling and enter into a discussion then maybe that would be possible.

[knight22]

I would like to have a rational explanation about why you poeple think free choices but be fighted. And how does that fit bitcoin vision.

If you would stop shilling and enter into a discussion then maybe that would be possible.

How a discussion is possible with people unwilling to move an inch in a timely mater?

[CIYAM]

How a discussion is possible with people unwilling to move an inch in a timely mater?

Let me guess - it might be because people like you don't allow any time (apparently it has to be done "right now").

Your strategy of trying to say that "this is an urgent thing" is rubbish and everyone with half a brain knows that (but you still keep pushing it).

So it is very clear you are aiming at people with "low intelligence".

You see how you keep losing when you argue with me?

(but keep it up - I enjoy making you look stupid)

[knight22]

How a discussion is possible with people unwilling to move an inch in a timely mater?

Let me guess - it might be because people like you don't allow any time (apparently it has to be done "right now").

Your strategy of trying to say that "this is an urgent thing" is rubbish and everyone with half a brain knows that (but you still keep pushing it).

So it is very clear you are aiming at people with "low intelligence".

You see how you keep losing when you argue with me?

Ok. Then you just proved me a discussion is impossible. Now accept the fact that people are freely moving away and move along.

[CIYAM]

Ok. Then you just proved me a discussion is impossible. Now accept the fact that people are freely moving away and move along.

I see - you have given up - good - now go an "fork off'.

[turvarya]

Well you could start a public shame list in this thread. It's about time they get what they deserve. I think that this thread is more suited for Meta though.

There was such a thread. Months ago.
Are you people going completely nuts?

[pedrog]

The "corporate takeover" already happen, Blocktream is now the owner of bitcoin development and they're pushing their agenda, maybe you should be worried about that...

[CIYAM]

The "corporate takeover" already happen, Blocktream is now the owner of bitcoin development and they're pushing their agenda, maybe you should be worried about that...

I don't think "any corporate takeover" should be supported (don't confuse me as a supporter of Blockstream).

[brg444]

The "corporate takeover" already happen, Blocktream is now the owner of bitcoin development and they're pushing their agenda, maybe you should be worried about that...

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs. What are yours?

[knight22]

The "corporate takeover" already happen, Blocktream is now the owner of bitcoin development and they're pushing their agenda, maybe you should be worried about that...

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs. What are yours?

The fact that no other scaling proposition other than the for profit privately owned Liquid should be worrying you. I'm not again Liquid but clearly blockstream have the wrong priorities on the scaling manner.

[CIYAM]

The fact that no other scaling proposition other than the for profit privately owned Liquid should be worrying you. I'm not again Liquid but clearly blockstream have the wrong priorities on the scaling manner.

Again - look at the *reality* of what is happening now.

The only full blocks have been because of spam attacks (not real demand).

There is ample time to work on improving performance - the whole idea of making this out to be a crisis is the FUD from your masters.

[brg444]

The "corporate takeover" already happen, Blocktream is now the owner of bitcoin development and they're pushing their agenda, maybe you should be worried about that...

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs. What are yours?

The fact that no other scaling proposition other than the for profit privately owned Liquid should be worrying you. I'm not again Liquid but clearly blockstream have the wrong priorities on the scaling manner.

There are different propositions being worked on right now by the various people at Blockstream. Too bad you can't keep track, being retarded and all that.

[CIYAM]

There are different propositions being worked on right now by the various people at Blockstream. Too bad you can't keep track, being retarded and all that.

He is a "shill" as we have shown - so I think we don't need to accuse him of being retarded - he is just doing what he has been told to do (I guess he is being paid to post).