Warning, ALL BFL PRE-ORDERS ARE NON REFUNDABLE - CONFIRMED BY INABA

[deathcode]

Don't cancel. Sell your spot in line.

Sure, people will buy a spot on the line to get nothing...
Where do I sign?

[loshia]

Dude (deathcode),
I wanna be the first one. Do not go before me pls
We are making jokes here, but there are a lot of people who are still spending money with BFL. That is complete misery at least for me..But the money are theirs anyway so they are free to do whatever they like

[Fjordbit]

Wait, you said this to smoothie? LOL

If this has *ANY* effect at all, please next ask the bernanke to stop printing.

You're right. I don't know what I was thinking.

[deathcode]

Dude (deathcode),
I wanna be the first one. Do not go before me pls
We are making jokes here, but there are a lot of people who are still spending money with BFL. That is complete misery at least for me..But the money are theirs anyway so they are free to do whatever they like

tell you what, I'll sell you my spot #187 for a jalapeño for only 4BTC...

[wdBTCtrader]

Let me put it this way. Let's say for instance BFL_Jody is fired tomorrow. Is BFL now responsible for what she's said in the past? How many customers have based decisions on what this one rep has said?

Actually yes, unless it was proven that those statements were made erroneously.

 

...and how do you prove that? More importantly how do you disprove a claim by BFL that those statements were made erroneously?

You either fail to grasp what I'm saying or you're intentionally ignoring the topic, so I'm going to try one last time.

BFL as a company(not a group of individuals) is responsible for the contents of the official faq

I do not correlate the following statement with BFL.  I only wish to convey a point by using an extreme example:  Whistle blowers have often been fired, but there statements have been found credible.

This has nothing to do with what we're discussing. Though a BFL whistleblower would be most welcome just now, it seems highly unlikely if the list of employees is as short as I believe it is.

Those statements are true unless proven otherwise.  It would be hard to prove the statements were erroneous which works in our favor. I haven't failed to grasp this concept.  I'm only offering arguments to broaden your perspective.

[creativex]

Those statements are true unless proven otherwise.  It would be hard to prove the statements were erroneous which works in our favor.

Define "our" in this context? The majority of your posts are so pro BFL slanted I haven't a clue what you mean with this pronoun.

What does BFL have to do to claim for instance that BFL_Jody made false or erroneous statements other than say...hey BFL_Jody made false and erroneous statements, that don't represent BFL as a company?

Can you see how this will not work with regard to the company faq? No? n/m

[smoothie]

As stated, they have indeed delivered FPGA products. Then like now they were months late, but they did eventually deliver.

^THIS Reminds me of when people said "Pirate paid before he will pay again." ....and then he stalled and stalled and made excuses and then went silent.

ROFL!

The problem with pirate wasn't that he had paid out before. The problem with pirate was he was offering 7% weekly interest on all deposits, making his business an obvious HYIP/Ponzi. People like myself spent months trying to convince people that the quacking like a duck was indeed coming from a duck. This has no bearing of a relationship to this scenario where BFL has a pretty modest business plan to execute. The fact that you are conflating these does a disservice to the bitcoin community because it will make newcomers complacent towards the real problems with HYIP scams. Once BFL delivers, those who did not live through the pirate era will see this post as proof that some future HYIP scammer is okay.

Think about the consequences of your words before you post.

And how is it any different that BFL has promised something that does not exist to be delivered? 7% could not be delivered forever. ASICs don't even exist yet. Delay delay stall stall, stall more, make up excuses, then troll. I don't see much difference in promising something that can't be done consistently or currently does not exist all the while taking people's money in both scenarios.

Think about the consequences of your words before you post.

LOL!!! 

[smoothie]

Think about the consequences of your words before you post.

Wait, you said this to smoothie? LOL

If this has *ANY* effect at all, please next ask the bernanke to stop printing.

Nope no effect. Perhaps he should think before speaking. BFL and BTCST are not much different.

[Starlightbreaker]

so i got my refund.

that's that.

no more bfl again.

i can spend my $$$ on something more profitable.

[smoothie]

Don't cancel. Sell your spot in line.

Sure, people will buy a spot on the line to get nothing...
Where do I sign?

+1 ROFL!

