lavajumper (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 10:08:56 PM |
|
Are the attacks over and is it safe to transfer coins? Also are coins stored in Livecoin stuck there?
Coins at Livecoin are safe, they are just frozen at the moment. The network is still vulnerable to attack until the hashrate improves. For this reason I would still hold off moving coins until Merge-mining is active and we see a healthy hashrate on the network. I will write a much more detailed post in the next couple of days.
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
lavajumper (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 10:58:32 PM |
|
@ArchitektoR: (and all Mac users) We have a new build for the Mac Client: https://github.com/sexcoin-project/sexcoin/releases/download/0.15.0/Sexcoin-Qt.V0.15.0.1.dmgI think this one will make you much happier. Please let us know if there are any issues. Thank you for the report, And thank you for posting the crash log! We're looking into it. Look for a better response soon. Good news for new wallet! Just installed on latest Mac OS - and it doesn't run: Process: Sexcoin-Qt [76135] Path: /Applications/Sexcoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Sexcoin-Qt Identifier: Sexcoin-Qt Version: 0.15.0 (0.15.0) Code Type: X86-64 (Native) Parent Process: ??? [1] Responsible: Sexcoin-Qt [76135] User ID: 501
Date/Time: 2018-12-29 11:37:15.272 +0300 OS Version: Mac OS X 10.14 (18A391) Report Version: 12 Bridge OS Version: 3.0 (14Y667) Anonymous UUID: A032CF23-0496-C050-A3D9-F182A09F013E
Time Awake Since Boot: 2200000 seconds
System Integrity Protection: disabled
Crashed Thread: 0
Exception Type: EXC_CRASH (SIGABRT) Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000 Exception Note: EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY
Termination Reason: DYLD, [0x4] Symbol missing
Application Specific Information: dyld: launch, loading dependent libraries
Dyld Error Message: Symbol not found: __ZN5boost6system6detail25generic_category_instanceE Referenced from: /Applications/Sexcoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/../Frameworks/libboost_thread-mt.dylib Expected in: /usr/local/lib/libboost_system-mt.dylib in /Applications/Sexcoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/../Frameworks/libboost_thread-mt.dylib
...
Model: MacBookPro14,3, BootROM MBP143.0178.B00, 4 processors, Intel Core i7, 2,9 GHz, 16 GB, SMC 2.45f0 Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 630, Intel HD Graphics 630, Built-In Graphics: Radeon Pro 560, Radeon Pro 560, PCIe Memory Module: BANK 0/DIMM0, 8 GB, LPDDR3, 2133 MHz, 0x80CE, 0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 Memory Module: BANK 1/DIMM0, 8 GB, LPDDR3, 2133 MHz, 0x80CE, 0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 AirPort: spairport_wireless_card_type_airport_extreme (0x14E4, 0x173), Broadcom BCM43xx 1.0 (7.77.61.1 AirPortDriverBrcmNIC-1305.2) Bluetooth: Version 6.0.8f6, 3 services, 27 devices, 1 incoming serial ports Network Service: USB Ethernet, Ethernet, en8 Network Service: USB 10/100/1000 LAN, Ethernet, en9 USB Device: USB 3.0 Bus USB Device: USB2.0 Hub USB Device: 4-Port USB 2.0 Hub USB Device: USB Keyboard USB Device: iBridge USB Device: VLI Product String USB Device: HP S140u USB Monitor USB Device: USB3.0 Hub USB Device: Mass Storage Device USB Device: 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub USB Device: Elements 25A2 USB Device: USB 10/100/1000 LAN Thunderbolt Bus: MacBook Pro, Apple Inc., 37.1 Thunderbolt Bus: MacBook Pro, Apple Inc., 37.1
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
lavajumper (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 12:22:32 AM Last edit: December 30, 2018, 12:40:18 AM by lavajumper |
|
Hi,
Upgrading and reindexing doesn't bring up HD-Keys. Any special advice to achieve this? maybe dumpwallet -> importwallet?
br, Andy
Wallets created pre-0.15.0 are not HD wallets. I think the best thing to do if you want an HD wallet is to let Sexcoin create a brand new wallet (which will be HD by default), then send the coins from your old wallet to the new one. This CAN be done by juggling wallets and restarts of the client. Because HD wallet keys are generated from a base key, importing old keys will not work. EDIT: You can import old keys, but they will not be part of the HD schema.
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
ArchitektoR
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 09:25:14 AM |
|
Now it works! Great job! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
N-DEE
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 11:35:16 AM |
|
Oh of course - the easiest ideas often are the best. I'll do it that way :-) Thanks! br, Andy Wallets created pre-0.15.0 are not HD wallets. I think the best thing to do if you want an HD wallet is to let Sexcoin create a brand new wallet (which will be HD by default), then send the coins from your old wallet to the new one. This CAN be done by juggling wallets and restarts of the client.
Because HD wallet keys are generated from a base key, importing old keys will not work.
EDIT: You can import old keys, but they will not be part of the HD schema.
|
|
|
|
N-DEE
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 08:30:29 PM |
|
We're at 3080275 Mergemining activated ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) YEAH!
|
|
|
|
no-ice-please
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 08:39:42 PM |
|
We're at 3080275 Mergemining activated ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) YEAH! Which coin is the other coin that you are now able to merge mine with this? Can it be done with several other coins?
|
|
|
|
roughswap
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 153
Merit: 8
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 10:06:12 PM |
|
Thanks for the reply LJ
|
|
|
|
lavajumper (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 03:33:43 AM Last edit: December 31, 2018, 03:54:24 AM by lavajumper |
|
::Update:: We're watching the network and it looks like there may be a fork. Cryptoid is showing different numbers than most of our nodes. According to our nodes we have about 18 - 20 GH/s on the network and the block count is a bit higher.
