Scammer Tag: Gineta

[Kelticfox]

[Deleted]

[BCB]

I saw Gineta pop up in irc and he was looking a little sketch.  Keep us posted.

[BCB]

tldr

are you a scammer?

[AndrewBUD]

I don't understand most things that you say.

[greyhawk]

I just want whatever crack cocaine he's doing.

[AndrewBUD]

I just want whatever crack cocaine he's doing.

LOL.... Must be full of speed.... can't even take a minute to use spell check

[Tomatocage]

I wonder how long before he requests a loan...

[AndrewBUD]

I wonder how long before he requests a loan...

Probably 24-48hrs... or less

[AndrewBUD]

I wonder how long before he requests a loan...

Already done that...

Hence the thread. Asked for a loan, supplied fake ID when asked for by Inbr3d.

Oh I thought he was trying to sell coins to a puppet account....

[BCB]

but this is an IRC issue no?

Why are you posting here.

Don't you have a WOT.

Deal with it on IRC.

[AndrewBUD]

That's not fair ^.. It's more or less someone asking for help in an area that is more widely used..  It's still a "community" as a whole is it not?

[gineta]

BCB is a IRC issue and NOT SELL, BUY OR SCAM is MAKE

But this 2 guys use the forum for TARGET ME and make discredit the moderator here also not care and delete all like need to be the normal

 

but this is an IRC issue no?

Why are you posting here.

Don't you have a WOT.

Deal with it on IRC.

[jasinlee]

I BCB belief make have one seen the bitcoin upload chat. We saw read chat otc rating.


(try reading that!)

[jwzguy]

thatescalatedquickly.jpg

[repentance]

I just want whatever crack cocaine he's doing.

I've seen more coherent posts from people on research chemical benders.

[AndrewBUD]

I just want whatever crack cocaine he's doing.

I've seen more coherent posts from people on research chemical benders.

Could probably get by a lot more clear if he used google translate.

[repentance]

Could probably get by a lot more clear if he used google translate.

Yep.  Google translate's not perfect but it's usually good enough to convey basic meaning.

[fbastage]

gineta has given ratings to various people in the WOT, apparently trying to pad his credentials/credibility by claiming to have traded with them

http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=gineta&sign=ANY&type=SENT

17553    gineta    danieldaniel    142    2012-11-18 17:30:46    1    small fees
17554    gineta    rothschild    7    2012-11-18 18:07:46    1    thanks
17555    gineta    Kelticfox    8    2012-11-18 17:49:20    1    good transaction
17528    gineta    adamjgmiller    10    2012-11-18 17:39:07    5    very trusted user good

danieldaniel, rothschild, and Kelticfox have sworn that they haven't traded with him

[16:58] <ReliableSource> he has you plussed. did you trade with him?
...
[16:59] <Kelticfox> I didnt
[16:59] <ReliableSource> http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=gineta&sign=ANY&type=SENT
[16:59] <Kelticfox> I wouldnt touch him with your bargepole let alone mine

[17:01] <rothschild> supplied fake IDr
[17:01] <rothschild> rofl
...
[17:01] <ReliableSource> did you trade with him, rothschild?
[17:01] <rothschild> naw
[17:01] <Kelticfox> Chump doctored his Driving License with a fake 1st name, but forgot to change the signature
[17:02] <rothschild> i don't know why that made me laugh but it did
[17:02] <ReliableSource> he says you did
...
[17:02] <rothschild> lol he does? where?
[17:02] <ReliableSource> read above
[17:02] <+ElevatedDownfall> SELLING 2.5 btc for PPUSD -- $30.34
[17:02] <rothschild> he definitely didn't
[17:02] <rothschild> which is why i haven't rated him
[17:03] <rothschild> he messaged me about a trade yesterday if i recall

[17:03] <ReliableSource> danieldaniel: did you trade with gineta?
[17:03] <+ElevatedDownfall> buy
[17:03] <Kelticfox> He wanted to pay me £10 on Tuesday via Bank Transfer
[17:03] <+ElevatedDownfall> my btc
[17:03] <WhiteBoyRik> looking to trade 40 BTC for a $400 moneypak...anyone able to do this?
[17:03] <ReliableSource> looks like he's padding his ratings so he can pull bigger scams
[17:03] <danieldaniel> ReliableSource: Not really, but he asked for a rating because he sent me .00001 btc
[17:04] <rothschild> lol
[17:04] <danieldaniel> I didn't do it

[repentance]

gineta has given ratings to various people in the WOT, apparently trying to pad his credentials/credibility by claiming to have traded with them

http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=gineta&sign=ANY&type=SENT

17553    gineta    danieldaniel    142    2012-11-18 17:30:46    1    small fees
17554    gineta    rothschild    7    2012-11-18 18:07:46    1    thanks
17555    gineta    Kelticfox    8    2012-11-18 17:49:20    1    good transaction
17528    gineta    adamjgmiller    10    2012-11-18 17:39:07    5    very trusted user good

Am I reading that right?  Did he rate them all on the same day within 10 minutes?

[ab8989]

There is a pattern here, that discussions that could perhaps lead into some useful information being found, is killed by someone thinking they are helpful and posting some theory that is plausible. However it really would be important to get the actual person in question to write whether his name is Arturo or Jacob.

Especially when questioning about the signature issue. It is only when the person in question replies to clear up the issue, it is when something positive progress happens in the discussion. If somebody else jumps in and offers one plausible theory it serves as a huge negative value to the overall discussion. The reason is that after that plausible theory being written, there is no more such a need for gineta to say what is the actual explanation. The issue now seems "solved", however it really very much still isn't.

This same pattern of helpful bystanders stepping in to clearing up potential important questions has harmed the discussions in so many other threads as well.