Suckers everywhere! What's on the horizon for future scam operations? I can't wait. Pure entertainment!

[wdBTCtrader]

Those statements are true unless proven otherwise.  It would be hard to prove the statements were erroneous which works in our favor.

Define "our" in this context? The majority of your posts are so pro BFL slanted I haven't a clue what you mean with this pronoun.

What does BFL have to do to claim for instance that BFL_Jody made false or erroneous statements other than say...hey BFL_Jody made false and erroneous statements, that don't represent BFL as a company?

Can you see how this will not work with regard to the company faq? No? n/m

our = customers.

You may perceive my questions as being pro BFL because I question the motives of those bashing BFL.  This is a common reaction for most people that are emotional about a subject, including myself. When in fact I'm trying to approach this in a logical manner and not emotionally.     Just take a look at my posts a few months from now when you are no longer emotionally charged about this subject and you'll see what I mean.  


edit - again just negating the statements of a BFL represtnative months afterwards would not prove they were erroneous.  They would have to show they were ignorant of those claims or that they could not otherwise take actions to correct those claims.

So unless they were in a cave or deserted island for the last 3 months that would be impossible to prove.  

[creativex]

You may perceive my questions as being pro BFL because I question the motives of those bashing BFL.  This is a common reaction for most people that are emotional about a subject, including myself. When in fact I'm trying to approach this in a logical manner and not emotionally.     Just take a look at my posts a few months from now when you are no longer emotionally charged about this subject and you'll see what I mean.

It may help your claim to be a non-biased non-emotional logical thinker if you remove the paid BFL ad in your signature. Just sayin'.

[wdBTCtrader]

You may perceive my questions as being pro BFL because I question the motives of those bashing BFL.  This is a common reaction for most people that are emotional about a subject, including myself. When in fact I'm trying to approach this in a logical manner and not emotionally.     Just take a look at my posts a few months from now when you are no longer emotionally charged about this subject and you'll see what I mean.

It may help your claim to be a non-biased non-emotional logical thinker if you remove the paid BFL ad in your signature. Just sayin'.

Why shouldn't I try to win a FPGA while I'm here?  I said I'm not biased, I never said I wasn't a cheap whore.

[creativex]

Why shouldn't I try to win a FPGA while I'm here?  I said I'm not biased, I never said I wasn't a cheap whore.

I'm definitely in the running for gold in the cheapest cheap whore Olympics and I won't advertise for anyone so cheaply. If I did I'd expect to take a credibility hit when my statements appeared to be in defense of the company that had bought my signature.

[wdBTCtrader]

Why shouldn't I try to win a FPGA while I'm here?  I said I'm not biased, I never said I wasn't a cheap whore.

I'm definitely in the running for gold in the cheapest cheap whore Olympics and I won't advertise for anyone so cheaply. If I did I'd expect to take a credibility hit when my statements appeared to be in defense of the company that had bought my signature.

They paid for space in my signature.  My opinion is still my own, that will never be sold.  I'm much too ornery to honestly put that up for sell.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=130195.msg1395324#msg1395324

[Fjordbit]

Why shouldn't I try to win a FPGA while I'm here?  I said I'm not biased, I never said I wasn't a cheap whore.

Per the new contest rules (as of week 10), the FPGA is no longer part of the giveaway. Only a little single sc will be awarded (once available).

[wdBTCtrader]

Why shouldn't I try to win a FPGA while I'm here?  I said I'm not biased, I never said I wasn't a cheap whore.

Per the new contest rules (as of week 10), the FPGA is no longer part of the giveaway. Only a little single sc will be awarded (once available).

True, well I guess I'm even a cheaper whore than I originally claimed.  

Damn it all to hell!


btw: thanks for letting me know

[mem]

Think about the consequences of your words before you post.

LOL!!!  [/size]

CAT PENIS BLENDER FUCKTASTIC !!!!

ohhh the humanity !!!!!

[smoothie]

Think about the consequences of your words before you post.

LOL!!!  [/size]

CAT PENIS BLENDER FUCKTASTIC !!!!

ohhh the humanity !!!!!

ROFL! That was pretty funny mem!!! 

[poly]

Wait, so are the preorders refundable or not? I couldn't find anything useful in this thread because it's turned into a trollfest.