I would refrain from moving coins around until we can get this resolved.
I think we forked at block #3080345
If anyone knows which pool "SFBYZr5RrXFYNvJAV7vJJEfrVg3U9d2don" or "SHthRm8YK3CJCt65KkEVLLvKGgRrxpk5eY" is , please alert them to the fact that they are mining the wrong chain.
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2235
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 10:58:10 AM |
|
I don't have links for other pools on me at the moment, so can't say for certain, however, from what I've seen myself and findblocks are on what I like to call the main fork.
Cryptopia, iSpace blockminer and prohashing are on what I like to call fork two and have not upgraded their wallets while chainz.cryptoid is on what i like to call fork three which is even further behind the block count than fork main or fork two.
Nova told me directly they have upgraded, I'm just trying to see if the other exchanges (Livecoin, NLexch, thecoin.pw ) have upgraded... and what chain they are on.
|
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2235
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 11:01:18 AM |
|
I don't have links for other pools on me at the moment, so can't say for certain, however, from what I've seen myself and findblocks are on what I like to call the main fork.
Cryptopia, iSpace blockminer and prohashing are on what I like to call fork two and have not upgraded their wallets while chainz.cryptoid is on what i like to call fork three which is even further behind the block count than fork main or fork two.
Nova told me directly they have upgraded, I'm just trying to see if the other exchanges (Livecoin, NLexch, thecoin.pw ) have upgraded... and what chain they are on.
I'm at block 3081200 21:00 AEST (GMT +10) 7436568d2a8b9a9e42f000e0ba1526db3131ad7e278162d5e47a5d0a99be2180
|
|
|
|
lavajumper (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 07:22:24 PM |
|
::Update::
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
lavajumper (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 08:23:19 PM |
|
Here's a good 'addnode' list for anyone that looks like they need it: addnode=74.208.174.17:9560 addnode=24.99.50.91:9560 addnode=62.99.220.186:9560 addnode=176.31.13.198:9560 addnode=217.103.221.7:5710 addnode=76.74.177.199:9560 addnode=66.172.11.190:6969 addnode=144.202.64.162:9560 addnode=76.74.178.151:9560 addnode=45.32.222.48:9560 addnode=37.187.135.212:9560 addnode=195.154.163.121:9560 addnode=80.123.211.2:9560
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
lavajumper (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 01, 2019, 12:29:41 AM |
|
::Update::
First Merge-mined blocks (auxpow) are on the chain!!!!! Network has about 300GH/s on it right now. This is fantastic news for all of us!!!
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
sasa9
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 01, 2019, 05:00:12 AM Last edit: January 01, 2019, 05:20:53 AM by sasa9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
dnp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 02, 2019, 04:39:20 PM |
|
::Update::
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
have the pools hash-to-coins.com ispace.co.uk prohashing.com (they run an explorer too)
been informed?
|
Explorer and full node hosting at explorer.dognose.net
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2235
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 03, 2019, 11:39:46 AM |
|
::Update::
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
have the pools hash-to-coins.com ispace.co.uk prohashing.com (they run an explorer too)
been informed? Well... yes... here is but one public example of us informing them: https://twitter.com/Timelord2067/status/1078511960004546560 other examples are via emails. It's unclear from their front page if hash-to-coins.com has upgraded or not (not the least of which is because they last updated their "news" feed six months ago), if you can shed any light on that, feel free to post the info here so we can investigate it. DO NOT USE YOBIT OR CRYPTOPIA FOR SEXCOIN TRANSACTIONS - YOU WILL LOSE YOUR SXC!
|
|
|
|
lavajumper (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 03, 2019, 01:16:15 PM |
|
::Update::
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
have the pools hash-to-coins.com ispace.co.uk prohashing.com (they run an explorer too)
been informed? Well... yes... here is but one public example of us informing them: https://twitter.com/Timelord2067/status/1078511960004546560 other examples are via emails. It's unclear from their front page if hash-to-coins.com has upgraded or not (not the least of which is because they last updated their "news" feed six months ago), if you can shed any light on that, feel free to post the info here so we can investigate it. DO NOT USE YOBIT OR CRYPTOPIA FOR SEXCOIN TRANSACTIONS - YOU WILL LOSE YOUR SXC!Informing them has been done. Our past experience has taught us that many times it holds more weight with many pool-ops when users that mine on a pool inform them. This is why we solicit the community ( everyone that reads this thread ) to let your pool-ops know. Link the github repo and also this thread when you tell them.
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
lavajumper (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 03, 2019, 05:04:01 PM Last edit: January 03, 2019, 05:20:46 PM by lavajumper |
|
::Update::We are seeing more and more adaptation of the new client. This is good news for the network. We are nearly certain there is a fork, which is being held alive by 0.10.4.x clients. I would encourage everyone to upgrade now, and definitely before sending coins. Almost all 0.10.4.x client are reporting a block height much below the current height. We have at least two large pools mining auxpow, one is constant and the other periodically jumps in. This is also a good sign. I have been in contact with the pools that have made commitments, and at least two are still working on getting the client installed. There is an issue which has come up with at least the linux headless client around initial syncing in that it will mysteriously die. We have found this most prevalent on nodes that are slim on RAM. Syncing via bootstrap ( bootstrap ) or adding in a swapfile so you have a total of 4 gigs of RAM+Swap seems to cure this. We are looking into it for a better solution. EDIT: After the initial sync, the swap file can be turned off.
|
SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
|
|
|
|